So, got to see the Mets on TV for a change...and got to see them WIN on TV, an even nicer change...and got to see them beat the BRAVES on TV...
Wow--in all my years of watching the Mets, I haven't seen a lot of those (at least not as many as I'd have liked to see.)
But anyway, on ESPN's telecast of the Mets/Braves game Sunday, I think bobby V had a great point about this whole Reyes/salary business.
His points, summarized:
You NEED players to build a team around, plain and simple.
Good players are needed for good teams.
And good players cost money.
Reyes is 27, and having arguably his best season so far in the majors.
Leads the league in triples.
Up there in doubles.
2nd in steals.
Nearly a .340 batting average.
Near the top in runs scored.
Sure-fire All-Star, and maybe the starting SS.
Good OBP.
Healthy as a horse.
New York will NOT accept a Pittsburgh Pirates/Kansas City Royals-level payroll or roster.
New York can SUPPORT better than a PIT/KC-level payroll or roster.
Ollie and Castillo come off the books for sure, K-Rod/Beltran maybe, probably at least one, if not both.
One, two, or even three All-Star-level players and their salaries is NOT too much to expect for a NY-market team.
The fans CLEARLY want Jose, he's drawing well, and with T-shirts and rallies, they want him BADLY.
Hence...
JOSE REYES CAN AND MUST BE KEPT!
I'm sorry, I refuse to believe both of the following cop-outs:
-The Mets don't have the money (Again, millions come off the books this year, so that fees up cash, and the new part-owner brings something to the table, assuming he wants a winner, and there's no question Jose Reyes is both a palyer to build around and will draw fans and make that expenditure justified. Besides all that--Ike isn't getting paid a lot, Turner isn't, Thole isn't, Pagan isn't Murphy isn't, Tejada, Dickey, Niese, NONE of them paid all that much, so it's not like this is the Yankees and everyone is costing a fortune right now; Wright/Reyes/Beltran/Bay and maybe Santana are the 5 big expenditures for the Mets. Bay we're stuck with or we trade and eat some of that salary--and given how poorly he's played and how well Pridie and Murphy are going, I'd be alright with that, give Pridie the spot, maybe groom Murph to eventually become decent enough to take the LF job, because his bat really does warrant his staying, and he's a low cost, he shoudl stay--and so that leaves 4. Santana isn't going anywhere, not being injured and having not pitched at all this year. Beltran likely is gone, probably as a DH somewhere. That leaves Reyes and Wright to be paid for--figure K-Rod to be gone, given he's on pace to be used 55+ times and max out his deal. So, the Mets can't afford to keep Wright/Reyes/Santana and then the other good players they currently have signed tosmall-scale-contracts? I don't buy it...and neitehr does Bobby V.)
-Reyes isn't worth it (See above for every last reason WHY he's worth it.)
Reyes MUST be kept.
Santana will have to stay, there's no trade option there.
Beltran is likely gone, sadly.
Ditto K-Rod.
Bay can go either way.
And that leaves Wright, whose having a subpar season, but still might be worth keeping, and isn't in a contract year yet.
Oh, and one final thing:
ESPN's stat analysis showed the overall numbers for Crawford and Reyes to be nearly identical, and the all-important-for-Alderson OBP WAS identical.
So sorry, Freddy Wilpon--he DOES deserve Carl Crawford money, and I don't believe you when you say you can't dish it out to even 1 of your 25 players, especially with the new ownership's money, MLB's urging Wilpon to keep the team a contender to preserve the all-important NY market--the same thing's going on in their handling of the Dodgers in my neck of the woods, trying to fix the situation and keep them intact as a team because they represent so much revenue--and the fans and stats clearly warranting Jose's stay.
You can afford it, in fact, you can't afford NOT to pay the one player who's really your beacon of light on the team.
So, to reiterate Bobby V's oh-so-wise Words of Wisdom:
WRIGHT/REYES CAN AND SHOULD BE PRESERVED!
And at the very least...lest we need to say it again...
JOSE REYES CAN AND MUST BE KEPT!!!
Bookmarks