Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 30

Thread: A bunch of guys: Hall of Fame?

  1. #1

    A bunch of guys: Hall of Fame?

    http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/blog/...ve-players-mlb

    It's behind the paywall, so I'm not sure what the protocol is for posting highlights?

    Essentially, he breaks players into categories:

    LOCKS
    A-Rod (depending on PED's)
    Jeter
    Rivera
    Chipper
    Thome
    Vizquel
    Pujols
    Cabrera
    Halladay

    PROBABLY
    Rolen

    MAYBE
    Big Papi
    Johan Santana
    Helton
    Beltran!
    Andruw Jones
    Adrian Beltre
    Utley

    GETTING CLOSE
    Konerko
    Sabathia
    Hudson

    PROBABLY NOT, BUT GETTING CLOSER
    Hunter
    Rollins

    Thoughts? Comments?
    "I won't be happy until we have every boy in America between the ages of six and sixteen wearing a glove and swinging a bat." Babe Ruth

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    4,688
    It does look pretty accurate, the only guy I would move up a rank is Tim Hudson.
    "(Shoeless Joe Jackson's fall from grace is one of the real tragedies of baseball. I always thought he was more sinned against than sinning." -- Connie Mack

    "I have the ultimate respect for Whitesox fans. They were as miserable as the Cubs and Redsox fans ever were but always had the good decency to keep it to themselves. And when they finally won the World Series, they celebrated without annoying every other fan in the country."--Jim Caple, ESPN (Jan. 12, 2011)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Moon
    Posts
    3,897
    I don't see Beltre getting in. He has impressive offensive seasons and a good arm, but he never had a dynamite run. Even now, he's likely to decline. It would be foolish to put in a guy because of a few strings of seasons equivalent to 130 OPS+. You'd have to open the doors for so many other players

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Florissant, Mo.
    Posts
    13,060
    Not a terrible list. I am not sold Vizquel will make it. I also think Konerko isn't that close and CC is a lot closer. Hunter and Rollins have 0% chance.

    I disagree re: Beltre. Unless he has a huge and fast decline, he will be a 400+ HR guy with many gold gloves, All Star appearances, and probably more postseason recognition if he stays with Texas. Had a monster 2004, which would have netted him the MVP w/o Bonds. His sabermetric stats are very favorable too, and 15 years from now, I think newer metrics will be used much more by the voters in HOF voting than they are now.

    I just don't see a 400 HR 3B with an outstanding defensive reputaion not getting in.
    1885 1886 1926 1931 1934 1942 1944 1946 1964 1967 1982 2006 2011

    1887 1888 1928 1930 1943 1968 1985 1987 2004

    1996 2000 2001 2002 2005 2009 2012


    The Top 100 Pitchers In MLB History
    The Top 100 Position Players In MLB History

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Florissant, Mo.
    Posts
    13,060
    I didn't read the article, but I am assuming that Ichiro was left off for some specific reason.

    Also, Berkman and Holliday have better shots than several of the guys they listed.
    1885 1886 1926 1931 1934 1942 1944 1946 1964 1967 1982 2006 2011

    1887 1888 1928 1930 1943 1968 1985 1987 2004

    1996 2000 2001 2002 2005 2009 2012


    The Top 100 Pitchers In MLB History
    The Top 100 Position Players In MLB History

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    4,688
    Quote Originally Posted by Matthew C. View Post
    I didn't read the article, but I am assuming that Ichiro was left off for some specific reason.

    Also, Berkman and Holliday have better shots than several of the guys they listed.
    Adam Dunn and Paul Konerko have a better shot than Lance Berkman and Matt Holliday.
    "(Shoeless Joe Jackson's fall from grace is one of the real tragedies of baseball. I always thought he was more sinned against than sinning." -- Connie Mack

    "I have the ultimate respect for Whitesox fans. They were as miserable as the Cubs and Redsox fans ever were but always had the good decency to keep it to themselves. And when they finally won the World Series, they celebrated without annoying every other fan in the country."--Jim Caple, ESPN (Jan. 12, 2011)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Florissant, Mo.
    Posts
    13,060
    Quote Originally Posted by chicagowhitesox1173 View Post
    Adam Dunn and Paul Konerko have a better shot than Lance Berkman and Matt Holliday.
    Where did I say otherwise? I didn't realize that "several guys on the list" meant "Dunn" and "Konerko". Dunn isn't even on the list at all, so why would you include him?

    I was referring to Rollins, Hunter, and Ortiz, who with the PED cloud has little chance given Bonds and Clemens will struggle to make it.

    I don't think Berkman will make it either - but niether will 90% of the guys below the "lock" section.

    Konerko won't make it either, btw. I think Holliday has a decent chance. Less than 50%, but a chance.
    1885 1886 1926 1931 1934 1942 1944 1946 1964 1967 1982 2006 2011

    1887 1888 1928 1930 1943 1968 1985 1987 2004

    1996 2000 2001 2002 2005 2009 2012


    The Top 100 Pitchers In MLB History
    The Top 100 Position Players In MLB History

  8. #8
    Those MAYBE and PROBABLY groups need to be balanced out. Helton is one, for example, that should be moved up into PROBABLY.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Florissant, Mo.
    Posts
    13,060
    Quote Originally Posted by dgarza View Post
    Those MAYBE and PROBABLY groups need to be balanced out. Helton is one, for example, that should be moved up into PROBABLY.
    With no MVPs, no huge milestones, and PED whispers, Helton will not make it, much less "probably" make it.
    1885 1886 1926 1931 1934 1942 1944 1946 1964 1967 1982 2006 2011

    1887 1888 1928 1930 1943 1968 1985 1987 2004

    1996 2000 2001 2002 2005 2009 2012


    The Top 100 Pitchers In MLB History
    The Top 100 Position Players In MLB History

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    5,227
    Blog Entries
    4
    I would put Vizquel on the maybe list. Surprised (pleasantly ) that Rolen is probably. Papi has 0 chance he's a DH with roid allegations. Beltran, Helton and Andruw seem about right even if I think they all crush Vizquel. Not a bad list overall, at least he acknowledges many guys that superficially seem underrated like Beltre and Utley.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    4,688
    Lance Berkman and Matt Holliday weren't listed either. And I would say Konerko has a pretty good chance of making it in.
    "(Shoeless Joe Jackson's fall from grace is one of the real tragedies of baseball. I always thought he was more sinned against than sinning." -- Connie Mack

    "I have the ultimate respect for Whitesox fans. They were as miserable as the Cubs and Redsox fans ever were but always had the good decency to keep it to themselves. And when they finally won the World Series, they celebrated without annoying every other fan in the country."--Jim Caple, ESPN (Jan. 12, 2011)

  12. #12
    Seems like a lot of HOF predictions are done so with short term lenses. In the long term (40... 50+ years), some of these guys have better chances than the author thinks. Concerns of today will fade to a degree. I myself would not be so arrogant to assume that my pains and concerns should be those of future generations.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Florissant, Mo.
    Posts
    13,060
    Quote Originally Posted by chicagowhitesox1173 View Post
    Lance Berkman and Matt Holliday weren't listed either. And I would say Konerko has a pretty good chance of making it in.
    Much, much, much bigger 1B stars (McGriff, Mattingly, Hodges) didn't make it. Konerko has to have 500 HRs to make it, and I don't think he will get there.
    Last edited by Matthew C.; 09-10-2012 at 07:53 AM.
    1885 1886 1926 1931 1934 1942 1944 1946 1964 1967 1982 2006 2011

    1887 1888 1928 1930 1943 1968 1985 1987 2004

    1996 2000 2001 2002 2005 2009 2012


    The Top 100 Pitchers In MLB History
    The Top 100 Position Players In MLB History

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Florissant, Mo.
    Posts
    13,060
    Quote Originally Posted by dgarza View Post
    Seems like a lot of HOF predictions are done so with short term lenses. In the long term (40... 50+ years), some of these guys have better chances than the author thinks. Concerns of today will fade to a degree. I myself would not be so arrogant to assume that my pains and concerns should be those of future generations.
    Perhaps. But the current PED paradigm is here to stay for a while. When the paradigm changes, so will my guesswork.
    1885 1886 1926 1931 1934 1942 1944 1946 1964 1967 1982 2006 2011

    1887 1888 1928 1930 1943 1968 1985 1987 2004

    1996 2000 2001 2002 2005 2009 2012


    The Top 100 Pitchers In MLB History
    The Top 100 Position Players In MLB History

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by chicagowhitesox1173 View Post
    Lance Berkman and Matt Holliday weren't listed either.
    I would have liked to have seen Abreu listed as well.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Florissant, Mo.
    Posts
    13,060
    Quote Originally Posted by dgarza View Post
    I would have liked to have seen Abreu listed as well.
    He is in a different category - probably the same as Berkman. Guys who were close, but who's time has closed to get any closer. Neither will make it. Helton is probably in that group too.
    1885 1886 1926 1931 1934 1942 1944 1946 1964 1967 1982 2006 2011

    1887 1888 1928 1930 1943 1968 1985 1987 2004

    1996 2000 2001 2002 2005 2009 2012


    The Top 100 Pitchers In MLB History
    The Top 100 Position Players In MLB History

  17. #17
    Vizquel is definitely not a lock. He will be a 20-40% vote getter at best and doesn't deserve election, IMO (and I'm a large HOF guy).

    Cabrera is not there yet. A few more good years and he will be.

    Only Beltran has a shot out of the maybes. Johann Santana had a HOF peak, but the traditionalists will not go for his wins totals and it looks like his best days are behind him. Helton gets punished by a lot of people for playing in Colorado during the PEDs and pre-humidor era.

    Does the author give a reason for excluding Ichiro Suzuki? That is a pretty big player to overlook.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    4,688
    Quote Originally Posted by jjpm74 View Post
    Vizquel is definitely not a lock. He will be a 20-40% vote getter at best and doesn't deserve election, IMO (and I'm a large HOF guy).

    Cabrera is not there yet. A few more good years and he will be.

    Only Beltran has a shot out of the maybes. Johann Santana had a HOF peak, but the traditionalists will not go for his wins totals and it looks like his best days are behind him. Helton gets punished by a lot of people for playing in Colorado during the PEDs and pre-humidor era.

    Does the author give a reason for excluding Ichiro Suzuki? That is a pretty big player to overlook.
    I'm not a big fan of Visquel but I have a hard time believing he wont be voted in. Every time I see him on tv these days the announcers are talking about how he's a shoo-in for the hof. I would have to think the voters feel the same way.
    "(Shoeless Joe Jackson's fall from grace is one of the real tragedies of baseball. I always thought he was more sinned against than sinning." -- Connie Mack

    "I have the ultimate respect for Whitesox fans. They were as miserable as the Cubs and Redsox fans ever were but always had the good decency to keep it to themselves. And when they finally won the World Series, they celebrated without annoying every other fan in the country."--Jim Caple, ESPN (Jan. 12, 2011)

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by chicagowhitesox1173 View Post
    I'm not a big fan of Visquel but I have a hard time believing he wont be voted in. Every time I see him on tv these days the announcers are talking about how he's a shoo-in for the hof. I would have to think the voters feel the same way.
    TV announcers don't have a vote. It's the writers who have a vote. I've heard several TV announcers mention Lance Berkman as a future HOFer when he hangs it up. That doesn't mean he will get in either. At the end of his career, a couple of non-Met announcers referred to John Franco as a HOFer. He didn't even clear the 5% necessary to stay on the ballot for more than a year.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Florissant, Mo.
    Posts
    13,060
    We need to keep in mind that this is a list of who we think will make it. Not who we think should or who we wish would. MVP's, ASG appearances, HRs, RBIs, BA, and milestones are still the key factors in actual enshrinement. No matter how much I like WAR, or whatever, the facts are, guys like Jones, Helton, Rolen, and Beltran did not do enough of those writer-favorite things to be elected. I wouldn't be surprised if nobody under the LOCK section from above make it unless some of them hang on long enough to accumulate benchmarks.
    1885 1886 1926 1931 1934 1942 1944 1946 1964 1967 1982 2006 2011

    1887 1888 1928 1930 1943 1968 1985 1987 2004

    1996 2000 2001 2002 2005 2009 2012


    The Top 100 Pitchers In MLB History
    The Top 100 Position Players In MLB History

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Florissant, Mo.
    Posts
    13,060
    Quote Originally Posted by jjpm74 View Post
    TV announcers don't have a vote. It's the writers who have a vote. I've heard several TV announcers mention Lance Berkman as a future HOFer when he hangs it up. That doesn't mean he will get in either. At the end of his career, a couple of non-Met announcers referred to John Franco as a HOFer. He didn't even clear the 5% necessary to stay on the ballot for more than a year.
    Don Mattingly, Steve Garvey, and Orel Hershiser were called "Future HOFers" a lot while active. Bert Blyleven never was.
    1885 1886 1926 1931 1934 1942 1944 1946 1964 1967 1982 2006 2011

    1887 1888 1928 1930 1943 1968 1985 1987 2004

    1996 2000 2001 2002 2005 2009 2012


    The Top 100 Pitchers In MLB History
    The Top 100 Position Players In MLB History

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    4,688
    Quote Originally Posted by jjpm74 View Post
    TV announcers don't have a vote. It's the writers who have a vote. I've heard several TV announcers mention Lance Berkman as a future HOFer when he hangs it up. That doesn't mean he will get in either. At the end of his career, a couple of non-Met announcers referred to John Franco as a HOFer. He didn't even clear the 5% necessary to stay on the ballot for more than a year.
    Yeah but Franco is a reliever, Berkman is too injury prone but Visquel is adored by most writers for his defense. There gonna give him the Ozzie Smith treatment. (Although Ozzie Smith was better and really was a hofer)
    "(Shoeless Joe Jackson's fall from grace is one of the real tragedies of baseball. I always thought he was more sinned against than sinning." -- Connie Mack

    "I have the ultimate respect for Whitesox fans. They were as miserable as the Cubs and Redsox fans ever were but always had the good decency to keep it to themselves. And when they finally won the World Series, they celebrated without annoying every other fan in the country."--Jim Caple, ESPN (Jan. 12, 2011)

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Posts
    3,601
    Blog Entries
    1
    He overrates most of these guys' chances. I would say Cabrera is 'getting close'..far from a lock already. Vizquel has virtually no chance. Big Papi is a juicer so his chances are virtually nil as well. I think Giambi has a better shot than Papi. Jones and Utley did not do enough, and aren't likely to add anything in the future. Rolen is a 'maybe maybe'. Hunter and Rollins? No way.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Florissant, Mo.
    Posts
    13,060
    Quote Originally Posted by willshad View Post
    He overrates most of these guys' chances. I would say Cabrera is 'getting close'..far from a lock already. Vizquel has virtually no chance. Big Papi is a juicer so his chances are virtually nil as well. I think Giambi has a better shot than Papi. Jones and Utley did not do enough, and aren't likely to add anything in the future. Rolen is a 'maybe maybe'. Hunter and Rollins? No way.
    I agree - I think he was approaching the list more form a who he thinks deserves it angle.
    1885 1886 1926 1931 1934 1942 1944 1946 1964 1967 1982 2006 2011

    1887 1888 1928 1930 1943 1968 1985 1987 2004

    1996 2000 2001 2002 2005 2009 2012


    The Top 100 Pitchers In MLB History
    The Top 100 Position Players In MLB History

  25. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by willshad View Post
    He overrates most of these guys' chances. I would say Cabrera is 'getting close'..far from a lock already. Vizquel has virtually no chance. Big Papi is a juicer so his chances are virtually nil as well. I think Giambi has a better shot than Papi. Jones and Utley did not do enough, and aren't likely to add anything in the future. Rolen is a 'maybe maybe'. Hunter and Rollins? No way.
    Agreed particularly regarding Vizquel. His failure to reach 3000 hits pretty much dooms his chances. Alan Trammell, a fellow shortstop and a much better candidate, has a career WAR 67.1 , while Vizquel has a WAR of 40.3. FWIW, Fan EloRater has Trammell as the number 69 offensive player of all time, while Vizquel is #221. Trammell hasn't close to getting elected, how in the world would Vizquel be considered a lock? Also, Johnny Damon at least merits a mention, as does Lance Berkman.

    Scott Rolen should make it, but he won't come close.

    The fact that he overrates the chances of elected of several candidates makes the exclusion of Ichiro Suzuki, who is a lock, all the more puzzling.
    Last edited by NJRob65; 09-10-2012 at 02:22 PM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •