The Red Sox have paid $39M for Victorino for 3 years. Did the Dodgers win or lose on the deal having not got too much production from him for the half season he was with the team?
Learning all the time.
The Red Sox have paid $39M for Victorino for 3 years. Did the Dodgers win or lose on the deal having not got too much production from him for the half season he was with the team?
"A hot dog at the ballgame beats roast beef at the Ritz." ~Humphrey Bogart
No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference. ~Tommy Lasorda
Registered User
They didn't give up much of anything but certainly didn't get what they hoped.Originally Posted by DownUnderDodger
Better
Good riddance, dig it?
No one can make you
Do what they want to
You know you're stronger
Than the lies
That they tell you
The hips drive the swing
No harm in this one, IMO. What's not to love about the way he plays the game, but large, multi-year contracts for 30-something OFers that don't have power numbers is a bad thing.
"I became a good pitcher when I stopped trying to make them miss the ball and started trying to make them hit it." - Sandy Koufax.
"My name is Yasiel Puig. I am from Cuba. I am 21 years old. Thank you."
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks