I don't see how anyone can claim Biggio isn't a HOFer...
There aren't many magical numbers left in baseball, but surely 3,000 is still one of them.
The only reason he's "suspected" of steroids is the era he played, which is an unfair supposition and lumping in, I agree with our old friend, good ol' Al Leiter...
If a player's had actual evidence against them--ie, tested positive, shown up on a report, etc.--then I think it's fair to hold steroids against them in the voting...
EVEN if you argue that steroid users should be allowed in, and that happened, I'd argue the steroid use should be held against them in judgement...
As such, if you wanted to argue that Clemens and Bonds were SO great that even taking steroids into account/pre-steroids they were/are HOFers, I'll listen...
If it's someone like Sammy Sosa, who went from 10-15 HRs to 30-40 HRs and then 66 while suddenly adding 40 lbs. or something, and they're proven cheaters, I say no way.
But if it's a Piazza, a Biggio, a Bagwell...or a Maddux or Glavine next year...
And the ONLY argument you have against them is that they happened to play during the steroid era, and have no actual evidence against them...
Then it's innocent before proven guilty, and any sportswriter who takes it upon themselves to let suspicion without evidence influence their judgment is not only logically impaired but, I would argue, an example of the sort of hand-wringing, self-important, self-indulgent, conceited histrionics present in today's society and culture that is disgusting and disgustingly-stupid--
And not only does baseball deserve better, but people in general deserve better than such an insipid attitude promulgated by they types who could never have hit a ball as far as a Piazza pop up, but will take THIS opportunity to act in an unfounded, vindictive manner.
(But how do I REALLY feel?)

Bookmarks