Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Baseball Reference dot com changes...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    138

    Baseball Reference dot com changes...

    .
    So baseball reference dot com has changed the design/layout of their site ...apparently to make it more mobile device friendly.

    What do you all think of it..??


    Also ...they have dropped the Elo ratings pages across the site. Players were displayed side-by-side and the readers choice one as being better.


    Were any of you users of it..?? I found myself on the page quite often. Apparently I was one of the few. I am going to miss it.

    .

    ...tom...

  2. #2
    Oh, I think it's okay; once ya get the hang of it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Florissant, Mo.
    Posts
    25,327
    The new layout is certainly 100% better now than the old mobile site. Maybe a tad harder to navigate on my PCand tablet, but it is more than a fair tradeoff.
    1885 1886 1926 1931 1934 1942 1944 1946 1964 1967 1982 2006 2011

    1887 1888 1928 1930 1943 1968 1985 1987 2004 2013

    1996 2000 2001 2002 2005 2009 2012 2014 2015


    The Top 100 Pitchers In MLB History
    The Top 100 Position Players In MLB History

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Anderson, SC
    Posts
    12,107
    I think it's about time. They did all the other sites first and then Baseball Reference last. Looks good to me, I don't have any issues with it.
    Onward to SunTrust Park!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    5,571
    I dislike the change quite a bit, but that comes from the perspective of someone who only checks it on a PC. I understand why they did it though.
    "Let me tell you the story of the 1999 Cubs. On June 9, they were 32-24, leading the Wild Card race, and looked bound for another playoff appearance. Then the White Sox came to Wrigley for the Crosstown Series and swept them. They finished 67-95."

    Play the Who am I? game in trivia and you can make this signature line yours for three days (baseball signatures only!)


    Go here for all your 1920's/1930's OF info

  6. #6
    I dislike the new design. Because of nerve damage in my hands, I only use a PC. The site is more difficult to navigate now.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    3,682
    Love the new design, just has a more modern look to me. Also they scrapped the Elo-Rater quite a few years ago. It was a crapshoot anyways.
    Rest in Peace Jose Fernandez (1992-2016)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    373
    Totally agree.. I much prefer the old site on my MAC

    Quote Originally Posted by Reds5 View Post
    I dislike the new design. Because of nerve damage in my hands, I only use a PC. The site is more difficult to navigate now.
    North of the Big Apple but missing Central Fla

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Toledo Inquisition View Post
    I dislike the change quite a bit, but that comes from the perspective of someone who only checks it on a PC. I understand why they did it though.
    This post ^ sums it up for me. I prefer the old site, but understand also they did it for the benefit of phone users, who apparently out number the rest of us by a wide margin.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Anderson, SC
    Posts
    12,107
    I access it both on my phone and the computer. While I do have to get a little used to it on the computer, I think I'll manage.
    Onward to SunTrust Park!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    9,867
    At first glance, I like it. And that is unusual. It certainly looks more modern.
    2016 World Series Champions

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    1,828
    No problems from this fan at all. On a desktop keyboard, the drop-down menus actually make it seem easier to use by easily presenting choices you're looking to find. Maybe I don't remember much about the old site, but there isn't anything missing on the site after checking. All the info is available and presented in much the same fashion. Boxscores might be easier to find, and that might have been a major impetus on the change. It all looks good to me.
    Catfish Hunter, RIP. Mark Fidrych, RIP. Skip Caray, RIP. Tony Gwynn, #19, RIP

    A fanatic is someone who can't change his mind and won't change the subject. -- Winston Churchill.

    Experience is the hardest teacher. She gives the test first and the lesson later. -- Dan Quisenberry.

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by abolishthedh View Post
    Maybe I don't remember much about the old site, but there isn't anything missing on the site after checking. All the info is available and presented in much the same fashion.
    The fielding statistics for the seasons prior to 1914 no longer indicate which outfield positions were played. They used to list "OF" in the position column, and then in a column at the far right, something like 14-105-27, which would indicate that the individual played 14 games in left field, 105 games in center field, and 27 games in right field. This information is no longer available, as far as I can tell.

    Edited to add: One day later, and the outfield position stats have been restored. (I had posted a request on their blog about this.) As long as I use Chrome rather than Explorer to browse the site, I'm OK with the changes now.
    Last edited by RUKen; 03-22-2017 at 05:48 AM.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Out There
    Posts
    2,435
    I don't access it on a mobile device, and I find the site now isn't worth accessing at all. Pages now take too long to load, I get the 'long-running script' message, etc. I can go to other sites more quickly now, while bbref takes its time.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    In a house
    Posts
    1,022
    Quote Originally Posted by Macker View Post
    I don't access it on a mobile device, and I find the site now isn't worth accessing at all. Pages now take too long to load, I get the 'long-running script' message, etc. I can go to other sites more quickly now, while bbref takes its time.
    I don't get the script message, thankfully, or I'd stop using it. i tried a little timeline to get used to it and to me, on a PC, it was sort of like if someone comes and rearranges where all your stuff is. Being legally blind, once i found things I liked it, but I do kind of miss having everything there versus having to click to see more options. Still, I am getting used to it.(I use Firefox so i don't know if that makes a difference)

    Seems to me they restored a few things from when I first noticed the difference, so perhaps there was more that needed done.
    If Baseball Integrated Early - baseball integrated from the beginning - and "Brotherhood and baseball," the U.S. history companion, at http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/Baseballifsandmore - IBIE updated for 2011.

    "Full House Chronology" at yahoo group fullhousefreaks & fullhouse4life with help of many fans, thanks for the input

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •