I do think it would be much harder to Ichiro to hit .400 than someone like the Balco version of Bonds (see my analysis earlier on this thread) because of the lack of walks. The less walks, the more AB's, and the greater the chance to regress to the mean towards the end of the (which, in his case, is in the .330's).
I wish the guy would take a lesson from people like Giambi and Abreu, who really maximize their at bats and work the hell out of the pitcher, but that's not in his constitution, I suppose. And those guys really take it to the extreme- he wouldn't even need to be nearly that patient and selective to be more valuable....
I've read and shared articles with people here where Ichiro was quoted as saying (paraphrasing here) that "fans don't come to the park to see walks" and basically, that he dislikes the idea of walks in general. I really wonder what kind of an offensive player he'd be if he only swung at strikes, and hardly ever swung at bad pitches. Personally, I think he'd be an alltime great.
What do you guys think?
I don't like watching people like Pat Burrell take strike three right down the pipe, but I don't like watching Ichiro flail at the first pitch way out of the zone to hit a weak groundout. He's wasting his speed and hitting ability by doing so.
Let's not forget, though, that he's one of the best bunters in the game, one of the fastest home-first players in history, and gets more infield hits than anyone has in a long, LONG time. Let's also not forget that Ichiro hit .399 for a 58 game stretch this year, and .429 for the entire second half of the season in 2004. So again, if anyone can hit .400 in today's game, I think he's still probably the best candidate (he's got a couple years before his legs start to go).


Reply With Quote

Bookmarks