Page 45 of 112 FirstFirst ... 3543444546475595 ... LastLast
Results 1,101 to 1,125 of 2793

Thread: Ask The Umpire

  1. #1101
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    North Bay, CA
    Posts
    2,266
    If a runner is standing on third base and a high pop-up is hit that comes down exactly on the bag, can I assume that since the runner is entitled to the base. it would NOT be runner interference if he prevents the third baseman from making the catch by simply holding his ground? I'm not talking about the runner using his hands to push the third baseman or anything obvious like that, he's just standing right where the ball comes down and the third baseman is not able to catch it because of the runner's presence.
    Always go to other people's funerals, otherwise they won't come to yours. - Yogi Berra

  2. #1102
    Quote Originally Posted by Dodgerfan1 View Post
    If a runner is standing on third base and a high pop-up is hit that comes down exactly on the bag, can I assume that since the runner is entitled to the base. it would NOT be runner interference if he prevents the third baseman from making the catch by simply holding his ground? I'm not talking about the runner using his hands to push the third baseman or anything obvious like that, he's just standing right where the ball comes down and the third baseman is not able to catch it because of the runner's presence.
    The base is not a safe haven in the situation you stated unless the infield fly rule takes effect. Runner must give fielder the opportunity to field the ball.

  3. #1103
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Gilbert, AZ
    Posts
    4,959
    Quote Originally Posted by Steven Tyler View Post
    The base is not a safe haven in the situation you stated unless the infield fly rule takes effect. Runner must give fielder the opportunity to field the ball.

    Yes, the runner has to make an effort to not hinder the fielder, and get out of his way, but the runner does not have to vacate the base.

  4. #1104
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,732
    I was in a rundown between third and home, and the catcher had the ball. He threw to the third baseman and I ran for home. The catcher was a couple of feet to the right of home plate (from my point of view), so I purposely veered a foot or two to the right in an attempt to get hit by the throw from the third baseman (if there was a throw coming). The ball hit me in right shoulder, and I touched the plate a few steps later and was ruled safe. I never looked toward the third baseman, by the way. So, was that the right call?

  5. #1105
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Yountville, CA (Napa Valley)
    Posts
    2,584
    Quote Originally Posted by ipitch View Post
    I was in a rundown between third and home, and the catcher had the ball. He threw to the third baseman and I ran for home. The catcher was a couple of feet to the right of home plate (from my point of view), so I purposely veered a foot or two to the right in an attempt to get hit by the throw from the third baseman (if there was a throw coming). The ball hit me in right shoulder, and I touched the plate a few steps later and was ruled safe. I never looked toward the third baseman, by the way. So, was that the right call?
    Brilliant move.

    Bob

  6. #1106
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    11,299
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by ipitch View Post
    I was in a rundown between third and home, and the catcher had the ball. He threw to the third baseman and I ran for home. The catcher was a couple of feet to the right of home plate (from my point of view), so I purposely veered a foot or two to the right in an attempt to get hit by the throw from the third baseman (if there was a throw coming). The ball hit me in right shoulder, and I touched the plate a few steps later and was ruled safe. I never looked toward the third baseman, by the way. So, was that the right call?
    Yes you are safe.
    "He who dares to teach, must never cease to learn."
    - John Cotton Dana (1856–1929) - Offered to many by L. Olson - Iowa (Teacher)
    Please read Baseball Fever Policy and Forum FAQ before posting.

  7. #1107
    This happened in our 10U game last Sunday. We were up by a run with bases loaded and two outs. Batter hits a high flyball towards the second baseman, he's looking up and calling off the first baseman, clearly the second basemans ball. Runner on first takes off on cantarct and wipes out the second baseman. The first baseman dives for the ball just in time to end the game. My question is what should of happened if the first baseman had dropped the ball? Even though he made the play should the runner have been out for running into the second baseman.

  8. #1108
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    8
    a runner is coming from third towards the plate. th catcher is blocking the plate with the ball. what legal actions can the runner perform so he has a chance to score? in our league we have this "slide or avoid rule". does that pertain to the major leagues too?

  9. #1109
    Quote Originally Posted by emaher29 View Post
    in our league we have this "slide or avoid rule". Does that pertain to the major leagues too?
    No it does not.

  10. #1110
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,732
    In MLB, the rule is "slide, avoid, or attempt to put into a coma".

  11. #1111
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    3,276
    This happened in tonites Giants/Dodgers game....

    Giants have a man on first, Bengie Molina hit a drive to deep right that hits high off the wall. Runner goes to third, Molina held to a single. Giants run Burris in for Molina. At that point the Umps decide to review the hit to see if it was a home run, and eventually they rule it did hit the mark which designates a HR, so two runs score. Problem is that the force Burris to stay in the game. Bochy protests the game arguing that Burris would never had gone into the game as Molina would have circled the bases and therefore no runner would have been needed. Umps ruled that this was analygous to the situation if Molina had tripped over First and injured himself and Burriss ran for him at that point. IMO, this was an insane ruling by the umps, as the ball was dead once it left the yard.

    Any Umps have an opinion on this??
    “Well, I like to say I’m completely focused, right? I mean, the game’s on the line. It’s not like I’m thinking about what does barbecue Pop Chips and Cholula taste like. Because I already know that answer — it tastes friggin’ awesome!"--Brian Wilson

  12. #1112
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Yountville, CA (Napa Valley)
    Posts
    2,584
    Quote Originally Posted by KHenry14 View Post
    This happened in tonites Giants/Dodgers game....

    Giants have a man on first, Bengie Molina hit a drive to deep right that hits high off the wall. Runner goes to third, Molina held to a single. Giants run Burris in for Molina. At that point the Umps decide to review the hit to see if it was a home run, and eventually they rule it did hit the mark which designates a HR, so two runs score. Problem is that the force Burris to stay in the game. Bochy protests the game arguing that Burris would never had gone into the game as Molina would have circled the bases and therefore no runner would have been needed. Umps ruled that this was analygous to the situation if Molina had tripped over First and injured himself and Burriss ran for him at that point. IMO, this was an insane ruling by the umps, as the ball was dead once it left the yard.

    Any Umps have an opinion on this??
    Unless someone can come up with a valid MLB rule to the contary, I believe the crew goofed.


    Bob
    Last edited by KHenry14; 09-27-2008 at 08:03 PM.

  13. #1113

    tag no ball

    Yesterday in a fall ball game 10 yr olds we had bases loaded 2 outs & the batter hit a grounder to third who fielded it and turned to tag the runner but he had the ball in the hand & tagged him with the glove. The ump signal safe no ball in glove which i thought was the correct call. After the inning walking back to the dugout the ump was questioning himself if maybe due to the force out he may only had to tag him with the glove , he wasn't sure & was gonna check into it for the future. He was an IHSA ump but he said he hadn't really had a play like that b4.. Just wondering thanks

  14. #1114
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Yountville, CA (Napa Valley)
    Posts
    2,584
    Quote Originally Posted by benz99 View Post
    Yesterday in a fall ball game 10 yr olds we had bases loaded 2 outs & the batter hit a grounder to third who fielded it and turned to tag the runner but he had the ball in the hand & tagged him with the glove. The ump signal safe no ball in glove which i thought was the correct call. After the inning walking back to the dugout the ump was questioning himself if maybe due to the force out he may only had to tag him with the glove , he wasn't sure & was gonna check into it for the future. He was an IHSA ump but he said he hadn't really had a play like that b4.. Just wondering thanks
    It was the correct call. The ball must be in the hand or glove making the tag on the runner. The ball just has to be held firmly when tagging the base for a force-out. The fielder may tag the base with any part of his attached uniform, or any part of his body. I had a play at 1B in a HS game MANY years ago where the first baseman fieled a low throw while srawled on the ground, and LITERALLY tagged the base with the tip of a finger on his bare hand while hoding the ball in his glove.

    Another time, in a men's league game the second baseman made a swipe tag on the runner going from 1B to 2B. He had the ball in his bare hand and tagged the runner with his glove. I made a 'safe' sign, and verbalized, "NO TAG". His only comment, with a grin on his face, was, "You're the only one who ever made that call".

    Bob

  15. #1115
    Quote Originally Posted by KHenry14 View Post
    This happened in tonites Giants/Dodgers game....

    Giants have a man on first, Bengie Molina hit a drive to deep right that hits high off the wall. Runner goes to third, Molina held to a single. Giants run Burris in for Molina. At that point the Umps decide to review the hit to see if it was a home run, and eventually they rule it did hit the mark which designates a HR, so two runs score. Problem is that the force Burris to stay in the game. Bochy protests the game arguing that Burris would never had gone into the game as Molina would have circled the bases and therefore no runner would have been needed. Umps ruled that this was analygous to the situation if Molina had tripped over First and injured himself and Burriss ran for him at that point. IMO, this was an insane ruling by the umps, as the ball was dead once it left the yard.

    Any Umps have an opinion on this??
    Some kinks still need to be worked out of the replay system and put into place in the rule book.

    IIRC, the runner for Molina was credited with the home run.

  16. #1116
    Situation is this. Bases loaded and batter bunts ball down the third base line. Pitcher fields ball and tags out runner going home. Umpire calls out and pitcher sets to pitcher. Batting team coach calls time out and says to blue that when his batter bunted the ball it touched home plate. Blue says he didn't see if it did or not and changed the call to foul ball and sent runner back. This is a fall ball league for 8U.

    I have always been under the impression that home was considered fair territory being that the foul lines start at the edge of the point.

    Thanks for the help.

  17. #1117
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    293

  18. #1118
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,732
    Quote Originally Posted by Steven Tyler View Post
    IIRC, the runner for Molina was credited with the home run.
    Not the home run, just the run. Although some box scores give Burriss the run, and some don't even list him. I don't know which is official.

  19. #1119
    The first baseman was playing behind the 1st baseline with a runner on 1st. A grounder was hit to the 1st baseman and on his way in to play the ball he ran into the runner who had started to run to second. The grounder went by them not hitting either one. What is the correct call?

    Would the call change if the grounder had hit the runner after contact with the 1st base man?

  20. #1120
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Gilbert, AZ
    Posts
    4,959
    Quote Originally Posted by baseballdad View Post
    The first baseman was playing behind the 1st baseline with a runner on 1st. A grounder was hit to the 1st baseman and on his way in to play the ball he ran into the runner who had started to run to second. The grounder went by them not hitting either one. What is the correct call?

    Would the call change if the grounder had hit the runner after contact with the 1st base man?
    On a batted ball, the fielder has all the rights and must not be hindered, intentionally or otherwise, while fielding a batted ball.

    Here's a video from my rules website http://baseball-rules.com that shows the ruling for the play you described. The runner is out and the ball is dead, on your play.

    http://wms17.streamhoster.com/firstp...terference.wmv

  21. #1121
    On a batted ball, the fielder has all the rights and must not be hindered, intentionally or otherwise, while fielding a batted ball.
    Does this rule apply to a first baseman fielding a foul pop-up and bumping into a runner who is standing on first base? This happened in our game the other day. The plate ump called it a foul ball, I didn't make a stink about it, because I wasn't sure of the rule. He told me that the base was a safe zone for the runner.

  22. #1122
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,732
    Quote Originally Posted by starman View Post
    Does this rule apply to a first baseman fielding a foul pop-up and bumping into a runner who is standing on first base? This happened in our game the other day. The plate ump called it a foul ball, I didn't make a stink about it, because I wasn't sure of the rule. He told me that the base was a safe zone for the runner.
    Unless the hindrance was intentional, the runner is not out.

    7.08 Any runner is out when-
    (b) He intentionally interferes with a thrown ball; or hinders a fielder attempting to make a play on a batted ball; A runner who is adjudged to have hindered a fielder who is attempting to make a play on a batted ball is out whether it was intentional or not. If, however, the runner has contact with a legally occupied base when he hinders the fielder, he shall not be called out unless, in the umpire's judgment, such hindrance, whether it occurs on fair or foul territory, is intentional. If the umpire declares the hindrance intentional, the following penalty shall apply: With less than two out, the umpire shall declare both the runner and batter out. With two out, the umpire shall declare the batter out.

  23. #1123
    Quote Originally Posted by jbooth View Post
    The ump is ignorant. You can appeal after a dead ball, you just have to put the ball in play before you can appeal. As you DID. Everybody knows what you were doing, and you did everything right except ONE thing. The pitcher needs to step on the rubber, then you need to wait for the ump to say, "Play", then you step off and state that you are appealing and do it.

    And just because you did it while the ball was dead, doesn't negate your right to do it. You just need to properly put the ball in play and do it again. There are only two things that cause you to lose your right to continue to appeal, 1) make a pitch or play before you appeal, or 2) throw the ball into dead ball territiory when you attempt the appeal.

    Since you appealed while he considered the ball dead, then it wasn't a pitch or a play. Nothing happens when the ball is dead. So, you didn't lose your right to appeal, and he can't rule on it yet.

    Here is text from my book "Baseball Rules in Plain English" ad and below that, is the actual rules;

    APPEAL is an act of a fielder in claiming violation of the rules by the offensive team. Such as: batting out of order, failing to retouch after a caught fly or failing to touch a base while advancing or retreating on the bases. Rule 2.00 Appeal, 7.10.

    Appeals must be made while the ball is in play (live) and after action has stopped. When the ball is dead, it becomes in play when the pitcher has the ball and is on the rubber and the umpire says, "Play." Rule 5.11.

    One appeal may be made on each runner at each base.

    Any defensive player who has the ball may make an appeal if the ball is live and action is stopped. If the ball is already live, it is not necessary for the pitcher to have the ball on the mound before making an appeal. If the ball is live, a fielder may make an appeal in any of the following ways:

    1. By touching the runner whom they believe committed a base running infraction;
    2. Or by touching the base they believe was missed while the runner was advancing;
    3. Or by touching the original base that a runner left before a fly ball was caught.

    If the umpire has called "Time" or the ball has become dead for any other reason; the ball must be made live before an appeal can be made. The ball is made live by having the pitcher stand on the rubber with the ball in his possession and wait for the umpire to say, "Play." The pitcher or any fielder may then make an appeal. If the pitcher balks before the appeal, all appeals are lost. The pitcher may throw to a base from the rubber to make an appeal, provided he makes no motion associated with the start of a pitch prior to doing this.
    In all cases, the fielder must make a verbal appeal to the umpire or complete an act that is unmistakably an appeal. Accidentally touching a base that was missed is not an appeal. A throw to a base to catch a runner who had not retouched is unmistakably an appeal.

    Appeals must be made before the next pitch or play. If the fielder makes an appeal after "time" has been called, the umpire should say "put the ball in play and appeal again." Since no runner may advance or be put out while the ball is dead, this is not a play and the defense has not lost their right to appeal after the ball is put in play.

    The appeal itself is not a play. A fake throw to hold a runner is not a play. It is a play when a balk is committed during an appeal. It is not a balk if the pitcher throws to an unoccupied base from the rubber for the purpose of making an appeal. Plays that occur during "continuous action" after an infraction do not cancel the defense's right to appeal.

    The defense loses their right to appeal when any of the following actions occur:

    1. When the throw made in an appeal attempt goes into dead ball territory. When this occurs, no more appeals may be made on any runner at any base. This is an "err" on an appeal and is interpreted to be the same as a play.
    2. A balk is committed before or as part of an appeal attempt. (It is not a balk if the pitcher throws to an unoccupied base from the rubber, for the purpose of making an appeal.) N.A.P.B.L. 6.6.
    3. A pitch is made to the batter.
    4. A play is made that is not part of continuous action.


    The actual rules:

    7.10 Any runner shall be called out, on appeal, when—

    (b) With the ball in play, while advancing or returning to a base, he fails to touch each base in order before he, or a missed base, is tagged.

    Any appeal under this rule must be made before the next pitch, or any play or attempted play. If the violation occurs during a play which ends a half-inning, the appeal must be made before the defensive team leaves the field.

    5.11 After the ball is dead, play shall be resumed when the pitcher takes his place on the pitcher’s plate with a new ball or the same ball in his possession and the plate umpire calls “Play.” The plate umpire shall call “Play” as soon as the pitcher takes his place on his plate with the ball in his possession.
    I just wanted to make sure of something. You can appeal a play while it is still going on right? As long as the ump hasn't called time? For example:
    A runner advances from first to third on a single. But the runner misses second base. The throw from the outfield goes into third but is too late because the runner was safe. The second baseman yells that he missed the bag and tells the third baseman to throw to second. He does and the second basemen touches the base while the ball is still in play and tells the ump he is appealing. This is legal right?

  24. #1124
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Gilbert, AZ
    Posts
    4,959
    Quote Originally Posted by B-Fly View Post
    I just wanted to make sure of something. You can appeal a play while it is still going on right? As long as the ump hasn't called time? For example:
    A runner advances from first to third on a single. But the runner misses second base. The throw from the outfield goes into third but is too late because the runner was safe. The second baseman yells that he missed the bag and tells the third baseman to throw to second. He does and the second basemen touches the base while the ball is still in play and tells the ump he is appealing. This is legal right?
    Yep. Legal appeal. Runner is out for failing to touch second.

  25. #1125
    And just because you did it while the ball was dead, doesn't negate your right to do it.
    That is one of the common mistakes new umpires make.They think because you didn't do it right the first time, it means you can't do it anymore.

Page 45 of 112 FirstFirst ... 3543444546475595 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •