Then who starte d the game Tuesday night wearing a Detroit uni?Originally Posted by Cougar
Yes
No, he's off the ballot as he should be
No, but he should definitely have been considered
No, but it's borderline
Then who starte d the game Tuesday night wearing a Detroit uni?Originally Posted by Cougar
Welcome back ARod. Hope you are a Yankee forever.
Phil Rizzuto-a Yankee forever.
Holy Cow
Originally Posted by Rickey_Henderson
They are very, very similar. They have very similar neutral won loss records, RSAA scores, and DERA's. Almost peas in a pod. Unfortunately for Brown, the other two are still pitching and can do things to capture the popular imagination. Mussina can easily reach 250+ wins next season. Schilling could get to 220+. And both of those guys might get the opportunity to do something in the post-season that will enhance their reputations.
Buck O'Neil: The Monarch of Baseball
Not Brown.Originally Posted by soberdennis
"I was pitching one day when my glasses clouded up on me. I took them off to polish them. When I looked up to the plate, I saw Jimmie Foxx. The sight of him terrified me so much that I haven't been able to wear glasses since." - Left Gomez
"(Lou) Gehrig never learned that a ballplayer couldn't be good every day." - Hank Gowdy
I'm nit saying he deserves to be there, but I think he'll be elected.
Brown's 96 and 98 seasons are pure dominance, and his last season in LA wasn't too shabby either
I think his career is a lot more impressive than he generally gets credit for I could understand selecting him, I have mixed feelings myself.
One thing that makes me somewhat sympathetic to his cause is that I think a hitter who compared to his peers the way Brown does to his pitching contemporaries would make the Hall. That's just a feeling I have.
THE REVOLUTION WILL NOT COME WITH A SCORECARD
In the avy: AZ - Doe or Die
Brown's career is kinda short in terms of total IP but I have him is a good solid middle-tier HOF candidate. He's got the DIPS credentials and a lot of the traditional stats look good as well...Originally Posted by digglahhh
This will save a lot of posts...I agree with you on this one.Originally Posted by SABR Matt
![]()
1885 1886 1926 1931 1934 1942 1944 1946 1964 1967 1982 2006 2011
1887 1888 1928 1930 1943 1968 1985 1987 2004
1996 2000 2001 2002 2005 2009 2012
The Top 100 Pitchers In MLB History
The Top 100 Position Players In MLB History
He seems to have the same problems as Mussina, meaning they never won a Cy Young award.
Aren't we talking about the same pitcher who a few years back punched a wall and broke his hand in the middle of a playoff race? I seem to recall that left his team in a fairly bad spot. I voted no. He is borderline and if he had stayed healthy through out his career he'd be a lock -- but how many players can that be said about?
That being said he's probably better than a third of the pitchers currently enshrined in Cooperstown.
Originally Posted by baseball junkie
Then shouldn`t he deserve to be in?
No, the HOF doesn't need to be watered down any more than it already is.Originally Posted by Rickey_Henderson
Originally Posted by baseball junkie
But what about the era. Think about how well he did in an incredibly offensively bloated era
LOL...well STLCards2 on the issue of Glavine I may yet come to agree with you if my current research project tells me something the DIPS-based research did not. We shall see...Originally Posted by STLCards2
Going into the season Brown ranks 45 all-time in ERA+, behind such great pitchers as Mike Timlin, Barry Zito, Mark Buehrle and Kent Tekulve.Originally Posted by Rickey_Henderson
But his 214 ERA+ in 1996 is impressive.
How many innings did you say those workhorses had?Originally Posted by baseball junkie
Mythical SF Chronicle scouting report: "That Jeff runs like a deer. Unfortunately, he also hits AND throws like one." I am Venus DeMilo - NO ARM! I can play like a big leaguer, I can field like Luzinski, run like Lombardi. The secret to managing is keeping the ones who hate you away from the undecided ones. I am a triumph of quantity over quality. I'm almost useful, every village needs an idiot.
Good traders: MadHatter(2), BoofBonser26, StormSurge
You do realize that comparing reliever and starter ERA+ figures is stupid, right? The fewer innings you throw...the larger the standard deviation in ERA+ (the bigger the swings in ERA).Originally Posted by baseball junkie
Kent Tekulve (one of the greatest relievers of all time, though often forgotten) and Mike Timlin are not fair comparisons to Brown...and by the time he's done, Mark Buehrle (who is also short on innings because his career is young) and Barry Zito may themselves be hall of famers.
Let's put a qualifier on this and see where Brown ranks. Say 2000 IP, which is really a pretty modest figure. This will filter out all of the relievers who really can't be compared to starters, all the current young players that will likely drop off as they age and decline, and players that had very short careers (like Joe Wood, Jim Devlin, and Spud Chandler).Originally Posted by baseball junkie
So now Brown's ranking is 24 (down from 41). Not too bad.
At first my reaction was "definitely not". When I looked at the statistics I think he probably is deserving actually. Quantity is a bit lower than I'd want, but he's also pitching in the era of low IP totals, so it's not as bad as it looks. His quantity stats are very solid even for this era, and DIPS measures are very friendly to him. I think he has a good case to be right after Maddux and Clemens for 1990s pitchers. I would say yes to Kevin Brown after looking at him more.
Can somebody please explain what ERA+ is
The player's ERA compared to league and park adjusted. The actual formula is (leagueERA/playerERA)*Park Factor. .Originally Posted by Rickey_Henderson
Originally Posted by 538280
Ahh thanks
If Barry Zito (1,355.1 IP) or Mark Buerhle (1,347 IP) ever make the Hall of Fame, I'll eat my hat! And since when is 1,350 IP short on innings? That virtually seven full seasons.Originally Posted by SABR Matt
Too bad for him, he's the 10th best pitcher of his time...
At least for me...
1. Pedro
2. Clemens
3. Johnson
4. Maddux
5. Glavine
6. Schilling
7. Mussina
8. Cone
9. Smoltz
10. Brown
Thet doesn't gets him in the Hall.
Bautista Fan: Licey AND Blue Jays???!!!
There are certainly reasons to believe that Brown was better than 6-9 on this list. Actually, you would be really hard pressed to convince that anyone other than the top 5 on your list are better than Brown. Still, I say no for Mr. Nasty. Just too many injuries.Originally Posted by yankillaz
Bookmarks