Page 3 of 23 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 568

Thread: Draft Details and Discussion Thread

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    1,185
    Quote Originally Posted by 538280
    The cut-off can't be 1871 if you're not allowing a season with less than 140 games be a part of the sim. Teams didn't play 140 or more games until the the mid 1890s or somewhere around there.
    I'd say a good cut-off point can be 1884, when seasons were finally over 100 games (112), and overhand pitching was allowed for the first time. This would also allow the great 1880's stars (Anson, Brouthers, Connor, Kelly, etc.) to still have a solid WARP1 season for the sim during their era while using a high enough sample-size of games.

    The minimum games played rule could then be simplified to:

    Non-catchers: must have played in 80% of team's scheduled games for the representative sim year
    Catchers: must have played in 70% of team's scheduled games for the representative sim year
    Pitchers: The previous minimums already decided upon can still apply.

    It would be the drafter's responsibility to make sure they are picking an eligible year. Major strike years can still be excluded from the sim.
    Last edited by Wee Willie; 02-04-2007 at 04:32 PM.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    1,640
    Quote Originally Posted by Wee Willie
    I'd say a good cut-off point can be 1884, when seasons were finally over 100 games (112), and overhand pitching was allowed for the first time. This would also allow the great 1880's stars (Anson, Brouthers, Connor, Kelly, etc.) to still have a solid WARP1 season for the sim during their era while using a high enough sample-size of games.

    The minimum games played rule could then be simplified to:

    Non-catchers: must have played in 80% of team's scheduled games for the representative sim year
    Catchers: must have played in 70% of team's scheduled games for the representative sim year
    Pitchers: The previous minimums already decided upon can still apply.

    It would be the drafter's responsibility to make sure they are picking an eligible year. Major strike years can still be excluded from the sim.
    This is quite reasonable.

    Rules post updated to reflect this change.
    Last edited by Minstrel; 02-04-2007 at 04:46 PM.
    "In the end it all comes down to talent. You can talk all you want about intangibles, I just don't know what that means. Talent makes winners, not intangibles. Can nice guys win? Sure, nice guys can win - if they're nice guys with a lot of talent. Nice guys with a little talent finish fourth and nice guys with no talent finish last." --Sandy Koufax

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Halifax, NS
    Posts
    10,302
    Blog Entries
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by Minstrel
    Fair enough. Eric Bedard seems to be the guy who'll do the simming, so maybe he can enlighten us as to what metrics it uses.
    Basically, everything you can think of is kept track of by OOTP2006, which is what I have. VORP, WARP1, whatever. What goes into rating the players is their actual stats. That's about it.

    On another note, after, say, the tenth round, the "miss a round, get kicked out" rule should be dropped.

    This looks like a lot of fun. And I love having an early pick.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Halifax, NS
    Posts
    10,302
    Blog Entries
    4
    On another note, I found a DB that uses Japanese League HoFers. So they could be used in the sim.

    BTW, what time does the clock start?

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    1,640
    Quote Originally Posted by Erik Bedard
    BTW, what time does the clock start?
    Tomorrow, 10 AM EST for both leagues.
    "In the end it all comes down to talent. You can talk all you want about intangibles, I just don't know what that means. Talent makes winners, not intangibles. Can nice guys win? Sure, nice guys can win - if they're nice guys with a lot of talent. Nice guys with a little talent finish fourth and nice guys with no talent finish last." --Sandy Koufax

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Halifax, NS
    Posts
    10,302
    Blog Entries
    4
    Cool with me.

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    4,592
    Can we get a list of which seasons were strike shortened? I know about '94, but not any of the others.
    The Dark Knight is the best movie I've ever seen.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDxgNjMTPIs

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    1,640
    Quote Originally Posted by Wade8813
    Can we get a list of which seasons were strike shortened? I know about '94, but not any of the others.
    The main three I know of are 1981, 1972 and 1994. If anyone else has a more comprehensive list, that would be great.
    "In the end it all comes down to talent. You can talk all you want about intangibles, I just don't know what that means. Talent makes winners, not intangibles. Can nice guys win? Sure, nice guys can win - if they're nice guys with a lot of talent. Nice guys with a little talent finish fourth and nice guys with no talent finish last." --Sandy Koufax

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    1,185
    Quote Originally Posted by Minstrel
    The main three I know of are 1981, 1972 and 1994. If anyone else has a more comprehensive list, that would be great.
    1972 had a short strike at the beginning of the season, but I'd put it in the category of "minor strike year", as probably 1995 should be as well. So I think both of those years should be eligible. 1981 and 1994 are the only ones I know of where a good chunk of the season was missed.

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    1,640
    Quote Originally Posted by Wee Willie
    1972 had a short strike at the beginning of the season, but I'd put it in the category of "minor strike year", as probably 1995 should be as well. So I think both of those years should be eligible. 1981 and 1994 are the only ones I know of where a good chunk of the season was missed.
    Sure. I don't know much about the history of strikes in baseball...and 1994 was the only one that happened while I was old enough to be following baseball.
    "In the end it all comes down to talent. You can talk all you want about intangibles, I just don't know what that means. Talent makes winners, not intangibles. Can nice guys win? Sure, nice guys can win - if they're nice guys with a lot of talent. Nice guys with a little talent finish fourth and nice guys with no talent finish last." --Sandy Koufax

  11. #61
    How does the sim treat shortened seasons since we can pick anything lower than the players' third-best WARP?
    (fantasy football)
    JM: Only did that for a couple of years and then we had a conspiracy so it kind of turned me sour. Our league's commissioner, Lew Ford(notes) at the time, was doing some shady things that ... I'd rather not talk about [laughs].
    DB: Isn't he in Japan right now?
    JM: I don't know where Lou is right now. He's probably fleeing the authorities [laughs].

  12. #62
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    1,185
    Also, what if two seasons are tied for the 2nd-best WARP1 for a player? Should either one of those seasons be eligible, since one of them could actually be the third best? Or would we need to pick that player's 4th best WARP1 year?
    Last edited by Wee Willie; 02-04-2007 at 11:41 PM.

  13. #63
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Through the Fire and Flames
    Posts
    6,749
    Can we trade players?
    "he probably used some performance enhancing drugs so he could do a better job on his report...i hear they make you gain weight" - Dr. Zizmor

    "I thought it was interesting and yes a conversation piece. Next time I post a similar story I will close with the question "So, do you think either of them have used steroids?" so that I can make the topic truly relevant to discussions about today's game." - Eric Davis

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqul1GyK7-g

  14. #64
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Earl Park, IN
    Posts
    1,958
    what stat are we using to determine the pitcher's seasons? is it still WARP1?
    Last edited by The Splendid Splinter; 02-05-2007 at 09:14 AM.

  15. #65
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    1,640
    Quote Originally Posted by Wee Willie
    Also, what if two seasons are tied for the 2nd-best WARP1 for a player? Should either one of those seasons be eligible, since one of them could actually be the third best? Or would we need to pick that player's 4th best WARP1 year?
    Either can be selected, since one of them is third-best. The "third-best season" thing is mostly to prevent Brady Anderson-esque hijinks. Or, more generally, one or two year flukes. Plus, one's two best seasons are probably not one's general ability, but one's highest-variance ability.
    "In the end it all comes down to talent. You can talk all you want about intangibles, I just don't know what that means. Talent makes winners, not intangibles. Can nice guys win? Sure, nice guys can win - if they're nice guys with a lot of talent. Nice guys with a little talent finish fourth and nice guys with no talent finish last." --Sandy Koufax

  16. #66
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    1,640
    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisLDuncan
    Can we trade players?
    Yes.

    Quote Originally Posted by The Splendid Splinter
    what stat are we using to determine the pitcher's seasons? is it still WARP1?
    For the purposes of determining third-best season, yes.
    "In the end it all comes down to talent. You can talk all you want about intangibles, I just don't know what that means. Talent makes winners, not intangibles. Can nice guys win? Sure, nice guys can win - if they're nice guys with a lot of talent. Nice guys with a little talent finish fourth and nice guys with no talent finish last." --Sandy Koufax

  17. #67
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Halifax, NS
    Posts
    10,302
    Blog Entries
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by plask_stirlac
    How does the sim treat shortened seasons since we can pick anything lower than the players' third-best WARP?
    OOTP adjusts everything to a 162-game schedule.

  18. #68
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    17,247
    I'm confused. Managers from both drafts can draft the same player? So Ruth will be picked twice?
    Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.-Crash Davis

    http://sfgiants-forum.com/forum/index.php

  19. #69
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Halifax, NS
    Posts
    10,302
    Blog Entries
    4
    It's not a problem as far as the sim's concerned.

  20. #70
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    1,185
    Quote Originally Posted by Honus Wagner Rules
    I'm confused. Managers from both drafts can draft the same player? So Ruth will be picked twice?
    That's correct. The AL - NL designation for each draft just means the AL draft will allow the use of a DH.

  21. #71
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    4,592
    It was mentioned before, but I don't see it in the official rules, so I wanted to clarify - we take all suspected steroid users by their actual numbers, correct?

    I can pick Honus Wagner in a year he played SS, and stick him at 3B, since he had enough games played there?

    * To be eligible as a relief pitcher, pitcher must have at least 5 seasons in which he had 40+ non-start appearances. If pitcher has fewer than 5 full seasons in his career, all 3 or 4 of his seasons must meet the 40+ non-start appearances qualification.
    This needs to be modified, IMO. John Smoltz should definitely qualify as a reliever, but he only has four seasons from the pen (and only three with 40+ non-start appearances). Since we only need three years worth of stats, I think we should only require three years with 40+ non-start appearances.

    This raises another question - if Smoltz's two best years are from when he was a starter, does that mean we can take his best year as a reliever for the sim?

    Lastly, the Baseball Prospectus site lists Warp1 for pitchers under advanced batting statistics. Is that still what I'm supposed to be looking at?
    Last edited by Wade8813; 02-05-2007 at 12:28 PM.
    The Dark Knight is the best movie I've ever seen.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDxgNjMTPIs

  22. #72
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Halifax, NS
    Posts
    10,302
    Blog Entries
    4
    It would be great if we had a Rosters thread as well.

  23. #73
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    1,640
    Quote Originally Posted by Wade8813
    It was mentioned before, but I don't see it in the official rules, so I wanted to clarify - we take all suspected steroid users by their actual numbers, correct?
    For the sim, we're going to have to. We have no way to come up with "real" numbers.

    In the poll, people will vote based on what they think. While that's fine, I'd urge people to vote based on their appraisal of true talent and not punitively.

    I can pick Honus Wagner in a year he played SS, and stick him at 3B, since he had enough games played there?
    Right.

    This needs to be modified, IMO. John Smoltz should definitely qualify as a reliever, but he only has four seasons from the pen (and only three with 40+ non-start appearances). Since we only need three years worth of stats, I think we should only require three years with 40+ non-start appearances.
    Okay, that's fair. I'll drop the five year requirements to three.

    This raises another question - if Smoltz's two best years are from when he was a starter, does that mean we can take his best year as a reliever for the sim?
    That's a good question that should be resolved. Yes, it would work that way...WARP is comparable between starters and relievers, since BP adds value for the leverage of the innings pitched.

    Lastly, the Baseball Prospectus site lists Warp1 for pitchers under advanced batting statistics. Is that still what I'm supposed to be looking at?
    Yes. BP seems to classify WARP an offensive number, but it combines batting, fielding and pitching, so it's valid for pitchers as well as hitters.
    "In the end it all comes down to talent. You can talk all you want about intangibles, I just don't know what that means. Talent makes winners, not intangibles. Can nice guys win? Sure, nice guys can win - if they're nice guys with a lot of talent. Nice guys with a little talent finish fourth and nice guys with no talent finish last." --Sandy Koufax

  24. #74
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    1,640
    Quote Originally Posted by Erik Bedard
    It would be great if we had a Rosters thread as well.
    We don't want to create too many threads for this. Posters can occasionally post their to-date rosters in the discussion thread, just to show how it's shaping up.
    "In the end it all comes down to talent. You can talk all you want about intangibles, I just don't know what that means. Talent makes winners, not intangibles. Can nice guys win? Sure, nice guys can win - if they're nice guys with a lot of talent. Nice guys with a little talent finish fourth and nice guys with no talent finish last." --Sandy Koufax

  25. #75
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    1,185
    I assume the NL in the rules stands for "Negro Leagues", right? Are essentially all Negro Leaguers eligible? How are their stats going to be simmed, since the actual Negro League season was quite short each year?

Page 3 of 23 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •