Har Har Har, Very funny.Originally Posted by Wade8813
Har Har Har, Very funny.Originally Posted by Wade8813
Here's to baseball... The best sport made.
"There are two theories on hitting a knuckleball. Unfortunately, neither of them works." ― Charlie Lau
I thought so...![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hey, guys, don't laugh...I ain't got a catcher yet either. Man, that is sure gonna be lots of passed balls....
I wonder if Jake Gibbs is still available....
Yankees Fan Since 1957
I wasn't just laughing because DMF doesn't have a catcher. It's because he doesn't have a catcher, he and I had specifically talked about grabbing players at positions that are more likely to run out of greats, and the clever way I made a spoof on his sig.Hey, guys, don't laugh...I ain't got a catcher yet either. Man, that is sure gonna be lots of passed balls....
Oh, and by the way -![]()
Minstrel, I must say you've got a pretty well-rounded squad thus far.
Thanks, WW. It's agonizing to leave a pitcher when I think a position player is urgent or vice versa, but I don't want to be left with a huge hole.Originally Posted by Wee Willie
I've been a fan of your picks as well. In fact, I usually expect your double-picks to eliminate at least my next pick.![]()
"In the end it all comes down to talent. You can talk all you want about intangibles, I just don't know what that means. Talent makes winners, not intangibles. Can nice guys win? Sure, nice guys can win - if they're nice guys with a lot of talent. Nice guys with a little talent finish fourth and nice guys with no talent finish last." --Sandy Koufax
I think I've got enough pitchers and position players that I can take the best player available at a position I need, and not pass up a talented position player to take a pitcher, as I did taking Plank.
Same here. My Number #1 priority was to get a big slugger (bonds) and not lose out on a top 3 second basemen (collins) and good shortstop (Jennings). Worked out pretty well.Originally Posted by Erik Bedard
I did that with one pick; The Rajah.Originally Posted by -Kyle-
Here's to baseball... The best sport made.
"There are two theories on hitting a knuckleball. Unfortunately, neither of them works." ― Charlie Lau
(From the Draft thread)
Wow Wade, I thought I had a sleeper there.I thought I had a sleeper in Alomar...I guess I'll have to go to plan B.Damn it. There goes my main sleeper.Chris, quit taking my sleepers!Agreed. He keeps taking my sleepers!!!I still think Sosa was a sleeper.Those were two of my "sleepers" I guess with you I can't let any players from the state of Texas sleep.Chris, no!!!! I've been looking at Rusie for several rounds but had to fill out my line-up. He was my sleeper pick!(And that's just from a Ctrl+F of the word sleeper. It doesn't count any other ways people might have said the same thing)UGHHHH One of my sleepers to play LF.
So, has ANYONE actually managed to get someone they thought was a sleeper?
I got derek Jeter. he was a sleeper in my opinion.
Here's to baseball... The best sport made.
"There are two theories on hitting a knuckleball. Unfortunately, neither of them works." ― Charlie Lau
Duke Snider I thought should've gone earlier...also Tony Perez, who has a 315/410/600 line with 40hr from a 1st/3rd basemen.Originally Posted by Wade8813
I was eyeing Hershiser's 85 a few rounds ago, and I thought I could hold off and still get him, because WARP1 doesn't think it was that great of a season. But he had a 172 ERA+, a 2.03 ERA, and batters only had a 539 OPS against him. I'll take that anyday as a 12th rounder.Originally Posted by Wade8813
I dunno. I think that's about when he should have been taken. A lot of teams had already taken SS, most of whom arguably were better.I got derek Jeter. he was a sleeper in my opinion.
Snider was probably a sleeper. Perez, taken when he was, probably wasn't a sleeper, because there's still an unpicked player who also qualifies at 1st/3rd, with almost identical hitting (although probably worse fielding).Duke Snider I thought should've gone earlier...also Tony Perez, who has a 315/410/600 line with 40hr from a 1st/3rd basemen.
He's kinda borderline, IMO. Definitely good as a 12th rounder, but I think you're overrating him a little if you take him a few rounds before.I was eyeing Hershiser's 85 a few rounds ago, and I thought I could hold off and still get him, because WARP1 doesn't think it was that great of a season. But he had a 172 ERA+, a 2.03 ERA, and batters only had a 539 OPS against him. I'll take that anyday as a 12th rounder.
Last edited by Wade8813; 02-19-2007 at 03:01 PM.
Originally Posted by Wade8813
Gwynn, Matthews, Wagner, and Berra I got them pretty low.
"he probably used some performance enhancing drugs so he could do a better job on his report...i hear they make you gain weight" - Dr. Zizmor
"I thought it was interesting and yes a conversation piece. Next time I post a similar story I will close with the question "So, do you think either of them have used steroids?" so that I can make the topic truly relevant to discussions about today's game." - Eric Davis
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqul1GyK7-g
Wagner? He was taken in 7th pick? I wouldn't call that a sleeper...maybe a tiny bit lower than expected.Originally Posted by ChrisLDuncan
Anyone think of picks they took too high? Mine are definitly Nichols and Walsh, I just got nervous and was desparate for pitching.
I think they were taken about where they should have gone. And I'm not sure if it's possible to be a "sleeper" when you're picked in the first round.Gwynn, Matthews, Wagner, and Berra I got them pretty low.
Fine. Can I use my real army weapons?Wade, since you responded to everyone's answer except for mine, i'll take that as an insult. Now we are at fantasy war.![]()
Besides, I'm at fantasy war with everyone in our league![]()
Again, I think he went about where he should have. There are unpicked players with better raw stats, although the era adjustment favors him.Dan Brouthers. I've holded off picking him for a couple rounds.
The raw stats will be adjusted, however, and he had a 201 OPS+.Originally Posted by Wade8813
I figured him for a sleeper because I know some people dont even know who he is.. and in the other all-time draft in this forum, he was taken in the 7th, so I figured I got him at a good round.
Right, which is why I think he was taken about where he should have been.The raw stats will be adjusted, however, and he had a 201 OPS+.
I figured him for a sleeper because I know some people dont even know who he is.. and in the other all-time draft in this forum, he was taken in the 7th, so I figured I got him at a good round.
I don't want to use my MTG deck. I want to use my M16-A2 rifle.Originally Posted by Westlake
Bookmarks