Page 1 of 118 1231151101 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 2928

Thread: The Mets Ownership / Management Thread

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Beautiful Shea Stadium
    Posts
    3,017

    The Mets Ownership / Management Thread

    The Mets are fielding a lousy team.

    The Mets have fielded mostly lousy teams for 20 years now.

    Even when they’re good on paper, they’re lousy on a diamond. This can’t be blamed on Minaya or Phillips or any of the GMs that have put these teams together. No matter who's GM, the result always seems the same. It’s the result of an organizational philosophy. Ever since the great teams of the 1980s were torn apart, it’s been the same formula over and over: a tired cast of generally indifferent, fireless mercenaries with what little homegrown talent that sprouts out a wasteland of a farm system usually winding up elsewhere.

    When the mercenaries fail to live up to expectations, or go down with injuries, there’s never anything to fall back on. When the mercenaries do well, they generally fail to gel as a team and spit the bit when it counts. The failure to run out batted balls and frequent botching of routine plays often doesn’t make the box scores, but it almost seems like a Mets tradition at this point - we can all name the various offenders from the past two decades.

    I can no longer blame the parade of different GMs, because the problem has proven to be endemic over the last 20 years.

    I consider it the fault of an ownership that seems to despise colorful, scrappy gamers and loves “safe” colorless types that don’t play with intensity. I consider it the fault of an ownership that will sign a few big names to fill the seats, but won’t pony up a few million extra for guys like Abreu and Hudson to actually win when the roster is obviously full of holes. I consider it the fault of an ownership that seems to worry more about the menus in their exclusive restaurants than depth charts.

    Not only do the teams reflect the dismal corporate philosophy of the owners, but I find the ongoing efforts to shed the team persona that won me as a fan in the first place and gentrify the team's image to be distasteful.

    Meanwhile, prices have been raised so high that none of the Subway Series games have sold out and most of the better seats can be found for below their obscene face value on Stub Hub. I can’t really say the franchise has been a source of much joy of late.

    I almost find myself wishing for things to finally bottom out so that Fred and Jeff will just sell the team. I don’t see much hope of significant change until then.

    Thoughts?
    Last edited by Mongoose; 06-30-2009 at 11:12 AM.


    "The Fightin' Met With Two Heads" - Mike Tyson/Ray Knight!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    5,556
    Quote Originally Posted by Mongoose View Post
    The Mets are fielding a lousy team.
    Not by choice.

    I didn't bother reading the rest of your post since it's just your tired complaitns about ownership.
    "I'm happy for [Edwin Encarnacion] because this guy bleeds internally, big-time" -Dusty Baker

    "If on-base percentage is so important, then why don't they put it on the scoreboard?" -Jeff Francoeur

    "At the end of the day, the sun comes up and I still have a job" -Joba Chamberlain

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Beautiful Shea Stadium
    Posts
    3,017
    Quote Originally Posted by NYMets523 View Post
    Not by choice.

    I didn't bother reading the rest of your post since it's just your tired complaitns about ownership.
    You shouldn't respond to things you haven't read - you'll wind up criticizing something you don't know about. You're then liable to come off looking ill-informed.

    Your tendency to do that has already resulted in some of the most unfortunate, wrongest posts I've ever read on this forum:

    Quote Originally Posted by NYMets523 View Post
    Sitting in the Promenade at Citi is like where the blue seats were at Shea.
    Quote Originally Posted by NYMets523 View Post
    I don't really care what the name of the blue section was. The seats in the Promenade are better than some of the Lodge seats at all of the Mezzanine.
    You came up with these gemstones in a thread comparing sight lines at Shea Stadium with those at "Citi Field".

    In the interests of furthering our knowledge (or at least entertainment), why not actually read the original post and enlighten us why you think this wretched team isn't the result of an endemic organizational problem.

    See if you can muster an articulate defense of the past 20 years of garbage.
    Last edited by Mongoose; 06-28-2009 at 03:52 AM.


    "The Fightin' Met With Two Heads" - Mike Tyson/Ray Knight!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    58
    Quote Originally Posted by NYMets523 View Post
    I didn't bother reading the rest of your post since it's just your tired complaitns about ownership.
    That's a shame because he basically nailed it. I'm about a season and a half away from refusing to support this team in any way, shape or form until there's a change in ownership. Fred and Paris don't have a clue about what makes their franchise tick.

  5. #5
    Maybe we can trade Kevin Mitchell for Kevin McReynolds

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    7,176
    Blog Entries
    4
    maybe the problem is that mangement is too responsive to a whiny fan base and so they bring in mercenaries at the expense of the farm system. Then there isn't the mental fortitude to stick with a players growing pains if he isn't Reyes or Wright straight out of the box.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    6,833
    Blog Entries
    9
    Great Post man.

    Although I'm not a Mets fan, I've always checked the box scores from time to time.
    This year I can definately say that your words ring true.

    This team just lacks depth at the Minor league level. No one who's ready to step in and fill a temporary hole. I like Fernando Martinez, but he's not ready. Johnathan's getting lit up in AAA. There's no one to turn to.


    I was just listening to the WFAN and I'm hearing Mets fan call for a Matt Holliday or Mark DeRosa...but I'm wondering just who are the Mets going to give to get?
    "After my fourth season I asked for $43,000 and General Manager Ed Barrow told me, 'Young man, do you realize Lou Gehrig, a 16-year-man, is playing for only $44,000?' I said, Mr. Barrow, there is only one answer to that - Mr. Gehrig is terribly underpaid."- Yankees outfielder Joe DiMaggio

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Bronx, NY
    Posts
    214
    Do we really have enough in the farm to pay for Matt Holliday, never mind that he could be merely a rent-a-player? And of course, the Cards nailed themselves Mark DeRosa and the Yankees got Eric Hinske.

    I regret that the organization is somewhat hog-tied about acquiring someone with pop, what with such a desolate farm system. Look at the abysmal performance of the Bisons and B-Mets, for example. Stl Lucie and Savannah are probably mezzo mezzo.

    On the other hand, the Cyclones are doing good so far, not that any of them are MLB prospects. At least their tickets are cheaper than CitiField's and the games are a ton of fun. Hint - if seeing the Mets is too expensive and makes you want to pull your hair out by the roots, go to Brooklyn! IYou'll get less oggida and it's quite an electric atmosphere! Tonight, Reggy the purple party dude will be there and so will I. Yes, he's child-oriented, but it adds pizzazz.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Beautiful Shea Stadium
    Posts
    3,017
    Quote Originally Posted by Bklyn'55 View Post
    Maybe we can trade Kevin Mitchell for Kevin McReynolds
    That deal, which took place in December of 1986 - 3 weeks after Wilpon usurped a 50% stake in the team from Doubleday and started to meddle in front office desicions - would set the tone for the next 23 years and beyond.

    Wilpon has always had an obsession with his players conducting themselves in a "moral" fashion. Google "Wilpon" and "image conscious" and you get a ton of hits, most of which discuss Wilpon's obsession with his organization looking "clean cut" and "family friendly".

    I watched with horror as the greatest team I'd ever seen was broken up. Starting with the Mitchell/McReynolds trade he proceeded to get rid of any and every player he considered to be a carouser and bad moral influence. And what was the result? There were probably more miscreants on the 1993 squad than on the 1986 squad. The only difference was that they were a bunch of mercenary underachieving losers with no fire and no soul.

    Some people have tried to pin the blame for breaking up that team on Frank Cashen, but it just doesn't add up.

    Cashen distinguished himself as a genius in Baltimore and in New York up until 1986. Then, all of a sudden, he became an imbecile - but not just an ordinary imbecile; an imbecile that had a freakish obsession with the nocturnal activities of his players.

    Here was a guy who had gone out and acquired Keith Hernandez at a time unsavory rumors of drug use were swirling around him and a lot of other teams didn't seem interested in touching him. Keith never was a moral paragon, but such considerations never seemed to be a factor in Cashen's decision making. Cashen always made the correct decision regardless...

    Until the day Wilpon became a full partner.

    We then learned through the press of a new determination on the part of the Mets front office to rid the team of all carousers and wild men. A series of trades then occurred which turned the deepest, most talented team many of us have ever seen into an surly unwatchable collection of garbage.

    Or as Joe McDonald puts it:

    http://www.nysportscene.com/?p=327

    Remember back in the 1980s and even the early 1990s, it was Fred Wilpon who forced the purge of less desirable players from the club. After the 1986 World Series win, potential trouble maker Kevin Mitchell was shipped to San Diego for the pure vanilla Kevin McReynolds. A few years later the known partiers like Lenny Dykstra, Wally Backman, and even Darryl Strawberry were shown the door.

    So I don't fully blame Minaya for the current situation. The pattern we're seeing here had been going on long before he got here; Wilpon never went for youth, only "names". Unfortunately Wilpon has been very active in remaking the Mets' persona, both on the field and as a fan experience.

    He has no affinity for the history of his own franchise. Fans have been noting his lack of connection to the team's history for years now. I need not go into that: it's been covered in great detail on this and other forums.

    As far as what he puts on the field, the teams have been the same old story for 20 plus years now. The Mets currently have no sure shot prospects in their whole system. It will take years to rebuild from where they are now.

    I don't know how badly Fred got swindled by his buddy Madoff, but perhaps if attendance diminishes enough, he'll be forced to sell the team.

    Maybe that's the only way anything's going to change.


    "The Fightin' Met With Two Heads" - Mike Tyson/Ray Knight!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    5,458
    Blog Entries
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by Mongoose
    You came up with these gemstones in a thread comparing sight lines at Shea Stadium with those at "Citi Field".
    Why the quotes around Citi Field? Have you not yet accepted that that's its name? Or do you simply refuse to accept it? Considering your "location," I envision you sitting in the middle of a parking lot right where home plate used to be sniffing a blanket and sucking your thumb. ...Now, that's just a tongue-in-cheek jibe, so please don't come back at me with anger.

    Incidentally, I happen to agree with those gemstones. Being ANYWHERE inside of Citi Field is hands down better than what we had been brainwashed for so many years to believe was home. Comparing the two parks is like comparing apples and kumquats. Citi Field is state of the art, and I think every seat is great. Couldn't say that about Shea, where in many places -- especially the Mezzanine -- fly balls were lost to the ceiling. Box seats were cramped (even on Field Level, where one could berely see the game for the people in front of them), and the upper decks were in another atmosphere with hard seats that made one want a backside-transplant after just an hour. That is, an hour after one's legs were rested from climbing steep and barely balance-manageable stairs and rows.

    Parking at Citi Field is a finely tuned machine handled by a relatively competent group of people directing you to a parking spot. Parking at Shea was, as Nixon once said to the country, "You're on your own." It was strictly park-at-your-own-risk despite a $15 fee. Ever read the back of one of those color-coded receipts? No longer. Now all one needs is a paper receipt without all the legalese on the back.

    As well, no longer does one need to go too far from their seat to find the refreshment of their choice. No longer are there lines for those refreshments (nor the eventual release of them) while people bump into you as they walk through some skinny hallway where one can't even see the playing field.

    And after the game, I can't begin to tell you what a relief it is to not have to walk down 75 miles of ramps before reaching the ground exit. There are stairs and elevators now. Such a novel concept.

    Okay, enough about Citi Field (without quotation marks).

    I get the idea -- as NYMets523 also noticed -- that you're simply not happy with the Wilpons. According to you, they've basically screwed up the team since day one, and nothing good has happened since 1986. You're entitled to your opinion, even if some of us disagree.

    Yeah, we've had our ups and downs since that era, but 20 years of "garbage"?


    Quote Originally Posted by StillShea View Post
    That's a shame because he basically nailed it. I'm about a season and a half away from refusing to support this team in any way, shape or form until there's a change in ownership. Fred and Paris don't have a clue about what makes their franchise tick.
    Good, so you, Mongoose, and EasilyFound can jump back on the wagon during good times. ... which, evidently, by Mongoose's standards, are only after a WS Championship.


    Quote Originally Posted by Bklyn'55 View Post
    Maybe we can trade Kevin Mitchell for Kevin McReynolds
    lol ...Ahh, the beginning of the end. ...of the beginning. ...of the end.


    Quote Originally Posted by PVNICK View Post
    maybe the problem is that mangement is too responsive to a whiny fan base and so they bring in mercenaries at the expense of the farm system. Then there isn't the mental fortitude to stick with a players growing pains if he isn't Reyes or Wright straight out of the box.
    Wham. Finally, the perspective that needed to be said. Thank you.


    Mongoose, if only you had the same bile-spewing antipathy for M. Donald Grant's imposition on his GM's. All I can say is, thank goodness you don't carry a grudge. ...or a gun.
    Last edited by milladrive; 06-30-2009 at 03:37 PM.
    Put it in the books.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    477
    Quote Originally Posted by PVNICK View Post
    maybe the problem is that mangement is too responsive to a whiny fan base and so they bring in mercenaries at the expense of the farm system. Then there isn't the mental fortitude to stick with a players growing pains if he isn't Reyes or Wright straight out of the box.
    This is very true. When Minaya took over the Mets, he immediately turned the franchise around by trading many prospects, and then signing a number of Type A free agents which required the Mets to give up first and second round picks. As a result the Mets have been competitive, but also lack the organizational depth to fill in the missing pieces.

    When Doubleday and Wilpon bought the team after the 1979 season, they embarked on a rebuilding program under Frank Cashen. While they struggled at the MLB level, they drafted high enough to acquire players like Strawberry and Gooden. Not all their top picks worked out, ala Blocker, Abner, Beane, etc, but their farm system was rich enough to make deals.

    They were also able to capitalize on trading established players for unproven prospects - the reverse of what they have been doing recently. Darling, Terrell, Fernandez, etc were acquired with veterans like Mazzilli and Bailor.

    Because the Mets jumped into the fire under Minaya to give fans a winner after many insufferable seasons, they also shot themselves in the foot a bit. It was a double-edged sword.

    Fans continue to moan and grown. At the moment it seems they want to acquire anyone at any cost without regard for long term impact. I'm all for making a deal, but not two prospects for a decent 34-year old free agent to be like Mark DeRosa. For all I know presently, the PTBNL might be a high pick from the 2008 draft since a player cannot be traded until one year after he is signed, without a lot of red tape. If the PTBNL ends up being Brett Wallace for example, that's not a deal I'd want the Mets to try to beat.
    Last edited by ReyesOfHope; 06-30-2009 at 03:42 PM.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Beautiful Shea Stadium
    Posts
    3,017
    Quote Originally Posted by milladrive View Post
    Why the quotes around Citi Field? Have you not yet accepted that that's its name? Or do you simply refuse to accept it? Considering your "location," I envision you sitting in the middle of a parking lot right where home plate used to be sniffing a blanket and sucking your thumb. ...Now, that's just a tongue-in-cheek jibe, so please don't come back at me with anger.

    Incidentally, I happen to agree with those gemstones. Being ANYWHERE inside of Citi Field is hands down better than what we had been brainwashed for so many years to believe was home. Comparing the two parks is like comparing apples and kumquats. Citi Field is state of the art, and I think every seat is great.
    You mean like these seats?

    Section 536, Row 12 Seat 8



    Section 532, Row 5 Seat 1


    Views of RF from 405, Row 6, Seat 16, both seated and standing.

    One loses the view of RF and has to look through a bed frame.




    Quote Originally Posted by Gary Dunaier View Post
    As promised, a few photos from Thursday night... I was sitting in the seat, facing straight ahead...

    but first, I think the photos mets16 posted are actually from section 502 or 504, not 503... 502/4 row 1 seat 1 has the steps leading away from you, as shown in mets16's shot... not that the view is any "better" than the view from 503-1-1...


    Basic view with just the obstruction...


    (Photo taken May 7, 2009. © Gary Dunaier. Link to upload on Flickr.com: here.)


    Here's where it gets exciting. End of the 5th, top of the 6th. We've got not only the usual between-inning traffic, but they also had the T-shirt launch, so we also had fans going to the front of the platform hoping to catch a shirt...


    (Photo taken May 7, 2009. © Gary Dunaier. Link to upload on Flickr.com: here.)


    ...but the worst has to be this inconsiderate schmuck, who decided the platform would be a great place to watch a few pitches in the top of the 6th inning. Never mind that he may be blocking someone else's view of home plate...


    (Photo taken May 7, 2009. © Gary Dunaier. Link to upload on Flickr.com: here.)
    Quote Originally Posted by Gary Dunaier View Post
    Two views from these, my Weekday Plan seats. First view is looking straight ahead without turning.


    (Photo taken May 27, 2009. © Gary Dunaier. Link to upload on Flickr.com: here.)


    Second view is with turning towards the plate and infield.


    (Photo taken May 27, 2009. © Gary Dunaier. Link to upload on Flickr.com: here.)

    Quote Originally Posted by milladrive View Post
    Citi Field is state of the art, and I think every seat is great.
    Look, you’re entitled to demolish your credibility if you want to. It makes no difference to me.

    One thing’s for sure: the reduction in affordable seating from the 34,576 of Upper Deck and Mezzanine combined at Shea to the 15,500
    capacity of Promenade at “Citi” is a matter of statistical fact.

    “Citi Field” is a pretty much a shopping mall built for the enjoyment of the corporate class of “fans” - which is one of the reasons
    it probably strikes many long term fans of the team as so “unMetslike”

    The quotation marks, by the way, are there because “Citi Field” is not the place’s permanent name. It will certainly be gone
    after 20 years, and will likely be gone sooner, if Congress has its way:

    http://www.newsday.com/news/local/ne...,1930544.story

    Even New York City declined to put “Citi Field” on the Willets Points subway station’s signs.

    Quote Originally Posted by milladrive View Post
    I get the idea -- as NYMets523 also noticed -- that you're simply not happy with the Wilpons.
    Gee, whatever gave you that idea?

    The problem is early on the Mets used to field teams of lovable losers. Over the past 20 years, they’ve fielded teams of hatable losers.

    Finally...

    If you disagree with me, please try to post something reasonable.

    Why not come up with facts or arguments that disprove the notion that a roster of tired, mercenary transients has been the Mets
    philosophy during the Wilpon regime?

    Why not disprove the notion that these tired mercenary transients have often been brutal to watch?

    Why not explain why the last 20 years of Mets baseball haven’t been generally awful in a grimly predictable way?


    "The Fightin' Met With Two Heads" - Mike Tyson/Ray Knight!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    5,458
    Blog Entries
    4
    Great, now everytime this page loads, it takes longer than usual.

    Btw, I think I sat behind that schmuck Sunday night in 533.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mongoose
    Look, you’re entitled to demolish your credibility if you want to. It makes no difference to me.
    Well, apparently it does. Besides, I don't think a person's opinion demolishes their credibility. ...unless one wishes to debate religion or politics.

    One thing’s for sure: the reduction in affordable seating from the 34,576 of Upper Deck and Mezzanine combined at Shea to the 15,500 capacity of Promenade at “Citi” is a matter of statistical fact.
    So? At least they're all lower to the ground, more comfortable, and easier to get to. Read my previous post.

    The quotation marks, by the way, are there because “Citi Field” is not the place’s permanent name. It will certainly be gone
    after 20 years, and will likely be gone sooner, if Congress has its way
    Well, while that may be true, it's the current name, and therefore needs no quotations. Do you put quotation marks around San Diego... I mean, Jack Murphy.... I mean, Qualcomm Stadium? Did you put quatations around Riverfront Stadium... I mean, Cinergy Field? Ever put quotations around Shibe Park... I mean, Connie Mack Stadium? How about we put an asterisk next to Yankee Stadium? Do you put punctuation around Coors Field, Minute Maid Park, PETCO Park, AT&T Park, Tropicana Field, U.S. Cellular Field, PNC Park, Citizens Bank Park, Chase Field, or any other corruptorate moniker that may change in the future? Didn't think so. Why not just whole hog and put quotation marks around the St. Louis Browns? Should I continue?

    Even New York City declined to put “Citi Field” on the Willets Points subway station’s signs.
    Yes, but it's indicated on all the road signs. Roads and signs owned and maintained by New York City.

    The problem is early on the Mets used to field teams of lovable losers. Over the past 20 years, they’ve fielded teams of hatable losers.
    So, perhaps you should direct your anger at King George Steinberger and the Player's Union, who began the separation of common-man salary and MLB big-time money salary. Face it, they would be a whole lot more loveable if we weren't taking out a mortgage just to go to the ballpark. I vividly recall barking about the price hikes after we got George Foster. WE, the fans, pay their salaries, via vendors, the box office, parking, and TV advertisements. You want loveable losers? Become a hockey fan.

    Finally...

    If you disagree with me, please try to post something reasonable.
    You think my posts have been unreasonable? Really? Hm. I'll try to put less energy into them then.

    Why not come up with facts or arguments that disprove the notion that a roster of tired, mercenary transients has been the Mets philosophy during the Wilpon regime?
    Can't disprove a notion. A notion is an opinion.

    As well, MLB, by definition, has become a business filled with mercenary transients. Very seldom does a player remain loyal to one team, especially when offered more moulah by another.

    Why not disprove the notion that these tired mercenary transients have often been brutal to watch?
    Again, can't disprove an opinion. Besides, why should I try to disprove an opinion with which I agree? Of course they've been oft-times brutal to watch. I sit through the same games as you. Just be glad we weren't Brooklyn Dodger fans. ...Oh wait, I forgot, they were loveable (i.e., low-paid) teams who just happened to finish in first place year after year, only to lose a heartbreaking Series to that arrogant team on the mainland. Guess that made them losers, too?

    Why not explain why the last 20 years of Mets baseball haven’t been generally awful in a grimly predictable way?
    Because perhaps I disagree with that statement? If I disagree, am I being unreasonable? You call the past two seasons predictable? Who are we, the Cubs? I don't think so.

    I'll refer back to the old Dodgers. Back then, finishing in first place meant a World Series. Today, a team can finish second and go the distance. Can you count how many times since 1984 the Mets have finshed either second in their division or failed to get the Ring in postseason? Don't bother; I'll tell you. Twelve. Twelve times in 24 years. That means that in half the seasons you call garbage, we were contenders.

    As I assessed, anything less than a WS ring is something you would call garbage. I may have been heartbroken more times than I care to admit, but I suppose one person's garbage is another person's heartbreak.
    Last edited by milladrive; 06-30-2009 at 05:27 PM.
    Put it in the books.

  14. #14
    Looks like some pretty ****** seating. And I'd like to see any team win after losing the likes of Reyes, Beltran, and Delgado...

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    477
    Quote Originally Posted by elancaster View Post
    Do we really have enough in the farm to pay for Matt Holliday, never mind that he could be merely a rent-a-player? And of course, the Cards nailed themselves Mark DeRosa and the Yankees got Eric Hinske.
    Please tell me you're not upset the Mets didn't get Eric Hinske.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    461
    I think the Mets should be sellers at the trade deadline. Look, I love the Mets and have rooted for them since 1967 but I don't think it really matters that much if Delgado or Reyes come back. They didn't win with the this whole crew before and they won't win now. I wish I was wrong but I can "feel" it. Eventhough it has been 23 years since they last won a WS, I would prefer that they restock with younger talent and try to create a new "window" for winning. I think they had their shot with this crew in 2006 and missed it. As hard as it is to go through I think they need to do it again, and to teach the new guys how to play fundamental baseball (catch, throw, run bases, hit cut off men, hit and run, read signs etc).

    Who to sell? Everyone is eligible if the deal is a good one except: Wright, Santana and K-Rod.

    The arguments about ownership are valid and will continue to confound us fans into the forseeable future, but also Omar has to get bunch of the blame particularly since; 1) the Mets haven't built the latin american pipeline that signing Pedro and Beltran was supposed to create and; 2) because Omar clearly said it was his goal to rebuild the farm system to perpetuate winning, (still not very deep and should be better despite the trades that have sapped talent for guys like Santana...he has made a few good trades but also gave away talent like Lindstrom, Milledge and Bell for about nothing) and; 3) to get the Mets more atheletic. Other than Wright, Reyes and Beltran the Mets aren't all that athletic.

    Omar has got to stop overpaying for marginal guys, while he seeks "lightning in a bottle." That blows too much payroll.

    Omar has to convice ownership to spend more on scouting and signing young latin players, asian players and to be willing to go above slotting with draftees in the States. It's his responsibility to make the business case for ownership. Nothing makes money more than winning. especially in NYC. He has to show them a real plan and the expected return on investment and be accountable if the plan doesn't work. I can't honestly say I know what the plan is these days other than wait until the guys get back...well I hope they are right and that I am wrong but I wouldn't bet on it.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    477
    Quote Originally Posted by LostMet View Post
    ...he has made a few good trades but also gave away talent like Lindstrom, Milledge and Bell for about nothing)
    The trades of Lindstrom and Bell turned out to be mistakes but...

    1. If these are the worst mistakes you can come up with, they aren't much to whine about.
    2. Bell had an ERA over 5.00 in two consecutive seasons and about 64 games. He stunk in NY, and the Mets gave him ample opportunity to secure a place on the roster. He had very little value at the time of the deal.
    3. The Mets received Church and Schneider for an enigmatic, inconsistent, prospect with few baseball instincts.


    Quote Originally Posted by LostMet View Post
    Omar has got to stop overpaying for marginal guys, while he seeks "lightning in a bottle." That blows too much payroll.
    Who is he overpaying except for Oliver Perez at the moment?

    Quote Originally Posted by LostMet View Post
    Omar has to convice ownership to spend more on scouting and signing young latin players, asian players and to be willing to go above slotting with draftees in the States.
    I would like the Mets to sign higher profile amateur free agents in other countries. They do sign players from all over - even the Netherlands and Germany - but generally avoid the high-priced bonus babies.

    I support slotting. When teams go above slotting, the best available players often fall to teams willing to pay over slot. The draft is supposed to help restore competitive balance. Better to allow teams to trade draft picks, IMO.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    1,519
    Who is he overpaying except for Oliver Perez at the moment?
    Castillo for one.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    477
    Quote Originally Posted by EasilyFound View Post
    Castillo for one.
    I will mostly agree. The term of the contract is too long, but $6 million is chump change and it isn't entirely inappropriate for a ten-year veteran of some merit. It isn't $13 million/season.

    So....that's two players. I think we could find at least two on most every team. And I wouldn't go overboard criticizing Minaya for something that befalls every GM - except for the markets where the GMs have almost no money to spend.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    1,519
    The problem with the Castillo contract is it prevented the Mets from signing Orlando Hudson, who I'd rather have than Castillo.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    5,556
    You should never bank on a player hitting free agency.
    "I'm happy for [Edwin Encarnacion] because this guy bleeds internally, big-time" -Dusty Baker

    "If on-base percentage is so important, then why don't they put it on the scoreboard?" -Jeff Francoeur

    "At the end of the day, the sun comes up and I still have a job" -Joba Chamberlain

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    1,519
    I suppose you're right. But it is certainly a consideration. And there were other considerations that did not favor giving Castillo that kind of contract.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    5,556
    There's a chance the Mets could get Hudson. Castillo's contract will be more attractive if he keeps producing. If the Mets agreed to pay half, you might get a team willing to pick him up. Of course it will depend on Hudson remaining in LA or not. He said in an article recently that he wanted to be a Met but loves LA now. Though I do believe he will become a free agent as it at least increases the chances of the Dodgers overpaying for him (as Coletti does for just about every FA).
    "I'm happy for [Edwin Encarnacion] because this guy bleeds internally, big-time" -Dusty Baker

    "If on-base percentage is so important, then why don't they put it on the scoreboard?" -Jeff Francoeur

    "At the end of the day, the sun comes up and I still have a job" -Joba Chamberlain

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    477
    Quote Originally Posted by EasilyFound View Post
    I suppose you're right. But it is certainly a consideration. And there were other considerations that did not favor giving Castillo that kind of contract.
    It is an after the fact consideration. Omar had two choices that I am aware coming into the 2008 season, David Eckstein or Castillo. The Mets met with Eckstein first, but he wanted a 4-year $30+ million deal, and was reluctant to move to 2B, so Minaya turned to Castillo.

    I agree with others that 4-years sounded nuts from the get-go. I would have thought 2 or 3 years + a team option was more sensible.

    Regardless, Omar needed a 2Bman. Ge chose to sign one that did not require the loss of draft picks or talent in a trade, and as someone noted, you cannot project who will or will not be a free agent and available down the road.

  25. #25

    Not a second guess

    Speaking of overplaying for players, Delgado should have been let go at the end of last year. We got all we could out of the guy. It was time to cut bait. What was the option, 12 mil? Maybe not too much $ but it certainly had an impact on what we spent this year.

    Maybe that $12 mil gets us Orlando Hudson and we never have to see Castillo's shaky knees (and glove) again. Minaya has made moves both good and bad but his biggest problem is not predicting decline in performance.

    2006 we get lucky with Valentin and we somehow think he'll repeat in 07.
    07 we get Alou. He gets hurt. And we think he'll come around in 08.
    06 with El Duque. Gets hurt, we depend on him for 07 and 08.
    (Quick interruption - Murphy just made a sick play at 1st. This guy should play everyday)
    Which brings me to Tatis. C'mon. Who didn't see the 09 dropoff coming?
    07, 08, Pedro.

    We've gone to bat for the last 3 years with no 2b, no corner OFs, and no C (be it a hitter or good defensive catcher). I'm not good in math but even I can tell that's half a lineup. When you have that many question marks, it's no surprise that things sometimes don't work out.

    And I didn't even get into the starters yet...

    What we need is a real baseball guy. Not a Bill James, not a Billy Beane, but a Branch Rickey or Frank Cashen. We need someone who can build a team, not collect a bunch of talent and hope it'll mesh. It hasn't here.

    It's becoming more and more apparent that Minaya is not that guy. And we know for damn sure it ain't Bernazard.

    So what do you do? Keep your fingers crossed. Stay home and watch (and pray) for the best. Hope this organization gets it's head out of it's ass. Go to Citi for the discounted games only and root for your fantasy team like every other baseball fan whose team sucks.

Page 1 of 118 1231151101 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •