What do you guys make of that?
It sounds an awful lot like maybe this person's not telling the whole truth (I'm no crime detective, but if he "ejaculated on her upper thigh," wouldn't this be an open-and-shut case? I mean, a DNA test and she'd have him nailed... a bit disgusting, maybe, to save some of that stuff, but still all the things she said he did- and not enough proof to even press charges, when she said he was THAT physical?)
Stilll... I REALLY liked Johan... I don't want to believe it's true, but logic must prevail.
So, logically speaking- what do you all think? :/