Originally posted by rwolfe09
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Red Sox Retired Numbers?
Collapse
X
-
Visit my card site at Mike D's Baseball Card Page.
-
Originally posted by Mike D.You don't see this in baseball much (or to my knowledge, ever). Not sure if it's against the rules, or if just nobody ever does it. Or, am I wrong, and it has been done? Anyone know?
You might get a kick out of this, Mike:
http://sports.espn.go.com/minorlbb/n...ory?id=2523029"Anything less would not have been worthy of me. Anything more would not have been possible." - Carl Yastrzemski
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mike D.You don't see this in baseball much (or to my knowledge, ever). Not sure if it's against the rules, or if just nobody ever does it. Or, am I wrong, and it has been done? Anyone know?
Comment
-
I agree that #3 is very limiting...but then again, not many numbers should be retired. Retiring a player's number means that that guy was the Red Sox for a number of years. Personally, as fantastic a pitcher and as great a Boston icon as Clemens was for those years with the Sox, I don't feel that he's as elite a Red Sox hero as Williams, Yaz, Fisk, etc.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SoxSonVisit my card site at Mike D's Baseball Card Page.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JamesWestThis practice was fairly common back in the days when a player needed to have five seasons in to be eligible for a pension. Players who who were short would be signed as a coach and then activated to the roster to get the days they needed or they would be signed to a short term deal, get their time in and be released (or retire)..Visit my card site at Mike D's Baseball Card Page.
Comment
-
Originally posted by EvanAparraWhat about Fisk, I thought he retired a White Sox?"Anything less would not have been worthy of me. Anything more would not have been possible." - Carl Yastrzemski
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mike D.Interesting...I wasn't aware of that. Do you know of anyone off-hand who did it? I know there used to be a lot of "player/coach" types back in the old days.
Comment
-
In defense of what my Yankees do, even though I do not think Mattingly nor Munson will make the hall their contributions to the team are significant, so their numbers deserve to be retired just like Jim Rice's and David Ortiz's when he retires (that's me saying I don't think Ortiz will make the hall (not that he doesn't desereve it)...too tough for a DH)"he probably used some performance enhancing drugs so he could do a better job on his report...i hear they make you gain weight" - Dr. Zizmor
"I thought it was interesting and yes a conversation piece. Next time I post a similar story I will close with the question "So, do you think either of them have used steroids?" so that I can make the topic truly relevant to discussions about today's game." - Eric Davis
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqul1GyK7-g
Comment
-
Originally posted by Johnny EversChris makes a good point. I think this should come down to the question "was this guy a Red Sox hero?" Williams was, Yaz was, and Ortiz is right now.
Gar! Why should a Yankee fan get credit for something I said back in post #3?! :grouchy
Just kidding. A player's contributions to a particular team should definitely be taken into consideration."Anything less would not have been worthy of me. Anything more would not have been possible." - Carl Yastrzemski
Comment
-
The way I like to think about the retired numbers is to make it completely unnavailable to anyone and only when someone is so deserving that you can't ignore it do you consider the possibility of retiring it.
Roger Clemens' number will one day be retired in Fenway.
Rules or no rules, they'll find a way. Wether it means giving him a front office job or do what they did with Jeff Nelson with the yankees (a minor league contract so he could retire a yankee) or if they actually pull a miracle and sign him for this year. I don't think they need to change the rules to get him in.
Comment
Ad Widget
Collapse
Comment