through 2008. Seems well deserved to me.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Francona gets contract extension
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
Originally posted by KCGHOSTManagers with horses get extensions. Managers without horses get to take extended walks off short piers.Visit my card site at Mike D's Baseball Card Page.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DoubleXGood for him. I would have thought that after the WS Win, he would have been extended indefinitely right there and then.
Franconia was one of the lowest paid managers, and this new deal remedies that, which I think is more than fair.Visit my card site at Mike D's Baseball Card Page.
Comment
-
I like Francona (and think he is a likeable guy), but I'm not sure I'm buying that he had a whole lot to do with 2004's outcome."Anything less would not have been worthy of me. Anything more would not have been possible." - Carl Yastrzemski
Comment
-
Originally posted by KCGHOSTManagers with horses get extensions. Managers without horses get to take extended walks off short piers.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SoxSonI like Francona (and think he is a likeable guy), but I'm not sure I'm buying that he had a whole lot to do with 2004's outcome.
He worked well with the talent he was given in the system he had.
They had a good regular season team that was able to fight out of a tough spot in 2004 playoffs to win the WS.Visit my card site at Mike D's Baseball Card Page.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mike D.Well, unlike Grady Little in 2003, he at least didn't screw it up. Once a team's in the playoffs, that's about all you can ask of your manager.
He worked well with the talent he was given in the system he had.
They had a good regular season team that was able to fight out of a tough spot in 2004 playoffs to win the WS.
Francona was fine by comparison."Anything less would not have been worthy of me. Anything more would not have been possible." - Carl Yastrzemski
Comment
-
I like Francona, I think he handles the team and Boston well and deserves an extension.
In his first two seasons he's averaged 96.5 wins per season, I'll just say 96. If he keeps that up (and assuming he finishes his contract, not a likely proposition in Boston) he'll have a total of 481 wins as Red Sox manager. That would put him 4th all time on the Wins list for Sox managers, ahead of Jimmy Collins and 8 behind Bill Carrigan for third. But, that would mean he managed for 5 years and only 5 managers have lasted that long in the entirety of Red Sox history.
Not a prediction or anything, just felt like throwing that up there."As I grew up, I knew that as a building (Fenway Park) was on the level of Mount Olympus, the Pyramid at Giza, the nation's capitol, the czar's Winter Palace, and the Louvre — except, of course, that is better than all those inconsequential places." - Bart Giamatti
You go through The Sporting News of the last 100 years and you will find two things are always true. You never have enough pitchers, and nobody ever made money.
-Don Fehr
Comment
-
Originally posted by SoxSonI like Francona (and think he is a likeable guy), but I'm not sure I'm buying that he had a whole lot to do with 2004's outcome.
Comment
-
It's good that the team extended his contract because if he is anything like his predecessors he possibly would have been gone after this year. Seriously.
Over the last 60 years the other guys on the Red Sox have brought the team a pennant or an ALCS championship and were gone within a few years. Come to think of it, this year is the average year for departure for managers who have gone to the World Series with the Red Sox- the last four guys left the team the during the second year or less after appearing in the series. Even the guys who made it to the ALCS or even the playoffs didn't last too long, the same thing happened to them.
I'm not saying that his departure was imminant, just saying that there is a trend there regarding prior managers who had success like him.Last edited by efin98; 03-14-2006, 09:25 PM.Best posts ever:
Originally posted by nymdanToo... much... math... head... hurts...Originally posted by RuthMayBondI understand, I lost all my marbles years ago
Comment
-
Originally posted by DoubleXI'm inclined to agree with that. Kind of right place at the right time kind of thing, but nothing will change the fact that he was at the helm when the curse was broken.Best posts ever:
Originally posted by nymdanToo... much... math... head... hurts...Originally posted by RuthMayBondI understand, I lost all my marbles years ago
Comment
-
Originally posted by efin98"playing with another guy's players" comes to mind there. I think of it kind of like the 1996 New York Yankees- Buck Schowalter's players, Joe Torre's victory. Everything after that though is his team, just as last year and this year is Terry's team.
I do see a lot of Sox games, but not enough to make a very good judgment of Francona. But from what I have seen, he does seem kind of passive as a manager, just kind of letting the pieces do their thing. I don't know though. What do Sox fans think of his in-game managing ability?
Comment
Ad Widget
Collapse
Comment