Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

GM for a Day - My Offseason Checklist

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GM for a Day - My Offseason Checklist

    As the regular season wraps up, I've started thinking about what moves I would make (or try) in the off season:

    Catcher - Two year deal for Tek, looking to trade with Texas for Salt, Teagarden or Ramirez as his backup and heir apparent. A 60/40 split in '09, 40/60 in '10, with Exposito sliding in as the backup in '11.

    Lock up Bay and Papelbon - look to do the same for Pedroia and Lester the following off season.

    Find a new home for Lugo - my first thought is STL, paying most of salary, seeking either McCellelan or Motte in return. I re-ink Cora to a one year deal to backup Lowrie.

    Make a run at Blake - The key will be whether another team offers him a pricey contract as a starter. If not and he can be had a decent price, he would be a great fit backing up Lowell, Youk and each corner outfield spot.

    Consider a run at CC - I salivate at the thought of adding him to the rotation. The payroll should support it but he'll most likely get a huge Santana like deal that would put him out of my price range.

    My '09 roster:

    Starters: Ellsbury, Pedroia, Ortiz, Youkilis, Drew, Bay, Lowell, Varitek, Lowrie
    Bench: TX Catcher, Carter?, Blake, Cora, Crisp (if not traded)
    Rotation: Beckett, Matsuzaka, Lester, Buc, Wakefield
    Bullpen: Papelbon, Ohkajima, Masterson, MDC, Lopez, McCellelan/Motte

  • #2
    i would like to try and move Drew as well...i love what he did this year, but i think his back is just not going to hold up. I would like to get a right handed masher or maybe try and get Milton Bradley. I know he has some baggage but damn, that guy can play baseball and hit with anyone in the league.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by mg050369 View Post
      As the regular season wraps up, I've started thinking about what moves I would make (or try) in the off season:

      Catcher - Two year deal for Tek, looking to trade with Texas for Salt, Teagarden or Ramirez as his backup and heir apparent. A 60/40 split in '09, 40/60 in '10, with Exposito sliding in as the backup in '11.

      Lock up Bay and Papelbon - look to do the same for Pedroia and Lester the following off season.

      Find a new home for Lugo - my first thought is STL, paying most of salary, seeking either McCellelan or Motte in return. I re-ink Cora to a one year deal to backup Lowrie.

      Make a run at Blake - The key will be whether another team offers him a pricey contract as a starter. If not and he can be had a decent price, he would be a great fit backing up Lowell, Youk and each corner outfield spot.

      Consider a run at CC - I salivate at the thought of adding him to the rotation. The payroll should support it but he'll most likely get a huge Santana like deal that would put him out of my price range.

      My '09 roster:

      Starters: Ellsbury, Pedroia, Ortiz, Youkilis, Drew, Bay, Lowell, Varitek, Lowrie
      Bench: TX Catcher, Carter?, Blake, Cora, Crisp (if not traded)
      Rotation: Beckett, Matsuzaka, Lester, Buc, Wakefield
      Bullpen: Papelbon, Ohkajima, Masterson, MDC, Lopez, McCellelan/Motte
      MG050369, that line up won't hit enough to beat Tampa's. Toronto's and even the Yankees ( after some off season FA signing) pitching in 2009.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Boston Boxer View Post
        i would like to try and move Drew as well...i love what he did this year, but i think his back is just not going to hold up. I would like to get a right handed masher or maybe try and get Milton Bradley. I know he has some baggage but damn, that guy can play baseball and hit with anyone in the league.
        So, we'd replace injury-prone JD Drew with injury-prone Bradley...and get to deal with is attitude, to boot? No thanks! No Carl Everett redux, please!
        Visit my card site at Mike D's Baseball Card Page.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by mg050369 View Post
          Catcher - Two year deal for Tek, looking to trade with Texas for Salt, Teagarden or Ramirez as his backup and heir apparent. A 60/40 split in '09, 40/60 in '10, with Exposito sliding in as the backup in '11.
          So, would the Texas catcher be the heir to Varitek, or would it be Exposito?

          Rotation: Beckett, Matsuzaka, Lester, Buc, Wakefield
          Bullpen: Papelbon, Ohkajima, Masterson, MDC, Lopez, McCellelan/Motte
          You have Masterson in the pen. Do you see that as his future, or do you see him as a starter long term?
          Visit my card site at Mike D's Baseball Card Page.

          Comment


          • #6
            Because of smart drafting and overall good management, the Sox don't need to do anything crazy this off-season. They have a lot of money coming off the books (Manny, Schilling, Tek, etc), but I don't see them going after a big name free agent.

            The catcher situation will need to be figured out...whether to keep Tek around and for how long and how much. I expect we'll see him back...I'm interested to see what he is looking for as far as years and dollars go. If you can get a young catcher who could be his backup/student/eventual replacement, I say go for it...or if they think Exposito is the guy in a couple of years, they could get by with some combination of Varitek/Brown/Kottaras. That group wouldn't be a strength on the team, but they'd be OK.

            After that, it's about finding bench guys and a few more bullpen options. With Drew's health up in the air, I try to find a 4th outfielder with some pop and a good enough arm to play right. With Ellsbury and Drew both being lefties, a right handed bat makes the most sense. I'd take Casey and Cora back if the terms were reasonable. Both were solid enough and good clubhouse guys.

            I wouldn't spend big on bullpen help (either in dollars or in a trade), but adding some depth couldn't hurt. At some point during the season, guys like Bowden, Bard, and maybe Hunter Jones should be able to help similarly to how Masterson has this year.

            Looking at the system, there isn't much for high level prospects at 3b. There are some guys lower in the system (Middlebrooks, Almanzar), but nobody ready soon. With Lowell getting towards the end of his contract, they need a plan there. The plan might well be to lock up Youk and move him to 3b when and if Lars Anderson stakes his claim to 1b.

            If they're happy with Lowrie as their starting shortstop (at least until he's challenged by some of the guys in the system), they should dump Lugo unceremoniously. Either pay the whole contract and get something decent in return (like in the Renteria deal) or just dump him for a bag of BP balls or a minor league scrub while picking up only a smaller portion of his salary.

            Crisp has really helped his trade value, especially of late. If they are convinced Ellsbury is ready to play CF every day, and they go in the direction of a 4th OF with more pop, they should try to move Crisp. Get what you can for him in term of prospects, and wish him well.

            All in all, nothing huge required this off-season...just keep to the plan, keep moving guys up the system, and fill in holes as required.
            Visit my card site at Mike D's Baseball Card Page.

            Comment


            • #7
              Let Casey walk, promote Carter or Bailey
              Let Varitek and Cash walk, promote Kottaras and Brown
              Put the moves on C. C. Sabathia and A. J. Burnett.
              Spend the rest of the offseason exploring various relief options to replace Timlin.

              There. Offseason done.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by scaffolds View Post
                MG050369, that line up won't hit enough to beat Tampa's. Toronto's and even the Yankees ( after some off season FA signing) pitching in 2009.
                Perhaps, but they are 2nd in the AL, 3rd in the Majors in runs scored this year. Time and upcoming opposing rotations will tell whether they see a significant drop in their '09 offensive numbers.

                I believe the challenge is finding suitable offensive upgrades. Looking at possible spots:

                Varitek - the greatest opportunity, however, depending on the alternatives, you could see a defensive downgrade.

                Lugo - You could sign Furcal but that could be a pricey endeavor. Barring a sophomore slump, I believe Lowrie can provide an upgrade.

                Lowell - 1st year of a 3 year deal, he's not going anywhere in '09.

                Ellsbury - I would hope in his 2nd full season, his numbers would improve. Barring a trade for another CF, I don't know if there is a significant FA upgrade out there.

                Drew - You could look at someone like Burrell or Dunn (moving Bay to RF) but I'm not sure there would be a lot of team lining up get Drew at $14M/year.

                I do, however, welcome feedback on realistic scenarios (trade or FA) that could provide significant offensive upgrades.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I agree with mg050369 in the fact that there aren't a lot of obvious upgradable positions for the Sox in '09.

                  While losing Manny takes some of the thunder out of the middle of the lineup, the emergence of Youk and Pedroia as offensive forces has really made the lineup more balanced. With a healthy Lowell and Drew (hopefully), it's a pretty solid lineup. Especially if Lowrie and Ellsbury can continue to improve.

                  Varitek is a weak hitter at this point, but there really isn't much out there for an offensive upgrade at the catching position.

                  One thing I love about the lineup is the amount of home-grown talent there. By my count, four of the nine starting spots will be home grown next year (Youk, Ellsbury, Lowrie, Pedroia) with a 5th (Tek) being a guy the Sox traded for as a minor leaguer. Lowell and Bay came in trades, leaving just two guys who came as FA's (Ortiz and Drew), and Ortiz originally came to the Sox as a very low-cost FA after being non-tendered.

                  The pitching staff is also very heavy on the home grown talent, with only Dice-K and Okajima coming via FA (unless you count Wakefield, who was another low cost pickup after being DFA). Beckett and Lopez were trades, and everyone else is home grown.

                  To a fan who grew up a Red Sox fan during the FA era, that marks a HUGE departure from the way things used to be done.
                  Visit my card site at Mike D's Baseball Card Page.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by scaffolds View Post
                    MG050369, that line up won't hit enough to beat Tampa's. Toronto's and even the Yankees ( after some off season FA signing) pitching in 2009.
                    Scaffolds, are you aware of what's happening in Toronto? Marcum likely done already for next season. A.J. Burnett is likely gone. Not sure on the situation regarding Dustin McGowan. In short, Toronto, which use to be 5 deep, will likely only have Halladay and Litsch returning next season. While Purcey been impressive, the Blue Jays are going to be downgrading their rotation next season. I'm not sure what type of moves they'll be making this winter, if they don't make many moves, I just don't see the Jays as a threat.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Imgran View Post
                      Let Casey walk, promote Carter or Bailey
                      Let Varitek and Cash walk, promote Kottaras and Brown
                      Put the moves on C. C. Sabathia and A. J. Burnett.
                      Spend the rest of the offseason exploring various relief options to replace Timlin.

                      There. Offseason done.
                      Red Sox will not put their trust in two rookies at the catching position. Why would you even suggest that? Because you like Kottaras and Brown, despite not having much of a MLB ceiling for success. Seems you over-rating them. I'm not oppose to the other suggestions. As Carter and Bailey won't be terrible bench options.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        The nice thing about Bailey and Carter are that this year they both saw substantial time in the OF in Pawtucket. Calling either even "average" in LF is probably being generous, but it would give the team a little just a tiny bit more versatility over say, a backup who can play only 1b.
                        Visit my card site at Mike D's Baseball Card Page.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I don't see Jason BAy long-term in Boston. He is good yeah, but not very good. I think the Red Sox will make a run at Matt Holliday. Jason Bay plus Clay Bucholz. This should do it. I love Clay Bucholz, and I think he will be a great player. Maybe the RedSox will also sign Jason Bay and give up nobody.

                          But I expect the RedSox do something this Winter. They will put the price up for CC of course and yeah they could also need him.

                          -1 year-deal for Varitek

                          -Get a good young backup cathcer in a trade, maybe also call-up wagner, exposito or Kottaras.

                          -Get massiv Bullpenhelp

                          -get a front-line starter and we are unbeatable if healthy.
                          I know you're watching, Si. Bu.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by SwissRedSoxFan View Post
                            I don't see Jason BAy long-term in Boston. He is good yeah, but not very good. I think the Red Sox will make a run at Matt Holliday. Jason Bay plus Clay Bucholz. This should do it. I love Clay Bucholz, and I think he will be a great player. Maybe the RedSox will also sign Jason Bay and give up nobody.
                            That seems like an aweful lot to give up for a guy who will be a FA at the end of the year, and who is going to demand huge money despite a track record that doesn't show just how good he'll be away from Coors field.

                            I think Bay is the Sox LF for 2009, no doubt. Beyond that, who knows. If they want Holliday, they can always go after him in the FA market after the 2009 season.
                            Visit my card site at Mike D's Baseball Card Page.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by mg050369 View Post
                              Perhaps, but they are 2nd in the AL, 3rd in the Majors in runs scored this year. Time and upcoming opposing rotations will tell whether they see a significant drop in their '09 offensive numbers.

                              I believe the challenge is finding suitable offensive upgrades. Looking at possible spots:

                              Varitek - the greatest opportunity, however, depending on the alternatives, you could see a defensive downgrade.

                              Lugo - You could sign Furcal but that could be a pricey endeavor. Barring a sophomore slump, I believe Lowrie can provide an upgrade.

                              Lowell - 1st year of a 3 year deal, he's not going anywhere in '09.

                              Ellsbury - I would hope in his 2nd full season, his numbers would improve. Barring a trade for another CF, I don't know if there is a significant FA upgrade out there.

                              Drew - You could look at someone like Burrell or Dunn (moving Bay to RF) but I'm not sure there would be a lot of team lining up get Drew at $14M/year.

                              I do, however, welcome feedback on realistic scenarios (trade or FA) that could provide significant offensive upgrades.

                              the Sox hitting numbers are miss leading they have been put up in circumstances like gainst Texas, Baltimore or the likes and Sox's hitting hasn't been consistent. The Red Sox has made many very average pitchers look like Hall of famers. part of the problem it has been talent, the team has been very inconsistent (hitting) with runners in scoring position We all know about Tek's hitting issues, Drew had about six weeks that he was hot, but not much the rest of the time, some it was health related, but not the rest of the time, in addition we all know about Crisp and Ellsbury ups and downs, this team doesn't have a clean up hitter, Youkilis has had a very good year but he isn't a clean up hitter. The other problem is the manager and the hitting coach. Francona doesn't know have to use the bench and pinch hitting is foreign to him, in addition he doesn't use the speed of the team enough, he needs to hit and run and no play so much for the 3 run home run. David Magadan is the wrong hitting coach and not a big league hitting coach, this is a man that was fired by the Padres for not doing his job only to be hired by his friend (Francona) as long as Magadan is the hitting coach there are going to be some hitting problems.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X