Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Red Sox offseason 2011-2012

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Boston Boxer View Post
    I dont know Swiss, but he was an AWESOME college starter. Guess that would mean Paps is back and Aceves would fill Bards roll????? interesting
    Thats what I heard, yes. If they can resign Papelbon, they want to make Bard a starter. Like Ogando or CJ Wilson. Would be awesome if this would work!
    I know you're watching, Si. Bu.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Mike D. View Post
      NY has an option for 2012 for him. Did they announce they're not picking it up?
      I would have brought him up but as Mike says the Yankees have an option and if they haven't picked it up yet they most definitely will. Case closed.
      Watching Derek Jeter make 40 defensive plays and then watching Adam Everett make 40 defensive plays at the same position is sort of like watching video of Barbara Bush dancing at the White House, and then watching Demi Moore dancing in Striptease. (Bill James)

      Dustin Pedroia doesn't have the strength or bat speed to hit major-league pitching consistently, and he has no power. If he can continue to hit .260 or so, he'll be useful, and he probably has a future as a backup infielder. (Keith Law)

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Boston Boxer View Post
        I dont know Swiss, but he was an AWESOME college starter. Guess that would mean Paps is back and Aceves would fill Bards roll????? interesting
        Not necessarily Paps but someone who can close. As far as Bard as a starter, I have very mixed feelings. His track record as Starter since college is disappointing while he seemed to have thrived almost immediately when put in the pen. On the other hand he increasingly throws his change and slider (and gets alot of swings and misses), which shows increased development in these secondary offerings. I might be very wrong here, but I'm not very comfortable with the idea of Bard as a SP. Of course if I am wrong and he is successfully turned into a SP, that would be awesome!
        Watching Derek Jeter make 40 defensive plays and then watching Adam Everett make 40 defensive plays at the same position is sort of like watching video of Barbara Bush dancing at the White House, and then watching Demi Moore dancing in Striptease. (Bill James)

        Dustin Pedroia doesn't have the strength or bat speed to hit major-league pitching consistently, and he has no power. If he can continue to hit .260 or so, he'll be useful, and he probably has a future as a backup infielder. (Keith Law)

        Comment


        • In this offseason it is much easier to find a closer than a SP. Bard has matured in a great way since becoming a reliever. He is 26 and it's at least worth a shot. It becomes a problem when the Red Sox rely on him becoming a successful starter in 2012. Would be cool to pass on signing former reliever turned SP CJW and simply do the same thing with one of our guys. I must say, that I cannot remember Bard pitching from the wind-up...
          I know you're watching, Si. Bu.

          Comment


          • Crawford has never played RF in the majors and only 54 games in his whole career in CF. I don't think he has a RF arm either. If you thought he was messed up this year trying to live up to that contract, imagine if he has to go into the 2012 season worrying about playing a completely new position. Your better option is Reddick or go after a FA RF instead IMO.

            http://www.baseball-reference.com/pl...02-field.shtml
            Please visit http://sportsfeedia.com/ for the latest RSS feed updates on all your favorite sports and teams (my son created it and is the owner )

            Comment


            • Originally posted by SwissRedSoxFan View Post
              Thats what I heard, yes. If they can resign Papelbon, they want to make Bard a starter. Like Ogando or CJ Wilson. Would be awesome if this would work!
              The talk of Bard being switched to a starter has been going on for a while. The issue that he has had as a starter was that with mechanics, couldn't maintain the same mechanics as a starter, could he do it now? perhaps.
              Last edited by scaffolds; 10-08-2011, 06:36 AM.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by scaffolds View Post
                The talk of Bard being switched to a starter has been going on for a while. I have mix opinion about it.
                As I said above, I have mixed feelings about Bard as a starter as well. Here's what I'm worried about. His secondary offerings have improved greatly and he threw them more and in fastball counts this season. But are they good enough to consistently get swings and misses over 7 innings. Also, while his fastball is filthy if in the upper 90's, it becomes rather hittable when in the lower to mid 90's. So, the question is can he hold up his fastball velo over 7 innings?

                We also talked a lot about Bard having become tired over the final month (just like everybody else on that team), so color me a little worried when his workload goes from 70 IP to 200 IP. It's something the Sox should discuss internally, but again, I'm not really comfortable with the idea of turning him into a starter.
                Watching Derek Jeter make 40 defensive plays and then watching Adam Everett make 40 defensive plays at the same position is sort of like watching video of Barbara Bush dancing at the White House, and then watching Demi Moore dancing in Striptease. (Bill James)

                Dustin Pedroia doesn't have the strength or bat speed to hit major-league pitching consistently, and he has no power. If he can continue to hit .260 or so, he'll be useful, and he probably has a future as a backup infielder. (Keith Law)

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Therwil Flyer View Post
                  when his workload goes from 70 IP to 200 IP.
                  That's actually something else to add to the equation. If Bard does become a starter, there's no way he'd be allowed to throw anywhere close to 200 innings. He'd either be on pitch counts, get skipped periodically, or go on the DL a couple of times to rest him.

                  Not saying they shouldn't make the move if they think it'd work out, but you need to plan extra pitching depth to cover those innings that Bard can't throw. Maybe that means using Aceves as a swingman more this year (taking an occassional start for Bard, and maybe even piggybacking on him if Bard goes 4-5 per start. Since Aceves was key in the late innings last year, that means adding ANOTHER solid arm to the pen (in addition to the one you need to replace because Bard is now in the rotation).
                  Visit my card site at Mike D's Baseball Card Page.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by scaffolds View Post
                    The talk of Bard being switched to a starter has been going on for a while. The issue that he has had as a starter was that with mechanics, couldn't maintain the same mechanics as a starter, could he do it now? perhaps.
                    Yes. The biggest issue would be throwing from the wind-up and having a respectable BB/9. Throwing 150 innings instead of 70 wouldnt if he builds up endurance and throws just every fifth day. Maybe he practiced his wind-up already during the season, which is why the Red Sox believe he could start again. I don't know. If they try it they should be pretty optimistic about it, because it also dictates what they do in free agency.
                    Last edited by SwissRedSoxFan; 10-09-2011, 03:43 AM.
                    I know you're watching, Si. Bu.

                    Comment


                    • I agree that he would need to build up endurance. however it is not as extreme as it sounds.

                      throwing 70 as a reliever is much harder than throwing 100 as a starter mainly because you have less rest and maybe also a little due to having less preparation time.


                      So he needs more stamina as a starter but it's not that you need 3 times as much endurance to throw 240 than you need for 70 in relief. I guess throwing 200 IP for mike marshall in relief was much more stressfull for his body than it was for nolan ryan to throw 300. you can't compare starters and relievers innings directly very good.
                      I now have my own non commercial blog about training for batspeed and power using my training experience in baseball and track and field.

                      Comment


                      • C'mon, fellas, all this talk of making Bard a starter is a knee-jerk reaction to how the season ended. I'll still take Beckett, Lester, and Buchholz over CC, Nova, and Burnett any day of the week and twice on Sunday. If Lackey was pitching half-way decently it would be a non-issue.

                        Comment


                        • it is not knee jerk by us...Swiss heard a report that the front office has been talking about it. I do agree that is Beckett, Lester pitch to thier abilities, and if Buch had not been hurt, it would have been a different season. Getting anything out of Lackey is a plus. I would like to give the rotation on more year to see what they can do befroe freaking out. I would like the rotation to be Beckett, Lester, Buchholz, Lackey, and ???.

                          you can be sure thet the Yankees will address the rotation and spend on a front end starter. BTW, did you see CC Sabathia's last start...he looks way fat. He was always a big boy and can still throw the ball well, but he is down right obese. I see an injury in his near future.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by 9&10 View Post
                            C'mon, fellas, all this talk of making Bard a starter is a knee-jerk reaction to how the season ended. I'll still take Beckett, Lester, and Buchholz over CC, Nova, and Burnett any day of the week and twice on Sunday. If Lackey was pitching half-way decently it would be a non-issue.
                            Although it seems everybody in the beloved Boston media is calling for stupid knee-jerk reactions, I believe that if the front office is indeed discussing moving Bard to the rotation has nothing to do with how the season ended and everything to do with a reestablished trust in his secondary offerings (changeup and slider).
                            Last edited by Therwil Flyer; 10-10-2011, 11:07 AM.
                            Watching Derek Jeter make 40 defensive plays and then watching Adam Everett make 40 defensive plays at the same position is sort of like watching video of Barbara Bush dancing at the White House, and then watching Demi Moore dancing in Striptease. (Bill James)

                            Dustin Pedroia doesn't have the strength or bat speed to hit major-league pitching consistently, and he has no power. If he can continue to hit .260 or so, he'll be useful, and he probably has a future as a backup infielder. (Keith Law)

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by 9&10 View Post
                              Yikes, I wouldn't touch him with a 39-and-a-half-foot pole. He's tops on my list of Yankee players I hate, and that's saying a LOT with the likes of ARod and TRod on the team!

                              (regarding Swisher)
                              Interesting. Swish is one of the few Yankees players I do not hate.
                              Watching Derek Jeter make 40 defensive plays and then watching Adam Everett make 40 defensive plays at the same position is sort of like watching video of Barbara Bush dancing at the White House, and then watching Demi Moore dancing in Striptease. (Bill James)

                              Dustin Pedroia doesn't have the strength or bat speed to hit major-league pitching consistently, and he has no power. If he can continue to hit .260 or so, he'll be useful, and he probably has a future as a backup infielder. (Keith Law)

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Therwil Flyer View Post
                                Interesting. Swish is one of the few Yankees players I do not hate.
                                For whatever reason, the Yankee Fans of this board want him to leave, because he doesn't hit good pitching...

                                I still would love a Reddick/Kalish/Brentz solution in the next 1-7 years. I think one of them can provide us something like .270/.340/15HR with above average defense for little money. And as a GM of that expensive Red Sox roster, I would take it, even if they all are left-handed.
                                I know you're watching, Si. Bu.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X