Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Boston Red Sox offseason thread

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by SDL View Post
    Well we HAD LaRoche briefly in 2009.....
    We need Napoli. LaRoche is not a fit, for different reasons.
    I know you're watching, Si. Bu.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by SwissRedSoxFan View Post
      We need Napoli. LaRoche is not a fit, for different reasons.
      Those reasons being...

      Comment


      • Originally posted by filihok View Post
        Those reasons being...
        Age and pushing for three years, draft pick compensation, lefthanded, one position only.

        Thought this was obvious.
        I know you're watching, Si. Bu.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by SwissRedSoxFan View Post
          Age and pushing for three years, draft pick compensation, lefthanded, one position only.

          Thought this was obvious.
          Lots of things seem obvious, but hardly anyone knows them. Better to be safe.

          Comment


          • Sox watched Bobby Abreu take grouders at 1b today...the off season gets stranger and stranger each day. Maybe he can come off the bench...

            i wonder if the Sox will offer him 3/$39 lol

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Boston Boxer View Post
              Sox watched Bobby Abreu take grouders at 1b today...the off season gets stranger and stranger each day.
              My first thought on hearing they worked out Abreu at 1st was that it was nuts. Abreu will be 39 in March and doesn’t appear to have much left, plus he’s never played 1st base.

              This could just be a negotiation tactic to get Napoli to sign, but it could also be that the Red Sox are concerned about Napoli’s health. If Napoli’s hip (the assumed health issue) is bad and he has stretch to dig out throws from Middlebrooks and Drew, it could put a strain on the hip causing further health issues, as would squatting in the catchers position.

              Though he didn’t hit for much power, looking at Abreu’s 2012 stats, he did have a pretty good OBP at .350 which would rank 6th amongst all MLB 1st basemen in 2012, however he accomplished this in only 257 PA’s which doesn’t really qualify.

              So if the Sox FO really isn’t willing to give up a draft pick and the slot money that goes with it for LaRoche, perhaps looking at Abreu to play 1st could be outside the box thinking out of concern for Napoli’s health.

              They could platoon Abreu who had an OBP of .353 against RHP with Gomez. And if Bill James projection for Gomez in 2013 is close to accurate where he projects BA .280 OBP .335 SLG .469 WOBA .348 maybe it has a chance to work. But I definitely wouldn’t be too thrilled about an Abreu/Gomez platoon.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Dogdaze View Post
                My first thought on hearing they worked out Abreu at 1st was that it was nuts. Abreu will be 39 in March and doesn’t appear to have much left, plus he’s never played 1st base.

                This could just be a negotiation tactic to get Napoli to sign, but it could also be that the Red Sox are concerned about Napoli’s health. If Napoli’s hip (the assumed health issue) is bad and he has stretch to dig out throws from Middlebrooks and Drew, it could put a strain on the hip causing further health issues, as would squatting in the catchers position.

                Though he didn’t hit for much power, looking at Abreu’s 2012 stats, he did have a pretty good OBP at .350 which would rank 6th amongst all MLB 1st basemen in 2012, however he accomplished this in only 257 PA’s which doesn’t really qualify.

                So if the Sox FO really isn’t willing to give up a draft pick and the slot money that goes with it for LaRoche, perhaps looking at Abreu to play 1st could be outside the box thinking out of concern for Napoli’s health.

                They could platoon Abreu who had an OBP of .353 against RHP with Gomez. And if Bill James projection for Gomez in 2013 is close to accurate where he projects BA .280 OBP .335 SLG .469 WOBA .348 maybe it has a chance to work. But I definitely wouldn’t be too thrilled about an Abreu/Gomez platoon.
                I think people read way too much into this Bobby Abreu thing. Currently Mauro Gomez is the only 1B above AA under contract. Abreu could provide some depth. That's all.
                Last edited by Therwil Flyer; 01-01-2013, 12:37 PM.
                Watching Derek Jeter make 40 defensive plays and then watching Adam Everett make 40 defensive plays at the same position is sort of like watching video of Barbara Bush dancing at the White House, and then watching Demi Moore dancing in Striptease. (Bill James)

                Dustin Pedroia doesn't have the strength or bat speed to hit major-league pitching consistently, and he has no power. If he can continue to hit .260 or so, he'll be useful, and he probably has a future as a backup infielder. (Keith Law)

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Therwil Flyer View Post
                  I think people read way too much into this Bobby Abreu thing. Currently Mauro Gomez is the only 1B above AA under contract. Abreu could provide some depth. That's all.
                  he has never played 1b in his life as far as i know. Maybe they just happened to be in town and took a look at him...I dont think he adds anything to this sox team. I assume that Napoli will sign for 2 years. I also think they need a back up to Napoli especially if he has a bad hip.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by filihok View Post
                    I don't see how Hanrahan is definitively better than Melancon.
                    Bill James projections for 2013:
                    Hanrahan: 57 IP, 9.16 K/9, 4.11 BB/9, 3.63 ERA, 3.61 FIP
                    Melancon: 57 IP, 8.53 K/9, 2.68 BB/9, 3.47 ERA, 3.33 FIP

                    Holt looks ok.
                    As I follow the Dodgers closely, I'm familiar with DeJesus and Sands. Neither are likely MLB starters but DeJesus can hit some (a leg injury wrecked his defense and speed) and Sands could be 4th/5th OFer.
                    Melancon's 2012 projected stats:

                    3-5, 75 IP, 31 BB, 71 SO, 3.84 ERA, 13 saves

                    Comment


                    • someone wake me when ST starts.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Boston Boxer View Post
                        someone wake me when ST starts.
                        This.

                        You know the offseason is going slow when you read about Javier Vazquez hitting 93 on a a skewed radar gun at some field in puerto rico...
                        Watching Derek Jeter make 40 defensive plays and then watching Adam Everett make 40 defensive plays at the same position is sort of like watching video of Barbara Bush dancing at the White House, and then watching Demi Moore dancing in Striptease. (Bill James)

                        Dustin Pedroia doesn't have the strength or bat speed to hit major-league pitching consistently, and he has no power. If he can continue to hit .260 or so, he'll be useful, and he probably has a future as a backup infielder. (Keith Law)

                        Comment


                        • looks like the Sox are offering a 1 year deal to Napoli??? time to move on boys

                          Comment


                          • http://www.boston.com/sports/basebal...d_sox_num.html

                            Jose Iglesias: 10 (was 58)
                            Will Middlebrooks: 16 (was 64)
                            Ryan Lavarnway 20 (was 60)
                            Pedro Ciriaco: 23 (was 77)
                            Daniel Nava: 29 (was 66)
                            Felix Doubront 35 (was 61)
                            Junichi Tazawa: 36 (was 63)

                            As for the new veteran players:

                            David Ross: 3 (formerly Mike Aviles)
                            Jonny Gomes: 5 (formerly Nick Punto)
                            Stephen Drew: 7 (formerly Cody Ross)
                            Shane Victorino: 18 (formerly Daisuke Matsuzaka)
                            Koji Uehara: 19 (formerly Josh Beckett)
                            Brock Holt: 26 (formerly Scott Podsednik)
                            Ryan Dempster: 46 (formerly Franklin Morales, now 56)
                            Joel Hanrahan: 52

                            Dempster has worn 46 for much of his career. Bet there's a story behind that. Hanrahan had 52 with the Pirates.

                            (No, 26 is not retired by the Red Sox. That seems like a crime.)

                            New manager John Farrell has 53. Here are his coaches:

                            Brian Butterfield: 13
                            Torey Lovullo: 22
                            Greg Colbrunn: 28
                            Arnie Beyeler: 43
                            Juan Nieves: 47
                            Gary Tuck: 57
                            Victor Rodriguez: 58

                            Colbrunn had 28 for much of the time he played in the majors. Adrian Gonzalez had it last year. Lovullo never had 22 in the majors.
                            "No matter how great you were once upon a time — the years go by, and men forget,” - W. A. Phelon in Baseball Magazine in 1915. “Ross Barnes, forty years ago, was as great as Cobb or Wagner ever dared to be. Had scores been kept then as now, he would have seemed incomparably marvelous.”

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by bluesky5 View Post
                              http://www.boston.com/sports/basebal...d_sox_num.html

                              Jose Iglesias: 10 (was 58)
                              Will Middlebrooks: 16 (was 64)
                              Ryan Lavarnway 20 (was 60)
                              Pedro Ciriaco: 23 (was 77)
                              Daniel Nava: 29 (was 66)
                              Felix Doubront 35 (was 61)
                              Junichi Tazawa: 36 (was 63)

                              As for the new veteran players:

                              David Ross: 3 (formerly Mike Aviles)
                              Jonny Gomes: 5 (formerly Nick Punto)
                              Stephen Drew: 7 (formerly Cody Ross)
                              Shane Victorino: 18 (formerly Daisuke Matsuzaka)
                              Koji Uehara: 19 (formerly Josh Beckett)
                              Brock Holt: 26 (formerly Scott Podsednik)
                              Ryan Dempster: 46 (formerly Franklin Morales, now 56)
                              Joel Hanrahan: 52

                              Dempster has worn 46 for much of his career. Bet there's a story behind that. Hanrahan had 52 with the Pirates.

                              (No, 26 is not retired by the Red Sox. That seems like a crime.)

                              New manager John Farrell has 53. Here are his coaches:

                              Brian Butterfield: 13
                              Torey Lovullo: 22
                              Greg Colbrunn: 28
                              Arnie Beyeler: 43
                              Juan Nieves: 47
                              Gary Tuck: 57
                              Victor Rodriguez: 58

                              Colbrunn had 28 for much of the time he played in the majors. Adrian Gonzalez had it last year. Lovullo never had 22 in the majors.

                              The instant Boggs went to NY, he lost the right to have #26 retired as far as I am concerned. Good for the Sox for not retiring it. If he had gone to the Rays at the end of his career from us, then I would say retire #26. Also. give out #21. To hell with Clemens. If #21 is retired, I'd consider it a tribute to Ray Culp who never complained and who never threw his teammates under a bus.

                              If anything, the Sox need to retire #3 for Jimmie Foxx, #7 for Dom DiMaggio and #43 for the Eck. He pitched 5 1/2 seasons for us and was technically employed by the Sawx when he was elected to the HOF (as was Fisk when he was elected). If Nomar ever gets in the HOF, #5 goes up in RF as well. He technically retired as a member of the Sox (1 day contract)

                              Above all, retire #25 for Tony C!
                              Last edited by SDL; 01-12-2013, 01:25 AM.
                              sigpicMan, do I *HATE* the Yankees!!!!!!

                              Comment


                              • I think the biggest news about the Red Sox is the new book by Terry Francona and Dan Shaughnessy. The owners are characterized as men who like, but don't love, baseball and it was evidently their doing that involved not re-signing Beltre and Victor Gonzales and forcing the signing of Adrian Gonzalez and Carl Crawford. They wanted a more "exciting" ballclub because they thought that would improve their TV ratings(!)

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X