Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

2013 ZiPS projections

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2013 ZiPS projections

    http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index...oston-red-sox/

    Red-Sox-Depth.png



    Lots of interesting players for the Red Sox

    New arrivals
    Shane Victorino .330/.425 2.9 WAR
    Mike Napoli .347/.488 1.8 WAR
    Stephen Drew .322/.396 1.7 WAR

    Young Players
    Wil Middlebrooks .292/.434 1.8 WAR
    Jackie Bradley .329/.367 1.6 WAR
    Lavarnway .311/.388 1.3 WAR
    Jose Iglesias .298/.304 1.1 WAR

    and former Dodger Ruby de la Rosa 51 IP, 4.38 ERA, 4.15 FIP 0.8 WAR

  • #2
    This year is gonna suck. Big time. If we get to 81 wins, I'll be happy.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by 9&10 View Post
      This year is gonna suck. Big time. If we get to 81 wins, I'll be happy.
      Interesting

      Because these WAR projections put the Red Sox at 90 wins

      *disclaimer: WAR projections shouldn't be used this way

      Comment


      • #4
        Isn't the projected 150 OPS+ for papina little bit optimistic if you consider his age and injuries?
        I now have my own non commercial blog about training for batspeed and power using my training experience in baseball and track and field.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by dominik View Post
          Isn't the projected 150 OPS+ for papina little bit optimistic if you consider his age and injuries?
          Ortiz has a 150 wRC+ over the last 3 seasons

          Comment


          • #6
            The spin is beginning in the press and on TV in Boston. The new sherrif has arrived to manage. He seems like a big, rather humorless guy, sort of in the mold of Joe Cronin, Steve O'Neill,or Darrell Johnson; his strength seems to be that he isn't Valentine. I doubt Farrell will ride in the Pan-Mass Challenge, in any event.

            John Lackey is now wonderful. He has lost weight and everyone in Florida just loves him, so they say and write. One non-established pitcher has accidentally shot himself inthe leg, and Buchholtz has sprained a hamstring bending over to pick up a baseball.

            Pedroia says he relishes being on an underdog team, as they now have more to shoot for, or some similar cliche. He has yet publicly to call out the manager.

            John Henry swears he is really interested in the team, but has to keep up with his other activities because just being owner of the Red Sox isn't enough to keep him busy.

            Not much seems to be expected of this team, which means that everyone hopes to be pleasantly surprised. Oh, yes, as expected, Terry Francona is morphing into a bad guy, on talk radio at least.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by filihok View Post
              Interesting

              Because these WAR projections put the Red Sox at 90 wins

              *disclaimer: WAR projections shouldn't be used this way
              Projections schmojections. . . how many wins were they projected to win last season?

              Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see 'em win 90 games, but I don't see it happening. Like I said, if they win 81 games, I'll be happy.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by 9&10 View Post
                Projections schmojections. . . how many wins were they projected to win last season?
                ZiPS projections are mean projections.

                If we projected 10 coin flips the mean projection would be 5 heads and 5 tails - that's the most likely outcome.

                But not the only possible outcome.

                http://www.mathamazement.com/Lessons...obability.html
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]120391[/ATTACH]

                As you can see, it is most likely that the number of heads will be near 5, which is half the total number of tosses. This histogram has a roughly bell-shape, which is typical of histograms of probability distributions of repeated independent trials.
                Attached Files

                Comment


                • #9
                  So based on that, are you supporting their projection of 90 wins?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by 9&10 View Post
                    So based on that, are you supporting their projection of 90 wins?
                    Well,

                    First that wasn't their projection. It was a rough projection based only on the projected starting iineup, not including any bench players.

                    Second, I don't understand what you mean by 'supporting'.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by filihok View Post
                      Well,

                      First that wasn't their projection. It was a rough projection based only on the projected starting iineup, not including any bench players.

                      Second, I don't understand what you mean by 'supporting'.
                      OK, let's make this easy. . . do you, or do you not, think the 2013 Red Sox will achieve 90 wins?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by 9&10 View Post
                        OK, let's make this easy. . .
                        Why do people think there is such virtue in making things easy?

                        do you, or do you not, think the 2013 Red Sox will achieve 90 wins?
                        Still appears that you're not understanding projections and probabilities.

                        If I told you I was going to flip a coin ten times and asked you how many times you thought it would land heads what would you say?

                        You can even look at this chart

                        10-coin-toss-histogram.JPG

                        What's your answer? How many heads will we get if we flip a coin 10 times?







                        Would you say 5 heads? If you did, you'd be wrong 75% of the time. Is that good guess then? Well...depends. It will be right more than any other number you could pick. But, still, it'll be wrong most of the time.

                        The best answer would be to say that you'd expect 5 heads 25% of the time, 4 or 6 heads 20% of the time, 3 or 7 heads 12% of the time, 2 or 8 heads 5% of the time, 1 or 9 heads about 2% of the time and 0 or 10 heads less than 1% of the time.

                        So, what does this have to do with the Red Sox you're probably asking.

                        The mean projection for the Red Sox is probably something like 86 wins if their true talent is around 90 wins. Those 90 wins are expected to come against an aggregate opponent who wins 50% of the time - an average team. But, the Red Sox play in the AL East and play more games against a bunch of teams who are expected to win more than 50% of their games. So, the Red Sox will be expected to lose more.

                        If the Red Sox mean projection is 86 wins, then there is some probability they'll win exactly 86 games. Some probability they'll win 87 or 85 games, some probability they'll win 88 or 84 games, some probability they'll win 89 or 83 games, some probability they'll win 90 or 82 games, etc...

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Joe Barrie View Post
                          The spin is beginning in the press and on TV in Boston. The new sherrif has arrived to manage. He seems like a big, rather humorless guy, sort of in the mold of Joe Cronin, Steve O'Neill,or Darrell Johnson; his strength seems to be that he isn't Valentine. I doubt Farrell will ride in the Pan-Mass Challenge, in any event.

                          John Lackey is now wonderful. He has lost weight and everyone in Florida just loves him, so they say and write. One non-established pitcher has accidentally shot himself inthe leg, and Buchholtz has sprained a hamstring bending over to pick up a baseball.

                          Pedroia says he relishes being on an underdog team, as they now have more to shoot for, or some similar cliche. He has yet publicly to call out the manager.

                          John Henry swears he is really interested in the team, but has to keep up with his other activities because just being owner of the Red Sox isn't enough to keep him busy.

                          Not much seems to be expected of this team, which means that everyone hopes to be pleasantly surprised. Oh, yes, as expected, Terry Francona is morphing into a bad guy, on talk radio at least.
                          Bryce Brentz is an outfielder.
                          Watching Derek Jeter make 40 defensive plays and then watching Adam Everett make 40 defensive plays at the same position is sort of like watching video of Barbara Bush dancing at the White House, and then watching Demi Moore dancing in Striptease. (Bill James)

                          Dustin Pedroia doesn't have the strength or bat speed to hit major-league pitching consistently, and he has no power. If he can continue to hit .260 or so, he'll be useful, and he probably has a future as a backup infielder. (Keith Law)

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by 9&10 View Post
                            Projections schmojections. . . how many wins were they projected to win last season?

                            Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see 'em win 90 games, but I don't see it happening. Like I said, if they win 81 games, I'll be happy.
                            I project you'll be happy.
                            Watching Derek Jeter make 40 defensive plays and then watching Adam Everett make 40 defensive plays at the same position is sort of like watching video of Barbara Bush dancing at the White House, and then watching Demi Moore dancing in Striptease. (Bill James)

                            Dustin Pedroia doesn't have the strength or bat speed to hit major-league pitching consistently, and he has no power. If he can continue to hit .260 or so, he'll be useful, and he probably has a future as a backup infielder. (Keith Law)

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by filihok View Post
                              Why do people think there is such virtue in making things easy?
                              Because most people don't like probabilistically projections. People want to know whether it's going to rain tomorrow or not. They don't want to know that there's a 45% chance of rain, no matter if your best available forecasts tell you exactly that.

                              I think what 9&10 wants to know, is what number of wins you would say the Red Sox will have at the end of regular season IF you had to chose a single, specific win number. So, your answer explaining him how to understand Zips projections correctly will do little to make him happy.

                              And since we are talking projections, the guys at BP ran their Monte Carlo sims and put the Red Sox at a .516 record.
                              Watching Derek Jeter make 40 defensive plays and then watching Adam Everett make 40 defensive plays at the same position is sort of like watching video of Barbara Bush dancing at the White House, and then watching Demi Moore dancing in Striptease. (Bill James)

                              Dustin Pedroia doesn't have the strength or bat speed to hit major-league pitching consistently, and he has no power. If he can continue to hit .260 or so, he'll be useful, and he probably has a future as a backup infielder. (Keith Law)

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X