Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

A Question For White Sox Fans

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A Question For White Sox Fans

    Greetings White Sox fans--I have a question that I'd like your opinion on.

    The White Sox, Red Sox and Cubs all went through prolonged championship droughts--86 years for the Red Sox, 88 years for the White Sox, and 103 and counting for the Cubs. But it has always seemed to me that baseball fans have always been more sympathetic to the Red Sox and Cubs than they ever were to the White Sox through that time. It was earthshaking when the Red Sox broke their curse; a year later the White Sox broke a longer one and hardly anyone seemed to care (where I'm from anyway).

    Is that my imagination, or do you agree? And if so, any idea why that is? Why is the Curse of the Bambino or the Curse of the Billy Goat more romantic than the Curse of the Black Sox?

    Would love to hear from White Sox fans on this.
    Everything from parking to peanuts at the ballgame...check out www.BallparkEGuides.com!

  • #2
    I always wondered the same thing. The Cubs and Redsox have larger fanbases so thats probaly a big reason. Plus the Whitesox have never had the history with losing dramatic games or losing out on pennants. They had a few but nobody really remembers those seasons unless your a Sox fan. I never saw anyone really cry or complain about the 1967, 1977 or the 1983 seasons. The Cubs lost out in 69 and Cub fans really made a big deal about that and I suppose it's because they had bigger names like Banks, Santo, Jenkins and Billy Williams and the 84 Cubs had that 2-0 lead and blew it while the Whitesox just didnt have the better teams.

    1967 Redsox I would say were better
    1977 Royals again better
    1983 Orioles were probaly even with the Whitesox but it wasnt a dramatic series.

    Most fans probaly didnt even know the Whitesox went so long without winning a WS.

    I never see Whitesox fans cry in thier beers either most Whitesox fans are blue coller and go to work kinda guys where maybe Cub fans are a bunch of "the world is gonna end if I dont get these new golfclubs kinda guys".
    "(Shoeless Joe Jackson's fall from grace is one of the real tragedies of baseball. I always thought he was more sinned against than sinning." -- Connie Mack

    "I have the ultimate respect for Whitesox fans. They were as miserable as the Cubs and Redsox fans ever were but always had the good decency to keep it to themselves. And when they finally won the World Series, they celebrated without annoying every other fan in the country."--Jim Caple, ESPN (Jan. 12, 2011)

    Comment


    • #3
      Double post
      Last edited by chicagowhitesox1173; 05-03-2012, 06:55 PM.
      "(Shoeless Joe Jackson's fall from grace is one of the real tragedies of baseball. I always thought he was more sinned against than sinning." -- Connie Mack

      "I have the ultimate respect for Whitesox fans. They were as miserable as the Cubs and Redsox fans ever were but always had the good decency to keep it to themselves. And when they finally won the World Series, they celebrated without annoying every other fan in the country."--Jim Caple, ESPN (Jan. 12, 2011)

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by chicagowhitesox1173 View Post
        I always wondered the same thing. The Cubs and Redsox have larger fanbases so thats probaly a big reason. Plus the Whitesox have never had the history with losing dramatic games or losing out on pennants. They had a few but nobody really remembers those seasons unless your a Sox fan. I never saw anyone really cry or complain about the 1967, 1977 or the 1983 seasons. The Cubs lost out in 69 and Cub fans really made a big deal about that and I suppose it's because they had bigger names like Banks, Santo, Jenkins and Billy Williams and the 84 Cubs had that 2-0 lead and blew it while the Whitesox just didnt have the better teams.

        1967 Redsox I would say were better
        1977 Royals again better
        1983 Orioles were probaly even with the Whitesox but it wasnt a dramatic series.

        Most fans probaly didnt even know the Whitesox went so long without winning a WS.

        I never see Whitesox fans cry in thier beers either most Whitesox fans are blue coller and go to work kinda guys where maybe Cub fans are a bunch of "the world is gonna end if I dont get these new golfclubs kinda guys".
        That is a great line...

        I think that people didn't start talking about a curse on the Red Sox until 1986, when they came within a strike of winning the Series and then blew it. Dan Shaughnessy's book "The Curse of The Bambino" came out a few years later and amplified that. Then we started hearing about the Curse of the Billy Goat, etc. And indeed the Cubs were in playoff series that they possibly should have won, while as you say the White Sox were often overmatched, 1983 being an exception.

        You make a good point about the different mindset of White Sox fans too; Jim Caple's quote is great. The two ballparks in Chicago are just a train ride apart, but they might as well be in different countries. And Red Sox fans are probably similar to Cubs fans in that regard.

        Could the Black Sox be a factor? That was and still is seen as an ugly chapter in baseball history, perhaps that may have influenced the general opinion of fans outside of Chicago and made them less sympathetic. Just a thought. Fans seem to feel worse for guys like Ted Williams or Ernie Banks than they did for Luke Appling.
        Everything from parking to peanuts at the ballgame...check out www.BallparkEGuides.com!

        Comment


        • #5
          The Chicago media loves the Cubs so they get all the ink and their failure steak is over a century now. When the White Sox won they sort of came out of nowhere and did it without a lot of charisma, other than Ozzie.
          Buck O'Neil: The Monarch of Baseball

          Comment


          • #6
            Despite all my reading, I can't give a very good answer because I adopted the White Sox pretty late in my life. But the White Sox haven't had the kind of spectacular dramas the Red Sox had, or the ridiculous failures of the Cubs. They've often fielded good teams which were never quite good enough, and so they've done well but have very little to show for it - the 1959 Pennant, the 1983 division title, the best record in the AL during 1994, and that's pretty much it. The Cubs and Red Sox won several Pennants and were big players in tight races. The Cubs and Red Sox also have more successful big name antagonists in the Cardinals and Yankees, while the White Sox rivalries - which are just as good - are just more small time teams, mostly the Indians and Twins. Bill Veeck's promotions probably distracted the media from their records or performances.
            The Evil Empire shall strike back again!
            http://litbases.wordpress.com/

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by BaronSamedi View Post
              Despite all my reading, I can't give a very good answer because I adopted the White Sox pretty late in my life. But the White Sox haven't had the kind of spectacular dramas the Red Sox had, or the ridiculous failures of the Cubs. They've often fielded good teams which were never quite good enough, and so they've done well but have very little to show for it - the 1959 Pennant, the 1983 division title, the best record in the AL during 1994, and that's pretty much it. The Cubs and Red Sox won several Pennants and were big players in tight races. The Cubs and Red Sox also have more successful big name antagonists in the Cardinals and Yankees, while the White Sox rivalries - which are just as good - are just more small time teams, mostly the Indians and Twins. Bill Veeck's promotions probably distracted the media from their records or performances.
              I hadn't considered the rivalries angle, I think you may be onto something there. The Yankees have 27 World Series wins and the Cardinals have 11, so having either of them as your divisional rival for all those years probably inspires a lot more emotion in fans. The White Sox were in the AL West all of those years, and no one really had a stronghold on that division in my young life--as I remember it many times a team could win it just being a .500 team, because the East was so good with Yankees, Red Sox, Orioles and Tigers (and often the Brewers). The Indians--another team in a long drought, for that matter--don't have anything much to brag about to Sox fans. Interesting take.
              Everything from parking to peanuts at the ballgame...check out www.BallparkEGuides.com!

              Comment


              • #8
                Another twist would be the 9 times the Cubs did make it to the World Series. And lost all but two.


                Sent from my iPhone
                Eaton Swap + 4.10's = Wreeeeeeeeeedom!!
                sigpic
                I have had the pleasure of watching games at: Comiskey Park, Comiskey Park II, Wrigley Field, Jacobs Field, Municipal Stadium, Three Rivers Stadium, Miller Park, Yankee Stadium (The one and only), and Fenway Park.

                Comment


                • #9
                  [QUOTE=1983whitesox;2024883]Another twist would be the 9 times the Cubs did make it to the World Series. And lost all but two.


                  True that...so there have been more near misses in Wrigleyville too. The White Sox may not have made it there as many times, but they've finished the job more often.
                  Everything from parking to peanuts at the ballgame...check out www.BallparkEGuides.com!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    [QUOTE=KurtDman24;2024939]
                    Originally posted by 1983whitesox View Post
                    Another twist would be the 9 times the Cubs did make it to the World Series. And lost all but two.


                    True that...so there have been more near misses in Wrigleyville too. The White Sox may not have made it there as many times, but they've finished the job more often.
                    Well, looking back at the period 1951-1967, I think the Sox out drew the cubs and they had some very good seasons. As for winning on the field, 1955 91-63 (3rd); 1957 90-64 (2nd); 1958 (2nd); 1959 pennant; 1963 94-68 (2nd); 1964 98-64 (2nd, one game out); 1965 95-67 (2nd); 1967 ; 1972, 1977, 1983,1990, 1993.........

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      [QUOTE=mandrake;2028408]
                      Originally posted by KurtDman24 View Post

                      Well, looking back at the period 1951-1967, I think the Sox out drew the cubs and they had some very good seasons. As for winning on the field, 1955 91-63 (3rd); 1957 90-64 (2nd); 1958 (2nd); 1959 pennant; 1963 94-68 (2nd); 1964 98-64 (2nd, one game out); 1965 95-67 (2nd); 1967 ; 1972, 1977, 1983,1990, 1993.........
                      Damn Yankees. kidding yeah I did look it up and the Sox did outdraw the Cubs all those years. I know the Cubs got bigger because of WGN but I have to wonder if when the Chicago Stockyards closed down if that may have hurt attendance too. They closed the Stockyards in 1971 but i'm sure it was being downsized for years before that.

                      These are the attendance figures (avg attendance)
                      1951 Whitesox 17,029 Cubs 11,616
                      1952 Whitesox 15,591 Cubs 13,309
                      1953 Whitesox 15,274 Cubs 9,918
                      1954 Whitesox 15,790 Cubs 9,717
                      1955 Whitesox 15,269 Cubs 11,374
                      1956 Whitesox 12,988 Cubs 9,001
                      1957 Whitesox 14,749 Cubs 8,598
                      1958 Cubs 12,726 Whitesox 10,357...I guess Ernie Banks MVP year helped this year.
                      1959 Whitesox 18,245 Cubs 11,146
                      1960 Whitesox 21,357 Cubs 10,250
                      1961 Whitesox 14,148 Cubs 8,629
                      1962 Whitesox 13,970 Cubs 7,528
                      1963 Whitesox 14,132 Cubs 12,093
                      1964 Whitesox 15,433 Cubs 9,280
                      1965 Whitesox 13,957 Cubs 7,727
                      1966 Whitesox 12,222 Cubs 7,851
                      1967 Whitesox 12,020 Cubs 11,634

                      After 1967 the Whitesox outdrew the Cubs in these years:
                      1974
                      1977
                      1978
                      1981
                      1982
                      1983
                      1984.....This year was kinda surprising to win but the sox won 26,383 to 26,346
                      1985
                      1991
                      1992
                      1994...That strike really lost alot of Sox fans this was the last year the Sox beat em in attendance,
                      Last edited by chicagowhitesox1173; 06-25-2012, 01:26 AM.
                      "(Shoeless Joe Jackson's fall from grace is one of the real tragedies of baseball. I always thought he was more sinned against than sinning." -- Connie Mack

                      "I have the ultimate respect for Whitesox fans. They were as miserable as the Cubs and Redsox fans ever were but always had the good decency to keep it to themselves. And when they finally won the World Series, they celebrated without annoying every other fan in the country."--Jim Caple, ESPN (Jan. 12, 2011)

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X