Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Should the Tigers sign Bonds?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    What kind of defensive setup would you all like to see?

    Comment


    • #17
      tigers527: It should be noted that Bonds' people have been tossing around the idea of charging MLB with collusion.

      the players union is looking at it, not bonds' camp.
      "you don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. just get people to stop reading them." -ray bradbury

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by west coast orange and black View Post
        tigers527: It should be noted that Bonds' people have been tossing around the idea of charging MLB with collusion.

        the players union is looking at it, not bonds' camp.
        Question would the lack of MLB pursuit be enough to make collusion stick? Wouldn't Bonds/Sammy Sueser (I love the Ted Kennedy pronunciation) or any of the other guys who I can't remember have to approach teams with the interest in playing before collusion would look to be a stronger case?

        Comment


        • #19
          I don't want Barry Bonds soiling Tiger Stadium

          even if it is that new stadium, Comerica Township. I'd rather have a 72 year old Hank Aaron playing for the Tigers than Barroid. I don't single out Barry as a steroid user, but at least McGwire had the sense to get out of the game before he did irreparable harm to too many of the game's hallowed records.

          Comment

          Ad Widget

          Collapse
          Working...
          X