About a week and a half ago, photos of a makeshift memorial to Gary Carter were posted in the Citi Field thread. This memorial was set up in the Citi Field parking lot and was in tribute to a baseball player who played for the baseball team that that plays there so it seemed rather appropriate that these pictures be posted there. You could even see Citi Field in the background of some of the photos!
The Citi Field administrator removed all posts regarding the Gary Carter tribute and wrote a lengthy post about why (which has also been removed).
Considering that that memorial was based at the site of Shea Stadium's home plate, I began a thread dedicated to the former site of Shea Stadium just as there is a thread dedicated to the former site of Yankee Stadium. This thread was also removed and I was banned for a week.
Now, what troubles me is that there is a scope of information about certain ballparks that is being lost because an individual administrator deems them off-topic and inappropriate even when several regular posters in those threads argue to the contrary. The Carter memorial, anything to do with 9/11, and the Last Play at Shea concerts have all been deemed inappropriate and have been struck from the record.
Are the Ebbets Field apartments not relevant to the Ebbets Field discussion?
Is Disco Demolition Night not relevant to the Comiskey Field discussion?
Is Heritage Field not relevant to the Yankee Stadium discussion?
They seem to be because they are permitted to exist within Baseball Fever. So how is a makeshift memorial to a former player set up in a parking lot of a ballpark not relevant to that ballpark? And what difference does six posts about this event make in the big scheme of things? In a sea of posts about how ugly the ads on the wall are or how cheap the Wilpons are, it should seem like a welcome symbol of what is good about baseball.
If a Family Guy clip is relevant to the Citi Field discussion, how this memorial to Gary Carter not?
I am requesting that there be an umpire conference to discuss what is relevant and what is not relevant to discussions of ballparks so that the threads can be governed in a consistent and fan-friendly manner. I love Baseball Fever and I love discussing ballparks with the community of people who have gathered here, but it kills me when conversations are shut down and posts are deleted from threads by one person when many most of the community agree that they very much belong.
So what's the strike zone, blue?
The Citi Field administrator removed all posts regarding the Gary Carter tribute and wrote a lengthy post about why (which has also been removed).
Considering that that memorial was based at the site of Shea Stadium's home plate, I began a thread dedicated to the former site of Shea Stadium just as there is a thread dedicated to the former site of Yankee Stadium. This thread was also removed and I was banned for a week.
Now, what troubles me is that there is a scope of information about certain ballparks that is being lost because an individual administrator deems them off-topic and inappropriate even when several regular posters in those threads argue to the contrary. The Carter memorial, anything to do with 9/11, and the Last Play at Shea concerts have all been deemed inappropriate and have been struck from the record.
Are the Ebbets Field apartments not relevant to the Ebbets Field discussion?
Is Disco Demolition Night not relevant to the Comiskey Field discussion?
Is Heritage Field not relevant to the Yankee Stadium discussion?
They seem to be because they are permitted to exist within Baseball Fever. So how is a makeshift memorial to a former player set up in a parking lot of a ballpark not relevant to that ballpark? And what difference does six posts about this event make in the big scheme of things? In a sea of posts about how ugly the ads on the wall are or how cheap the Wilpons are, it should seem like a welcome symbol of what is good about baseball.
If a Family Guy clip is relevant to the Citi Field discussion, how this memorial to Gary Carter not?
I am requesting that there be an umpire conference to discuss what is relevant and what is not relevant to discussions of ballparks so that the threads can be governed in a consistent and fan-friendly manner. I love Baseball Fever and I love discussing ballparks with the community of people who have gathered here, but it kills me when conversations are shut down and posts are deleted from threads by one person when many most of the community agree that they very much belong.
So what's the strike zone, blue?
Comment