Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Dodger Stadium

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dodger Stadium

    I have never been there so obviously i have an opinion based only on pics .. But it seems many love this ballpark?? I dont really know why. Can Anyone explain the highlites of this ballpark. From what i see it looks pretty bland on the outside exterior, the upper deck looks as high and far back as the avg stadium and has the suites in between the decks.. The seats along the outfield foul lines look to be facing the outfield, not towards the infield.. No great characteristics in the park and just bleachers past the outfield wall.. Is it the views, the sunken in stadium into a hill?? The colors of the seats?? It looks as plain a ballpark as you can get and since it was the stadium built for the team leaving Brooklyn and built by O'malley, i would think many more would hate it .. Althoguh from what ive heard it was Omalley's vision to stay in Brooklyn but the powers that be woudlnt allow it, so Moses got his new stadium in Flushing which is Shea stadium. Now ofcourse i like Dodger stadium's looks better then Shea, who wouldnt, but it doesnt seem to be that much out of the box IMO!!!

    (OH BY THE WAY AFTER ONLY A FEW PAGES ON THIS THREAD,, I NOW SEE WHY IT IS SO HIGHLY REGARDED AS A STADIUM. REAL NICE PLACE)
    Last edited by nymTom; 08-21-2007, 08:06 PM.

  • #2
    The San Gabriel mountains in the background. The exterior facade blends in nicely with the location, it doesn't have a forced facade like many newer stadiums. The 76 gas station past center. The symmetry gives the park a classic feel. The palm trees. The landscaping surrounding the park. The nice pacific breeze coming in from the west. Many great ticket bargains like the bleachers or the top deck for $8. Views of the whole city behind homeplate including the Hollywood Sign, downtown, and the Westside. The classic canopy. 50,000 fans show up almost every night. Close proximity to the lovely Elysian Park. Think Blue sign, Dodger Dogs, great weather, the best logo on top of a dugout. The upper decks are closer to the action than you think. Vin Scully. The roofs covering the bleachers that look like Japanese fans.

    What else am I missing Elvis?

    Comment


    • #3
      I think the big selling point is the view of the hills behind the park. It gives it a nice pastoral feel to it. Had the view been of a flat parking lot, I don't think it would be as nice.

      Dodger Stadium is simple in its design, but not boring. (Unlike the concrete donut clones which followed soon thereafter, which were incredibly boring). It was designed for baseball, and shows nicely to that effect. Also what helps with Dodger Stadium is that I've heard it's been nicely maintained, unlike, say, Shea Stadium which has just been allowed to deteriorate.

      Along with Kauffman Stadium and Angels Stadium (as renovated), Dodger Stadium shines out as a good park in what was otherwise an awful era for ballpark construction in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s.

      The only question I have about Dodger Stadium is that it seems to get a free pass from some on this board whose big thing is that upper decks must be placed virtually on top of each other. The upper decks at Dodger Stadium look pretty massive and far back. Not that I really care--I really don't care much one way or another about the placement of upper decks, but there are some who seem intent on making that their key factor in ballpark design, yet they don't seem to make that much of a fuss about Dodger Stadium.

      But all in all, Dodger Stadium is by far one of the better ballparks, and deserves to be saved for posterity for years to come.

      Comment


      • #4
        an upper deck view from Dodger stadium.
        Attached Files

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by PeteU View Post
          I think the big selling point is the view of the hills behind the park. It gives it a nice pastoral feel to it. Had the view been of a flat parking lot, I don't think it would be as nice.

          Dodger Stadium is simple in its design, but not boring. (Unlike the concrete donut clones which followed soon thereafter, which were incredibly boring). It was designed for baseball, and shows nicely to that effect. Also what helps with Dodger Stadium is that I've heard it's been nicely maintained, unlike, say, Shea Stadium which has just been allowed to deteriorate.

          Along with Kauffman Stadium and Angels Stadium (as renovated), Dodger Stadium shines out as a good park in what was otherwise an awful era for ballpark construction in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s.

          The only question I have about Dodger Stadium is that it seems to get a free pass from some on this board whose big thing is that upper decks must be placed virtually on top of each other. The upper decks at Dodger Stadium look pretty massive and far back. Not that I really care--I really don't care much one way or another about the placement of upper decks, but there are some who seem intent on making that their key factor in ballpark design, yet they don't seem to make that much of a fuss about Dodger Stadium.

          But all in all, Dodger Stadium is by far one of the better ballparks, and deserves to be saved for posterity for years to come.
          Thanks for the helpful input, sheds some light on the topic..
          Last edited by nymTom; 11-08-2007, 08:06 AM.

          Comment


          • #6
            I believe Dodger Stadium is highly regarded because of its subtlety. Its original (and current) color scheme was very unassuming, the architectural elements understated, and the exterior all but nonexistent. Unlike today's excess, it works through complementing the game being played, not by attempting to overpower it.

            The new parks attempt to be unique by having kitschy features, mainly because the fundamental structure is more or less the exact same. Dodger Stadium took a normal seating configuration, with clean lines and comparatively nice sightlines, added a single beautiful architectural element (the bleacher roof), and otherwise let the view and baseball do the rest. There's something to be said for not having distractions, and if I am correct, Dodger Stadium was never wanting for patrons.

            Dodger and Kauffman both prove that baseball can stand on its own, rather than being controlled by the space.
            http://www.virtualfenway.com

            Comment


            • #7
              Easy fellas, nobody's mothers got insulted here.

              Breathe fellas, breathe....

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by PeteU View Post

                The only question I have about Dodger Stadium is that it seems to get a free pass from some on this board whose big thing is that upper decks must be placed virtually on top of each other. The upper decks at Dodger Stadium look pretty massive and far back. Not that I really care--I really don't care much one way or another about the placement of upper decks, but there are some who seem intent on making that their key factor in ballpark design, yet they don't seem to make that much of a fuss about Dodger Stadium.
                I think you've completely missed the boat on this point, especially on how it related to Dodger Stadium:

                The "big thing" complaint by me, as you put it (and others on "my" side correct me if I'm wrong), is when decks are pushed back and not cantilevered as much as they could be or should be. If you look at a cross-section of Chavez Ravine, you can plainly see that all levels are aggressively cantilevered over the deck below--from the loge level all the way up to the top deck. This is why (As Lafferty can attest since he has season tickets there) the Top Deck has great sight lines, even though it's the 5th deck up from the field, and the field level is extremely deep.

                This is a typical Dodger Stadium cantilever:
                Attached Files

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Sean O View Post
                  I believe Dodger Stadium is highly regarded because of its subtlety. Its original (and current) color scheme was very unassuming, the architectural elements understated, and the exterior all but nonexistent. Unlike today's excess, it works through complementing the game being played, not by attempting to overpower it.

                  The new parks attempt to be unique by having kitschy features, mainly because the fundamental structure is more or less the exact same. Dodger Stadium took a normal seating configuration, with clean lines and comparatively nice sightlines, added a single beautiful architectural element (the bleacher roof), and otherwise let the view and baseball do the rest. There's something to be said for not having distractions, and if I am correct, Dodger Stadium was never wanting for patrons.

                  Dodger and Kauffman both prove that baseball can stand on its own, rather than being controlled by the space.

                  Ok i see your points, almost like a down to business park with baseball written all over it with a less is more attitude with no forced quirks.. Thanks, i guess seeing it in person with the views would be awsome ..I was looking for people's input who have been there, but unfortunatley i may have insluted the KING!! lol

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    More examples of Dodger Stadium's aggressive cantilevers:
                    Attached Files

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Upper Deck view. As anyone can see, the views from the upper deck are lower than any HOK stadium. The "Top Deck" section is not considered the upper deck--it's really considered a small "bonus section", giving fans unobstructed cheap seats right behind home plate.
                      Attached Files
                      Last edited by Elvis; 08-20-2007, 10:44 AM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Elvis View Post
                        I think you've completely missed the boat on this point, especially on how it related to Dodger Stadium:

                        The "big thing" complaint by me, as you put it (and others on "my" side correct me if I'm wrong), is when decks are pushed back and not cantilevered as much as they could be or should be. If you look at a cross-section of Chavez Ravine, you can plainly see that all levels are aggressively cantilevered over the deck below--from the loge level all the way up to the top deck. This is why (As Lafferty can attest since he has season tickets there) the Top Deck has great sight lines, even though it's the 5th deck up from the field, and the field level is extremely deep.

                        This is a typical Dodger Stadium cantilever:
                        I'll have to plead ignorance on the basis I've never been to Dodger Stadium in person. I can only say from the pictures I've seen, the upper decks look rather distant, even with the cantilevers, which I can clearly see but they still look relatively mild to me (compared to that of, say, Tiger Stadium, or more relevantly the renovated Yankee Stadium which has a cantilever without the support posts.)

                        In the end, this is all pretty much irrelevant as I don't think the placement of an upper deck alone makes or breaks a ballpark (if I did, then I'd be forced to heap praise upon RFK Stadium and its cantilevers, which would be patently absurd.)

                        And even without having gone to Dodger Stadium myself (although I would love to go see a game there whenever my first trip to the Los Angeles area might be), I can still tell it is certainly one of the better ballparks in baseball. I think the fact that it was designed for the game of baseball, along with its hillside setting, helps secure it as one of the top ballparks in the "modern" era.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Elvis View Post
                          Upper Deck view. As anyone can see, the views from the upper deck are lower than any HOK stadium. The "Top Deck" section is not considered the upper deck--it's really considered a small "bonus section", giving fans unobstructed cheap seats right behind home plate.
                          Ahh the Top Deck, one of few values in Los Angeles at $8 a seat

                          Comment


                          • #14

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Lafferty Daniel View Post
                              Ahh the Top Deck, one of few values in Los Angeles at $8 a seat
                              On a somewhat related note, I've heard Dodger Stadium is pretty strict on not letting you "cheat," i.e. sneak down to closer seats after buying the cheap seats. (Not that I would ever dream of doing such a thing, of course. )

                              Is that still the case?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X