Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Nationals Park

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Nationals Park

    Not sure if anybody's seen this yet... more than half of the video is devoted to showing all of the different suites and luxury boxes.

    I think it looks good. I know people are upset that the suites are located in places that get rid of some of the best seating locations, but I think that's just a result of where the team is playing. They must figure that a good portion of their business is going to come from politicians, lobbyists, businessmen entertaining clients, etc... whereas a more established team has some of these but the overwhelming majority of the teams' business comes from fans coming to see the ballgame itself. I don't know if you can fault the Nationals for that.

    Either way, the amenities are unbelivable... and it looks like it might turn out to be a nice place for the average fan to catch a game, too.

    http://washington.nationals.mlb.com/...rtual_tour.jsp
    Last edited by nymdan; 10-18-2007, 11:29 AM.

  • #2
    Originally posted by nymfan9 View Post
    Not sure if anybody's seen this yet... more than half of the video is devoted to showing all of the different suites and luxury boxes.

    I think it looks good. I know people are upset that the suites are located in places that get rid of some of the best seating locations, but I think that's just a result of where the team is playing. They must figure that a good portion of their business is going to come from politicians, lobbyists, businessmen entertaining clients, etc... whereas a more established team has some of these but the overwhelming majority of the teams' business comes from fans coming to see the ballgame itself. I don't know if you can fault the Nationals for that.

    Either way, the amenities are unbelivable... and it looks like it might turn out to be a nice place for the average fan to catch a game, too.

    http://washington.nationals.mlb.com/...rtual_tour.jsp
    ------------------

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Elvis View Post
      ------------------
      Let it out :-)

      Comment


      • #4
        Review

        They sure love their concession stands because I've noticed that got mentioned alot in the tour. The obvious flaw, of course, is the seating that is styled by HOK. You can tell that upper decks will never be the same and good again as long as HOK keeps making this rubbish. That is just too much of a sacrifice to make if you ask me. I'm not impressed at all. I'm sure it would impress the politicians and lobbysists and the like but that is for the casual fans and the business people who want to make profits.

        This park gets praised so much, and I don't think it deserves to be at all. Look at the field again, and you have far away upper deck seats. I can make a better ballpark than that. Some of the most inexeperienced architecture makers can do a better job, too. I still say that the opening building just before the concession stands looks like a post office type of building. Nothing real interesting there that blows you away. Having the suites lined behind the plate intimidates the pitcher a la Tiger Stadium, but I don't think we need that type of impact anymore.

        To sum it up, this will be a terrible ballpark. Fans are going to get excited about the concession stands and nothing more I believe. The views satisfy nobody. I am hoping that some business goes up against HOK because I have seen what I've already needed to see out of HOK, and HOK just doesn't cut the mustard. We've been due for HOK's arch rival to emerge.

        My Top 4 funniest BBF posts ever:

        1) "plZ dOn;t' pOsT LikE tHIs n e mOr!"

        2) "The teams play 1962 games in 180 days."

        3) "Stadiums don't move silly, people do."

        4) "Once again you quibble, because it is I who speaks."

        5) Almost anything RuthMayBond says...

        Comment


        • #5
          This site is doing a great job tracking the construction... http://www.jdland.com/dc/stadium.cfm?tab=no2

          Looks like it should be ready in time for the corporate guys to sit behind home plate and have a business meeting while a baseball game is going on next April.

          Comment


          • #6
            As I've posted before, I believe this will be a decent ballpark, nothing more and nothing less. Certainly not a great ballpark, but certainly not a horrible ballpark either.

            They could have done a lot more with it, in terms of providing a better view of the city with the Capitol and Washington Monument. And the exterior could have been made to look less like a suburban office park and more to match the greco-roman architecture Washington DC is famous for.

            But it will have some nice amenities and it is designed exclusively for baseball, so I can't say it will be that bad of a place for a game. And it certainly beats the heck out of RFK Stadium, which as the first of the awful cookie cutters of the 1960s and 1970s I can't say will be missed all that much.

            There will be some issues as to parking, which is something of a premium in the neighborhood. And I can see the nearby Metro station getting bottlenecked pretty fast (I think they only have one line running to it, as opposed to RFK which has three lines).

            But all in all, the Nationals get to have a park of their own and it's average to above-average. Could have done so much more with it, but I really think it beats what they have right now.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by PeteU View Post
              As I've posted before, I believe this will be a decent ballpark, nothing more and nothing less. Certainly not a great ballpark, but certainly not a horrible ballpark either.

              They could have done a lot more with it, in terms of providing a better view of the city with the Capitol and Washington Monument. And the exterior could have been made to look less like a suburban office park and more to match the greco-roman architecture Washington DC is famous for.

              But it will have some nice amenities and it is designed exclusively for baseball, so I can't say it will be that bad of a place for a game. And it certainly beats the heck out of RFK Stadium, which as the first of the awful cookie cutters of the 1960s and 1970s I can't say will be missed all that much.

              There will be some issues as to parking, which is something of a premium in the neighborhood. And I can see the nearby Metro station getting bottlenecked pretty fast (I think they only have one line running to it, as opposed to RFK which has three lines).

              But all in all, the Nationals get to have a park of their own and it's average to above-average. Could have done so much more with it, but I really think it beats what they have right now.
              RFK has 2 lines (Blue & Orange) but they run on the same tracks so it really only has one line as you can only have 1 train in the station (per direction) at a time. If they increase the service of the green line there shouldn't be much (if any) drop in service. The new park will have things to do after games as well so many will linger after games. Nobody hangs around RFK unless you have a car, a beer and a grill.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Smirkman View Post
                RFK has 2 lines (Blue & Orange) but they run on the same tracks so it really only has one line as you can only have 1 train in the station (per direction) at a time. If they increase the service of the green line there shouldn't be much (if any) drop in service. The new park will have things to do after games as well so many will linger after games. Nobody hangs around RFK unless you have a car, a beer and a grill.
                True, but the extra line or lines means less people have to make multiple transfers (unless they are lucky enough to be located near a station along the green line).

                I agree the new park has a lot more potential for neighborhood interaction and business growth than RFK, but I think it's going to take a little while for that area to become an established entertainment district. I don't think it will happen overnight.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by PeteU View Post
                  I agree the new park has a lot more potential for neighborhood interaction and business growth than RFK, but I think it's going to take a little while for that area to become an established entertainment district. I don't think it will happen overnight.
                  Boy, let's hope it's as successful as Arlington was after the Rangers' new park, right?

                  The urban renewal was totally worth all the taxpaper money that went into the area. Awesome.
                  http://www.virtualfenway.com

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Sean O View Post
                    Boy, let's hope it's as successful as Arlington was after the Rangers' new park, right?

                    The urban renewal was totally worth all the taxpaper money that went into the area. Awesome.
                    Actually the area that Petco Park is in San Diego was nearly abandoned and nothing but old run-down warehouses. AGreed it was closer to a more revitalized part of downtown than the ballpark in Washington is, but its nothing like Arlington, where they built it in the middle of nowhere. If you do it right, the ballpark can be a catalyst for some great development and revitalization. You should see the area where Petco Park is now and compare it to what it used to look like, night and day.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by PadreHomer View Post
                      Actually the area that Petco Park is in San Diego was nearly abandoned and nothing but old run-down warehouses. AGreed it was closer to a more revitalized part of downtown than the ballpark in Washington is, but its nothing like Arlington, where they built it in the middle of nowhere. If you do it right, the ballpark can be a catalyst for some great development and revitalization. You should see the area where Petco Park is now and compare it to what it used to look like, night and day.
                      You're right, there has been a lot of development near Padres Park. Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the revitalization of the Gaslamp District occur years before the ballpark construction?

                      Stadiums don't usually cause development unless a plan is set before construction begins.

                      In Minneapolis, they thought there would be a lot of new construction next to the Metrodome and it never happened. With the new park in the Warehouse District, the bars, restaurants, and clubs are already there. Hines development group are planning on building condos and other entertainment options right next to the new park, yet nobody really knows if it will happen for sure.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Looks good to me. I like this design its really growing on me. I think this one will go down as one of the greats in years to come.

                        Elvis, what do you think?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Hey, did they mention anything in the video about luxury seating and private boxes? If they did, I must have missed it

                          Actually, I think they could come up with a great slogan to accompany the presentation;

                          The new Washington ballpark: Poor people need not apply!
                          From now until the end of September, I'll be chronicling in real time on Twitter the 1946 season of the International league's Montréal Royals, when Jackie Robinson broke the color barrier in professional baseball. Check it out: https://twitter.com/Royals_46season

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by RichardLillard1 View Post
                            Looks good to me. I like this design its really growing on me. I think this one will go down as one of the greats in years to come.

                            Elvis, what do you think?


                            Oh, far from being one of the greats of all time. The ballpark dimensions aren't unique enough, the seating formation is crooked and out of whack (in a bad way), and the concession stands and suites were the highlights of the tour, what can that say about everything else? Are they chopped liver?
                            My Top 4 funniest BBF posts ever:

                            1) "plZ dOn;t' pOsT LikE tHIs n e mOr!"

                            2) "The teams play 1962 games in 180 days."

                            3) "Stadiums don't move silly, people do."

                            4) "Once again you quibble, because it is I who speaks."

                            5) Almost anything RuthMayBond says...

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by RichardLillard1 View Post
                              Looks good to me. I like this design its really growing on me. I think this one will go down as one of the greats in years to come.

                              Elvis, what do you think?
                              Sorry, Richard. I think it's horrible. Explained here: http://baseball-fever.com/showpost.p...&postcount=261

                              Comment

                              Ad Widget

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X