Which is better the A2K or the Pro Preferred?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Wilson A2K vs Rawlings PP
Collapse
X
-
Both are made of the highest quality leather out there. The a2K will feel softer straight off the rack, and the PP feel very stiff. But like a fine wine or a good girlfriend -- a little TLC, pampering, rubbing, and attention in all the right places will cause the Rawlings to pass the Wilson. I alos find the wool inside the glove is of the highest quality with the Rawlings, allowing you to shape the fingers how you want them, and they will STAY that way. A PP will NEVER end up a floppy mess.
Even better, you can reposition the fingers as you wish, change them as well, etc. I am referring to, say the thumb. Lots of infielders want the thumb flared out, making the web area a little bigger... more catching area. Dontrelle Willis does this as well, if you look up photos of him and his glove. Some third baseman want both the thumb and pinkie turned IN just a little, giving the glove a rounded look. Outlfielders want their gloves long and slender, to better get to balls just out of their reach.
The PP will allow you any shape you want after you break it in.
But I am a Rawlings guy, admittedly."Herman Franks to Sal Yvars to Bobby Thomson. Ralph Branca to Bobby Thomson to Helen Rita... cue Russ Hodges."
Comment
-
Originally posted by mastachimpsta View PostWhich is better the A2K or the Pro Preferred?
If the glove is not easy to break thats the glove you should want. Easy break in = short glove life.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Paulypal View PostPro Preferred without question. Its not even close in my opinion. As I said in another thread...the Wilson A2k's are crap in my opinion. If you use the glove alot I can see it getting floppy in a big hurry.
If the glove is not easy to break thats the glove you should want. Easy break in = short glove life.
Comment
-
reviving and old post but wanted to give my experience on the A2k.
I love it! A2k-33 model and it's still hard to close after 2 months of intense use. I'm not using any break-in oils because i want a good natural fit to my hand. I don't think this glove will get floppy any times soon thanks to the dual welting. That really makes the difference, it makes the fingers very stiff. I did the whole "wrap it with rubber bands" thing for about two weeks and it's still stiff.
i was using a 20 year old wilson before that was very floppy. so maybe i'm just spoiled with the new technology. I hope this one lasts me another 20.
Comment
-
My son has his A2K four years now. He carries a Rawlings PP 11-3/4 that was supposed to be for 3rd base and pitching. He uses his A2K for Short, 2nd and 3rd. He uses the Rawlings for Showcase outfield and for pitching.Last edited by Baseball gLove; 06-17-2009, 01:00 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by baseballdad View PostNot to hijack the thread but what is the most popular make and model middle infield gloves out there for adults and young teens?
I was looking at the Akadema AGM209 or ADH214 prosoft models that break in easy.
Comment
-
Here is a hint: Grab the gloves and put them on. The one that feels better is the one you should buy!
I myself have a few Wilson gloves, A2000, A2800 (1st base) and some historical stuff from the 40s and 60s and I always wanted to try out a Rawlings glove. Bought an old XFB-1 (HoH 1st basemitt) in perfect condition on the internet and I have to admit that I am a bit disappointed. It just doesn't feel right and I have a tendency to drop balls with it. I simply don't trust that glove and keep using my old "gamer" instead.
Comment
Ad Widget
Collapse
Comment