Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Toe Touch and Heel Plant

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Toe Touch and Heel Plant

    Why are these used as checkpoints? Where did this come from?

  • #2
    Originally posted by Tewks View Post
    Why are these used as checkpoints? Where did this come from?
    Don Slaught at RightViewPro.

    You need to land on a soft front leg, so thinking toe, then heel helps. There is dang little time elapsed between toe touch and heel plant, so it's hard to call each a check point, but your hips start to turn as the heel plants, in power swings. Also, the back elbow starts to come into the hip, at heel plant.

    Comment


    • #3
      So what if the pelvis starts to turn before heel plant?

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Tewks View Post
        So what if the pelvis starts to turn before heel plant?
        It's not exact. If you have your hips coiled at negative move/load, then they naturally start to turn as you push the toe out. They are in the process of turning already, but the main drive into rotation doesn't start until the heel starts to go down, and by the time it's down, the hip drive is in full force.

        You just don't want the hips to be open before toe touch. The transfer of linear momentum to rotational is done once the heel is down. If your hips are already starting to open before heel plant, then less energy is transferred into rotation when the heel gets down. You've bled off some energy, as some say, if you open too soon.

        Note that starting to turn, and starting to open, are two different things. If you coil, they start to turn before heel plant, but they shouldn't be OPEN before heel plant.

        Comment


        • #5
          Isn't the bleed or non-bleed argument a matter of power source? The heel plant argument is a due to ground reaction force, correct? So Barry and Ted are bleeding power here?






          The root of my contention here... is what if rotation isn't the true power source of the high level swing? Not saying a turning/rotation component doesn't exist, but as a power source there is something else there.

          Comment


          • #6
            I love this clip of Babe Ruth... and ignoring the fact that he goes onto his heel (just in case anybody is still teaching bug squishing)... is Ruth bleeding his power?



            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Tewks View Post
              Why are these used as checkpoints? Where did this come from?
              For me when I played it was a control and power thing. I always wanted my legs underneath me before go time. Without it I felt vulnerable to certain pitches.

              Do You believe in balanced weight distribution at go time?
              Last edited by TDS; 11-30-2011, 06:40 AM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Tewks
                what if rotation isn't the true power source of the high level swing
                Is rotation more of a result?

                Rotation of what?

                Can one over rotate? / Emphasize rotation too much?

                Have you had students that simply don't "rotate" well? Why do you think that is?

                Do high level hitters have no choice but to rotate or said another way....
                "become rotated".?

                The question might really be....what is rotation as it relates to the baseball swing?
                With all the twisting / torquing / turning / tilting / overall articulation----- occuring in various body parts in both an overlapping and simultaneous fashion the question of "What if rotation isn't the true power source of the high level swing?"....becomes very fascinating.

                I see lots and lots of questions asked and very few answers or even opinions...but if rotation isn't the primary source then why the "gear picture (gif)" ? Or has that theory gone by the wayside?
                Last edited by LClifton; 11-30-2011, 09:01 AM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Tewks View Post
                  I love this clip of Babe Ruth... and ignoring the fact that he goes onto his heel (just in case anybody is still teaching bug squishing)... is Ruth bleeding his power?



                  If a HS player came to you with this swing, what would you change?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    To the question: Would you change Babe Ruth's swing?


                    No.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      LC, I have been trying to describe the directional component to the swing. Been doing a lot of writing, sharing, explaining. Again, I am not saying the body doesn't turn, but a rotation-based swing IMO is not high level. I don't think a linear push being transferred into rotational power is a good model at all.

                      Originally posted by LClifton View Post
                      Is rotation more of a result?
                      Result of what? If I said rotation is leveraged, would that make sense?

                      Rotation of what?
                      Pelvis, torso, shoulders. The whole x-factor separation as a process of having the hips open when the shoulders are closed.

                      Can one over rotate? / Emphasize rotation too much?
                      A hitter can over-rotate and/or emphasize rotation too much.

                      Have you had students that simply don't "rotate" well? Why do you think that is?
                      Often. How about the kid who comes in saying their coach says their lower body isn't finishing (or some variation of that.)

                      Why? Lots of reasons really. Most commonly because they are trying to power the swing with their arms. But a lot of kids don't have basic body awareness and don't know how to generate force.


                      Do high level hitters have no choice but to rotate or said another way....
                      "become rotated".?
                      OK... I understand this. There is a cleanliness to swing paths with high level hitters. They get very clear. The barrel path is true. Is this a product of becoming rotated? Does the weight shift forward or with rotation? Can a hitter get "open" without shifting their weight?

                      The question might really be....what is rotation as it relates to the baseball swing?
                      With all the twisting / torquing / turning / tilting / overall articulation----- occuring in various body parts in both an overlapping and simultaneous fashion the question of "What if rotation isn't the true power source of the high level swing?"....becomes very fascinating.

                      I spend a lot of time thinking and working on it. Very fascinating.

                      I see lots and lots of questions asked and very few answers or even opinions...but if rotation isn't the primary source then why the "gear picture (gif)" ? Or has that theory gone by the wayside?
                      As you know, I can talk about this for hours on end. Making something that is incredibly complicated simple is fun. I've got it down to about 40 min in a clinic setting. Do the gears represent rotation, opening, turning, "clearing"?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Tewks View Post
                        To the question: Would you change Babe Ruth's swing?


                        No.
                        No, I am not asking if you would change Babe Ruth's swing. If a random player walked into your clinic with that swing what would you change?

                        That does not look like the swing we are trying to develop in players today. Is that the mechanics you are looking for in the players you coach? From my very ignorant point of view, his head is moving three feet in that clip. That looks closer to a mens slow pitch softball swing. Hard to argue with the results though.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by real green View Post
                          No, I am not asking if you would change Babe Ruth's swing. If a random player walked into your clinic with that swing what would you change?

                          That does not look like the swing we are trying to develop in players today. Is that the mechanics you are looking for in the players you coach? From my very ignorant point of view, his head is moving three feet in that clip. That looks closer to a mens slow pitch softball swing. Hard to argue with the results though.
                          Bold above... my point exactly. The question you asked, to me, is would I change Babe Ruth's swing (mechanics.)

                          The mechanics. The mechanics. The mechanics. See through the style.


                          Who said moving the head is bad? Better tell Arod.




                          And Pujols...

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Tewks View Post

                            The root of my contention here... is what if rotation isn't the true power source of the high level swing? Not saying a turning/rotation component doesn't exist, but as a power source there is something else there.
                            Tewks, in looking at Pujol's swing above, if not rotation then what?
                            Granny said Sonny stick to your guns if you believe in something no matter what. Because it's better to be hated for who you are than to be loved for who you're not.

                            Comment


                            • #15





                              And 100's of other clips with little to no head movement. Even the two clips you posted have different head movement than the clip of Babe Ruth. Pulos head moves about 6inches and Arod less than a foot.

                              Again my ignorance is getting in the way. I don't study film like you but find it very interesting.

                              If a kid walked in with Babe Ruth's swing off the street I find it hard to believe you would consider it a perfect swing and not suggest any adjustments to "improve it."

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X