Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Trout and Harper Baseball Swings

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by The Uncoach View Post
    You guys realize that's Harper swinging a heavy bat, right? Like I said way earlier in this thread, post up some game swings. Stop posting irrelevant images and videos of practice.
    Of course Harper has a very good swing or he wouldn't be that good even with his kind of natural power.

    but if that heavy bat does alter his swing, doesn't that mean that kind of training is kinda pointless? swinging a heavy bat sounds great (williams advocated that too) but if it even alters harpers swing it might not be the best idea.
    I now have my own non commercial blog about training for batspeed and power using my training experience in baseball and track and field.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by trschnell View Post
      Your language is interesting, and these types of discussions fall apart quick without slow motion video with fast shutter speeds and a common language. Care to describe what you mean by his hands go very directly down to the ball? and do they do this independently of the other elements of the swing? or are they connected to other supporting elements throughout the swing? or are they connected at points, and disconnected at points?

      You also refer to the barrell's path, care to describe how his barrel path is different than others using this "very direct and down to the ball" hand path? It's not elliptical? It doesn't first swing towards the catcher? it's out of relation with torso tilt (above, below, etc.), it takes a turn somewhere differently, it starts and ends differently, but looks similar at contact? Are the hands going down at contact, up, or level with pitch plane? Is the barrel going down at contact, up, or level relative to pitch plane? etc.

      BTW: This is the challenge in teaching/learning hitting, everyone's language is different, unless you sit down for a 1-2 hour kinesology 101 session and define terms, movements, positions, getting on the same page, and never talk to anyone that isn't using different terms.

      But, taken literally, "hands very directly down and to the ball" is crazy, I'd hit the ball with my hands instead of the barrell. Further, my hands except for very high pitches, are way above the ball vertically, with only the barrel being at the level of the ball. So enjoy the language challenge if you will. If not, it's hard to offer meaningful comment on such an elementary statement.

      Cheers
      Boy I'm impressed, another internet expert. Read my original post, I was asking about barrel path. Don't claim to be an expert myself just asking what people think about Trout and Harpers swing and the path of their barrel prior to contact.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Standballdad View Post
        Boy I'm impressed, another internet expert. Read my original post, I was asking about barrel path. Don't claim to be an expert myself just asking what people think about Trout and Harpers swing and the path of their barrel prior to contact.
        so what is your point? hand path or barrell path?

        as for the barrell path it does go down initially but it will level out and start going up before contact. this shouldn't happen too early but also not too late. I would say usually the low point is about 1 foot to 1,5 before contact. if it happens farther back the swing will be long and loopy and if it happens later you don't got on plane with the pitch long enough.
        I now have my own non commercial blog about training for batspeed and power using my training experience in baseball and track and field.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by dominik View Post
          so what is your point? hand path or barrell path?

          as for the barrell path it does go down initially but it will level out and start going up before contact. this shouldn't happen too early but also not too late. I would say usually the low point is about 1 foot to 1,5 before contact. if it happens farther back the swing will be long and loopy and if it happens later you don't got on plane with the pitch long enough.
          Sorry, barrel path as I mentioned I am no expert. Lot of folks talk about high level MLB swings have the barrel on path early by turning it. Trout and Harper do not appear to do this. It is more direct. Just an observation on my part. People get all excited when the hitting topic comes up. I ask because I am trying to wade through all this stuff and understand what is really important to hitting so that I can steer my son in the right direction. IMO a more direct barrel path to the ball seems much simpler to me than some of the other stuff that's is being pushed on the Internet. I might be wrong but I need to understand why I am wrong not because someone says so. Dominik this is not pointed at you, you actually are trying to be helpful without pushing a specific approach.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Standballdad View Post
            Sorry, barrel path as I mentioned I am no expert. Lot of folks talk about high level MLB swings have the barrel on path early by turning it. Trout and Harper do not appear to do this. It is more direct. Just an observation on my part. People get all excited when the hitting topic comes up. I ask because I am trying to wade through all this stuff and understand what is really important to hitting so that I can steer my son in the right direction. IMO a more direct barrel path to the ball seems much simpler to me than some of the other stuff that's is being pushed on the Internet. I might be wrong but I need to understand why I am wrong not because someone says so. Dominik this is not pointed at you, you actually are trying to be helpful without pushing a specific approach.
            I think it's something in between. people now always talk about uppercutting and getting the barrell below the ball ("on plane") early. this is true but the uppercut is not as severe as people think. just because video has shown that pros do uppercut somewhat some people think the more uppercut the better.

            the barrell path while certainly not linear or straight down is still RELATIVELY direct and short. rotational hitting and circular hand path (the thing mankin promoted so aggressively compared to the old "hands move on straight line") does not mean wide, sweeping arcs and huge uppercuts. it still has to be tight and relatively direct.
            I now have my own non commercial blog about training for batspeed and power using my training experience in baseball and track and field.

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by dominik View Post
              I think it's something in between. people now always talk about uppercutting and getting the barrell below the ball ("on plane") early. this is true but the uppercut is not as severe as people think. just because video has shown that pros do uppercut somewhat some people think the more uppercut the better.

              the barrell path while certainly not linear or straight down is still RELATIVELY direct and short. rotational hitting and circular hand path (the thing mankin promoted so aggressively compared to the old "hands move on straight line") does not mean wide, sweeping arcs and huge uppercuts. it still has to be tight and relatively direct.
              I think what you are saying is barrel direct to ball but it will get on plane with ball path just before contact. If this is what you are saying then I kinda of agree with you. I am not a big fan of the terms linear and rotational. I think a good swing has both. IMHO

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by dominik View Post
                Of course Harper has a very good swing or he wouldn't be that good even with his kind of natural power.

                but if that heavy bat does alter his swing, doesn't that mean that kind of training is kinda pointless? swinging a heavy bat sounds great (williams advocated that too) but if it even alters harpers swing it might not be the best idea.
                No. It doesn't mean it's pointless. It could very well be that without that kind of training he would not start slower and earlier. Or he could simply be building up muscle. Yes, one has to be careful that doing something like that a lot could alter a swing in a non-constructive way, but we don't know how often, how much or why he was doing this. That's why observing practice swings and commenting on them makes very little sense.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Standballdad View Post
                  I think a good swing has both. IMHO
                  Keep studying. They are mutually exclusive terms.

                  Linear has nothing to do with striding/not striding.

                  You either throw your hands, or you keep them back. You either slot your elbow to contact, or you throw your arms out like a maniac. That's it.
                  efastball.com - hitting and pitching fact checker

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Standballdad View Post
                    Watch his hands, very direct and down to the ball

                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WnHX...eature=related
                    Originally posted by Standballdad View Post
                    Here is video of Harper, around 15 seconds into his swing it appears he loads up with the hands and takes a direct path to the ball. No film on Trout, just what I saw last night. Harpers does not seem as downward as Trouts after looking at this video.


                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dm7EG...eature=related
                    Stop looking at their hands and look at their barrels (paths) instead.....
                    In memory of "Catchingcoach" - Dave Weaver: February 28, 1955 - June 17, 2011

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by mudvnine View Post
                      Stop looking at their hands and look at their barrels (paths) instead.....
                      Yes barrel path, I corrected myself a couple of times.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by songtitle View Post
                        Keep studying. They are mutually exclusive terms.

                        Linear has nothing to do with striding/not striding.

                        You either throw your hands, or you keep them back. You either slot your elbow to contact, or you throw your arms out like a maniac. That's it.
                        You lost me

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by Standballdad View Post
                          Yes barrel path, I corrected myself a couple of times.
                          Well then.....no, their barrel paths are not, "down and through".

                          Their barrel path are both "behind and through".....

                          CCabrera.gif

                          .....like basically every other decent MLB hitter.

                          Don't know what else you expect them to do for "getting on plane early turning the barrel etc".....their barrels are doing basically the same thing(s) as Cabrera's above, with a slightly different handset.
                          Last edited by mudvnine; 05-04-2012, 10:19 PM. Reason: Grammar.....
                          In memory of "Catchingcoach" - Dave Weaver: February 28, 1955 - June 17, 2011

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by mudvnine View Post
                            Well then.....no, their barrel path is not, "down and through".

                            Their barrel path are both "behind and through".....

                            [ATTACH]108192[/ATTACH]

                            .....like basically every other decent MLB hitter.

                            Don't know what you else you expect them to do for "getting on plane early turning the barrel etc".....their barrels are doing basically the same thing(s) as Cabrera's above, but maybe from a different handset.
                            I wish I had a good clip of Trouts swing. What I thought I saw was not what your clip shows.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              So use the Pujols still in this thread, and describe to us how the pink and yellow dots of the barrell traced on Trout's swing would be postioned differently as compared to Pujols ... representing Trout's more direct barrel path you witnessed.
                              We can edit the still to represent what you saw, label that picture Trout's more direct barrel path (as compared to Pujols), and when we get an acceptable video, we can trace it to see if video supports your eye.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Granted, Mike might not load his hands as "rearward" as Cabrera or some other MLB hitters....or has yet to get as good as "stretch/separation" as the more experienced (refined) professional hitters, and is currently relying a lot in his athleticism, but his barrel still turns from "behind" and swings "through" the ball, more than it goes "down and through".
                                In memory of "Catchingcoach" - Dave Weaver: February 28, 1955 - June 17, 2011

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X