Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Baseball Logic & Probability Question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Baseball Logic & Probability Question

    Most coaches, scorekeepers, and others i know who understand baseball, have a very good understanding of probability and logic. So, put on your thinking cap and see if you can answer the following probability question.

    Here it is:
    As you approach home plate to flip a coin to determine who will be home team, the umpire decides he is tired of using the coin toss to decide this, tosses 3 identical hats on the ground. He has you look away, while he puts a baseball under one of the hats. He asks you to chose the hat which is covering the ball. You choose hat #1.
    The umpire then lifts up one of the other 2 hats and tosses it aside. (since he knows where the ball is, he shows you the hat that does NOT have the ball). He then asks if you would like to switch your choice from hat#1 to the remaining hat?

    To give yourself the best chance to pick the hat with the ball, do you:
    1. Stay with your first choice?
    2. Switch your choice to the other hat?
    Last edited by steddie; 07-03-2012, 11:32 AM.

  • #2
    Monty Hall problem.

    Comment


    • #3
      First proposed by Stephen Selvin (sp?) 1975.
      "He who dares to teach, must never cease to learn."
      - John Cotton Dana (1856–1929) - Offered to many by L. Olson - Iowa (Teacher)
      Please read Baseball Fever Policy and Forum FAQ before posting.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by steddie View Post
        The umpire then lifts up one of the other 2 hats and tosses it aside.
        Maybe he only lifts up one of the other hats whenever he knows that you guessed right...? :P That would be pretty tricky.

        I have a probability question rattling around my head; it's not a brain-teaser, though, just math:

        Here it is:

        Assume a batter that takes every pitch.

        If a pitcher throws 80% strikes, what is the probability that the batter will draw a walk rather than strike out? What about 70% strikes? 60%? 50%?

        Comment


        • #5
          well, does he throw his strikes all clumped together or strike-ball-strike-ball?

          Comment


          • #6
            Assume the probability of each pitch isn't affected by the previous pitches. Just like flipping a coin or rolling dice...

            Comment


            • #7
              Correct me if I'm wrong, but here's the numbers I get:

              80% strikes: 1.7% chance of a walk
              70% strikes: 7.0% chance of a walk
              60% strikes: 17.9% chance of a walk
              50% strikes: 34.3% chance of a walk
              42.1% strikes: 50% chance of a walk

              This is assuming the batter doesn't swing. Which isn't all that rare at the very young levels.
              Last edited by bbrages; 07-03-2012, 02:57 PM. Reason: whoops, found an error

              Comment


              • #8
                I knew this thing had been around for a while, but had no idea how long. One thing that did amaze me about it, was the responses received from top physicists working in various universities across the country. A MAJORITY of the professors gave an incorrect answer when this question was posed in Parade magazine in the early 90s.

                This past week we did a 8 hour drive down to the global world series near Gulf Shores, so I had plenty of time to kill.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Jake Patterson View Post
                  First proposed by Stephen Selvin (sp?) 1975.
                  Nice memory Jake. Spot on, correct name (even the spelling!) and the year! real green also got it right. Some pretty educated folks around here that would know something so esoteric.

                  It's an interesting little problem, at first a little surprising but once you think about it the answer is pretty easy to understand. That said, the vast majority of folks get fooled by the answer, and as steddie points out, even a bunch of Ph.D.'s.
                  The outcome of our children is infinitely more important than the outcome of any game they will ever play

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by steddie View Post
                    Most coaches, scorekeepers, and others i know who understand baseball, have a very good understanding of probability and logic. So, put on your thinking cap and see if you can answer the following probability question.

                    Here it is:
                    As you approach home plate to flip a coin to determine who will be home team, the umpire decides he is tired of using the coin toss to decide this, tosses 3 identical hats on the ground. He has you look away, while he puts a baseball under one of the hats. He asks you to chose the hat which is covering the ball. You choose hat #1.
                    The umpire then lifts up one of the other 2 hats and tosses it aside. (since he knows where the ball is, he shows you the hat that does NOT have the ball). He then asks if you would like to switch your choice from hat#1 to the remaining hat?

                    To give yourself the best chance to pick the hat with the ball, do you:
                    1. Stay with your first choice?
                    2. Switch your choice to the other hat?
                    2. Switch your choice to the other hat.
                    Never played baseball, just a dad of someone that loves to play. So take any advice I post with a grain of salt.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by steddie View Post
                      Most coaches, scorekeepers, and others i know who understand baseball, have a very good understanding of probability and logic. So, put on your thinking cap and see if you can answer the following probability question.

                      Here it is:
                      As you approach home plate to flip a coin to determine who will be home team, the umpire decides he is tired of using the coin toss to decide this, tosses 3 identical hats on the ground. He has you look away, while he puts a baseball under one of the hats. He asks you to chose the hat which is covering the ball. You choose hat #1.
                      The umpire then lifts up one of the other 2 hats and tosses it aside. (since he knows where the ball is, he shows you the hat that does NOT have the ball). He then asks if you would like to switch your choice from hat#1 to the remaining hat?

                      To give yourself the best chance to pick the hat with the ball, do you:
                      1. Stay with your first choice?
                      2. Switch your choice to the other hat?
                      I had this problem explained by our maths professor in university. It's several years ago though.

                      when I remember it correctly changing does increase the chance here however I have forgotten why. maybe brett or matt in the stats section could help you here more.
                      I now have my own non commercial blog about training for batspeed and power using my training experience in baseball and track and field.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by dominik View Post
                        I had this problem explained by our maths professor in university. It's several years ago though.

                        when I remember it correctly changing does increase the chance here however I have forgotten why. maybe brett or matt in the stats section could help you here more.
                        The key is that the umpire knows what's under the hats and the umpire always chooses a hat the coach did not choose but is not the right hat. (And the coach realizes this is the situation.) Try it yourself with 3 cups and a coin. Try different scenarios and note how you are constrained as the umpire and how the second choice shakes down. I think it will make complete sense then.
                        Indeed the first step toward finding out is to acknowledge you do not satisfactorily know already; so that no blight can so surely arrest all intellectual growth as the blight of cocksureness.--CS Peirce

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          How the problem is explained and the sequence of choices is very important when proving Selvin correct.
                          "He who dares to teach, must never cease to learn."
                          - John Cotton Dana (1856–1929) - Offered to many by L. Olson - Iowa (Teacher)
                          Please read Baseball Fever Policy and Forum FAQ before posting.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            steddie,

                            I'll take a crack at explaining the answer to the peanut gallery when you want, but I don't want to spoil the answer yet until folks get a chance to try their luck. It's a fun little problem.

                            -JJA
                            The outcome of our children is infinitely more important than the outcome of any game they will ever play

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by bbrages View Post
                              Correct me if I'm wrong, but here's the numbers I get:

                              80% strikes: 1.7% chance of a walk
                              70% strikes: 7.0% chance of a walk
                              60% strikes: 17.9% chance of a walk
                              50% strikes: 34.3% chance of a walk
                              42.1% strikes: 50% chance of a walk

                              This is assuming the batter doesn't swing. Which isn't all that rare at the very young levels.
                              Yes, I get the same numbers. Good calculation.
                              The outcome of our children is infinitely more important than the outcome of any game they will ever play

                              Comment

                              Ad Widget

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X