And What's on second.
When my son was a little younger (6-8), it was fairly standard to put one of the team's best receivers at first base. This year, I decided I needed my best fielders at the other infield positions. So I picked two tall, slow kids to play first base. I figured I could throw a zillion balls at them until they got it down. But I suspect that I'm making a huge mistake. Both kids are scared of the hard throws and have terrible footwork as a result. Of course, they also miss a lot of throws because they're just stabbing at the ball and flinching.
Is it okay to put one of the better athletes at first base on a 10U team? I have a lightning fast kid who fields the ball well but tends to make bad throws. It seems like I can kill two birds with one stone by moving him to first base. He's also my No. 2 catcher, but my No. 1 catcher seems like he would fit well at first base, too. So I'm thinking of rotating the two.
When my son was a little younger (6-8), it was fairly standard to put one of the team's best receivers at first base. This year, I decided I needed my best fielders at the other infield positions. So I picked two tall, slow kids to play first base. I figured I could throw a zillion balls at them until they got it down. But I suspect that I'm making a huge mistake. Both kids are scared of the hard throws and have terrible footwork as a result. Of course, they also miss a lot of throws because they're just stabbing at the ball and flinching.
Is it okay to put one of the better athletes at first base on a 10U team? I have a lightning fast kid who fields the ball well but tends to make bad throws. It seems like I can kill two birds with one stone by moving him to first base. He's also my No. 2 catcher, but my No. 1 catcher seems like he would fit well at first base, too. So I'm thinking of rotating the two.
Comment