Re: Re: Re: Re: ponson
I was referring to the fact that the Orioles are looking to slash salary and acquire prospects, but in order for the Red Sox, Braves, Cardinals, etc. to part with multiple good prospects, they'd want Ponson longer than 2 months. Now I realize that the spin some writers are putting on it is that if the O's can afford to sign him, they'll happily keep him, and I'm not saying I know that to be wrong, but I AM saying that I don't think that's necessarily true. They may be signing him to get more for him. Also, even if that's not their intension, once he's signed, the increased offers they receive may prove too tempting.
One other note - The fact that you haven't heard the sox or their brass mention him doesn't mean a thing as to whether or not their pursuing him. I saw Theo interviewed on tv tonight, and he said they want a pitcher who'll be a 'difference maker now and in the future'. (sounds good) But he also said they are playing it close to the vest and would not name names, and mentioned hurting their cause this past off season by talking too much about their intentions.
so, sox fans, stay tuned....
Originally posted by Mattingly
I'll take your word for it. I wasn't checking out the O's team page much, so I missed it. Either case, I guess they must not have gotten much of a reaction from Boston or anyone else if they're going to offer him a contract. From your description, they seemed to want to send out a "feeler" to guage interest. I guess even if they'd kept Ponson, the interest level would've helped determine salary or length of contract.
Yes, I think Boston needs a #2 starter badly, but I guess you'll understand my hoping this never happens soon.
Seriously, I'm not sure who's your current #2 (Lowe or Wakefield), but someone solid couldn't hurt. Heck, I'd give my eyeteeth to have Halladay or Wood in the Bronx.
It's Sunday, so if this isn't finalized, I couldn't say. From ESPN's Baltimore team page:
From the Baltimore Sun:
You'll need to click the link to see the rest of the article.
When you'd written "If he gets signed to a longer term, his value goes up and teams are more willing to commit", were you referring to his trade value later on? His value to the team?
I'll take your word for it. I wasn't checking out the O's team page much, so I missed it. Either case, I guess they must not have gotten much of a reaction from Boston or anyone else if they're going to offer him a contract. From your description, they seemed to want to send out a "feeler" to guage interest. I guess even if they'd kept Ponson, the interest level would've helped determine salary or length of contract.
Yes, I think Boston needs a #2 starter badly, but I guess you'll understand my hoping this never happens soon.

It's Sunday, so if this isn't finalized, I couldn't say. From ESPN's Baltimore team page:
From the Baltimore Sun:
You'll need to click the link to see the rest of the article.
When you'd written "If he gets signed to a longer term, his value goes up and teams are more willing to commit", were you referring to his trade value later on? His value to the team?
One other note - The fact that you haven't heard the sox or their brass mention him doesn't mean a thing as to whether or not their pursuing him. I saw Theo interviewed on tv tonight, and he said they want a pitcher who'll be a 'difference maker now and in the future'. (sounds good) But he also said they are playing it close to the vest and would not name names, and mentioned hurting their cause this past off season by talking too much about their intentions.
so, sox fans, stay tuned....
Comment