Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Players reaching out to fans to raise money for charities

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Captain Cold Nose
    replied
    Originally posted by Cap78 View Post
    Unless there are specific athletes who the OP wants to "out," this thread is pointless
    You think so?

    Me, too.

    Closing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cap78
    replied
    Unless there are specific athletes who the OP wants to "out," this thread is pointless

    Leave a comment:


  • ian2813
    replied
    Originally posted by BiZmaRK View Post
    You're missing the point. It's not whether or not you feel you should help the charity. It's a question of why the player reaches out to those who are far less capable to help out than those who are in his immediate professional circle.

    If you were in a profession in which many people were millionaires and wanted to raise money for a charity, would you go to a bunch of starving students or would you reach out to other millionaires? Which would more likely help you meet the demands of the charity?
    Oh, for crying out loud.

    1. Unless it's a fundraiser where a specific goal is stated, I imagine most charities will take any money they can get. That means even small donations from average people like you and me contribute to their cause.

    2. How do you know the ballplayers don't donate to the charity themselves or reach out to their fellow ballplayers? If I were a millionaire trying to help out a charity, of course I'd give some of my own money. Are they supposed to publicize the exact amount they give, or the full extent to which they've worked with the charity? Why? Are they doing it because they believe in the cause or because they want to glorify themselves?

    3. Why should only millionaires donate to charity? Are the rest of us exempt from any sort of social responsibility? Your argument seems to be "Why ask us for money? Can't their money alone support this charity?" Why should the entire burden be placed on their shoulders? I've donated small amounts to causes I thought were worthwhile before, and I don't feel bitter about it because theoretically some rich person could've donated my share and more.

    Leave a comment:


  • Honus Wagner Rules
    replied
    Originally posted by BiZmaRK View Post
    You're missing the point. It's not whether or not you feel you should help the charity. It's a question of why the player reaches out to those who are far less capable to help out than those who are in his immediate professional circle.
    No, I get the point. It's another one of your threads complaining about greedy baseball players. I'm surprised you haven't mentioned Matt Cain yet.

    If you were in a profession in which many people were millionaires and wanted to raise money for a charity, would you go to a bunch of starving students or would you reach out to other millionaires? Which would more likely help you meet the demands of the charity?
    Starving students can still help in other ways without giving money. They can offer services and work to the charity.

    Leave a comment:


  • EdTarbusz
    replied
    Originally posted by BiZmaRK View Post

    If you were in a profession in which many people were millionaires and wanted to raise money for a charity, would you go to a bunch of starving students or would you reach out to other millionaires? Which would more likely help you meet the demands of the charity?
    The only way I could see myself appealing to the general public (if I were a millionaire) would be if I were famously associated with a specifice charity and they specifically asked me to appeal for donations. I think it's kind of tasteless for millionaires to appeal to the general public for donations.

    Leave a comment:


  • BiZmaRK
    replied
    Originally posted by Honus Wagner Rules View Post
    Well if the charity is legit you are not helping out the player. You are helping out the people the charity is for, right? Who cares if the player gives or not. If a player asks to help feed the homeless would it make much sense for you to say, "Since the player doesn't donate, I don't want to help a charity that feeds the homeless either."
    You're missing the point. It's not whether or not you feel you should help the charity. It's a question of why the player reaches out to those who are far less capable to help out than those who are in his immediate professional circle.

    If you were in a profession in which many people were millionaires and wanted to raise money for a charity, would you go to a bunch of starving students or would you reach out to other millionaires? Which would more likely help you meet the demands of the charity?

    Leave a comment:


  • Honus Wagner Rules
    replied
    Originally posted by BiZmaRK View Post
    Countless times you will see players reaching out to the fans to raise money for charities. But when these players don't make it public that they're donating their own money to the same charity they want your money from, it makes them seem greedy - especially since most of them make well over 100 times what the typical fan makes.

    Imagine if someone came to you to ask money for a charity. And you find out this person lives a life of luxury - exotic cars, exotic vacations, etc. - yet doesn't donate any of his own money to the charity. How would you feel about helping out someone who has far more capability of giving to the charity than you do?

    The players need only look to their colleagues to raise money for their charities. Their teammates make far more money than the typical fan does and have far more discretionary money than the typical fan.
    Well if the charity is legit you are not helping out the player. You are helping out the people the charity is for, right? Who cares if the player gives or not. If a player asks to help feed the homeless would it make much sense for you to say, "Since the player doesn't donate, I don't want to help a charity that feeds the homeless either."

    Leave a comment:


  • Captain Cold Nose
    replied
    This is not a current event. It's more of a (highly speculative,zero-fact based) blog post than anything else.

    Leave a comment:


  • GiambiJuice
    replied
    I'm not sure I understand what the issue is. Nobody has to give anything. If you are a famous personality, what's wrong with lending your name to a good cause? Let's say Derek Jeter has 1,000,000 Twitter followers. If they each give an average of $1, he can raise $1,000,000 for a good cause simply by taking 5 seconds to type a few words. IF I had that kind of influence, I hope I'd use it for good things like this. Whether or not Jeter himself gives money to this particular charity should be irrelevant IMO.

    Leave a comment:


  • Players reaching out to fans to raise money for charities

    Countless times you will see players reaching out to the fans to raise money for charities. But when these players don't make it public that they're donating their own money to the same charity they want your money from, it makes them seem greedy - especially since most of them make well over 100 times what the typical fan makes.

    Imagine if someone came to you to ask money for a charity. And you find out this person lives a life of luxury - exotic cars, exotic vacations, etc. - yet doesn't donate any of his own money to the charity. How would you feel about helping out someone who has far more capability of giving to the charity than you do?

    The players need only look to their colleagues to raise money for their charities. Their teammates make far more money than the typical fan does and have far more discretionary money than the typical fan.

Ad Widget

Collapse
Working...
X