The Nets I think moved to Brooklyn. I recently read an article discussing that Brooklyn would not mind luring the Islanders to a facilty in Brooklyn. I know the Yanks and Mets would never allow it, but could Brooklyn support a baseball team nowadays? Thay would be cool.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Brooklyn
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Richard View PostThe Nets I think moved to Brooklyn. I recently read an article discussing that Brooklyn would not mind luring the Islanders to a facilty in Brooklyn. I know the Yanks and Mets would never allow it, but could Brooklyn support a baseball team nowadays? Thay would be cool.Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.-Crash Davis
-
I wonder what are the MLB rules about bringing in another team close to an existing team(s)? I know the SF Giants have "territorial rights" to the South Bay that prevents the A's from moving to San Jose. But those rights were only granted to the Giants in 1992. From what I read about the Expos moving to D.C. the Baltimore Orioles did not have territorial rights to the D.C. when the Expos moved but the Orioles were still paid to to allow the Expos move. Do the Yankees and Mets have "territorial rights"? Can the other major league teams overrule the Yankees and Mets or not?Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.-Crash Davis
Comment
-
Why are teams in Brooklyn entitled to be named "Brooklyn" instead of New York? It's been over 100 years since Brooklyn was an independent city. They're part of New York City now, so why not just use "New York"?
Bronx Yankees - doesn't sound right, right?Using a stolen chant from Boston Celtics fans whenever an L.A. team is playing up there just reeks of inferiority complex.
If hitting a baseball is the toughest thing to do in sports, then pitching must be the easiest thing to do in sports.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Richard View PostThe Nets I think moved to Brooklyn. I recently read an article discussing that Brooklyn would not mind luring the Islanders to a facilty in Brooklyn. I know the Yanks and Mets would never allow it, but could Brooklyn support a baseball team nowadays? Thay would be cool.
Originally posted by UnderPressure View PostWhy are teams in Brooklyn entitled to be named "Brooklyn" instead of New York? It's been over 100 years since Brooklyn was an independent city. They're part of New York City now, so why not just use "New York"?
Bronx Yankees - doesn't sound right, right?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Blue387 View Post(In response to Honus Wagner Rules' question, "Are the baseball fans in Brooklyn more Yankees fans or Mets fans?")
The Yankees.
I feel lonely.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Brooklyn View PostThere is no rule in how a team is named. You have teams named after states (Texas rangers), cities (Los Angeles dodgers), bodies of water (Tampa bay rays) and in other sports you have the giants and jets who are named after a city/state that they don't even play in, or the patriots who are named after a region. Brooklyn just has a nice ring to it, named after a very proud boroughVisit my card site at Mike D's Baseball Card Page.
Comment
-
-
I think a third team could indeed be supported in the Greater New York area, but the only way I can envision it being successful and not stepping on too many toes would be if they were to be located in New Jersey.
The question, imho, is, can MLB support a 31st team. I would think any new team in the NYC area would have to be a relocated existing one.Put it in the books.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Brooklyn View PostOr the Golden State Warriors, who are named after a state's nickname.Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.-Crash Davis
Comment
Ad Widget
Collapse
Comment