Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bottom to Top in one season?
Collapse
X
-
I do believe the Dodgers are a big chance to be contenders after last season's dismal performance, but they need a boost to the pitching rotation. They have had a management change which seems ok at this stage (my crystal ball tells me it is ok) and their playing strength makes them a contender.
-
Originally posted by DoubleXYou meant the Dodgers, instead of the Angels, right?
Leave a comment:
-
The Devil Rays just got rid of Baez, one of the few bright spots on that team. I think there's gonna be more pain in Tampa, at least for a few years to come.
Leave a comment:
-
You meant the Dodgers, instead of the Angels, right?
I think any team in the NL West not named the Rockies has a shot of going from the bottom to contending from one year to the next. So the Dodgers fit that bill.
I think the Tigers and Mariners should improve noticeably, but probably not enough to seriously contend.
I also think the Devil Rays are getting closer to really improving. They have a terrific young core in the field: Crawford, Baldelli, Gomes, Cantu, Young, and Upton. Kazmir is an ace in the making. With some pitching help, this is a team that could really be something special in 2 or 3 years.
Leave a comment:
-
Bottom to Top in one season?
We've had a couple threads like this already, but I just wanted to put a different spin on it.
Are there any teams out there that lost 90+ games, that has a shot at contending next season? If so, who? Was it one specific player? Management changes? Tell us what you think.
For reference, here are last years 90+ game losers:
Colorado Rockies (67-95)
Los Angeles Dodgers (71-91)
Pittsburgh Pirages (67-95)
Tampa Bay Devil Rays (67-95)
Detroit Tigers (71-91)
Kansas City Royals (56-106)
Seattle Mariner's (69-93)
*my 1000th post*Last edited by Edgartohof; 01-17-2006, 07:28 PM.Tags: None
Ad Widget
Collapse
Leave a comment: