Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Crisp Trade Completed!
Collapse
X
-
Thanks for the link. As a Red Sox fan I think it may be a few years before we know how this helped both teams. Injuries may decide who got the better of the deal.
I understand the thinking of the Red Sox front office the past four weeks: Keep Damon, age 32, at 13 million or get Crisp, age 26, at only 3 or 4 million. If Coco hits .300 then all three Sox GM's look like geniuses.
The Indians are gambling that Marte will be as good or better than Crisp."He's tougher than a railroad sandwich."
"You'se Got The Eye Of An Eagle."
Comment
-
Originally posted by BoofBonser26
Marte is putting up numbers similar to those posted by Chipper Jones at the same age and level. He's a consensus top 10 prospect (probably top 5). You acquired Jason Michaels to help soften the blow of losing Crisp; Michaels is a good defender that posts solid OBPs, and all you had to give up for him was a mid-30s reliever that had an out-of-context year in 2005.
You can't really blast Boston for this, since they were desperate for a CF, but I think looking back on this in a few years, Cleveland will surely be ahead.
Comment
-
This is also worth repeating: while Crisp is generally regarded as an outstanding left fielder, he's going to be playing CF in Boston. He has 188 games as a CF under his belt, and his RAA is -12.
Take it for what it's worth.
Comment
-
Bad trade for the Indians who are built to compete now, and for a team that is financially convervative and will have to make some tough decisions in a few years on its star players (Hafner, Martinez, Peralta, Sizemore), they should have kept this team intact for as long as possible and compete while they can. Plus, not only does Cleveland weaken itself for this season, but it strengthens a team that could possibly be rivaling Cleveland for the Wild Card playoff spot.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pacewonThis is also worth repeating: while Crisp is generally regarded as an outstanding left fielder, he's going to be playing CF in Boston. He has 188 games as a CF under his belt, and his RAA is -12.
Take it for what it's worth.
You should add that one year, 2004, certainly skewed Crisp's RAA in center field. His three other years are just barely below 0. The four taken as a whole are not consistently abysmal by any means. Add to that a career RAA of 11 in left, and I think you're painting the picture of a young, raw player. Clearly, for now, this was a good move by Boston. I think most fans would agree."Anything less would not have been worthy of me. Anything more would not have been possible." - Carl Yastrzemski
Comment
-
I disagree that this was a bad move for cleveland, i think it was great. Michaels will be a slight downgrade from Crisp, but Marte will be a significant upgrade over Boone. They'll have him under control for 6 years and that will add another great young hitter to the lineup. Its fair to say Crisp doesn't have much upside beyond what he already has done. He was never projected to be as good as he has been, and both scouting reports and defensive metrics agree that he is a questionable defender in center. I don't trust BP's Rate or FRAA at all, but UZR and Gassko's RAA both agree that he has been great in left, but pretty bad in center (Gassko had him at -20 there in 2004). That said, Crisp is an offensive upgrade over Damon, and moving from Jacobs to Fenway he could put up a .315/.365/.490 line. The Sox probably have the second best offense in the majors at this point, but have question marks in their rotation, bullpen, and outfield defense. I'd put them and the yankees about even, and project both of them for around 92 wins.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TonyKDasperp: You really think Crisp is an offensive upgrade over Damon?
You took the words out of my mouth, TonyK."Anything less would not have been worthy of me. Anything more would not have been possible." - Carl Yastrzemski
Comment
-
Originally posted by DoubleXBad trade for the Indians who are built to compete now, and for a team that is financially convervative and will have to make some tough decisions in a few years on its star players (Hafner, Martinez, Peralta, Sizemore), they should have kept this team intact for as long as possible and compete while they can. Plus, not only does Cleveland weaken itself for this season, but it strengthens a team that could possibly be rivaling Cleveland for the Wild Card playoff spot.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AstroI disagree... there is no reason to think Marte cant come up and contribute right away... 2 of the star players you listed (Sizemore and Peralta) did just that in their first full seasons
Don't you think, though, that with almost any prospect, a team has to assume that he won't be able to come up big right away?"Anything less would not have been worthy of me. Anything more would not have been possible." - Carl Yastrzemski
Comment
-
You really think Crisp is an offensive upgrade over Damon?
Comment
-
Originally posted by AstroI disagree... there is no reason to think Marte cant come up and contribute right away... 2 of the star players you listed (Sizemore and Peralta) did just that in their first full seasonsCLEVELAND INDIANS Central Division Champions
1920 1948 1954 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2001 2007
Comment
-
Originally posted by AstroI disagree... there is no reason to think Marte cant come up and contribute right away... 2 of the star players you listed (Sizemore and Peralta) did just that in their first full seasons
Comment
Ad Widget
Collapse
Comment