Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Should the Nationals carry 2000 infielders or 2001?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Should the Nationals carry 2000 infielders or 2001?

    I'm really thinking we should sign Roberto Alomar to a deal for added depth.
    The Q: Can the Cubs hold a 6-5 lead with 2 outs and nobody on in the 9th?

    The A: No

    ***********My Rant on Bud Selig***********
    Selig is like a stray pigeon. Pigeons are too self-absorbed to care about anyone else. They poo on people they don't like; they poo on people they don't even know. The only real difference between Selig and a pigeon is that Selig intends to bury our heritage, our traditions, and our culture,

  • #2
    "Should the Nationals carry 2000 infielders or 2001?"

    That's tough with only a 40-man roster. And where will they put them all?

    Bob

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by bluezebra
      "Should the Nationals carry 2000 infielders or 2001?"

      That's tough with only a 40-man roster. And where will they put them all?

      Bob
      I presume this was for guys who'd played in the years 2000 or 2001, not the number of players on a roster.
      Please read Baseball Fever Policy and Forum FAQ before posting. 2007-11 CBA
      Rest very peacefully, John “Buck” O'Neil (1911-2006) & Philip Francis “Scooter” Rizzuto (1917-2007)
      THE BROOKLYN DODGERS - 1890 thru 1957
      Montreal Expos 1969 - 2004

      Comment


      • #4
        No it was a joke considering we have 24 infielders right now on the spring training roster. I exaggerated by saying: Should we have 2000 or 2001 infielders on our team?
        The Q: Can the Cubs hold a 6-5 lead with 2 outs and nobody on in the 9th?

        The A: No

        ***********My Rant on Bud Selig***********
        Selig is like a stray pigeon. Pigeons are too self-absorbed to care about anyone else. They poo on people they don't like; they poo on people they don't even know. The only real difference between Selig and a pigeon is that Selig intends to bury our heritage, our traditions, and our culture,

        Comment


        • #5
          2001? Why stop there? Just keep on going up!
          I like cranberry sauce.

          "The Babe was a great ballplayer, sure, but Ty Cobb was even greater. Babe could knock your brains out, but Cobb would drive you crazy." - Tris Speaker

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by KingJ
            No it was a joke considering we have 24 infielders right now on the spring training roster. I exaggerated by saying: Should we have 2000 or 2001 infielders on our team?
            I take it your team isn't banking on too many outfield flies then. 24 Are including 1B and C in that? I might expect pitchers to be on with that many.
            Johnson and now Goligoski gone.
            I hope that's all.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Chisox
              I take it your team isn't banking on too many outfield flies then. 24 Are including 1B and C in that? I might expect pitchers to be on with that many.
              Includes C and 1B...our OF doesn't look that bad anyway. Tucker is a little old, but the rest are all young and upcoming.
              The Q: Can the Cubs hold a 6-5 lead with 2 outs and nobody on in the 9th?

              The A: No

              ***********My Rant on Bud Selig***********
              Selig is like a stray pigeon. Pigeons are too self-absorbed to care about anyone else. They poo on people they don't like; they poo on people they don't even know. The only real difference between Selig and a pigeon is that Selig intends to bury our heritage, our traditions, and our culture,

              Comment


              • #8
                I think its hilarious that the Nats were able to sign a SS (Royce Clayton) that is actually bad enough to be a backup for Christian Guzman.

                Comment

                Ad Widget

                Collapse
                Working...
                X
                😀
                🥰
                🤢
                😎
                😡
                👍
                👎