Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Nick Markakis:Surprising Lack Of Inrterest KIn Markakis In the Free Agent Market

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Nick Markakis:Surprising Lack Of Inrterest KIn Markakis In the Free Agent Market

    It's kind of odd that Nick Markkis hasn't been snatched up by some team that needs a good outfielder like Nick Markakis. I know he carried a huge salary last season, but isn't this true of every player who has been in the majors as long as Markakis has (13 years 2006-2018) and been an everyday player throughout their career, like Markakis. Perhaps he has "priced himself out" of anyone taking a chance on him repeating his 018 success.
    It seems like Markakis can't find a suitor for his services despite having his first all-star year in 2018 for the Braves. He played in all of the Braves' 162 games on last year's schedule. Markakis will only be 35 in the 2019 season and he's coming off one of his career's best seasons.
    Here's Markakis' 2018i and career numbers.

    2018i: Games: 162 Hits 185 Home Runs 14 RBI 93 Batting Average .297 (Was a National League starting All-Star Outfielder (1st time all-star) and Played every game on the schedule.
    Career: Games 2001 Hits 2237 Home Runs 179 RBI 969 Batting Average .288.

  • #2
    Probably because he is a 2-win player asking for 4-win player money because he and his agent think FOs around the league are still stupid enough to pay massive amounts of money for a bunch seasons just for hitting close to .300. This ain't 1999 anymore and they aren't. A 117 OPS+ for a mediocre fielding corner OFer is not really a SUPER valuable commodity. And that was his BEST season since Obama's 1st term.

    Most teams can pull up a 2-win player from their minors for free.
    Last edited by Bothrops Atrox; 01-14-2019, 07:17 AM.
    1885 1886 1926 1931 1934 1942 1944 1946 1964 1967 1982 2006 2011

    1887 1888 1928 1930 1943 1968 1985 1987 2004 2013

    1996 2000 2001 2002 2005 2009 2012 2014 2015


    The Top 100 Pitchers In MLB History
    The Top 100 Position Players In MLB History

    Comment


    • #3
      Markakis is mediocre, at best, for a major league starting outfield. He's coming of a mediocre year, which was his best since 2009, in which he posted a 117OPS+ 12Rbat 6RAA 2.6rWAA 0.4rWAA 1.8Btwins 1.0WPA 23.5RE24 2.3REW He also had a putrid postseason of .083/.267/.083 He also recently turned 35.

      HIs remarkable durability is his greatest strength. He only has a career 110OPS+ 113Rbat 36RAA 32.4rWAR 3.7rWAA, hardly formidable numbers. Markakis shouldn't be signed for anything over a two year contract, with a team option for the second year with a salary of 3-4 million a year.
      Last edited by NJRob65; 01-13-2019, 08:26 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        "Surprising" to whom?
        My top 10 players:

        1. Babe Ruth
        2. Barry Bonds
        3. Ty Cobb
        4. Ted Williams
        5. Willie Mays
        6. Alex Rodriguez
        7. Hank Aaron
        8. Honus Wagner
        9. Lou Gehrig
        10. Mickey Mantle

        Comment


        • #5
          This isn't a surprise at all. Markakis really isn't that good. He pretty much had his best season in a long time and it was built on a red-hot first half. His second half? .258/.332/.369. I don't usually throw WAR around, but this is kind of telling: Markakis's BBRef WAR last year, 2.6 (which really isn't even that special), is more than his previous two years (1.7 and 0.7) combined. You don't pay big money for that kind of production. The Braves could stick Johan Camrago, who's almost entirely unexperienced, in right and he'd get more WAR than that.
          46 wins to match last year's total

          Comment


          • #6
            All this being said... if the Braves have to re-sign Markakis, something has gone seriously wrong.
            46 wins to match last year's total

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by SamtheBravesFan View Post
              All this being said... if the Braves have to re-sign Markakis, something has gone seriously wrong.
              I think the Braves do have to resign Markakis now. Why wouldn't they?
              "No matter how great you were once upon a time — the years go by, and men forget,” - W. A. Phelon in Baseball Magazine in 1915. “Ross Barnes, forty years ago, was as great as Cobb or Wagner ever dared to be. Had scores been kept then as now, he would have seemed incomparably marvelous.”

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by bluesky5 View Post

                I think the Braves do have to resign Markakis now. Why wouldn't they?
                They don't. They can do better than him. I'm utterly convinced they're going to have to replace him at some point in the season because he's just not that good anymore.
                46 wins to match last year's total

                Comment


                • #9
                  He's also now on the wrong side of 35. Not every player can be Omar Vizquel or John Olerud.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by SamtheBravesFan View Post

                    They don't. They can do better than him. I'm utterly convinced they're going to have to replace him at some point in the season because he's just not that good anymore.
                    He just was an all-star, GG, SS winner that hit cleanup for a division winner and he's going to come cheap. He knows everyone in the organization and is by all accounts a great guy. If they need to cut him they have a built in excuse - he's old. What is the downside?
                    "No matter how great you were once upon a time — the years go by, and men forget,” - W. A. Phelon in Baseball Magazine in 1915. “Ross Barnes, forty years ago, was as great as Cobb or Wagner ever dared to be. Had scores been kept then as now, he would have seemed incomparably marvelous.”

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by bluesky5 View Post

                      He just was an all-star, GG, SS winner that hit cleanup for a division winner and he's going to come cheap. He knows everyone in the organization and is by all accounts a great guy. If they need to cut him they have a built in excuse - he's old. What is the downside?
                      The All-Star is a quirk of fate, he didn't deserve the Silver Slugger and I can only marginally defend him deserving the Gold Glove. And he'd better come cheap because if he doesn't, it's a waste of money.

                      The downside is he's 35 and hadn't posted this good a season since 2012. And it was largely based on the strength of the first half of the year. He was incredibly pedestrian in the second half:

                      419 PA - .323/.389/.488
                      286 PA - .258/.332/.369

                      Frankly, I think it's easy to guess that he's going to be closer to the second half of last season. He was never that first half good at leading up to his time in Atlanta, especially when he was recovering from his injury. Why should I expect it from him again?
                      46 wins to match last year's total

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by SamtheBravesFan View Post

                        The All-Star is a quirk of fate, he didn't deserve the Silver Slugger and I can only marginally defend him deserving the Gold Glove. And he'd better come cheap because if he doesn't, it's a waste of money.

                        The downside is he's 35 and hadn't posted this good a season since 2012. And it was largely based on the strength of the first half of the year. He was incredibly pedestrian in the second half:

                        419 PA - .323/.389/.488
                        286 PA - .258/.332/.369

                        Frankly, I think it's easy to guess that he's going to be closer to the second half of last season. He was never that first half good at leading up to his time in Atlanta, especially when he was recovering from his injury. Why should I expect it from him again?
                        I've seen the stats. I understand what you're saying. Going by WAR as you've been pointing out he had the same WAR from '14-16 as he did in '12. He's always made good contact and hit for good average (.288 career), had a good eye and doesn't strike out a lot. Teams don't shift on him. He can hit to the situation and bat anywhere in the order. He's not going to pull an Adam Dunn and hit .170 and be worthless. For his career he hits .282 against RHP and .291 against LHP. He's also a reliable glove on the outfield corners. He doesn't make dumb mistakes in the field or on the bases and is a good model of professionalism for young players to follow. He's a team player that wouldn't complain about being platooned (unlikely anyways) or coming off the bench if the young and promising Camargo begins to really break out. Having a guy that can hit lefties and righties equally can save a roster spot for a relief pitcher. Which is a great advantage in the N.L. without the DH. They're probably going to get him for less than $10 mil. Again, I don't see a downside.
                        "No matter how great you were once upon a time — the years go by, and men forget,” - W. A. Phelon in Baseball Magazine in 1915. “Ross Barnes, forty years ago, was as great as Cobb or Wagner ever dared to be. Had scores been kept then as now, he would have seemed incomparably marvelous.”

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Look, I'm convinced it's not going to go well if he comes back. That's it. You can't convince me otherwise.
                          46 wins to match last year's total

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by bluesky5 View Post

                            I've seen the stats. I understand what you're saying. Going by WAR as you've been pointing out he had the same WAR from '14-16 as he did in '12. He's always made good contact and hit for good average (.288 career), had a good eye and doesn't strike out a lot. Teams don't shift on him. He can hit to the situation and bat anywhere in the order. He's not going to pull an Adam Dunn and hit .170 and be worthless. For his career he hits .282 against RHP and .291 against LHP. He's also a reliable glove on the outfield corners. He doesn't make dumb mistakes in the field or on the bases and is a good model of professionalism for young players to follow. He's a team player that wouldn't complain about being platooned (unlikely anyways) or coming off the bench if the young and promising Camargo begins to really break out. Having a guy that can hit lefties and righties equally can save a roster spot for a relief pitcher. Which is a great advantage in the N.L. without the DH. They're probably going to get him for less than $10 mil. Again, I don't see a downside.
                            Right. Nobody is saying he is trash. Just that you can get 2 win players even a lot cheaper than what he is asking for.
                            1885 1886 1926 1931 1934 1942 1944 1946 1964 1967 1982 2006 2011

                            1887 1888 1928 1930 1943 1968 1985 1987 2004 2013

                            1996 2000 2001 2002 2005 2009 2012 2014 2015


                            The Top 100 Pitchers In MLB History
                            The Top 100 Position Players In MLB History

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Let me put it this way: I'd rather them trade for Nomar Mazara and I don't think he's very good. That's how much I don't trust Markakis producing going forward. You'd think the same way after having him for four years. I will admit that he at least provided a sold batting average, as I defended him on that front in the past. But that's it. That's all he had to hang his hat on for a long time.
                              46 wins to match last year's total

                              Comment

                              Ad Widget

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X