Bonds proof you always plead innocent

[lovethegame]

I don't care if they nab you red handed ,if you plead innocent there is always a good chance some clerk will screw up and you walk.
Man the Justice Dept has to be squirming, all that time and our money may just go right down the drain

[Doctor X]

So, demonstrating he used them earlier is good for him how?

--J.D.

[lovethegame]

So, demonstrating he used them earlier is good for him how?

--J.D.

It isn't a question of if. It is now a loophole that can be used to dismiss , due to the filing of an improper document
Judge could rule to dismiss if so moved because of a clerical error.

[hudsonharden]

I think the proper plea is "not guilty" rather than "innocent"

[Mattingly]

I don't care if they nab you red handed ,if you plead innocent there is always a good chance some clerk will screw up and you walk.
Man the Justice Dept has to be squirming, all that time and our money may just go right down the drain

So you're saying that a clerical error will allow this case to be tossed out? On which legal grounds, counsel?

It isn't a question of if. It is now a loophole that can be used to dismiss , due to the filing of an improper document
Judge could rule to dismiss if so moved because of a clerical error.

Which document was improperly filed in the Barry Bonds perjury case?

[Doctor X]

What Mattingly wrote.

--J.D.

[lovethegame]

So you're saying that a clerical error will allow this case to be tossed out? On which legal grounds, counsel?

Which document was improperly filed in the Barry Bonds perjury case?

According to ESPN , the documents given to the court last week that deliver the charges to be used vs Bonds,cite a positive Nov 2001 test not as it truly was a 2000 test
Again according to ESPN, this screwup now makes it possible to have the case vs Bonds dismissed because of the erroneous charge.

[Doctor X]

Uh . . . no.

--J.D.

[Wade8813]

Pleading "not guilty" just because there's a slight chance for a mistake to occur isn't the right way to do things.

By that logic, everyone should go play lotto, since "Fred Smith" won, and there's always that slight chance that you'll win.

[lovethegame]

Pleading "not guilty" just because there's a slight chance for a mistake to occur isn't the right way to do things.

By that logic, everyone should go play lotto, since "Fred Smith" won, and there's always that slight chance that you'll win.

I don't think people on the hot seat worry about "the right way to do things" as much as they do getting off for any reason

[lovethegame]

Uh . . . no.

--J.D.

uh maybe
Bonds filed for dismissal based on the prosecutions clerical errors

[Wade8813]

Let me rephrase it - if your goal is getting off for any reason, banking on someone goofing probably isn't the way to go. The odds aren't in your favor.

[Westlake]

Next thread: "Bonds coughs"

The only things Bonds has been proof of is that we can run a subject so far into the ground that even Skin and Bones and ESPNFan aren't around talking about it anymore.

This is now the 21st thread about steroids on the first two pages of CE.

[Old Sweater]

Next thread: "Bonds coughs"

Do you have a link as to what caused this?

[digglahhh]

By that logic, everyone should go play lotto, since "Fred Smith" won, and there's always that slight chance that you'll win.

If I had a multi-millionaire's legal team presiding over the machine that spits out the balls, I'd be more inclined to buy a ticket!