We are three weeks away from Opening Day (which should be a national holiday) and I think it is time to post predictions.
Here are mine (trying to take away any biases I have).
AL EAST
1)NY Yankees
2)Boston Red Sox
3)Toronto Blue Jays
4) Tampa Bay Rays
5) Baltimore Orioles
AL CENTRAL
1) Detroit Tigers
2) Cleveland Indians
3) Chicago White Sox
4) Minnesota Twins
5) KC Royals
AL WEST:
1) LA Angels of Anaheim
2) Seattle Mariners
3) Oakland A's
4) Texas Rangers
AL WC: Boston Red Sox
Notes: It was hard to choose between Boston and NY and between Detroit and Cleveland. It was also really hard to leave out Cleveland in the playoff picture. Seattle could surprise, but I don't think they are quite strong enough.
NL EAST:
1)NY Mets
2)Atlanta Braves
3)Philadelphia Phillies
4) Washington Nationals
5)Florida Marlins
NL Central:
1) Milwaukee Brewers
2) Chicago Cubs
3) Houston Astros
4)St. Louis
5) Cincinnatti
6) Pittsburgh
NL West:
1) Colorado Rockies
2)Arizona Diamondbacks
3)LA Dodgers
4) SD Padres
5) SF Giants
NL Wild Card: Atlanta Braves
Notes: NL Central should be close between Milwaukee and Chicago. I felt MIL with some more experience for that young team should be able to come out on top this year. NL West should also be close. Arizona added Haren and expect Johnson back, but I don't believe they were as good as their 90-72 record. They were actually outscored last year. I expect them to be good, but I like the Rockies better.
And for the life of me, I don't see how some are drooling over the Phillies. They won the division last year, but I don't see them repeating. With heart and grit, they willed themselves to 89 wins and the division (with an assist from a collapse of the Mets). This year, their pitching still isn't that good and I don't think they will have the same motivation to finally win the division now that they finally have. Yes, the Phillies added Lidge and Myers is back in the rotation, but unless Lidge returns to pre-2005 NLCS form, I don't see it mattering. And I don't think Myers is an ace (career ERA of 4.3). Their back end of the rotation looks shaky with Kendrick (looks pretty good but unproven), Moyers (ERA over 5), and Eaton (ERA over 6). The Mets have clearly strengthened with Santana (followed by Pedro, Perez, Maine, and Pelfrey). The Braves have two aces (Smoltz and Hudson) and their 3-5 starters look much better than last year. Last year, the 3-5 starters had a terrible record (12 games under .500) and terrible ERA (ERA of about 5.5). This year with Glavine, Jurjjens, and Hampton/James, they should put up at least avergage numbers, which should translate into more wins. So someone explain why so many are picking the Phillies. I think they are good, but I don't see them topping 90 wins.
Here are mine (trying to take away any biases I have).
AL EAST
1)NY Yankees
2)Boston Red Sox
3)Toronto Blue Jays
4) Tampa Bay Rays
5) Baltimore Orioles
AL CENTRAL
1) Detroit Tigers
2) Cleveland Indians
3) Chicago White Sox
4) Minnesota Twins
5) KC Royals
AL WEST:
1) LA Angels of Anaheim
2) Seattle Mariners
3) Oakland A's
4) Texas Rangers
AL WC: Boston Red Sox
Notes: It was hard to choose between Boston and NY and between Detroit and Cleveland. It was also really hard to leave out Cleveland in the playoff picture. Seattle could surprise, but I don't think they are quite strong enough.
NL EAST:
1)NY Mets
2)Atlanta Braves
3)Philadelphia Phillies
4) Washington Nationals
5)Florida Marlins
NL Central:
1) Milwaukee Brewers
2) Chicago Cubs
3) Houston Astros
4)St. Louis
5) Cincinnatti
6) Pittsburgh
NL West:
1) Colorado Rockies
2)Arizona Diamondbacks
3)LA Dodgers
4) SD Padres
5) SF Giants
NL Wild Card: Atlanta Braves
Notes: NL Central should be close between Milwaukee and Chicago. I felt MIL with some more experience for that young team should be able to come out on top this year. NL West should also be close. Arizona added Haren and expect Johnson back, but I don't believe they were as good as their 90-72 record. They were actually outscored last year. I expect them to be good, but I like the Rockies better.
And for the life of me, I don't see how some are drooling over the Phillies. They won the division last year, but I don't see them repeating. With heart and grit, they willed themselves to 89 wins and the division (with an assist from a collapse of the Mets). This year, their pitching still isn't that good and I don't think they will have the same motivation to finally win the division now that they finally have. Yes, the Phillies added Lidge and Myers is back in the rotation, but unless Lidge returns to pre-2005 NLCS form, I don't see it mattering. And I don't think Myers is an ace (career ERA of 4.3). Their back end of the rotation looks shaky with Kendrick (looks pretty good but unproven), Moyers (ERA over 5), and Eaton (ERA over 6). The Mets have clearly strengthened with Santana (followed by Pedro, Perez, Maine, and Pelfrey). The Braves have two aces (Smoltz and Hudson) and their 3-5 starters look much better than last year. Last year, the 3-5 starters had a terrible record (12 games under .500) and terrible ERA (ERA of about 5.5). This year with Glavine, Jurjjens, and Hampton/James, they should put up at least avergage numbers, which should translate into more wins. So someone explain why so many are picking the Phillies. I think they are good, but I don't see them topping 90 wins.
Comment