Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

McGwire confesses

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by John Shoemaker View Post
    Another question would be - How many homeruns would Maris have hit in 1961 if he had to bat against pitchers that were on steroids?
    Fair question. Here's another fair question. Assuming Maris was also on steroids as well, as McGwire admittedly was in 98, how many more Hrs would he have hit off pitchers, including some who used steroids? 9 More?, 12 more?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by BoweryBoys View Post
      Fair question. Here's another fair question. Assuming Maris was also on steroids as well, as McGwire admittedly was in 98, how many more Hrs would he have hit off pitchers, including some who used steroids? 9 More?, 12 more?
      If Maris was on steroids and many of the pitchers he faced were on steroids (as IMO many of the pitchers McGwire faced were also on steroids) the numbers would be basically the same 61 and 70.
      Last edited by John Shoemaker; 01-14-2010, 02:48 PM.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by BoweryBoys View Post
        Fair question. Here's another fair question. Assuming Maris was also on steroids as well, as McGwire admittedly was in 98, how many more Hrs would he have hit off pitchers, including some who used steroids? 9 More?, 12 more?
        9 less, 12 less? Who knows? He also did not have top face pitchers with arms that were repaired surgically. He did not have other hitters whose eyes were enhanced with laser scopes so that they could see the spin coming off the pitchers hand.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by SHOELESSJOE3 View Post
          Thats all that matters, for all users.
          So if he only used in 1989 is he cheating? So obviously other things matter besides whether or not he used.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Ace Venom View Post
            First off, Major League Baseball operates in the United States of America and is thus a subject of its laws. Secondly, does the lack of action against Mark McGwire excuse him? That investigation was aimed at prosecuting the drug pushers and not the drug users. Just because Bud Selig is wishy washy and wouldn't ban users then doesn't excuse him at all.
            Yes, and Mark McGwire was not prosecuted and found guilty of any crime therefore he was/is innocent of any criminal actions. So if he has not been convicted of any crimes what baseball rule did he break?

            Vincent would have wasted no time banning them.
            Not true at all. Vincent was Commish when McGwire and Canseco were using steroids. MLB knew at the very least Canseco was using and the Commish did nothing. He put out a memo that he himself admits meant nothing. Vincent had his chance and like Selig after him he did nothing.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by NJYankeeFan View Post
              What about Sosa? Did he admit? Pujols? Why not? He was the spokesman for the company that made McGwire's andro?

              What makes you think Howard is clean?

              We know Mays and Aaron used PEDs.

              We know Babe Ruth tried to pump himself up with excessive amounts of caffeine because that is what he could get then.
              [[B]
              [ Who is "we". After reseaching Ruth most of my life, I have never seen that in print from what could
              be termed a reliable source, what is the source.]SHOELESSJOE3

              PED usage has always been rampant in baseball and all sports.

              It's rampant in many walks of life. What is coffee? But if that's ok what about the guy that takes ADD drugs to improve mental performance on the job to beat out the guy doing it naturally or the guy just drinking coffee.
              What about Sosa? His name was on the list of 104, maybe some day that can be verified, why would he admit it. He cried "skin color" when he got nailed with that corked bat. I doubt he did use the bat that much but he should have just kept his mouth shut, took his punishment without crying
              Howard, I have no idea, how would I know. Not saying he used or not, I just don't know.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Ubiquitous View Post
                So if he only used in 1989 is he cheating? So obviously other things matter besides whether or not he used.
                Read my post, no words about cheating.
                I just countered to your tired worn out line...............they knew but they did nothing. He still used put the blame where it belongs.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by SHOELESSJOE3 View Post
                  Read my post, no words about cheating.
                  I just countered to your tired worn out line...............they knew but they did nothing. He still used put the blame where it belongs.
                  How are my lines tired and worn out but your lines are not? If it isn't about cheating then why is there blame?

                  Okay then, if McGwire only used in 1989 is there any blame to be put on him? If Sosa went to the island to use steroids is there any blame to be put on him.


                  If there is blame for using steroids then the blame belongs on the players, the managers, the execs, the owners, the leagues, the commissioners, the reporters, the editors, the media, the media execs, and the fans.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by SHOELESSJOE3 View Post
                    What about Sosa? His name was on the list of 104, maybe some day that can be verified, why would he admit it. He cried "skin color" when he got nailed with that corked bat. I doubt he did use the bat that much but he should have just kept his mouth shut, took his punishment without crying
                    Howard, I have no idea, how would I know. Not saying he used or not, I just don't know.
                    You just don't know but you want to flame some and not others.

                    We really have no way of knowing who did or who did not without them coming out and saying that they did it.

                    So some feel the need to go on witch hunts.

                    And players have always used what they could. Steroids, greenies, ephedrine, cocaine, coffee. And they always will.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Ubiquitous View Post
                      How are my lines tired and worn out but your lines are not? If it isn't about cheating then why is there blame?

                      Okay then, if McGwire only used in 1989 is there any blame to be put on him? If Sosa went to the island to use steroids is there any blame to be put on him.


                      If there is blame for using steroids then the blame belongs on the players, the managers, the execs, the owners, the leagues, the commissioners, the reporters, the editors, the media, the media execs, and the fans.
                      Thats your take, user takes the blame, not bad enough blaming others, now it's the fans.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by SHOELESSJOE3 View Post
                        Thats your take, user takes the blame, not bad enough blaming others, now it's the fans.
                        I'm a fan and I don't care if they take drugs. I give baseball my money. Am I free of blame? Am I the only fan who either didn't care about the truth, didn't want to see it, or refused to accept it?

                        So who is using the users?

                        How come teams that knew these players were taking drugs and yet still offered them megamillion dollar contracts are free from blame? How come the media, which tries to cast themselves as the watchdog of society, is free from blame even though they decided to look the other way?

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Ubiquitous View Post
                          Okay then, if McGwire only used in 1989 is there any blame to be put on him?


                          If there is blame for using steroids then the blame belongs on the players, the managers, the execs, the owners, the leagues, the commissioners, the reporters, the editors, the media, the media execs, and the fans.
                          the blame begins the split second the syringe is depressed 1/1000th of an inch, the blame begins the moment the drink is taken to swallow the pills, the blame begins the millisecond the cream or clear is applied to the skin.... Even BEFORE it is absorbed or rubbed in.

                          Blaming an exec, a writer or an owner all depends on whether or not a player decided to break the law and juice. In other words, years from now one could blame polititians or the legal system for strict sentences or unfair courtroom practices regarding evidence. But if you never kill anyone with a chain saw, the polititians won't ever hear you complain or blame them
                          "Herman Franks to Sal Yvars to Bobby Thomson. Ralph Branca to Bobby Thomson to Helen Rita... cue Russ Hodges."

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Ubiquitous View Post
                            I'm a fan and I don't care if they take drugs. I give baseball my money. Am I free of blame? Am I the only fan who either didn't care about the truth, didn't want to see it, or refused to accept it?

                            So who is using the users?

                            How come teams that knew these players were taking drugs and yet still offered them megamillion dollar contracts are free from blame? How come the media, which tries to cast themselves as the watchdog of society, is free from blame even though they decided to look the other way?
                            Of course you are not the only person indifferent to juicers. You are however a very LARGE minority. HOF voters obviously disagree with you, and there is little, VERY little public oppositionto the 23% HOF votes Mac has been getting. Very little outrage on boards like this one, and very little support from those in baseball. I wonder why that is......

                            You do stand firm on your convictions, I can respect that. You're nuts and completely wrong, but I respect it!!

                            Blame towards owners and media is quite a nice fall back for you.... But let's ask this. What year, or after what incident or situation should the media have blown this open? Can you please clarify EXACTLY when they should have acted, how they should have acted, etc to be completely void of your "blame?"
                            "Herman Franks to Sal Yvars to Bobby Thomson. Ralph Branca to Bobby Thomson to Helen Rita... cue Russ Hodges."

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by StanTheMan View Post
                              Of course you are not the only person indifferent to juicers. You are however a very LARGE minority. HOF voters obviously disagree with you, and there is little, VERY little public oppositionto the 23% HOF votes Mac has been getting. Very little outrage on boards like this one, and very little support from those in baseball. I wonder why that is......
                              According to Canseco at least steroid user has been inducted into the HoF in the last 5 to 8 years. Considering that most reporters knew who was taking what I seriously doubt that this guy snuck in. Nor is the jury verdict in yet. We still have Clemens and Bonds up for election.


                              You do stand firm on your convictions, I can respect that. You're nuts and completely wrong, but I respect it!!

                              Blame towards owners and media is quite a nice fall back for you.... But let's ask this. What year, or after what incident or situation should the media have blown this open? Can you please clarify EXACTLY when they should have acted, how they should have acted, etc to be completely void of your "blame?"
                              How about after LaRussa stated that Canseco used steroids in the minors back in 1988 or so? How about when Boswell(?) said that Canseco was using steroids back in 1989? How about at any point when they began noticing it and they themselves said they should have said something but didn't?

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by StanTheMan View Post
                                the blame begins the split second the syringe is depressed 1/1000th of an inch, the blame begins the moment the drink is taken to swallow the pills, the blame begins the millisecond the cream or clear is applied to the skin.... Even BEFORE it is absorbed or rubbed in.

                                Blaming an exec, a writer or an owner all depends on whether or not a player decided to break the law and juice. In other words, years from now one could blame polititians or the legal system for strict sentences or unfair courtroom practices regarding evidence. But if you never kill anyone with a chain saw, the polititians won't ever hear you complain or blame them
                                It is a fact that a society or culture that does not care about something (in terms of morals, ethics, law) the more likely it is to happen. In otherwords if there are no repercussions then it is likely something negative will happen.

                                Look at speeding. If you know a street will never have a cop on it then there will be higher rates of speeding on that street. If everybody knows there is a speed trap on that street or a cop is likely to be on that street you will have lower rates of speeding.

                                The owners were the ones running the show. You get the house you built and in the case of the owners they built a house that nurtured and steroid use. Every single time they signed some steroid user to a mega contract and cut some scrub who wasn't using steroids they help strengthen the steroid environment.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X