Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Ryan Braun busted for PED use; faces 50 day ban

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by SHOELESSJOE3 View Post
    Don't understand this reply. You spoke about an ump calling a pitch a ball and the batter knowing it was a strike should
    sit down and call himself out, your post #638. Thats what you said, my reply............can we get serious.
    Now you say golfers are supposed to do that
    I don''t get your reply at all.
    Simple golfers are required to call a foul on themselves. Why shouldn't baseball players turn around and say to the ump. "No that was strike three" and walk to the dugout. Why not? If it was really a strike, taking that walk is not fair.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by SHOELESSJOE3 View Post
      If MLB allows anything for treating an injury then it can't be banned, your saying it's legal.
      Your stretching this one out.................there is no problem with using any substance that is not banned, where are we going with this one.It's simple to understand.
      So again the only problem is some arbitrary decision that says they can use A but not B??

      Comment


      • Originally posted by SHOELESSJOE3 View Post
        OK, thanks OAP. That thought went through my mind but was not sure, never played golf, so I thought I would make sure, what the poster meant, I think you confirmed my thought.

        To tell you the truth and I'm sure the poster will read this, it was a silly reply. Beating around the bush about steroid use and other prodedures that are not illegal and any player can use those procedures, no fear of penalty.

        I say to the poster, for that matter why don't see players doing that now, without "Super eye sight"...............ump calls a runner safe on a tag play......the player says, nope he got me. I'm out.....sillier and sillier. Hence my words, can we get serious.
        No it was not a "silly reply". Your position is the "silly" one. That is what I was trying to point out. Thinking players are not taking every advantage they can to win and excel is silly.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by NJYankeeFan View Post
          No it was not a "silly reply". Your position is the "silly" one. That is what I was trying to point out. Thinking players are not taking every advantage they can to win and excel is silly.
          I'm trying to be polite with the word silly, it's beyond that.

          Why don't players do that now on players being tagged out....tell the ump he was wrong, I'm was out and walk to the bench. Tell the ump you were wrong, I didn't check the swing with two strikes, you missed the call, I'm out. Even if this foolishness was true, players could not over rule the ump.........

          Are you getting the point of this nonsense
          You can have the last word on players being honest, not much more I can say.

          Comment


          • No you are being rude and condescending when it is your position that is "silly".

            But your next point is correct. Why don't they do that? If they were out, they should go sit down. IF they were playing strictly by the rules on some honor code.

            This is baseball not golf.

            Originally posted by SHOELESSJOE3 View Post
            I'm trying to be polite with the word silly, it's beyond that.

            Why don't players do that now on players being tagged out....tell the ump he was wrong, I'm was out and walk to the bench. Tell the ump you were wrong, I didn't check the swing with two strikes, you missed the call, I'm out. Even if this foolishness was true, players could not over rule the ump.........

            Are you getting the point of this nonsense
            You can have the last word on players being honest, not much more I can say.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by NJYankeeFan View Post
              Ooh. So it is arbitrary. Ok.
              Absolutely, completely 100% arbitrary and up to MLB and it's rules makers to decide what is allowed in the drug use arena. eye surgery, and changes to players bodies. 100% up to them, and it always will be.


              Arbitrary baby!!! Much like balls and strikes. Outfield fence depth, etc. You ever watch a game? I'm assuming yes, yet you choose to make silly points about certain PED use being banned by MLB (coincidentally many of them are also illegal to handle, sell, and consume in the USA) being ARBITRARY... in the sport with the MOST Arbitrary rules of all the major sports?


              Seems like you are being quite conditional with what you object to, and how.
              Last edited by StanTheMan; 03-04-2012, 03:26 PM.
              "Herman Franks to Sal Yvars to Bobby Thomson. Ralph Branca to Bobby Thomson to Helen Rita... cue Russ Hodges."

              Comment


              • Originally posted by NJYankeeFan View Post
                Simple golfers are required to call a foul on themselves. Why shouldn't baseball players turn around and say to the ump. "No that was strike three" and walk to the dugout. Why not? If it was really a strike, taking that walk is not fair.
                Again, astonishly shortsided and a poor attempt at diminishing the quality of the alternate opinion.

                Are you SURE you want to suggest that every batter who would do this, would NEVER BE WRONG? Would always have a better view than the home plate umpire, who is DIRECTLY behind the plate? Has a view of the lateral movement of the ball far superior to that of the batter?

                Awaiting your reply... because if a SINGLE batter ever made an error, calling himself out on strike three on a close pitch, only to see on replay he was wrong, then the ONLY solution is to revert to the umpires decisions ruling absolutely once again... and you'll have to come up with a new way to try to simultaneously suggest players are trying really really super hard.
                Last edited by StanTheMan; 03-04-2012, 03:28 PM.
                "Herman Franks to Sal Yvars to Bobby Thomson. Ralph Branca to Bobby Thomson to Helen Rita... cue Russ Hodges."

                Comment


                • Originally posted by StanTheMan View Post
                  Again, astonishly shortsided and a poor attempt at diminishing the quality of the alternate opinion.

                  Are you SURE you want to suggest that every batter who would do this, would NEVER BE WRONG? Would always have a better view than the home plate umpire, who is DIRECTLY behind the plate? Has a view of the lateral movement of the ball far superior to that of the batter?

                  Awaiting your reply... because if a SINGLE batter ever made an error, calling himself out on strike three on a close pitch, only to see on replay he was wrong, then the ONLY solution is to revert to the umpires decisions ruling absolutely once again... and you'll have to come up with a new way to try to simultaneously suggest players are trying really really super hard.
                  In a way one could say that Braun called himself out by flunking a urine test. It's very unlikely that there was any tampering with the specimen.

                  Different from golf, but baseball and the players' union seem to have some agreement about PEDs. My guess is that Braun's case would have been handled differently were he black or Hispanic, and not a favorite of Selig.

                  Comment


                  • Race and favoriticism has zero to do with anything imo.
                    "Herman Franks to Sal Yvars to Bobby Thomson. Ralph Branca to Bobby Thomson to Helen Rita... cue Russ Hodges."

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by StanTheMan View Post
                      Absolutely, completely 100% arbitrary and up to MLB and it's rules makers to decide what is allowed in the drug use arena. eye surgery, and changes to players bodies. 100% up to them, and it always will be.


                      Arbitrary baby!!! Much like balls and strikes. Outfield fence depth, etc. You ever watch a game? I'm assuming yes, yet you choose to make silly points about certain PED use being banned by MLB (coincidentally many of them are also illegal to handle, sell, and consume in the USA) being ARBITRARY... in the sport with the MOST Arbitrary rules of all the major sports?


                      Seems like you are being quite conditional with what you object to, and how.

                      No. But you can't have it both ways. Why do you object to PED use? Is it because it is unfair? Or because it gives an advantage players in the past did not have??

                      Why???

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by StanTheMan View Post
                        Again, astonishly shortsided and a poor attempt at diminishing the quality of the alternate opinion.

                        Are you SURE you want to suggest that every batter who would do this, would NEVER BE WRONG? Would always have a better view than the home plate umpire, who is DIRECTLY behind the plate? Has a view of the lateral movement of the ball far superior to that of the batter?

                        Awaiting your reply... because if a SINGLE batter ever made an error, calling himself out on strike three on a close pitch, only to see on replay he was wrong, then the ONLY solution is to revert to the umpires decisions ruling absolutely once again... and you'll have to come up with a new way to try to simultaneously suggest players are trying really really super hard.
                        No. The batter will not always be correct. Neither will the golfer. But if he knows he did something wrong, shouldn't he play by the rules and go sit down. Rather than faking his way on base.

                        Why is it ok to do that? Why is it ok to steal a sign? Baseball is not an honor sport. So don't claim that is why one objects to PED's.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by NJYankeeFan View Post
                          No. But you can't have it both ways. Why do you object to PED use? Is it because it is unfair? Or because it gives an advantage players in the past did not have??

                          Why???



                          MLB does not allow them. In many instances (depending on thensubstance) laws in this country do not allow them either. It seems to me those taking the position that the law is wrong and the rules of MLB are wrong should be the ones being asked to explain their position, not me.

                          Ball in your court then.
                          "Herman Franks to Sal Yvars to Bobby Thomson. Ralph Branca to Bobby Thomson to Helen Rita... cue Russ Hodges."

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by NJYankeeFan View Post
                            No. The batter will not always be correct. Neither will the golfer. But if he knows he did something wrong, shouldn't he play by the rules and go sit down. Rather than faking his way on base.

                            Why is it ok to do that? Why is it ok to steal a sign? Baseball is not an honor sport. So don't claim that is why one objects to PED's.
                            Well then.... It's a good thing baseball has umpires and golf tournaments (even the ones I played in in college and high school much less the PGA Tour) have decision makers whose decisions are final. Players abide by them, mistakes and all. After all, the batter won't be right all the time when "calling himself out" so his only recourse is to abide by the umpires decision ONLY.

                            Stealing signs with the naked eye is NOT against the rules of baseball and never will be. If a team cannot communicate in a way that other teams cannot decipher, that is on THEM, not on the team who is playing their hardest, both on the field and from the dugout, noticing signs and using them to their advantage. If you are talking about stealing signs using other more devious methods, that's a different story. What would you do to them?
                            "Herman Franks to Sal Yvars to Bobby Thomson. Ralph Branca to Bobby Thomson to Helen Rita... cue Russ Hodges."

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by StanTheMan View Post
                              Well then.... It's a good thing baseball has umpires and golf tournaments (even the ones I played in in college and high school much less the PGA Tour) have decision makers whose decisions are final. Players abide by them, mistakes and all. After all, the batter won't be right all the time when "calling himself out" so his only recourse is to abide by the umpires decision ONLY.

                              Stealing signs with the naked eye is NOT against the rules of baseball and never will be. If a team cannot communicate in a way that other teams cannot decipher, that is on THEM, not on the team who is playing their hardest, both on the field and from the dugout, noticing signs and using them to their advantage. If you are talking about stealing signs using other more devious methods, that's a different story. What would you do to them?
                              What do you do to the cheats that knowingly take a walk when they really struck out?

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by NJYankeeFan View Post
                                What do you do to the cheats that knowingly take a walk when they really struck out?
                                What about when the umpire is wrong and they get punched out on a pitch out of the strike zone?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X