Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Will we ever see a 60+ homerun season done by a modern player who isn't a juicer?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Will we ever see a 60+ homerun season done by a modern player who isn't a juicer?

    Obviously the players who have done so are known juicers, but I'm just curious if anyone thinks a modern player can do it without the juice.

    For an era that everyone claims is incredibly easy to hit homeruns, I've always found it interesting how many of the top homeruns seasons were done by juicers. Including many 50+ homerun seasons too. In fact, Howard's 58 in 2006 is the the highest total done by a modern player who hasn't been linked to steroids. After that you have Griffey who hit 56 twice. If it really is that easy to be a homerun hitter in today's age, why hasn't one player not linked to roids been able to smash 60 or more homeruns?
    Last edited by fenrir; 04-04-2012, 09:43 AM.

  • #2
    If we did, would we know?

    Comment


    • #3
      I've always though Prince Fielder is the most likely current player to hit 60 HRs.
      Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.-Crash Davis

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Honus Wagner Rules View Post
        I've always though Prince Fielder is the most likely current player to hit 60 HRs.
        I like his chances too - Bautista might also have a shot.
        WAR? Prove it!

        Trusted Traders: ttmman21, Dalkowski110, BoofBonser26, Kearns643, HudsonHarden, Extra Innings, MadHatter, Mike D., J.P., SShifflett

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by fenrir View Post
          If it really is that easy to be a homerun hitter in today's age, why hasn't one player not linked to roids been able to smash 60 or more homeruns?
          Not including the steroid era, the best era for HRs was from 1955-1962, but it's virtually tied with 2010-2011 as far as HRs per game. In that 8-year period (1955-1962), only one player hit 60+ HRs. Since the steroid era is barely over, it shouldn't be surprising that no one has hit 60+ HRs recently.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by ipitch View Post
            Not including the steroid era, the best era for HRs was from 1955-1962, but it's virtually tied with 2010-2011 as far as HRs per game. In that 8-year period (1955-1962), only one player hit 60+ HRs. Since the steroid era is barely over, it shouldn't be surprising that no one has hit 60+ HRs recently.
            I've heard many people claim that this era has been the easiest for homerun hitters. Maybe it is, but if that were the case, why have all the top homeruns seasons been done by juicers? Is being a natural power hitter really easier now than it was years ago? I think it's very possible we may never see a 60+ homerun season again, unless in the future they come out with legal supplements that replicate the benefits of steroids.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by fenrir View Post
              Obviously the players who have done so are known juicers, but I'm just curious if anyone thinks a modern player can do it without the juice.

              For an era that everyone claims is incredibly easy to hit homeruns, I've always found it interesting how many of the top homeruns seasons were done by juicers. Including many 50+ homerun seasons too. In fact, Howard's 58 in 2006 is the the highest total done by a modern player who hasn't been linked to steroids. After that you have Griffey who hit 56 twice. If it really is that easy to be a homerun hitter in today's age, why hasn't one player not linked to roids been able to smash 60 or more homeruns?
              The problem is that pitchers are incredibly good. the MLB does everything to make it easy for hitters (small strikezone, small parks, not allowing pitchers to throw inside) but pitchers have adapted by developing a plethora of pitches including new ones like the cutter. pitchers are just better than ever (maybe not in the top since there is currently no pedro or maddux but the field of good pitchers got much larger-even the 3 and 4 guys in these days throw 93 with a couple of off speed pitches).

              I think baseball history is a history of pitchers getting constantly better with the MLB every once in a while doing a rule change to help the batters back on track (mound from 50 to 60, live ball, smaller parks, smaller zone...).
              Last edited by dominik; 04-04-2012, 11:47 AM.
              I now have my own non commercial blog about training for batspeed and power using my training experience in baseball and track and field.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by dominik View Post
                The problem is that pitchers are incredibly good. the MLB does everything to make it easy for hitters (small strikezone, small parks, not allowing pitchers to throw inside) but pitchers have adapted by developing a plethora of pitches including new ones like the cutter. pitchers are just better than ever (maybe not in the top since there is currently no pedro or maddux but the field of good pitchers got much larger-even the 3 and 4 guys in these days throw 93 with a couple of off speed pitches).

                I think baseball history is a history of pitchers getting constantly better with the MLB every once in a while doing a rule change to help the batters back on track (mound from 50 to 60, live ball, smaller parks, smaller zone...).

                I think other then the possibilty that the testing and penalty possibly scaring some previous users to quit using in recent years, I agree with your point, pitching has caught up with hitting. No way to prove that scaring some into stop using plays a part.

                I've said this before, not much feedback on it , what appears to me the increase in the number change ups in recent years and some darn good young pitchers with great change ups. The fact that some of these guys have lots of speed to go along with the change up. I think before the present crop of young pitchers, those pitchers that came before thought they had to blow away hitters with speed.

                Back to Warren Spahn who said it all, word to this effect............Hitting is timing, pitching is upsetting timing, so simple, makes so much sense. You don't always have to throw 90+ MPH to get a hitter out.
                Also, many young pitchers in the game with a good assortment of other pitches.
                Last edited by SHOELESSJOE3; 04-04-2012, 12:31 PM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by dominik View Post
                  The problem is that pitchers are incredibly good. the MLB does everything to make it easy for hitters (small strikezone, small parks, not allowing pitchers to throw inside) but pitchers have adapted by developing a plethora of pitches including new ones like the cutter. pitchers are just better than ever (maybe not in the top since there is currently no pedro or maddux but the field of good pitchers got much larger-even the 3 and 4 guys in these days throw 93 with a couple of off speed pitches).

                  I think baseball history is a history of pitchers getting constantly better with the MLB every once in a while doing a rule change to help the batters back on track (mound from 50 to 60, live ball, smaller parks, smaller zone...).
                  I agree with everything you say, and I guess the main point I was trying to get make is that I don't think it's easier to hit a lot of homeruns today then it was years ago. If it was, then wouldn't at least one player not linked to steroids have at least hit 60 or more homeruns? Hell, it seems like many 50+ homeruns guys were juicers too. Only Thome, Griffey, Howard, Prince Fielder, and Bautista haven't been linked to the juice

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I'm not sure about Bautista. He was crushing balls the 1st half of last season. Then post all star, it seemed as if pitchers found a weakness and his productivity dropped.

                    If Prince Fielder is going to do it, this may be the year he'll do it. Depends if the put him before or after Cabrera in the line up
                    Vintage Photos of Detroit Ballparks:
                    http://www.flickr.com/photos/doctor_gogol/sets/

                    http://www.flickr.com/photos/46267068@N04/sets/

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Nobody's hitting 60+ at Comerica Park. Cabrera hasn't even reached 40 yet in four seasons as a tiger. That is a tough ballpark to hit homeruns. I'd be surprised if Fielder hits more than 44 or so in any of his 9 seasons as Tiger. Just look at his last two seasons in Milwaukee - he played at least 161 games in each season and hit only 38 and 32 home runs respectively.
                      My top 10 players:

                      1. Babe Ruth
                      2. Barry Bonds
                      3. Ty Cobb
                      4. Ted Williams
                      5. Willie Mays
                      6. Alex Rodriguez
                      7. Hank Aaron
                      8. Honus Wagner
                      9. Lou Gehrig
                      10. Mickey Mantle

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by GiambiJuice View Post
                        Just look at his last two seasons in Milwaukee - he played at least 161 games in each season and hit only 38 and 32 home runs respectively.
                        And Miller Park is favorable to hitters isnt it? Lefties especially?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by GiambiJuice View Post
                          Nobody's hitting 60+ at Comerica Park. Cabrera hasn't even reached 40 yet in four seasons as a tiger. That is a tough ballpark to hit homeruns. I'd be surprised if Fielder hits more than 44 or so in any of his 9 seasons as Tiger. Just look at his last two seasons in Milwaukee - he played at least 161 games in each season and hit only 38 and 32 home runs respectively.
                          Excellent points, GiambiJuice.
                          Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.-Crash Davis

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Ryan Howard almost did it with 58. It's safe to say that a player can only do it if he plays home games in a bandbox.
                            Using a stolen chant from Boston Celtics fans whenever an L.A. team is playing up there just reeks of inferiority complex.

                            If hitting a baseball is the toughest thing to do in sports, then pitching must be the easiest thing to do in sports.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by UnderPressure View Post
                              Ryan Howard almost did it with 58. It's safe to say that a player can only do it if he plays home games in a bandbox.
                              When Howard hit 58 HRs in 2006 he had 29 HRs at home and 29 HRs on the road. Howard hit slightly better on the road as well.

                              Home: .309/.422/.656
                              Road: .318/.427/.662
                              Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.-Crash Davis

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X