Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

All-Time Draft Rematch

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sam ready to draft? Minstrel? When do the windows expire? I have a laser beam site on one player, and I don't really know what I'll do if he isn't there.
    "Simply put, the passion, interest and tradition surrounding baseball in New York is unmatched."

    Sean McAdam, ESPN.com

    Comment


    • Well then, instead of being so impatient, you should figure out a backup plan...
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDxgNjMTPIs

      Comment


      • Originally posted by ElHalo View Post
        Sam ready to draft? Minstrel? When do the windows expire? I have a laser beam site on one player, and I don't really know what I'll do if he isn't there.

        I PMed him right after the last vote, but he has until 1 pm central time tomorrow, technically, to make a pick.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by brett View Post
          I PMed him right after the last vote, but he has until 1 pm central time tomorrow, technically, to make a pick.
          How? Doesn't his clock expire the second the overnight tolling period ends?
          "Simply put, the passion, interest and tradition surrounding baseball in New York is unmatched."

          Sean McAdam, ESPN.com

          Comment


          • Originally posted by brett View Post
            So Bonds can play centerfield but get credit for his 2000-2004 hitting numbers. I'll keep the rule in mind, but I think someone should have to have played there at least some during the 5 years, say 50 games. If not, that's fine though.

            --My thinking is that since we are specifying a 5 year period the player ought to qualify there during that period. I'd prefer the full 162 game requirement (adjusted if the 5 year period was one of shorter seasons).
            --As for A-Rod, I'd be wasting alot of his value by using him at 3B. Being as I drafted Schmidt immediately ahead of him I think his position on my ballclub is obviously going to be SS anyway.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by leecemark View Post
              --My thinking is that since we are specifying a 5 year period the player ought to qualify there during that period. I'd prefer the full 162 game requirement (adjusted if the 5 year period was one of shorter seasons).
              --As for A-Rod, I'd be wasting alot of his value by using him at 3B. Being as I drafted Schmidt immediately ahead of him I think his position on my ballclub is obviously going to be SS anyway.
              Here's the thing about ARod: your window is going to be very difficult to choose. You probably took the best window, getting all of the Texas years, but you missed both of his best seasons (1996 and 2007).
              "Simply put, the passion, interest and tradition surrounding baseball in New York is unmatched."

              Sean McAdam, ESPN.com

              Comment


              • Originally posted by brett View Post
                So Bonds can play centerfield but get credit for his 2000-2004 hitting numbers. I'll keep the rule in mind, but I think someone should have to have played there at least some during the 5 years, say 50 games. If not, that's fine though.
                I dont agree with this at all. If so, I can put Hornsby at SS right? Seems kind of unfair...
                Originally posted by Domenic
                The Yankees should see if Yogi Berra can still get behind the plate - he has ten World Series rings... he must be worth forty or fifty million a season.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by leecemark View Post
                  --My thinking is that since we are specifying a 5 year period the player ought to qualify there during that period. I'd prefer the full 162 game requirement (adjusted if the 5 year period was one of shorter seasons).
                  --As for A-Rod, I'd be wasting alot of his value by using him at 3B. Being as I drafted Schmidt immediately ahead of him I think his position on my ballclub is obviously going to be SS anyway.
                  At any rate, I want to make sure that I could play Cobb at right field if I happened to pick up another centerfielder (soon). I think Cobb was probably an all time great defensive right fielder and he did play over 162 even during the stretch that I chose '09-'13.

                  By the way, he had a 198 OPS+ and averaged 67 steals a year during that stretch-plus all of his other non-WARP bases. Even if he is more like a 180 OPS+ in an integrated league, has anyone else had a similar combo of OPS+ and stolen bases over a 5 year period. Just wondering who might be close.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by brett View Post
                    Just remember that there are a lot more pitchers who had dominant short stretches, but who didn't have hall of fame careers out there. Something like 20 of the top 100 pitching seasons in history probably were produced by non hall of famers while only maybe 5 of the top 100 hitting seasons did.
                    I completely disagree with you here. I can think of a lot of position players people don't really think of as all timers having five straight 140+ OPS+ seasons. There aren't even that many all time pitchers who have those kind of ERA+ numbers... and, remember, you need five of them.

                    In all liklihood, this guy isn't going to get taken, because he's not one of the top 14 1Bmen:

                    5 year averages:
                    BA: .315
                    OBP: .373
                    SLG: .560
                    OPS+: 134
                    2B: 40
                    3B: 9
                    HR: 31
                    R: 108
                    RBI: 131

                    Could imagine a pitcher with equivalent five year stats not getting taken? I can't. There are going to be 70 starting pitchers taken. You really think the seventieth best starting pitcher is going to give even remotely close to the kind of production Hal Trosky won't be giving anybody in this league?
                    "Simply put, the passion, interest and tradition surrounding baseball in New York is unmatched."

                    Sean McAdam, ESPN.com

                    Comment


                    • At any rate, I want to make sure that I could play Cobb at right field if I happened to pick up another centerfielder (soon). I think Cobb was probably an all time great defensive right fielder and he did play over 162 even during the stretch that I chose '09-'13.
                      IIRC, all CFers can play the corner OF.

                      Interesting strategy, BTW. I'd just be careful when hate drafting, though. You taking a 2nd CFer means that one other team will be stuck with a worse CFer, but it means you aren't picking a player at other positions that might not be very deep either.
                      Last edited by Wade8813; 01-11-2008, 06:05 PM.
                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDxgNjMTPIs

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Westlake View Post
                        I dont agree with this at all. If so, I can put Hornsby at SS right? Seems kind of unfair...
                        So do you agree that they should have played a certain number of games there during the 5 year stretch chosen?

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by ElHalo View Post
                          I completely disagree with you here. I can think of a lot of position players people don't really think of as all timers having five straight 140+ OPS+ seasons. There aren't even that many all time pitchers who have those kind of ERA+ numbers... and, remember, you need five of them.

                          In all liklihood, this guy isn't going to get taken, because he's not one of the top 14 1Bmen:

                          5 year averages:
                          BA: .315
                          OBP: .373
                          SLG: .560
                          OPS+: 134
                          2B: 40
                          3B: 9
                          HR: 31
                          R: 108
                          RBI: 131

                          Could imagine a pitcher with equivalent five year stats not getting taken? I can't. There are going to be 70 starting pitchers taken. You really think the seventieth best starting pitcher is going to give even remotely close to the kind of production Hal Trosky won't be giving anybody in this league?
                          Your probably right. While there are non-hof pitchers who had a spectacular season, or even 2, there aren't many who had great 5 year stretches.


                          I'd take Kevin Brown '96-'00 over Trosky though, but your right, there are even some real good career pitchers who didn't have great 5 year stretches. Blylevin and Perry for example are in most people's top 50 but didn't have a fantastic 5 year stretch.

                          By the way, are you interested in switching draft spots in this round, and then again in the next? You move up 1 in this round and I move up 1 in the next round?

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Wade8813 View Post
                            IIRC, all CFers can play the corner OF.

                            Interesting strategy, BTW. I'd just be careful when hate drafting, though. You taking a 2nd CFer means that one other team will be stuck with a worse CFer, but it means you aren't picking a player at other positions that might not be very deep either.

                            What does IIRC mean? Just curious what is meant by "hate drafting". I think that CF drops off the fastest after the next pick, and Cobb is still a better right fielder than Aaron for peak 5 in my view. Aaron never had a 5 year OPS+ over 170 (compared to 198 for Cobb) and never stole the bases and I think that in right, he was probably even a better fielder than Aaron who may be going soon so I could have a right fielder better than the next guy, and a centerfielder MUCH better than the next guy, and the other positions do not drop off that fast yet. I'm just considering the possibilities though.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by ElHalo View Post
                              How? Doesn't his clock expire the second the overnight tolling period ends?
                              The way I read it was that there is an 8 hour clock and the clock stops during the down time. I understand it, because you don't want to wake up the next morning and find that 5 people drafted late, and you missed your pick, but it would be nice if people anticipated checking in and keeping the draft moving.

                              Comment


                              • IIRC = If I Remember Correctly.

                                Hate drafting is when you make a pick that may be a little bit worse for you, because it hurts the other drafters. In this case, taking CFers because you think that will make all of the other teams be stuck with worse CFers.

                                And, yes, there's some drop off in CF, but I don't think it's as much as you're saying. But even if it is, so what? You already have a CFer. You taking one more CFer means that ONE of the other teams has a much worse CFer, but all of the other teams are unaffected. And so what if Cobb is much better than Aaron? You don't need to compare Cobb to Aaron, since you already have Cobb. You need to compare the CFer you're considering picking to Aaron.
                                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDxgNjMTPIs

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X