Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Statistical Breakdown

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Statistical Breakdown

    I started this for my own statistical purposes in rating the teams. I will begin with raw data only for SP, RP, Lineup, Bench and Fielding, then I will subjectify them. I really just needed to get started because it is quite a chore. Feel free to discuss. I may post a data only thread later.

  • #2
    See thread "Brett's worksheet"
    Last edited by brett; 03-02-2008, 05:29 PM.

    Comment


    • #3
      I will be posting another set of averages in italics which are straight up averages rating every pitcher though the same number of innings. The bold averages over-weight the huge inning guys of course. The "equal weight" average will underrate legitimate inning eaters, but both averages used together should be valuable.

      Comment


      • #4
        I was never going for ERA+ with my pitchers, but more fielding independent pitching stats. Vance and Waddell, relative to their leagues, are probably the greatest strikeout artists of all time. But good chart, and I hope to see more like them.
        "Any pitcher who throws at a batter and deliberately tries to hit him is a communist."

        - Alvin Dark

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by AstrosFan View Post
          I was never going for ERA+ with my pitchers, but more fielding independent pitching stats. Vance and Waddell, relative to their leagues, are probably the greatest strikeout artists of all time. But good chart, and I hope to see more like them.
          If I have the time, I will be looking at the actual fielding effects on a pitcher's ERA during their career-though this would be a little more subjective in that there is no great stat. I know it can be significant though. In a given season a pitcher can pitch at a 100 level and produce at a 120 or 80 level with historically great or terrible defenses. This would be very rare though. +/-10 over a 5 year period would be about the limit.

          So Waddell and Vance may very well be 10-15 points better in my final analysis, while others may ne 10-15 points worse.

          (Well based on BBPro, Waddell is about 6 points better and Vance about 2-2.5 points better, but that's pretty significant, unfortunately Coveleski is 4 points worse, while Bender is about +1. Alltogether it would raise your starters by about 1.3 points on the composite ERA+, but other teams might also drop some).
          Last edited by brett; 02-11-2008, 04:05 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Bullpens. I will probably run this like starters for now. A team will probably need around 300-400 innings from the pen.

            I may also try to run Lefty v. Lefty and Righty v. Right OPS against.
            Last edited by brett; 03-02-2008, 05:29 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              TSS doesn't have Gordon, AF does (Unless they traded, and I missed the announcement).
              Last edited by Wade8813; 02-16-2008, 06:50 PM.
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDxgNjMTPIs

              Comment


              • #8
                Thanks! I'll have it up with some numbers tonight!

                Comment


                • #9
                  For bullpen, I listed the combined average innings because I figure that a team needs to have at least 400 innings covered by the bullpen to be really set there. If 5 starters each go 200, then there are about 377 innings left for the pen assuming 8.5 innings per game and 458 assuming 9.0 innings per game.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    You have both TSS and WL listed as having Plesac, and you missed that DMF has Eckersley.
                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDxgNjMTPIs

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I'm pleasantly surprised by my bullpen. Probably top 5, with my rotation. And I like my lineup more than my pitching. And Gagne looks like the second-best closer option out there, after Rivera.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        And Gagne looks like the second-best closer option out there, after Rivera.
                        Based on what? Papelbon, Wagner, Nathan, (and I assume Eck) all have better numbers based off just that chart. And Ryan is basically tied.
                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDxgNjMTPIs

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Wade8813 View Post
                          Based on what? Papelbon, Wagner, Nathan, (and I assume Eck) all have better numbers based off just that chart. And Ryan is basically tied.
                          I think they are correct now.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Erik Bedard View Post
                            I'm pleasantly surprised by my bullpen. Probably top 5, with my rotation. And I like my lineup more than my pitching. And Gagne looks like the second-best closer option out there, after Rivera.
                            I think you need at least 3 more relievers. They are out there

                            Unfortunately there are not enough top lefties out there.
                            Last edited by brett; 02-16-2008, 07:18 PM.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Wade8813 View Post
                              Based on what? Papelbon, Wagner, Nathan, (and I assume Eck) all have better numbers based off just that chart. And Ryan is basically tied.
                              None have as many IP. I kinda missed Nathan and Wagner when skimming the chart, but Papelbon is about 25 IP less than Gagne. Personally, I'd rank it Rivera, Wagner, Gagne, Nathan, Ryan. So third.

                              Comment

                              Ad Widget

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X