Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

1901 Off Season Thread

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by buppers View Post
    What we are saying is when several players are equally ranked then we will almost always take the position player. If you look over some CKL drafts you will see pitchers taken above position players early in the draft. The coming CKL draft should see Fernando go fast - probably before I pick at #4.
    If they're really equally valuable, why does it matter which you take first?

    Also, maybe that's what people mean, but that's not what they say. When someone says they can't justify taking a pitcher with the first pick (no matter how good), that means if Walter Johnson had his rookie season in 1901, you wouldn't even consider taking him.

    (I'm not picking on you catcher24. I've heard a LOT of people say the same thing)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDxgNjMTPIs

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Wade8813 View Post
      If they're really equally valuable, why does it matter which you take first?

      Also, maybe that's what people mean, but that's not what they say. When someone says they can't justify taking a pitcher with the first pick (no matter how good), that means if Walter Johnson had his rookie season in 1901, you wouldn't even consider taking him.

      (I'm not picking on you catcher24. I've heard a LOT of people say the same thing)
      I don't consider a pitcher equally valuable at all. I prefer someone who will play 150+ games instead of 40+.

      Comment


      • #63
        So then will you take your entire starting lineup before you take your first SP? Because that's what you just said.
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDxgNjMTPIs

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Wade8813 View Post
          So then will you take your entire starting lineup before you take your first SP? Because that's what you just said.
          everyone has their own method of rating player's worth. If you place more emphasis on a top end starter than others then that's great for you especialy if they are drafting ahead of you. We make a point of not being too openly critical of other owners strategies here. The gentswho you are in disagrement with have been huge winners in the CKL league for a reason.
          Baseball statistics are like a girl in a bikini. They show a lot, but not everything. ~Toby Harrah

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by rmadachik View Post
            everyone has their own method of rating player's worth. If you place more emphasis on a top end starter than others then that's great for you especialy if they are drafting ahead of you. We make a point of not being too openly critical of other owners strategies here. The gentswho you are in disagrement with have been huge winners in the CKL league for a reason.
            I'm not even discussing their strategy - not really. I'm saying that their statements don't line up with their actions. It's not really a big deal though.
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDxgNjMTPIs

            Comment


            • #66
              Personally I have been baxk and forth on this thought process. Having run a club that was heavy on hitting and weak on pitching I can say I never want to go through that type of season again (also growing up in cleveland and witnessing the Indians of the 90's assemble rag tag rotations year after year),

              Christy Matthewson, regardless of the fact that he is my favorite player of all time, to me would be the first pick . . . the only downside is that since you only get 8 years max you miss out on a lot of great pitching from him. Wagners glove is solid most of his career at a position of relative weakness in the 1900's, as is Lajoie's and both are terrors with the bat. I agree they are the top three with some very great players just behind them.

              I would say that I am glad I don't have to make that decision you do Lew ... but I'd be lying.
              Baseball statistics are like a girl in a bikini. They show a lot, but not everything. ~Toby Harrah

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Wade8813 View Post
                So then will you take your entire starting lineup before you take your first SP? Because that's what you just said.
                Actually, thats not what he said. He said he "prefers" someone who plays 150+ games over someone who plays 40+. When his turn comes up he will take his player rankings and pick the player that he thinks will help his team the most. You or I, with the same team may take another player with that pick. I may be playing for current season while someone else may be building for the future. So if someone ranks players different than you do you have a better chance of getting the player you want. So if you think someone is ranking players wrong you should sit back and take advantage. Who knows, you could end up with 8 HOF caliber pitchers and lose 100 games 2 - 1.
                There are 10 kinds of people. Those who get binary and those who don't.

                Comment


                • #68
                  ???

                  1901 is Mathewson's first full season. You basically get his entire career.
                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDxgNjMTPIs

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Wade8813 View Post
                    ???

                    1901 is Mathewson's first full season. You basically get his entire career.
                    The initial draft of 1901 players has contract length restrictions. They are posted in the rules thread
                    Baseball statistics are like a girl in a bikini. They show a lot, but not everything. ~Toby Harrah

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by jaybird_1981 View Post
                      I don't consider a pitcher equally valuable at all. I prefer someone who will play 150+ games instead of 40+.
                      Originally posted by buppers View Post
                      Actually, thats not what he said. He said he "prefers" someone who plays 150+ games over someone who plays 40+. When his turn comes up he will take his player rankings and pick the player that he thinks will help his team the most. You or I, with the same team may take another player with that pick. I may be playing for current season while someone else may be building for the future. So if someone ranks players different than you do you have a better chance of getting the player you want. So if you think someone is ranking players wrong you should sit back and take advantage. Who knows, you could end up with 8 HOF caliber pitchers and lose 100 games 2 - 1.
                      He said he doesn't consider them equally valuable at all because someone who plays 150+ games is worth more.

                      In reality he's probably not going to pick like that, but that's what he said.
                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDxgNjMTPIs

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by rmadachik View Post
                        The initial draft of 1901 players has contract length restrictions. They are posted in the rules thread
                        Oh, okay. I thought you were saying you only get 8 years from him compared to more years from other people.
                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDxgNjMTPIs

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          tell you what lew ... i'm willing to swap you your number 1 pick for my spot in the stadium draft at #4 .... and a future 4th rounder
                          Baseball statistics are like a girl in a bikini. They show a lot, but not everything. ~Toby Harrah

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            nah .... just would be a shame to have him for 8 years and then watch someone else enjoy that awesome 1909 season. It will be very interesting to see how teams aproach the first 2 or 3 rounds of this draft.
                            Baseball statistics are like a girl in a bikini. They show a lot, but not everything. ~Toby Harrah

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by Wade8813 View Post
                              So then will you take your entire starting lineup before you take your first SP? Because that's what you just said.
                              No it isn't at all. When I draft I take whatever player I deem will help my team the most but if I have two players rated fairly even I will take the position player.
                              Last edited by jaybird_1981; 02-12-2012, 08:55 AM.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by buppers View Post
                                What we are saying is when several players are equally ranked then we will almost always take the position player. If you look over some CKL drafts you will see pitchers taken above position players early in the draft. The coming CKL draft should see Fernando go fast - probably before I pick at #4.
                                Ed, you can bet your life on it my friend without worry. I lucked into the #2 pick, and there's only one guy I would take over Fernando.

                                Regarding Wade's post, you're kind of mixing apples and oranges. If it wasn't for the fact that this is a league formation draft and not a rookie draft, and that there are two everyday players available who many still consider the best ever at their respective positions even though they played over 100 years ago, Mathewson would be an easy top pick. We have had a several rookie drafts in the CKL where the top player taken was a pitcher. It just depends on who else is available. With Wagner (frequently included in all time top 10 player lists) and Lajoie available for everyday play, they just nudge out Mathewson - and not by much, either. It's almost a coin flip.

                                If Walter Johnson was available as a rookie in 1901, I WOULD make him the top pick, even over Wagner and Lajoie. That's how highly I think of Walter. I guarantee you now, without looking at who else is even a rookie that year, that in 1907 Walter Johnson will go #1.
                                Last edited by catcher24; 02-12-2012, 12:00 PM.
                                You see, you spend a good deal of your life gripping a baseball and in the end it turns out that it was the other way around all the time. J. Bouton

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X