Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Ultimate Quest for Candidates: Round 1 – The 1930’s

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Ultimate Quest for Candidates: Round 1 – The 1930’s

    Welcome to the Ultimate Quest for Candidates! This thread will have the second poll in this project, choosing the best candidates for the Hall of Fame from the MLB stars of the 1930’s. You will be asked to vote for your top SIX (6) players. The poll will close five weeks after it opens.

    I’m asking voters not to peek at the results of the voting until after they’ve cast their ballot. I would hope that voters are capable of independently assessing the candidates without worrying about who the consensus is favoring.

    The threads in this project will always be posted a few days before the poll is added. This is done in order to encourage research and discussion of the candidates. I believe (paraphrasing Socrates) that the unexamined ballot is not worth casting. This also gives you a little time to make the case for a candidate not listed who you think deserves to be on the ballot (although you should sign up as a consultant if you really want to be involved in this aspect of the project).

    If someone wants to open a separate thread to focus on one of these candidates, go for it; we already see that a lot on this forum. All of these players are worthy of discussion, because the worst candidates here are on a par with the worst players in the Hall.

    I expect that everyone is familiar with Baseball-Reference.com and Baseballprospectus.com. These are essential sites for researching a player’s statistical record. I’ve also inserted links to each player’s bio at the SABR Bioproject or Wikipedia.

    We will be judging players by the same criteria that the Hall of Fame uses:

    “voting shall be based upon the individual's record, ability, integrity, sportsmanship, character and contribution to the game.”

    So everything counts, their lifetime achievements on and off the field, along with their character and other intangibles.

    Below are the players we think are the top 18 candidates whose careers centered in the 1930’s. About half of them are affected by credits or demerits for WW2. Basic data are shown for each.
    Code:
    Pos	BJ	Player	Name	  Win Shares	  WARP3	              Car WS Adj   Pk WS Adj	Car W3 Adj
    6	#37	[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Bartell"]Dick	Bartell[/URL]	([B]266[/B]: 28-24-21)	([B]109.6[/B]: 10.6-10.3-9.8)	+14		           +6.0
    8	#13	[URL="http://bioproj.sabr.org/bioproj.cfm?a=v&v=l&bid=78&pid=973"]Wally	Berger[/URL]	(241: 36-33-31)	(69.5: 9.8-9.7-9.0)			
    1	#77	[URL="http://bioproj.sabr.org/bioproj.cfm?a=v&v=l&bid=807&pid=1553"]Tommy	Bridges[/URL]	([B]241[/B]: 26-22-20)	([B]88.6[/B]: 9.1-7.6-7.2)	+16		           +6.6
    3	#29	[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolph_Camilli"]Dolph	Camilli[/URL]	([U]222[/U]: 29-28-[U]27[/U])	(73.6: 10.9-9.8-9.6)	-2	      -1	
    8/9	#55	[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Chapman_%28baseball_player%29"]Ben	Chapman[/URL]	(233: 23-22-22)	(71.9: 7.8-6.7-6.5)			
    5	#37	[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harlond_Clift"]Harlond	Clift[/URL]	([U]213[/U]: 25-[U]23[/U]-23)	(80.0: 12.7-11.7-8.9)	-3	      -1	
    1	---	[URL="http://bioproj.sabr.org/bioproj.cfm?a=v&v=l&bid=1034&pid=3511"]Paul  Derringer[/URL]	([U]228[/U]: 26-25-24)	(75.4: 8.6-7.8-7.0)	-3		
    1	#40	[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wes_Ferrell"]Wes	Ferrell[/URL]	(233: 35-32-28)	(83.1: 13.6-11.4-10.7)			
    1	#92	[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mel_Harder"]Mel	Harder[/URL]	([U]232[/U]: 27-27-24)	(73.9: 10.0-9.7-8.3)	-2		
    9	#50	[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babe_Herman"]Babe	Herman[/URL]	(232: 32-26-26)	(66.8: 9.9-8.9-7.8)			
    7	#31	[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Johnson_%28MLB_outfielder%29"]Bob	Johnson[/URL]	([U]280[/U]: 29-[U]28[/U]-[U]25[/U])	(97.8: 10.1-9.8-8.9)	-7	      -4	
    3	#64	[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Kuhel"]Joe	Kuhel[/URL]	([U]237[/U]: 26-[U]22[/U]-21)	(61.7: 7.7-7.0-5.9)	-6	      -3	
    1	---	[URL="http://bioproj.sabr.org/bioproj.cfm?a=v&v=l&bid=17&pid=8485"]Red	Lucas[/URL]	(194: 26-23-23)	(63.9: 9.2-8.7-7.5)			
    4	#24	[URL="http://bioproj.sabr.org/bioproj.cfm?a=v&v=l&bid=1045&pid=10228"]Buddy	Myer[/URL]	(258: 33-24-23)	(81.4: 10.7-10.7-6.7)			
    7	#52	[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lefty_O%27Doul"]Lefty	O'Doul[/URL]	(144: 33-31-22)	(41.3: 10.9-10.4-5.7)			
    1	---	[URL="http://thedeadballera.com/Obits/Root.Charlie.Obit.html"]Charlie	Root[/URL]	(223: 23-22-21)	(68.8: 7.3-6.9-6.4)
    3	#38	[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hal_Trosky"]Hal	Trosky[/URL]	(195: 28-27-25)	(50.6: 8.0-8.0-7.7)		
    1	#44	[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lon_Warneke"]Lon	Warneke[/URL]	(220: 31-29-26)	(72.3: 10.5-9.6-8.1)
    Bold - increased
    Underlined - decreased
    Pos – primary position(s)
    BJ – rank at his position in the New Bill James Historical Baseball Abstract (2002)
    Win Shares – shown are career total and best 3 years
    WARP3 – from Baseball Prospectus; shown are career total and best 3 years
    Other – O’Doul was instrumental in the development of baseball in Japan. He is still an icon in San Francisco, where he played and managed for many years.

    Some other things to be aware of:
    1) Bill James’ rankings emphasize players’ peak years; this results in long steady careers being rated lower than what may seem right.
    2) Win shares during WW2 play are discounted: 3% for 1942, 6% for 1943, 9% for 1944, and 12% for 1945. YMMV. Camilli, Clift, Johnson and Kuhel lost both career and peak WS; Derringer and Harder have small career deductions. Players are also conservatively credited for missed play due to military service. Bartell and Bridges have additional WARP and WS for time lost in 1944-45.
    3) You are free to credit players with minor league or foreign league play. I have not attempted this, but the guys at the Hall of Merit have. Camilli, Johnson and O’Doul are three players who may have lost productive years due to being held out of MLB by powers beyond their control.
    190
    Dick Bartell
    6.32%
    12
    Wally Berger
    13.68%
    26
    Tommy Bridges
    11.58%
    22
    Dolph Camilli
    4.21%
    8
    Ben Chapman
    1.58%
    3
    Harlond Clift
    3.16%
    6
    Paul Derringer
    0.00%
    0
    Wes Ferrell
    14.74%
    28
    Mel Harder
    3.16%
    6
    Babe Herman
    4.74%
    9
    Bob Johnson
    11.58%
    22
    Joe Kuhel
    0.53%
    1
    Red Lucas
    0.53%
    1
    Buddy Myer
    6.84%
    13
    Lefty O'Doul
    6.32%
    12
    Charlie Root
    2.11%
    4
    Hal Trosky
    3.16%
    6
    Lon Warneke
    5.79%
    11

    The poll is expired.

    Last edited by Freakshow; 11-02-2007, 06:18 AM.
    Si quaeris peninsulam amoenam, circumspice.

    Comprehensive Reform for the Veterans Committee -- Fixing the Hall continued.

  • #2
    ---Couple guys with very strong peak cases, but moderate career cases, in Wally Berger and Wes Ferrell. I like both for Cooperstown, which I couldn't really say for any of the 20s guys. Lon Warneke is a name you seldom hear, but he had a strong peak and solid career. Ditto for Tommy Bridges. Bob Johnson and Dick Bartell are probably the best two career candidates, although niether exactly knocks your socks off. That is probably my ballot.
    --Buddy Myer could edge out Bartell. If you like consistently good as a path of mid-range career totals, rather than great mixed with not so good and/or injured, then Mel Harder could beat out Bridges or Warneke. Lefty O'Doul could be ballot worthy if you give him enough of a boost for his offfield achievements to supplement the 2 great years and completly underwhelming career. Bobo Newsom probably deserves to have his name on the list of contenders, although I can't imagine he'd actually get my vote.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by leecemark View Post
      Bobo Newsom probably deserves to have his name on the list of contenders, although I can't imagine he'd actually get my vote.
      I should probably mention that Newsom, along with some other 30's-40's players like Walters, Hack and Travis are seen as candidates for the 1940's.
      Si quaeris peninsulam amoenam, circumspice.

      Comprehensive Reform for the Veterans Committee -- Fixing the Hall continued.

      Comment


      • #4
        I thought I'd share a reply I made to one of the ballot consultants.

        Has the the 1930's ballot been set in stone? If not another candidate that has been overlooked and worth considering is Tony Cuccinello - 2B, Bees, 1930-1945.

        I have him ahead of

        Joe Kuhel
        Red Lucas
        Hal Trosky
        Lefty O'Doul
        Not quite in stone yet; it's still in play until the poll is up, probably tomorrow night or Friday.

        If I've got them all, that's 14 players you've suggested for the 1930's. Some stats:
        Code:
        Sam West - CF, Senators, 1927-1942		192: 24-19-18	60.5: 7.1-6.3-5.7
        Van Mungo - P, Dodgers, 1931-1945		147: 24-22-17	57.7: 10.0-9.1-7.9
        Ival Goodman - RF, Reds, 1935-1944				48.9: 10.5-9.1-6.5
        Billy Jurges - SS, Cubs, 1931-1947		170: 18-18-17	69.6: 7.9-7.7-7.4
        Pinky Whitney - 3B, Phillies, 1928-1939				61.7: 8.7-7.8-7.3
        Jo-Jo Moore - LF, Giants, 1930-1941		170: 26-24-23	53.0: 8.7-7.4-7.1
        Hal Schumacher - P, Giants, 1931-1946		176: 24-23-23	57.8: 9.3-7.3-7.2
        Ripper Collins - 1B, Cardinals, 1931-1941	147: 32-28-19	43.4: 9.5-8.0-5.9
        Ed Brandt - P, Braves, 1928-1938				55.6: 10.4-8.9-6.8
        Freddie Fitzsimmons - P, Giants, 1925-1943	222: 20-18-18	66.1: 6.5-5.9-5.4
        Billy Werber - 3B, Red Sox, 1930-1942		162: 27-26-25	60.0: 9.7-9.0-8.9
        Charlie Root		                        223: 23-22-21	68.8: 7.3-6.9-6.4
        Gus Suhr		                        170	        52.8: 8.9-6.9-6.3
        Tony Cuccinello		                        203: 23-23-23	65.7: 9.6-7.3-7.1
        No obvious choice here. Root has the most career and a much better peak than Fitzsimmons. But 223 and 68.8 are a weak argument for a career candidate. Moore and Schumacher have decent peaks, but even war credit doesn't get their career numbers too high. Werber has a very good three years, but nothing beyond it. Collins is O'Doul-lite. Goodman is like that, too.

        What it really comes down to is, do any of these guys bring anything to their case besides the numbers? Consideration for the HOF goes well beyond the stats; every one of those 14 needs that something more.

        Another criteria I use is "popularity" as a candidate. I've been studying the Hall for more than 30 years and have a good handle on which players seem to have a constituency arguing on their behalf, whose names have actually been considered as candidates, who have writers stumped for from time to time, etc. None of those 14 seems to have this going for them.

        I may yet replace Kuhel or Lucas (or Chapman); or I may add an 18th player. If you had to choose one of the 14, who would it be?
        Last edited by Freakshow; 10-31-2007, 07:33 AM.
        Si quaeris peninsulam amoenam, circumspice.

        Comprehensive Reform for the Veterans Committee -- Fixing the Hall continued.

        Comment


        • #5
          Charlie Root and Fat Freddie Fitzsimmons are the only two off that list that I would consider.
          "It's good to be young and a Giant." - Larry Doyle

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Chickazoola View Post
            Charlie Root and Fat Freddie Fitzsimmons are the only two off that list that I would consider.
            Why? What separates them? Anything beyond the numbers?
            Si quaeris peninsulam amoenam, circumspice.

            Comprehensive Reform for the Veterans Committee -- Fixing the Hall continued.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Freakshow View Post
              Why? What separates them? Anything beyond the numbers?
              I think career length and the fact that they were key contributors on multiple pennant winners. Also the 200 wins looks pretty.

              I actually like Fitzsimmons somewhat as a borderline case. In the sense that his 3 most similar comps are in the hall, although I think 2 of the 3 are marginal hall of famers(Coveleski and Haines, Griffith is a surefire guy for a lot of reasons).

              I think the argument could be made that he is better than Haines. Haines' only real edge is his 3 20 win seasons to Fat Freddy's 1. Haines was a mop-up guy his final 6 seasons, while Fat Freddy was still very effective late in his career. Fat Freddy also has a better career ERA+, Winning Pct, and more wins.
              "It's good to be young and a Giant." - Larry Doyle

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Chickazoola View Post
                I think career length and the fact that they were key contributors on multiple pennant winners. Also the 200 wins looks pretty.

                I actually like Fitzsimmons somewhat as a borderline case. In the sense that his 3 most similar comps are in the hall, although I think 2 of the 3 are marginal hall of famers(Coveleski and Haines, Griffith is a surefire guy for a lot of reasons).

                I think the argument could be made that he is better than Haines. Haines' only real edge is his 3 20 win seasons to Fat Freddy's 1. Haines was a mop-up guy his final 6 seasons, while Fat Freddy was still very effective late in his career. Fat Freddy also has a better career ERA+, Winning Pct, and more wins.
                Yes, Fitzsimmons is better in some superficial ways that often score points with HOF voters. That he is similar to Haines (perhaps the worst pitcher in the Hall) and Griffith (elected as a manager/executive) is next to meaningless. Those sim scores are not adjusted for era or park or anything; they should be used for amusement purposes only.

                Neither he nor Root could hit. And both stunk in the postseason; Root is notorious for giving up the "called shot" to the Babe.

                But along with his peak edge, Root also pulls ahead of Fat Freddy due to being a relief ace. Through 1944, his 266 relief games was tied for the NL record; his 40 saves were tied for second, behind Mordecai Brown's 45. As we know, the major metrics don't account very well for the leverage of pitching in a pinch. Relief pitching in general is probably underrated by win shares and WARP.
                Si quaeris peninsulam amoenam, circumspice.

                Comprehensive Reform for the Veterans Committee -- Fixing the Hall continued.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Charlie Root would be the name I would pick out of the 14.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Freakshow View Post
                    I thought I'd share a reply I made to one of the ballot consultants.


                    Not quite in stone yet; it's still in play until the poll is up, probably tomorrow night or Friday.

                    If I've got them all, that's 14 players you've suggested for the 1930's. Some stats:
                    Code:
                    Sam West - CF, Senators, 1927-1942		192: 24-19-18	60.5: 7.1-6.3-5.7
                    Van Mungo - P, Dodgers, 1931-1945		147: 24-22-17	57.7: 10.0-9.1-7.9
                    Ival Goodman - RF, Reds, 1935-1944				48.9: 10.5-9.1-6.5
                    Billy Jurges - SS, Cubs, 1931-1947		170: 18-18-17	69.6: 7.9-7.7-7.4
                    Pinky Whitney - 3B, Phillies, 1928-1939				61.7: 8.7-7.8-7.3
                    Jo-Jo Moore - LF, Giants, 1930-1941		170: 26-24-23	53.0: 8.7-7.4-7.1
                    Hal Schumacher - P, Giants, 1931-1946		176: 24-23-23	57.8: 9.3-7.3-7.2
                    Ripper Collins - 1B, Cardinals, 1931-1941	147: 32-28-19	43.4: 9.5-8.0-5.9
                    Ed Brandt - P, Braves, 1928-1938				55.6: 10.4-8.9-6.8
                    Freddie Fitzsimmons - P, Giants, 1925-1943	222: 20-18-18	66.1: 6.5-5.9-5.4
                    Billy Werber - 3B, Red Sox, 1930-1942		162: 27-26-25	60.0: 9.7-9.0-8.9
                    Charlie Root		                        223: 23-22-21	68.8: 7.3-6.9-6.4
                    Gus Suhr		                        170	        52.8: 8.9-6.9-6.3
                    Tony Cuccinello		                        203: 23-23-23	65.7: 9.6-7.3-7.1
                    No obvious choice here. Root has the most career and a much better peak than Fitzsimmons. But 223 and 68.8 are a weak argument for a career candidate. Moore and Schumacher have decent peaks, but even war credit doesn't get their career numbers too high. Werber has a very good three years, but nothing beyond it. Collins is O'Doul-lite. Goodman is like that, too.

                    What it really comes down to is, do any of these guys bring anything to their case besides the numbers? Consideration for the HOF goes well beyond the stats; every one of those 14 needs that something more.

                    Another criteria I use is "popularity" as a candidate. I've been studying the Hall for more than 30 years and have a good handle on which players seem to have a constituency arguing on their behalf, whose names have actually been considered as candidates, who have writers stumped for from time to time, etc. None of those 14 seems to have this going for them.

                    I may yet replace Kuhel or Lucas (or Chapman); or I may add an 18th player. If you had to choose one of the 14, who would it be?

                    Boy that sure looks familier

                    Another player for whom I believe is deserving of a spot on the 1930's list is Larry French - P, Pirates, 1929-1942. Solid career guy. Won 197 games, including 9 seasons of 15+ wins. I believe he's just a notch under Mel Harder and a definite step up from Red Lucas.
                    My dream ballpark dimensions
                    LF: 400 Feet...Height 37 Feet...LCF: 455 Feet...CF: 542 Feet...Height 35 Feet
                    RCF: 471 Feet...RF: 400 Feet...Height 60 Feet
                    Location....San Diego

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Sockeye View Post
                      Another player for whom I believe is deserving of a spot on the 1930's list is Larry French - P, Pirates, 1929-1942. Solid career guy. Won 197 games, including 9 seasons of 15+ wins. I believe he's just a notch under Mel Harder and a definite step up from Red Lucas.
                      French was good, but not quite, falling between Root and Fitzsimmons, IMO. His basic numbers:

                      Win Sh = 218: 22-21-21
                      WARP3 = 70.6: 8.2-6.9-6.5

                      As for Red Lucas, perhaps you're overlooking his shadow career as a pinch hitter. From his SABR bio: "led the NL in pinch hits four times, and ended with career 114 hits in 437 pinch at bats (.261). He held the major league career pinch- hit record from 1933 until Smoky Burgess broke it in 1965."

                      So, maybe Red's pitching numbers alone fall short of some of those you've mentioned, but when combined with his hitting I think it's a valuable package.

                      Lucas also had one of the highest complete game percentages of his era, completing more than two-thirds of his starts.
                      Si quaeris peninsulam amoenam, circumspice.

                      Comprehensive Reform for the Veterans Committee -- Fixing the Hall continued.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Freakshow View Post
                        French was good, but not quite, falling between Root and Fitzsimmons, IMO. His basic numbers:

                        Win Sh = 218: 22-21-21
                        WARP3 = 70.6: 8.2-6.9-6.5

                        As for Red Lucas, perhaps you're overlooking his shadow career as a pinch hitter. From his SABR bio: "led the NL in pinch hits four times, and ended with career 114 hits in 437 pinch at bats (.261). He held the major league career pinch- hit record from 1933 until Smoky Burgess broke it in 1965."

                        So, maybe Red's pitching numbers alone fall short of some of those you've mentioned, but when combined with his hitting I think it's a valuable package.

                        Lucas also had one of the highest complete game percentages of his era, completing more than two-thirds of his starts.

                        So let me get this straight. You are basing Red Lucas inclusion on this list heavily on his complete game % and 114 pinch hits? I think you are overrating both stats. He had 204 complete games in 301 starts. That's a nice stat and all. But he only had 157 wins and a 107 ERA+ so perhaps it wasn't advantages that he was left to complete so many starts. Pinch hits are of only slightly more value than a basic hit. That all depends on the situation they come in. He had a .281 career average, .261 as a pinch hitter. Can you tell me his AVG with RISP? Did his pinch hits lead to a higher amount of runs created? Lucas was a very good hitting pitcher don't get me wrong. He appeared in 18 games at other positions during his career. That's not enough to make him a deserving candidate and I doubt he'll receive so much as one vote in the poll. Larry French on the other hand has a very ligitimate argument based on his pitching record. 197 wins, nine 15+ win seasons, 114 ERA+, 218 WS, & 70.6 WARP3 higher than 6 of the players on the list. He deserves to be included.
                        My dream ballpark dimensions
                        LF: 400 Feet...Height 37 Feet...LCF: 455 Feet...CF: 542 Feet...Height 35 Feet
                        RCF: 471 Feet...RF: 400 Feet...Height 60 Feet
                        Location....San Diego

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Sockeye View Post
                          So let me get this straight. You are basing Red Lucas inclusion on this list heavily on his complete game % and 114 pinch hits? I think you are overrating both stats. He had 204 complete games in 301 starts. That's a nice stat and all. But he only had 157 wins and a 107 ERA+ so perhaps it wasn't advantages that he was left to complete so many starts. Pinch hits are of only slightly more value than a basic hit. That all depends on the situation they come in. He had a .281 career average, .261 as a pinch hitter. Can you tell me his AVG with RISP? Did his pinch hits lead to a higher amount of runs created? Lucas was a very good hitting pitcher don't get me wrong. He appeared in 18 games at other positions during his career. That's not enough to make him a deserving candidate and I doubt he'll receive so much as one vote in the poll. Larry French on the other hand has a very ligitimate argument based on his pitching record. 197 wins, nine 15+ win seasons, 114 ERA+, 218 WS, & 70.6 WARP3 higher than 6 of the players on the list. He deserves to be included.
                          No, that's not quite it.

                          The CG% and PH are the kickers to Lucas case. The "extras" I look for that sabermetrics may not quite capture accurately yet. Both are primarily leverage issues. Lots of CG make a pitcher his own closer, pitching those high leverage innings at the end of games. And a team's ace pinch hitter will tend to bat in high leverage situations.

                          But I skimmed over Lucas' obvious edge over French, which is that I see a significant advantage in peak for Lucas versus a minor edge in career for French.

                          I guess the bottom line is both of these, along with the other 14, are fringe candidates. If you want to run a poll "French or Lucas?", please do so. But I don't think too many will care enough vote.
                          Si quaeris peninsulam amoenam, circumspice.

                          Comprehensive Reform for the Veterans Committee -- Fixing the Hall continued.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Freakshow View Post
                            Yes, Fitzsimmons is better in some superficial ways that often score points with HOF voters. That he is similar to Haines (perhaps the worst pitcher in the Hall) and Griffith (elected as a manager/executive) is next to meaningless. Those sim scores are not adjusted for era or park or anything; they should be used for amusement purposes only.

                            Neither he nor Root could hit. And both stunk in the postseason; Root is notorious for giving up the "called shot" to the Babe.

                            But along with his peak edge, Root also pulls ahead of Fat Freddy due to being a relief ace. Through 1944, his 266 relief games was tied for the NL record; his 40 saves were tied for second, behind Mordecai Brown's 45. As we know, the major metrics don't account very well for the leverage of pitching in a pinch. Relief pitching in general is probably underrated by win shares and WARP.
                            One more kicker concerning Charlie Root.

                            He was stuck in the minors at ages 25-26, playing for Los Angeles in the PCL. He did very well in 1924: 21-16, 3.69 ERA in 322 IP, 199/102 K/BB ratio. In 1925 he dominated: 25-13, 2.86 ERA in 324 IP, 211/91 K/BB.

                            When he came back to MLB in 1926 he stepped right in with a solid season. To me, this shows he ought to have been in MLB in 1924-25, that he was ready, but circumstances beyond his control kept him on the west coast. I think he deserves some credit for those seasons.

                            I added Root as the 18th man in the poll.
                            Si quaeris peninsulam amoenam, circumspice.

                            Comprehensive Reform for the Veterans Committee -- Fixing the Hall continued.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              1. Bob Johnson
                              2. Babe Herman
                              3. Tommy Bridges
                              4. Dolph Camilli
                              5. Lon Warneke
                              6. Wally Berger

                              Comment

                              Ad Widget

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X