Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Is Trammel over Whitaker inappropriate? Is it racist?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is Trammel over Whitaker inappropriate? Is it racist?

    What are the cases for Trammel over Whitaker. Are they fair? The only thing I can think of regarding Trammel is that he may have been the best player in the AL in 1987. I was also a little surprised that Whitaker only got MVP votes once and made 5 all star teams while Trammel got votes 7 times and made 6 all star games.

    Whitaker played more games, had a higher OPS+, slugging percentage and on-base percentage,

  • #2
    Trammell peaked higher. Whitaker had a lot of his best rate seasons at the end of his career when he was playing under 140 games a year and may have been platooning.

    Comment


    • #3
      Yeah, Trammell was less consistent, but he has 6 or 7 great years scattered about, while Lou had maybe 2 great years. The hitting standards for shortstop are a bit less than for second basemen. WAR tells the story pretty well.
      6 WAR seasons: Whitaker 2, Trammell 6
      3.5 WAR seasons: Whitaker 15, Trammell 11

      Whitaker was good player for a long time, Trammell was an occassional star.

      Comment


      • #4
        It's a battle for sure, Tom Thress has Trammell edging Whitaker in his key stat, the basic version calls for a 229.8 to 216.4 gap:
        http://baseball.tomthress.com/Leaders/UberLeaders.php

        Valuation of defense one way or the other should tip the scales to either guy.

        Both benefit a bit by Tiger Stadium from an rrOPS+ perspective, Trammell losing ~2 wins and Whitaker ~3.5
        Contextually, Whitaker takes a leap forward with RE24 wins/clutch (+7.24 and +4.30) compared with Trammell (+1.42 and +1.20).

        PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE HOF, get Lou Whitaker into the hall of fame while he can enjoy it!!!
        Jacquelyn Eva Marchand (1983-2017)
        http://www.tezakfuneralhome.com/noti...uelyn-Marchand

        Comment


        • #5
          Racism is the boy who called wolf. When it really does exist, people don't see it, because they are numb to it being used as a reason for virtually everything.

          I really don't know if it is the case here, but it seems unlikely. Both should have been in years ago. Shortstop is more of a glamour position and VC elections now are a long process. hopefully Sweet Lou will get in soon.
          This week's Giant

          #5 in games played as a Giant with 1721 , Bill Terry

          Comment


          • #6
            It's definitely difficult to rationalize having one and not the other.
            "Every HoF vote for a PED user is a clear message from those voters to Fred McGriff: 'You should have taken steroids.' Brutal." C.J. Nitkowski

            3 6 10 21 29 31 35 41 42 44 47

            Comment


            • #7
              It is odd, at best, that you mention racism as a possible reason in the thread title, but don't elaborate (much less suggest a need for the question at all) in the OP. More poignantly, the suggestion is as offensive as it is absurd unless you have some evidence that might point towards that as a remotely plausible explanation. So far the proof you've provided is a big fat zero and all we have to go on is that one particular inductee (Trammell) is white while one particular candidate (Whitaker) is black. It would be just as ridiculous to suggest that Vladimir Guerrero was elected, but not Larry Walker for the same reason. Where's the correlation between their election status and skin color? If one existed, that would be on you to prove before tossing such an incendiary charge out there.
              "It is a simple matter to erect a Hall of Fame, but difficult to select the tenants." -- Ken Smith
              "I am led to suspect that some of the electorate is very dumb." -- Henry P. Edwards
              "You have a Hall of Fame to put people in, not keep people out." -- Brian Kenny
              "There's no such thing as a perfect ballot." -- Jay Jaffe

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Chadwick View Post
                It is odd, at best, that you mention racism as a possible reason in the thread title, but don't elaborate (much less suggest a need for the question at all) in the OP. More poignantly, the suggestion is as offensive as it is absurd unless you have some evidence that might point towards that as a remotely plausible explanation. So far the proof you've provided is a big fat zero and all we have to go on is that one particular inductee (Trammell) is white while one particular candidate (Whitaker) is black. It would be just as ridiculous to suggest that Vladimir Guerrero was elected, but not Larry Walker for the same reason. Where's the correlation between their election status and skin color? If one existed, that would be on you to prove before tossing such an incendiary charge out there.
                I hesitated to include that, but I had friends who contended that it was "racist" and so I wanted to get opinions without prejudicing peoples answers by giving my opinion. I personally feel that accusations of racism are greatly overused and tend to dismiss them. I can't think of any other instance where I believe that a black player didn't get into the hall of fame versus a highly comparable white player who did.

                However it is not exactly the same as Guerrero versus Walker. They were exact contemporaries on the same team, they rank almost exactly the same place on many members rankings by position, and Whitaker had more games, a better on-base percentage, slugging percentage, more home runs, more WAR and a higher OPS+ and Whitaker was one and done in his original time on the ballot despite being probably the best second baseman in the AL in a 20 year period, and maybe the best in baseball for a decade, while Trammell could never make that claim at shortstop.

                In reality I just woke up with the prior conversation I had had in my mind and started typing while my morning coffee was kicking in. I see I spelled Trammell wrong in a couple of spots. Why does my spellcheck say that Trammel is no misspelled (but Trammell is?) Edit: Apparently trammel is a real word or two.

                I guess (ironic to my thread title) a better comparison would be to ask about Trammell versus someone like Buddy Bell who had a virtually identical career in terms of stats, relative stats, peak and dominance at his position (As Bell and Trammell really have no case as the best in baseball for any extended period of time). And a better comp contrast for Whitaker might be Larkin who had somewhat of a fragmented career.
                Last edited by brett; 06-14-2018, 07:18 PM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Both Trammel and Whitaker should have been in long ago. Racism does not play a role here. Historically, the HOF has been very bad at identifying the best second basemen. Also not in are Bobby Grich, Ross Barnes and WIllie Randolph. Struggling is Jeff Kent. Ryne Sandberg, an all time great struggled to get in. Alomar did not get in on the 1st ballot. Several second basemen got in via the VC.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by brett View Post

                    I hesitated to include that, but I had friends who contended that it was "racist" and so I wanted to get opinions without prejudicing peoples answers by giving my opinion. I personally feel that accusations of racism are greatly overused and tend to dismiss them. I can't think of any other instance where I believe that a black player didn't get into the hall of fame versus a highly comparable white player who did.
                    .
                    Oh come on

                    This is just so far off the track.
                    One is white and one is black, so your friends cried "racism?'

                    This week's Giant

                    #5 in games played as a Giant with 1721 , Bill Terry

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by JR Hart View Post

                      Oh come on

                      This is just so far off the track.
                      One is white and one is black, so your friends cried "racism?'
                      I was going to post simply whether there was justification to put in Trammell but not Whitaker as well as ask whether there had been a thread on that before. When I woke up I just added in the "is it racist" part because I had recently been told that is was and had not thought of it before and wondered if that was something that was "going around" that I was out of the loop on.

                      And again, its not just one is white and one is black. They share a lot in common and Whitaker comes out ahead on many traditional and sabermetric stats including:

                      Hits
                      HR
                      Runs scored
                      RBI
                      Slugging
                      On base%
                      WAR
                      OPS+
                      Last edited by brett; 06-14-2018, 08:09 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by brett View Post

                        I can't think of any other instance where I believe that a black player didn't get into the hall of fame versus a highly comparable white player who did.
                        Dick Allen has not gotten in, but several lesser white players have. His race definitely played a part in him having a bad reputation among the writers. Despite excellent WAR totals Willie Randolph has never been a a serious candidate, but similar players like Nellie Fox and Red Schoendienst are in. Maury Wills and Bert Campaneris have never been real serious candidates, but Rizzuto, Sewell, Jackson and Bancroft are in. Albert Belle was never a serious candidate, but Chuck Klein and Hack Wilson are in. Minnie Minoso is still waiting, but Heinie Manush and Joe Kelley are in. Vada Pinson is not in, but Richie Ashburn and Edd Roush are. Dave Parker is not in, but Enos Slaughter is. Reggie Smith is not in but Sam Rice is. Luis Tiant is not in but Bob Lemon is.


                        .


                        19th Century League Champion
                        1900s League Champion
                        1910s League Champion

                        1930s League Division Winner
                        1950s League Champion
                        1960 Strat-O-Matic League Regular Season Winner
                        1960s League Division Winner
                        1970s League Champion
                        1971 Strat-O-Matic League Runner Up
                        1980s League Champion
                        All Time Greats League Champion

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Among the inductees who are considered to be mistakes, are ANY of them black?

                          .


                          19th Century League Champion
                          1900s League Champion
                          1910s League Champion

                          1930s League Division Winner
                          1950s League Champion
                          1960 Strat-O-Matic League Regular Season Winner
                          1960s League Division Winner
                          1970s League Champion
                          1971 Strat-O-Matic League Runner Up
                          1980s League Champion
                          All Time Greats League Champion

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by SavoyBG View Post

                            Dick Allen has not gotten in, but several lesser white players have. His race definitely played a part in him having a bad reputation among the writers. Despite excellent WAR totals Willie Randolph has never been a a serious candidate, but similar players like Nellie Fox and Red Schoendienst are in. Maury Wills and Bert Campaneris have never been real serious candidates, but Rizzuto, Sewell, Jackson and Bancroft are in. Albert Belle was never a serious candidate, but Chuck Klein and Hack Wilson are in. Minnie Minoso is still waiting, but Heinie Manush and Joe Kelley are in. Vada Pinson is not in, but Richie Ashburn and Edd Roush are. Dave Parker is not in, but Enos Slaughter is. Reggie Smith is not in but Sam Rice is. Luis Tiant is not in but Bob Lemon is.

                            Many of those may be more the result of older generation players getting higher regard in baseball over more modern players. They are pretty good examples but I don't think any of them is a GLARING omission and also not being left off while lesser contemporaries got in. I was thinking about Reggie Smith generally being rated below contemporaries or even behind Garvey a couple of times in MVP races. White guys you mentioned probably shouldn't have gotten in in my opinion but I would put Whitaker over anyone you listed.

                            I also thought of Tiant versus Hunter, but it was the anomaly that was Hunter.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by brett View Post

                              I would put Whitaker over anyone you listed.
                              I think Minoso and Tiant are as deserving as Whitaker, and Minnie and Luis each have a much better narrative than Whitaker.

                              .


                              19th Century League Champion
                              1900s League Champion
                              1910s League Champion

                              1930s League Division Winner
                              1950s League Champion
                              1960 Strat-O-Matic League Regular Season Winner
                              1960s League Division Winner
                              1970s League Champion
                              1971 Strat-O-Matic League Runner Up
                              1980s League Champion
                              All Time Greats League Champion

                              Comment

                              Ad Widget

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X