Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What if Dave Kingman had 500 HRs. HOFER?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Joltin' Joe
    replied
    Originally posted by Fuzzy Bear View Post
    This post makes my case for ending the moralism and witch hunts.
    I was replying to a poster who was referring to a "clean" list. I don't see how anyone can know who is clean and not clean.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herr28
    replied
    Originally posted by Fuzzy Bear View Post
    This post makes my case for ending the moralism and witch hunts.
    Thank you. I agree.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fuzzy Bear
    replied
    Originally posted by Joltin' Joe View Post
    To me Thome and Thomas is highly suspect. Griffey is less so but still can't eliminate him. There's no way you can classify anyone as clean.

    Are you saying you believe Pujols to be clean?
    This post makes my case for ending the moralism and witch hunts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joltin' Joe
    replied
    Originally posted by bluesky5 View Post
    It still is. Thome, Thomas and Griffey are the only clean post 90's players to make it. Pujols will soon join them.
    To me Thome and Thomas is highly suspect. Griffey is less so but still can't eliminate him. There's no way you can classify anyone as clean.

    Are you saying you believe Pujols to be clean?

    Leave a comment:


  • JR Hart
    replied
    Originally posted by White Knight View Post
    And out of that list (Thome, Thomas, Griffey, Pujols) I suspect everyone except Griffey.
    It's foolhardy not to suspect everyone.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herr28
    replied
    Originally posted by westsidegrounds View Post
    Thanks.

    And by the way, Williams & McGwire were my first guesses too! I decided to ask after I checked them.

    The 93 RBI isn't too bad either. It's not Top Ten for that year but it's not ridiculously far off the pace (Joe Carter lead the AL with 121).

    I understand the one-dimensionality arguments, and basically agree, but it's very hard to believe that a guy coming off three straight 30-or-more HR and 90+-RBI seasons, and closing in on 500 career HR, would not have been of value to a single team in all of MLB.
    I would have thought that some bottom dwelling teams would have picked him up, especially if they had a small stadium like the Mariners in the Kingdome. They sure as heck weren't going anywhere, and they got rid of Gorman Thomas as the DH. Kingman could have helped put some fans in that place with his monster HRs, and the fact that he would have been chasing 500. Other than that, I can't think of any other reason why a team would want his attitude in the clubhouse, or those non-HR stats in their lineup.

    Leave a comment:


  • White Knight
    replied
    Originally posted by bluesky5 View Post
    It still is. Thome, Thomas and Griffey are the only clean post 90's players to make it. Pujols will soon join them.
    And out of that list, I suspect everyone except Griffey.

    Leave a comment:


  • bluesky5
    replied
    Originally posted by Joltin' Joe View Post
    Not sayin' he would've gotten in with 500 but those of you comparing him to Dunn and Sosa; 500 HRs back in the 70s and the 80s were not the same as 500 HRs today. It was quite an accomplishment back in those days; 500 HR Club was very exclusive and prestigious.
    It still is. Thome, Thomas and Griffey are the only clean post 90's players to make it. Pujols will soon join them.

    Leave a comment:


  • westsidegrounds
    replied
    Thanks.

    And by the way, Williams & McGwire were my first guesses too! I decided to ask after I checked them.

    The 93 RBI isn't too bad either. It's not Top Ten for that year but it's not ridiculously far off the pace (Joe Carter lead the AL with 121).

    I understand the one-dimensionality arguments, and basically agree, but it's very hard to believe that a guy coming off three straight 30-or-more HR and 90+-RBI seasons, and closing in on 500 career HR, would not have been of value to a single team in all of MLB.

    Leave a comment:


  • jalbright
    replied
    Kingman has the most in his last season. There are two guys tied at 29 for second place, Ted Williams and Mark McGwire.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herr28
    replied
    Originally posted by westsidegrounds View Post
    How many other players have closed out their careers with a 35* HR season?

    *Or more
    That's a good question. I wonder how many even finished their final season with 30. The first two that popped into my mind were Ted Williams and Mark McGwire. Big Mac had 29 or so in his final year, which was an injury marred half season actually. Ted Williams "only" had 29 in 390 plate appearances, but he hit .316/.451/.645 with a 190 OPS+ at age 41.

    Kingman certainly hit more home runs (only 6, but with a much larger home park), however was only hitting .210/.255/.431 (90 OPS+) at age 37 with a pretty good supporting cast in Oakland. The 35 home runs are impressive, but nothing else about that batting line is.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dude Paskert
    replied
    This thread had me poking around in Kingman's splits, and there are some really interesting things about '84 for him.
    Dave hit very well with RISP, .303 BA with .577 slugging.
    He went hog wild with men on first only, .313 BA with 14 HRs in 115 ABs, .713 slugging...only 5 walks. Seems like pitchers were giving him strikes with a guy on first despite his lack of patience, and he went nuts on the ball.
    With the bases loaded, Kingman went totally insane...5 hits in 10 ABs, 3 HRs, 1 2B, 1 single. .500 BA, 1.500 slugging, 1 K, no walks, 24 RBI, 6 sac flies for a .313 OBP! Seems kind of unfair in a way, but I guess you could argue that getting one run in with an out with the bases loaded and less than two outs isn't a wonderful outcome. Dave also hit extremely well with men on 2nd and 3rd.
    Just seemed odd to me that Kingman had more RBI in '84 than his big '79 with the Cubs, and I would say that his outstanding performance with runners on had something to do with it. Couldn't have hurt that the amazing Rickey Henderson was batting in front of him in '84, while the '79 Cubbies had a truly brutal offense...Dave actually had pretty good splits with runners on in '79, too, but not quite as many opportunities. I'll have to look at that more later!

    Leave a comment:


  • westsidegrounds
    replied
    How many other players have closed out their careers with a 35* HR season?

    *Or more

    Leave a comment:


  • Herr28
    replied
    Originally posted by Joltin' Joe View Post
    Not sayin' he would've gotten in with 500 but those of you comparing him to Dunn and Sosa; 500 HRs back in the 70s and the 80s were not the same as 500 HRs today. It was quite an accomplishment back in those days; 500 HR Club was very exclusive and prestigious.
    I know, but so is the 600 HR club. It is still extremely exclusive despite the huge spike in home runs in the 1990s and 2000s. Fewer guys are in the 600+ club than were in the 500+ club back when Kingman would have joined it, if he could have. That is why I brought up Sosa.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joltin' Joe
    replied
    Not sayin' he would've gotten in with 500 but those of you comparing him to Dunn and Sosa; 500 HRs back in the 70s and the 80s were not the same as 500 HRs today. It was quite an accomplishment back in those days; 500 HR Club was very exclusive and prestigious.

    Leave a comment:

Ad Widget

Collapse
Working...
X