Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Babe for the HOF?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Babe for the HOF?

    I don't usually engage much in HOF talk. My philosophy is simple. If a player was great, and not merely very good, he may just belong in the Hall. Far too many very good players have not only become enshrined, IMO, but have become the standard bearer for others to follow - "Well, if Bill Mazeroski is in the HOF, then (pick your good/very good player) belongs." I have moved beyond the Hall being for 'immortals', as it was originally intended. Over time, standards of any kind tend to become relaxed, and exceptions are made. In the case of the Baseball Hall of Fame, standards have become not only relaxed, but practically ignored, in many cases. Just my opinion, of course.

    Now, I give you Floyd Caves Herman. With a middle name like that, he almost HAD to have a nickname, and with a zany character such as him, it had to be colorful. Why not Babe?

    Babe Herman was a marvel at the plate. For twelve full seasons, he was among the National League's better hitters. His lifetime marks include a .324 BA. His .532 slugging average ranked him fourth among all-time National Leaguer hitters with at least 5,000 ABs at the time of his retirement. His most productive year netted him a whopping .393 BA, 35 HRs, 130 RBIs, a .678 SA, 241 hits and 416 total bases. The fact that he accomplished all this in 1930, however, necessarily diminishes those achievements. In fact, 1930 was such an amazing year for hitters that Herman's huge year didn't even merit a whisper of MVP talk!

    If hitting alone were the criteria for HOF induction, I would think Herman would probably be enshrined by now. There are also many colorful characters in the HOF, so if that were a criterion as well, Babe CERTAINLY belongs. Some of his quotes are at least on a par with the best of Berra and Stengel (what is attributed to them, anyway!). He was the main reason the Dodgers of the ‘30s were known as the ‘Daffiness Boys.’

    Unfortunately, Babe Herman was an atrocious fielder. An absolute butcher. He made Hack Wilson look like Tris Speaker in the outfield. Had he played first base, he may possibly have been the 1930's version of Dick Stuart. Generally, one of the first things that springs to mind when the name Babe Herman is uttered, is the image of him being hit on the head by fly balls. That, unfortunately, is a well-earned perception. From what I have read, that happened at least two or three times in his career. One of his most famous quotes was in response to a reporter’s question about his fielding. Tired of the seemingly endless references to his horrific glove work, he began a campaign to convince reporters that he really wasn’t THAT bad a fielder. Surrounded by reporters before a game one day, he was quoted as saying, “Fellows, if another fly ball ever hits me on the head, I’ll quit the game of baseball forever.” Allegedly, one of the reporters then asked, “What if one hits you on the shoulder?” Babe’s now-famous reply was, “The shoulder? That doesn’t count.”

    While he was in his prime, Herman was a very well-known and easily recognizable celebrity around the Brooklyn area. For a short time, an imposter began making the rounds of the local nightclubs and restaurants claiming to be Babe Herman. Herman reportedly went to the press, saying, “That guy doesn’t even look like me! In fact, no one looks like me. Sometimes, even I don’t look like me!” After Herman had finished his tirade and walked away, one reporter allegedly said to another, “It would be easy to show up the fake Babe Herman. Just take the guy out and hit him a fly ball. If the bum catches it, he’s a fake.”

    One story told by an ex-teammate goes as follows: Dodger manager Max Carey loved Babe Herman. Treated him like a son and thought he could do no wrong. This blatant favoritism irked many players on the team, including pitcher Hollis ‘Sloppy’ Thurston and backup catcher Paul Richards. One afternoon, the Dodgers were playing the Cubs when Kiki Cuyler stepped to the plate. Thurston and Richards watched the action from the bullpen as Cuyler lifted a high, lazy fly ball down the right field line. It should have been an easy out – except for the fact that Babe Herman was the right fielder. Herman never saw the ball. In fact, he never even moved until the ball hit the ground in fair territory. By the time Herman retrieved the ball and fired it back to the infield, the speedy Cuyler was standing on third base with one of the luckiest triples ever hit. When the inning was over, Thurston and Richards decided to go over to the dugout to hear what Carey had to say to his pet player, Herman. They were sure Max was going to finally jump on Babe’s case. As soon as they set foot in the dugout however, Carey yelled to them, “Hey, you two! What were you doing in the bullpen, sleeping? Why didn’t you yell to Babe that it was going to be a fair ball?”

    Herman did not like to report to spring training, and rarely signed his yearly contract until just before the season began. His teammates and the press accused Babe of holding out for more money, but Herman assured them that wasn’t the case. Quote: “I don’t do it for the money. The longer I stay out of camp, the less chance I have of getting injured by a fly ball.”

    Yet, as legendary as Herman’s outfield misadventures are, he is best known by some fans for a monumental base running blunder which led to one of the more famous jokes in baseball history. In fact, the blunder wasn’t totally Herman’s fault. In a game in 1926, Babe was at bat with Chick Fewster on first base and slew-footed pitcher Dazzy Vance on second. Herman blasted a drive to right field for what was a sure double at least. Fewster, who did not get a good jump from first base, rounded second and headed for third when he saw Vance round the bag and head for home. Inexplicably, Vance, who was almost halfway down the line, put on the brakes and headed back for third base. Fewster, seeing Vance’s retreat, also applied the brakes and turned around to head back to second. Unfortunately for Fewster, Herman, who had rounded first and seen second base unoccupied, threw caution to the wind and decided to try for a triple. Babe blazed past Fewster before Chick could even get up a head of steam to head back to second base. Even passing Fewster did not slow down Herman. He slid into third base in a cloud of dust at about the same time Vance was sliding into third from the opposite direction. There is a version of this incident, which has been debunked by some, that Fewster was standing on third base when Herman and Vance made their comical slides into the bag, but that is likely a situation contrived by Vaudeville comedians so that they could use the old line, “Hey, Brooklyn has three men on base!” “Oh yeah? Which base?” In all likelihood, Herman was called out as a result of passing Fewster on the basepaths. The Vaudeville line also goes that Braves third baseman Ed Taylor tagged all three runners while they were on third base which, again, doesn't appear to have happened that way. This would be Taylor's only season in the bigs, but he does have that claim to infamy, bogus though it likely is.

    So, does Herman belong in the HOF? His batting stats are great, although I have read that he wasn’t the greatest clutch hitter in the world, as possibly attributed to his relatively low number of RBIs. I choose to believe, however, that his low RBI total is directly associated with the horrible teams he played on. You can’t drive in many runs without runners on base.

    Who thinks Herman belongs? Who thinks he doesn’t? I’m generally not wishy-washy with my opinions, but I’m on the fence. I suppose his ineptness with the glove has prevented him from being considered ‘great enough’ to be enshrined. In any event, Babe Herman was truly a baseball original!
    Always go to other people's funerals, otherwise they won't come to yours. - Yogi Berra

  • #2
    His career is short, his best seasons came in hitters park during a high offense era, and he couldn't field.

    If his career was longer he would have a good shot, but he was washed up at 34.
    "It's good to be young and a Giant." - Larry Doyle

    Comment


    • #3
      Has he had his own thread here before? He seemed to be a popular candidate, Bill James mentioned him a bit in Politics of Glory. While I know he's been discusssed, I honestly don't think he's had his own threrad, or if he has, it's been a while aned buried under the doozens of threads about four or five different players who aget the lions share of should he be or not discussion.

      Yeah, yeah, yeah, I'll do a search.

      I think it's actually good that Herman is not in. He was a good player in an over-represented era. His not being in the HOF is not a mistake.
      Dave Bill Tom George Mark Bob Ernie Soupy Dick Alex Sparky
      Joe Gary MCA Emanuel Sonny Dave Earl Stan
      Jonathan Neil Roger Anthony Ray Thomas Art Don
      Gates Philip John Warrior Rik Casey Tony Horace
      Robin Bill Ernie JEDI

      Comment


      • #4
        Cap, I did a search as well and could find no thread on Herman, which frankly surprises me. I have little doubt that somewhere someone has to have created one. He has always fascinated me as a player and as a wacky character of the game. There are so many anecdotes about him that I have not seen on this forum that it was too tempting not to include some of them here.
        Last edited by Dodgerfan1; 05-30-2008, 04:30 AM.
        Always go to other people's funerals, otherwise they won't come to yours. - Yogi Berra

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Dodgerfan1 View Post
          Cap, I did a search as well and could find no thread on Herman, which frankly surprises me. I have little doubt that somewhere someone has to have created one. He has always fascinated me as a player and as a wacky character of the game. There are so many anecdotes about him that I have not seen on this forum that it was too tempting not to include some of them here.
          I also did a search. No threads on him.

          Always good to see that, where the candidate being discussed is worth discussing more than people just shooting down the idea. I hope that happens, at least.
          Dave Bill Tom George Mark Bob Ernie Soupy Dick Alex Sparky
          Joe Gary MCA Emanuel Sonny Dave Earl Stan
          Jonathan Neil Roger Anthony Ray Thomas Art Don
          Gates Philip John Warrior Rik Casey Tony Horace
          Robin Bill Ernie JEDI

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Chickazoola View Post
            His career is short, his best seasons came in hitters park during a high offense era, and he couldn't field.

            If his career was longer he would have a good shot, but he was washed up at 34.
            These are good arguments against, although the shortness of his career doesn't seem to be too much of a factor with the HOF. A few players enshrined have had shorter careers. Kiner only played ten years, Joss only nine, etc. I'm not literally comparing his career to theirs, as I believe they were both superior players to Herman, I'm merely trying to disabuse you of the shortness of career being a factor. It's also true that he played in a vast hitters era, which certainly takes a bit away from his accomplishments at the plate. There is that fielding thing, too.....
            Always go to other people's funerals, otherwise they won't come to yours. - Yogi Berra

            Comment


            • #7
              To quote from the Great One: "pass."
              "It is a simple matter to erect a Hall of Fame, but difficult to select the tenants." -- Ken Smith
              "I am led to suspect that some of the electorate is very dumb." -- Henry P. Edwards
              "You have a Hall of Fame to put people in, not keep people out." -- Brian Kenny
              "There's no such thing as a perfect ballot." -- Jay Jaffe

              Comment


              • #8
                Not a good candidate. Not among the top 100 for the HOF.

                He was voted the 9th best candidate from the 1930's:
                Code:
                Wes	Ferrell	83.3%
                Wally	Berger	78.8%
                Tommy	Bridges	65.2%
                Bob	Johnson	65.2%
                Buddy	Myer	39.4%	
                Dick	Bartell	36.4%
                Lefty	O'Doul	36.4%
                Lon	Warneke	30.8%
                Babe	Herman	27.3%
                Dolph	Camilli	24.2%
                Si quaeris peninsulam amoenam, circumspice.

                Comprehensive Reform for the Veterans Committee -- Fixing the Hall continued.

                Comment


                • #9
                  You would think a guy with a career OPS+ of 140 would be a stone lock for the HoF, but he's not. During his short career he was very productive. In the period of his career (1926-1937) he was probably in the range of the 10-15th best hitter in baseball. The problem is that it's a very short career and his counting numbers are all rather light.

                  If you look at the live ball era of 1920 - 1940 Herman ranks 20th in HR's, 44th in runs, 32nd in rbi's, and 35th in hits. That just seems like not enough overall output for a guy who was defensively challenged.
                  Buck O'Neil: The Monarch of Baseball

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    If they had the DH during Herman's career, and if Herman had been a career DH, would he be a better candidate for the HOF?

                    I am certain that if he had the option of being a career DH, his career would have been longer.
                    "I do not care if half the league strikes. Those who do it will encounter quick retribution. All will be suspended and I don't care if it wrecks the National League for five years. This is the United States of America and one citizen has as much right to play as another. The National League will go down the line with Robinson whatever the consequences. You will find if you go through with your intention that you have been guilty of complete madness."

                    NL President Ford Frick, 1947

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Dodgerfan1 View Post
                      These are good arguments against, although the shortness of his career doesn't seem to be too much of a factor with the HOF. A few players enshrined have had shorter careers. Kiner only played ten years, Joss only nine, etc. I'm not literally comparing his career to theirs, as I believe they were both superior players to Herman, I'm merely trying to disabuse you of the shortness of career being a factor.
                      That doesn't follow. Yes it's possible to be selected with eight full seasons (Ross Youngs) and several have been selected with ten full seasons but a short career does make a big difference. With 12 seasons of his productivity rather than nine, Ralph Kiner would have been one of the all-time home run leaders and he would have been elected sooner. With 15 seasons he would have been a cinch.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by KCGHOST View Post
                        You would think a guy with a career OPS+ of 140 would be a stone lock for the HoF,
                        I wouldn't. A list of candidates in that range or better:
                        Code:
                        Player		OPS+	PA
                        Mark	McGwire	162	7660
                        Pete Browning	162	5315
                        Dick	Allen	156	7314
                        Charlie	Keller	152	4604
                        Gavvy	Cravath	151	4645
                        Charley	Jones	150	4009
                        Mike	Donlin	144	4282
                        Albert	Belle	143	6673
                        Lefty	O'Doul	143	3659
                        George	Stone	143	3668
                        Bill	Joyce	143	4149
                        Harry	Stovey	143	6832
                        Tip	O'Neill	143	4720
                        Kevin Mitchell	142	4696
                        Frank	Howard	142	7353
                        Jack Fournier	142	6033
                        Henry	Larkin	141	5302
                        Babe	Herman	140	6226
                        Norm	Cash	139	7910
                        Jeff	Heath	139	5560
                        Denny	Lyons	139	5010
                        Darr Strawberry	138	6326
                        Bob	Johnson	138	8047
                        Ken Williams	138	5616
                        Si quaeris peninsulam amoenam, circumspice.

                        Comprehensive Reform for the Veterans Committee -- Fixing the Hall continued.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Fuzzy Bear View Post
                          If they had the DH during Herman's career, and if Herman had been a career DH, would he be a better candidate for the HOF?

                          I am certain that if he had the option of being a career DH, his career would have been longer.
                          That's one of my problems with the DH when HoF discussions come up. You get generations of great hitters that saw their careers end early either due to poor fielding or injury or a combination of both, but who may have thrived for years if given the opportunity to DH. In a case like Herman's, it may have made a difference between Hall of Fame and not. Take someone like Edgar Martinez, a terrific hitter, but without the DH, I'm not convinced his career would be much different than Ted Kluszewski's.

                          So for me, there is a pretty high standard of offense for a DH to get in. It's like another positional adjustment.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Herman's peak offensive stats, even for a short career, are HOF-worthy.

                            Herman started off as a first baseman, and while he wasn't great, he wasn't Dick Stuart, either. What happened was that in 1928, the Robins (Herman never played for the "Dodgers"; the first year the "Dodgers" existed, Herman was a Cub) came up with Del Bissonette who, while not the hitter Herman was, carried a better glove:

                            Code:
                             Year Ag Tm  Lg Pos   G     PO    A    E   DP    FP   lgFP  RFg  lgRFg  RF9  lgRF9
                            +--------------+---+----+------+----+----+----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
                            +---- Fielding Sorted by Year ------+
                             1928 28 BRO NL  1B  155   1482   77   20   95  .987  .989 10.06  6.45            
                             1929 29 BRO NL  1B  113   1093   47   15   70  .987  .989 10.09  8.85            
                             1930 30 BRO NL  1B  146   1427   72   20  142  .987  .990 10.27  6.85            
                             1931 31 BRO NL  1B  152   1460   66   16  136  .990  .990 10.04  6.58            
                             1933 33 BRO NL  1B   32    298   19    4   25  .988  .990  9.91 10.20            
                            +---- Fielding Sorted by Position --+
                             1928 28 BRO NL  1B  155   1482   77   20   95  .987  .989 10.06  6.45            
                             1929 29 BRO NL  1B  113   1093   47   15   70  .987  .989 10.09  8.85            
                             1930 30 BRO NL  1B  146   1427   72   20  142  .987  .990 10.27  6.85            
                             1931 31 BRO NL  1B  152   1460   66   16  136  .990  .990 10.04  6.58            
                             1933 33 BRO NL  1B   32    298   19    4   25  .988  .990  9.91 10.20            
                            +--------------+---+----+------+----+----+----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
                             Position Total  1B  598   5760  281   75  468  .988  .990 10.10  7.23            
                            +--------------+---+----+------+----+----+----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
                             Overall Total       598   5760  281   75  468  .988  .990 10.10  7.23
                            Bissonette's range factors are off the charts. That they are so high suggest that (A) the Robins were an extreme ground ball pitching team, and (B) that Bissonette chose to take the play to 1B by himself, rather than flip to the pitcher. He MUST have been quicker and faster than Herman; however, he was nowhere near the hitter. Herman was not a good outfielder by any stretch of the imagination, but it seems clear to me that playing Herman in RF was a step taken to keep a big bat in the lineup.

                            One of Herman's credentials for the HOF (in the eyes of some) is that he was, in his time, famous. A book was written about him, entitled Brooklyn's Babe, and he was, in his time, regarded as a star when he was with the Robins. He was not a superstar, but he was nowhere near as bad as some have made him out to be. His five best years (1928-32) are, offensively Hall-worthy; and if he had 15 years of that quality, he'd be a HOFer, warts and all. I can't say he was a HOFer, and if I were picking a HOFer from Herman's already over-honored era with a short career, I'd pick Lefty O'Doul (who's case rests on aspects of his career beyond his playing days). But he WAS "Brooklyn's Babe"; he WAS considered an important player in his time, he DID enjoy a degree of fame in his time, and he would not be the worst player in the HOF if inducted.
                            "I do not care if half the league strikes. Those who do it will encounter quick retribution. All will be suspended and I don't care if it wrecks the National League for five years. This is the United States of America and one citizen has as much right to play as another. The National League will go down the line with Robinson whatever the consequences. You will find if you go through with your intention that you have been guilty of complete madness."

                            NL President Ford Frick, 1947

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              league range factor (lgRF) for 1B at baseball-reference

                              Del Bissonette wasn't that good. There is some problem with the league range factors reported by baseball-refererence (lgRF), at least for firstbase.

                              Looking up George Sisler (St Louis A) and George Kelly (New York N),
                              I see that lgRF plummets after 1915 for Sisler, after 1919 for Kelly.

                              Looking up Lou Gehrig and Jimmie Foxx, both in the American League,
                              I see that lgRF in 1927 is 6.45 for Gehrig, 10.28 for Foxx.

                              Looking up Joe Start ~1880 and Keith Hernandez ~ 1980,
                              I see that lgRF looks ok in the olden days (but don't rely on it) and looks crazy in modern times --same as around 1920 although innings data is available as well as games data (lgRF9 is no better than lgRF).

                              Comment

                              Ad Widget

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X