Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Relief Pitchers in the Hall of Fame

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Relief Pitchers in the Hall of Fame

    Rather than start a poll, I want to have a discussion about this. In addition the relievers who are already in there (though I think they all were starters for part of their career as well), Trevor Hoffman will likely be enshrined soon and, after his waiting period, Mariano Rivera would seem to be a no-brainer too. My question is- are the ones already in worthy? Who should be in that's already eligible? And who that's still active or recently retired deserves the honor as well?
    Found in a fortune cookie On Thursday, August 18th, 2005: "Hard words break no bones, Kind words butter no parsnips."

    1955 1959 1963 1965 1981 1988 2017?

  • #2
    I'll answer my own questions first:

    Are the ones already in worthy? - I'm pretty undecided about all of them, though I don't have a quibble with them individually either. Wilhelm is there mostly on longevity- I'm not sure he was a better knuckleballer than Wilbur Wood all told- but just making it to almost age 50 is an impressive feat, and he did have some good seasons. Eckersley is probably the most deserving- not only did he accomplish a decent amount as a starter but he had some amazing season as a reliever. As for the other three, well, something to be said for being that high on the career saves list considering a save used to mean more pitching, and was harder to get.

    Who should be in that's already eligible? - Anyone with over 400 career saves might be at least borderline, but Lee Smith should be in. Even allowing for his erraticism and the fact that he's been surpassed by Hoffman and Rivera, he still set the standards for saves, was way ahead of anyone else for a while, and started before the age of specialization completely kicked in. The kicker for me is, even if relief stats really go back less than half a century, the woods are full of closers who performed at historic levels for 5 years or less, but it's the rare talent, even now, that does it for an extended period of time. Not only was Smith the first to be a top reliever year in, year out for 15 years, before Hoffman and Rivera he was the only one.

    Who that's still active or recently retired deserves the honor as well? - Rivera's the no-brainer. He was there when it counts and presided over a classic Yankee era (and I say that as a Yankee-hater). Hoffman's deserving as well for his consistency, though unlike Rivera he didn't have much in the way of postseason experience (and was solid but unspectacular the few times he was there) and unlike Smith barely had more innings than appearances. He'll probably be superceded as well not too long from now, but for now he's the one that's done what he's done.
    Found in a fortune cookie On Thursday, August 18th, 2005: "Hard words break no bones, Kind words butter no parsnips."

    1955 1959 1963 1965 1981 1988 2017?

    Comment


    • #3
      Wilhelm rates easily. He had one of the best peaks ever from 64-68 he was 1.74 ERA+ 185 whip .0924 and averaged 108 innings. The only year that he was a starter 1959, he led the league in ERA and ERA+. Wilhelm is 8th all-time in h/9 and he had longevity.

      Gossage also wasn't getting just 1 inning appearances like now. Look at these innings pitched to ERAs, all in relief as the closer> 1975 142/1.84, 1977 133/1.62, 1978 134/2.01, 1980 99/2.27, 1982 93/2.23, 1984 102/2.90

      Fingers from 1972-82 averaged 65 app and 109 innings a year 2.63 era and ERA+ 131

      These 3 guys easily rate. I'm not high on the one inning wonders, but I would put Smith, Rivera, and Hoffman in and that's it. Sutter doesn't rate but he did have some amazing seasons. He's not the worst selection.
      This week's Giant

      #5 in games played as a Giant with 1721 , Bill Terry

      Comment


      • #4
        I think Billy Wagner gets underrated. I would put him in before Lee Smith and probably Trevor Hoffman.
        "(Shoeless Joe Jackson's fall from grace is one of the real tragedies of baseball. I always thought he was more sinned against than sinning." -- Connie Mack

        "I have the ultimate respect for Whitesox fans. They were as miserable as the Cubs and Redsox fans ever were but always had the good decency to keep it to themselves. And when they finally won the World Series, they celebrated without annoying every other fan in the country."--Jim Caple, ESPN (Jan. 12, 2011)

        Comment


        • #5
          I'm in the vast minority but...I wouldn't cry if Ron Perranoski, Kent Tekulve and/or Clay Carroll got in.

          Comment


          • #6
            The only ones I would put in are Hoyt Wilhelm and Mariano Rivera with Rich Gossage being a maybe. On the other hand if Bruce Sutter is in then there are about 6 or 7 guys I'd put in before him.
            "(Shoeless Joe Jackson's fall from grace is one of the real tragedies of baseball. I always thought he was more sinned against than sinning." -- Connie Mack

            "I have the ultimate respect for Whitesox fans. They were as miserable as the Cubs and Redsox fans ever were but always had the good decency to keep it to themselves. And when they finally won the World Series, they celebrated without annoying every other fan in the country."--Jim Caple, ESPN (Jan. 12, 2011)

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by chicagowhitesox1173 View Post
              The only ones I would put in are Hoyt Wilhelm and Mariano Rivera with Rich Gossage being a maybe. On the other hand if Bruce Sutter is in then there are about 6 or 7 guys I'd put in before him.
              These are my feelings exactly. Wilhelm, and Rivera for sure and Gossage probably in for me. I'd say yes to Gossage today. He had a 146 ERA+ over his last 1200+ innings and 182 over 9 years while averaging 93 innings per.

              Wilhelm actually had the best ERA+ in history (2000+ innings) through 1969 and of course only broke into the majors at age 29 (turned 30 midseason). He had a 156 ERA+ for 881 innings after age 40. Since he was one of the most valuable players in the league in his rookie season, he almost surely lost 2-3 solid seasons to military service but maybo someone else knows more specifics. Rivera is totally automatic when you look at his post season play.

              Comment


              • #8
                To the current HOF, I would add Billy Wagner and Dan Quisenberry. Otherwise, I think the HoF has done a good job with relievers. The only one I'm not a fan of is Rollie Fingers as he was a bit of a compiler. Trevor Hoffman was also a compiler.

                EDIT: Of course Rivera sails in as soon as he reties.
                Last edited by jjpm74; 11-26-2012, 08:43 AM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  --I would be fine with fewer relievers in the Hall. Wilhelm, Gossage and Rivera (when eligible) are the only ones I strongly support. Eckersley I think deserved his induction based on his good record as a SP combined with his excellent second act as a reliever.
                  --Fingers has a decent narrative, but he really only had a few great seasons in a long (and very good) career. He isn't a clear mistake, but if I'm building a Hall from scratch he probably doesn't make it. Sutter was a poor choice and if he is the standard then the door is open for at least 8-10 more relievers. That would be WAY too many. I'd be happier if Rivera is the only future induction based on achievement to date and the standard for future relievers is set moe around the Gossage level. That is a long strech of dominance, combined with a very long and successfull career.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    To be fair to Fingers, the guy was a 4 time Rolaids Award winner, a CYA winner, a MVP winner, and a WS MVP winner. And most of those were won after he left the juggernaut A's teams too.

                    I understand the argument for Lee Smith, and under most circumstances i'd want him in. But he was the most unimpressive saves leader saves leader I've ever seen. He collected all those saves for teams that never won anything (save 84 and 88, both LCS losses), especially those Cardinal teams where he had his best seasons. Just ask yourself, how many closers would you pick to close for you before you get to Lee Smith? 10? 15?

                    Obviously, Rivera is a mortal lock 1st ballot HOF guy. He defines the position IMO.

                    Hoffman is a lot tougher. He did rack up all those save...but like Smith, how much did they matter on those Padres teams? With that said, I'd take Hoffy over Smith anyday of the week.

                    And what about the argument for John Franco? #4 on the saves list. A solid consistant performer over his career. If you let Smith in, it seems like you have to put Franco in too.

                    But what this thread tells me is that there just not a lot of Candidates who just scream out HOFer. Those that did are either already in, or will be in about six years (Rivera).
                    “Well, I like to say I’m completely focused, right? I mean, the game’s on the line. It’s not like I’m thinking about what does barbecue Pop Chips and Cholula taste like. Because I already know that answer — it tastes friggin’ awesome!"--Brian Wilson

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I've never been a fan of relievers in the HOF because, IMO, they are still guys who are not good enough to start. Relievers, even the best, have either (A) endurance issues, or (B) limited pitch selections, rendering them "one trick ponies".

                      That being said, I would advocate for Rivera. The rest, I can't really get excited about. Hoffman, maybe, but Wagner, I'd have to think about.
                      "I do not care if half the league strikes. Those who do it will encounter quick retribution. All will be suspended and I don't care if it wrecks the National League for five years. This is the United States of America and one citizen has as much right to play as another. The National League will go down the line with Robinson whatever the consequences. You will find if you go through with your intention that you have been guilty of complete madness."

                      NL President Ford Frick, 1947

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        As of now, eleven relievers make my HoF:
                        Rivera
                        Gossage
                        Henke
                        Fingers
                        Hoffman
                        Wilhelm
                        Wagner
                        J. Franco
                        Eckersley
                        L. Smith
                        Quiz

                        If I had t drop one to limit myself to ten, it would be Quiz. One day I may add Joe Nathan to that list as well as K-Rod if he picks up again. Kimbrel is too young to tell.

                        I gained a lot more appreciation after reading Fireman by Zimniuch. Face and Konstanty played a considerable role in the pioneer era
                        "Allen Sutton Sothoron pitched his initials off today."--1920s article

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Fuzzy Bear View Post
                          I've never been a fan of relievers in the HOF because, IMO, they are still guys who are not good enough to start. Relievers, even the best, have either (A) endurance issues, or (B) limited pitch selections, rendering them "one trick ponies".

                          That being said, I would advocate for Rivera. The rest, I can't really get excited about. Hoffman, maybe, but Wagner, I'd have to think about.
                          Just curious but it sounds like you would rate Hoffman better than Wagner. I would think Wagner had the better career. Is it because of the saves that Hoffman is better? I guess I could see the logic behind that because after all when its all said and done career records do matter and Hoffman did put up the better saves total. I guess saves would be the benchmark for a closer. If I had to choose between em though I think I would rather have Wagner.
                          "(Shoeless Joe Jackson's fall from grace is one of the real tragedies of baseball. I always thought he was more sinned against than sinning." -- Connie Mack

                          "I have the ultimate respect for Whitesox fans. They were as miserable as the Cubs and Redsox fans ever were but always had the good decency to keep it to themselves. And when they finally won the World Series, they celebrated without annoying every other fan in the country."--Jim Caple, ESPN (Jan. 12, 2011)

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Tyrus4189Cobb View Post
                            As of now, eleven relievers make my HoF:
                            Rivera
                            Gossage
                            Henke
                            Fingers
                            Hoffman
                            Wilhelm
                            Wagner
                            J. Franco
                            Eckersley
                            L. Smith
                            Quiz

                            If I had t drop one to limit myself to ten, it would be Quiz. One day I may add Joe Nathan to that list as well as K-Rod if he picks up again. Kimbrel is too young to tell.

                            I gained a lot more appreciation after reading Fireman by Zimniuch. Face and Konstanty played a considerable role in the pioneer era
                            Wow Tyrus you amost have as many relievers in the Hall as there are thirdbasemen.
                            "(Shoeless Joe Jackson's fall from grace is one of the real tragedies of baseball. I always thought he was more sinned against than sinning." -- Connie Mack

                            "I have the ultimate respect for Whitesox fans. They were as miserable as the Cubs and Redsox fans ever were but always had the good decency to keep it to themselves. And when they finally won the World Series, they celebrated without annoying every other fan in the country."--Jim Caple, ESPN (Jan. 12, 2011)

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by chicagowhitesox1173 View Post
                              I think Billy Wagner gets underrated.
                              Originally posted by KHenry14 View Post
                              To be fair to Fingers, the guy was a 4 time Rolaids Award winner, a CYA winner, a MVP winner, and a WS MVP winner. And most of those were won after he left the juggernaut A's teams too.
                              Wise words from these two gentlemen.
                              "It's like watching a Western. It's slow, so you can watch the chess moves. Nothing seems to happen, but when it goes down, it goes down big." - Howard Bryant

                              3 6 10 21 29 31 35 41 42 44 47

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X