Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

BBF Progressive HoF Election: 1934

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by jalbright View Post
    I know this isn't 1934-oriented, but I think our reluctance to vote in many earlier 3B is a product of our 2009 image of what a 3B HOFer should be--which has been formed by guys like Schmidt, Mathews, Chipper Jones, Alex Rodriguez (if he's a 3B instead of a SS), Killebrew, Brett, Molitor, Brooks Robinson, Boggs and Tony Perez. Maybe some won't consider some of these guys 3B, but of this group, only Brooks Robinson has an OPS+ below 122. Now Groh is "only" at 119, so I don't know that he should clearly be on the "under" side of the HOF line, but he's closer, to be sure--but his 119 OPS+ is not what folks are used to seeing in the traditional stats, because he played so much in the deadball era. Not a lot of early 3B were really very close to as capable offensively as Groh, especially if one throws out short career guys like McGraw--throw in the difficulty some folks have in dealing with deadball hitting stats because they're tied to the traditional numbers, and you've explained much of the generalized lack of votes for early 3B.
    I agree Jim. Most top 10 3B lists are heavily-laden with post-1950 players, and mostly post-1960 players really. So our perception of 3B is probably subconsciously skewed. That's why I've been saying that perhaps we need to reassess what our 3B standards are for the period we've been looking at.

    Originally posted by jjpm74 View Post
    What might help us is if anyone has an explanation as to why 3B was a position where regulars at the position lacked longevity for so long. Was 3B the DH slot of the deadball era? Was it a defensively demanding position? IIRC, looking at this through 2009 eyes, there are no A+ level defenders from this position for an entire era according to the BJ WS Book and this position was more fragmented and separated out in his book than other positions. Was it that many people who played 3B and were good with the glove were more valuable at another position?
    I was wondering the same. I do think we generally underrate though how important defense at the corner IF positions (3B in particular) was during the 19th Century and Deadball Era, just because of how the game was played. A lot more choking up, just trying to slap the ball in play, and more bunts as well.
    Last edited by DoubleX; 01-09-2009, 07:53 AM.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by DoubleX View Post
      I agree Jim. Most top 10 3B lists are heavily-laden with post-1950 players, and mostly post-1960 players really. So our perception of 3B is probably subconsciously skewed. That's why I've been saying that perhaps we need to reassess what our 3B standards are for the period we've been looking at.



      I was wondering the same. I do think we generally underrate though how important defense at the corner IF positions (3B in particular) was during the 19th Century and Deadball Era, just because of how the game was played. A lot more choking up, just trying to slap the ball in play, and more bunts as well.

      Given how different a position 3B was defensively during the time we've been voting on, and how different the offensive production expectations were, it seems very reasonable and realistic that in 1934 we'd consider third basemen HoF worthty that we would not consider worthy in 2009. From 2009 perpective, I wouldn't put in Traynor or Groh; or consider any of them great third basemen. But I think in 1934, I would probably consider Groh and Traynor great third basemen, and feel they were worthy of the Hall.

      And from what I've read, the main thing for a third basemen back then was a strong, accurate arm and the ability to range up and cover bunts. Much like catcher, any offensive production was a bonus. A guy like Chipper or Eddie Mathews or Killebrew would most likely not have been able to play 3B back then.

      Same with first base. With much more bunting, they needed a lot more range than first basemen do today. And with smaller gloves, putouts at first were not nearly as "routine" as they became in later years.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by mwiggins View Post
        Same with first base. With much more bunting, they needed a lot more range than first basemen do today. And with smaller gloves, putouts at first were not nearly as "routine" as they became in later years.
        Very true and this is also why Jack Fournier's career was as short as it was. He was a big hulking 1B who lacked range and did not fit the typical mold of a 1st baseman at the time. Fournier's career would have been much more productive had he been born about 50 years later.

        We really do need to evaluate 1B/3B from this era through much different eyes. It is hard to cast away 2009 biases which is why even the best 3rd basemen from the pre-war era typically do not fare well when putting together all time lists and why we have such a shortage of 1st basemen from the 1900-1930 time frame as well.

        Edit: One thing that still puzzles me, however is that we have been able to identify the best catchers from pre-1900 and from the deadball era. Why do we have such a good handle on them when at the same time we struggle in our assessment of the demands of defense on 1B/3B 1871-1930?
        Last edited by jjpm74; 01-09-2009, 08:57 AM.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by mwiggins View Post
          . . . it seems very reasonable and realistic that in 1934 we'd consider third basemen HoF worthy that we would not consider worthy in 2009. From 2009 perspective, I wouldn't put in Traynor or Groh; or consider any of them great third basemen.
          Why not? Since 2006(?) the Hall of Merit and the BaseBall-Fever Hall of Fame elected Groh; the BBFHOF elected Traynor too. They were not role-playing 1934. Do you think they must have misjudged?
          Same with first base. With much more bunting, they needed a lot more range than first basemen do today. And with smaller gloves, putouts at first were not nearly as "routine" as they became in later years.
          No doubt some plays have continued to become "more routine" and the process continues in 2008. On the other hand the 1930s gloves were much improved, in ways that make some routine catches, beyond those of the 1900s. Bill Doak added the web between thumb and forefinger in 1920.

          Here in 1934 we are already seeing players who worked with a web glove late in their careers. Lou Gehrig has used one all his baseball life.

          Probably the improvements in firstbasemen's gloves have been significant in every generation since Al Spalding first used a glove. The players have freely experimented with different combinations of padding, fingering, lacing, etc.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by mwiggins View Post
            Given how different a position 3B was defensively during the time we've been voting on, and how different the offensive production expectations were, it seems very reasonable and realistic that in 1934 we'd consider third basemen HoF worthty that we would not consider worthy in 2009. From 2009 perpective, I wouldn't put in Traynor or Groh; or consider any of them great third basemen. But I think in 1934, I would probably consider Groh and Traynor great third basemen, and feel they were worthy of the Hall.
            I'm very much the same way. I have Groh and Traynor ranked behind a number of post 1960 3Bmen, but I'd likely put both Groh and Traynor in before some of those players because Groh and Traynor stood out more in their time.

            Originally posted by jjpm74 View Post
            Edit: One thing that still puzzles me, however is that we have been able to identify the best catchers from pre-1900 and from the deadball era. Why do we have such a good handle on them when at the same time we struggle in our assessment of the demands of defense on 1B/3B 1871-1930?
            It might be because there is a much more distinct understanding to have lower offensive and durability expectations out of catcher. 3B is much more muddled, as is 1B in this era, especially given our 2009 biases.

            Comment


            • #51
              Max Carey...

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by Paul Wendt View Post
                Why not? Since 2006(?) the Hall of Merit and the BaseBall-Fever Hall of Fame elected Groh; the BBFHOF elected Traynor too. They were not role-playing 1934. Do you think they must have misjudged?
                You're right, saying I wouldn't put them in is a bit too harsh. But they're both pretty borderline for me, from a 2009 perspective. I would probably put in about a dozen or 3B into my Hall if I was creating one today. Both those guys would be in the mix. I'd probably put in these guys for sure - Schmidt, Mathews, Brett, Boggs, Molitor, Baker, Santo, Chipper, Collins, and Robinson - and then probably Groh and Hack would also get in. Traynor, Evans, Bando, and K. Boyer would be just out the outside.
                Last edited by mwiggins; 01-09-2009, 11:45 AM.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by mwiggins View Post
                  I'd probably put in these guys for sure - Schmidt, Mathews, Brett, Boggs, Molitor, Baker, Santo, Chipper, Collins, and Robinson - and then probably Groh and Hack would also get in. Traynor, Evans, Bando, and K. Boyer would be just out the outside.
                  Not familar with most of those names. Are they Negro Leaguers, or perhaps early players from before the Association started?
                  .


                  19th Century League Champion
                  1900s League Champion
                  1910s League Champion

                  1930s League Division Winner
                  1950s League Champion
                  1960 Strat-O-Matic League Regular Season Winner
                  1960s League Division Winner
                  1970s League Champion
                  1971 Strat-O-Matic League Runner Up
                  1980s League Champion
                  All Time Greats League Champion

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by jalbright View Post
                    Doing a little more research, the problem with 3B may be even simpler than I thought. Using a database, I figured out how many folks had at least 7000 PA from 1876-1935 (the database doesn't include info before 1876). There were 92 such players.
                    I just did a similar exercise but using 6000 PA as my cutoff in the hopes of capturing a few more 19th Century players, and I also stopped at players who retired in 1934 (given that's the current election year). There are 137 such players. For general consumption, here are all the players ordered by position in descending OPS+ order (I apologize if I missed any one). I have listed some players at multiple positions. Players in italics have been elected our Hall of Fame:

                    Catcher (5)
                    King Kelly - 138 OPS+ (6455 PA) - Also Listed at RF
                    Deacon White - 127 OPS+ (6972 PA)
                    - Also Listed at 3B
                    Deacon McGuire - 101 OPS+ (6932 PA)
                    Duke Farrell - 99 OPS+ (6254 PA)
                    Ray Schalk - 83 OPS+ (6217 PA)

                    Of this list, only McGuire, Farrell, and Schalk can definitively be called catchers. I knew catchers had poor longevity, but I didn't realize just how rare 6000 PA has been for a catcher. Notice that the other two primary catchers we've elected, Bresnahan and Bennett aren't even on the list. I'm going to seriously reconsider McGuire and Farrell at the next VC election and give Schalk some extra thought as well.

                    First Base (25)
                    Dan Brouthers - 170 OPS+ (7658 PA)
                    Roger Connor - 153 OPS+ (8837 PA)

                    Harry Stovey - 143 OPS+ (6832 PA) - Also listed at LF
                    Jack Fournier - 142 OPS+ (6033 PA)
                    Cap Anson - 141 OPS+ (11319 PA)
                    Jake Beckley - 125 OPS+ (10470 PA)

                    George Sisler - 124 OPS+ (9013 PA)
                    Ed Konetchy - 122 OPS+ (8664 PA)
                    Harry Davis - 119 OPS+ (7379 PA)
                    Jake Daubert - 117 OPS+ (8742 PA)
                    Dan McGann - 117 OPS+ (6047 PA)
                    Joe Judge - 114 OPS+ (9171 PA)
                    John Anderson - 114 OPS+ (6768) - Also Listed at LF
                    George H. Burns - 113 OPS+ (7233 PA)
                    Hal Chase - 112 OPS+ (7939 PA)
                    Fred Tenney - 109 OPS+ (8807 PA)
                    Lu Blue - 109 OPS+ (7207 PA)
                    George Kelly - 109 OPS+ (6565 PA)
                    Fred Merkle - 109 OPS+ (6426 PA)
                    Stuffy McInnis - 105 OPS+ (8623 PA)
                    Jack Doyle - 105 OPS+ (6566 PA)
                    Wally Pipp - 104 OPS+ (7820 PA)
                    Tommy Tucker - 102 OPS+ (7266 PA)
                    Dots Miller - 95 OPS+ (6476 PA) - Also Listed at 2B
                    Charlie Comiskey - 82 OPS+ (6035 PA)

                    This actually makes me feel a lot better about Jake Beckley's election. After the big three (Anson, Brouthers, and Connor) and Stovey who was really more of an OFer, Beckley seems to stand out both in level of production and longevity. I think this also demonstrates that other than the 1880s when the big three were at it, 1B has not been the offensive-heavy position that it started to become in the 1920s and 1930s.

                    Second Base (25)
                    Napoleon Lajoie - 150 OPS+ (10460 PA)
                    Eddie Collins - 141 OPS+ (12037 PA)
                    Hardy Richardson - 130 OPS+ (6029 PA) - Also Listed at LF
                    Larry Doyle - 126 OPS+ (7382 PA)
                    Cupid Childs - 119 OPS+ (6758 PA)

                    Jimmy Williams - 115 OPS+ (6112 PA)
                    Del Pratt - 112 OPS+ (7609 PA)
                    Miller Huggins - 107 OPS+ (6800 PA)
                    Tom Daly - 107 OPS+ (6483 PA)
                    Bid McPhee - 106 OPS+ (9409 PA)
                    Johnny Evers - 106 OPS+ (7210 PA)
                    Marty McManus - 102 OPS+ (7563 PA) - Also listed at 3B
                    Claude Ritchey - 101 OPS+ (6822 PA)
                    Dots Miller - 95 OPS+ (6476 PA) - Also Listed at 1B
                    Buck Herzog - 96 OPS+ (6047 PA) - Also Listed at 3B and SS
                    John Ward - 92 OPS+ (8084 PA) - Also Listed at SS
                    Fred Pfeffer - 92 OPS+ (7108 PA)
                    George Cutshaw - 87 OPS+ (6213 PA)
                    Bobby Lowe - 86 OPS+ (7741 PA)
                    Bill Hallman - 84 OPS+ (6596 PA)
                    Sparky Adams - 83 OPS+ (6174 PA) - Also Listed at 3B
                    Lou Bierbauer - 83 OPS+ (6007 PA)
                    Kid Gleason - 78 OPS+ (8198 PA)
                    Bill Wambsganss - 78 OPS+ (6097 PA)
                    Joe Quinn - 76 OPS+ (6879 PA)

                    So 2B is on par with 1B in terms of frequency of longevity. In respect to Del Pratt, who is currently on the ballot, I think this shows that he's about where I thought he was, around the border.

                    Third Base (21)
                    Frank Baker - 135 OPS+ (6660 PA)
                    Deacon White - 127 OPS+ (6972 PA) - Also Listed at 3B

                    Heinie Groh - 118 OPS+ (7035 PA)
                    Jimmy Collins - 113 OPS+ (7452 PA)
                    Tommy Leach - 109 OPS+ (9051 PA)
                    Joe Sewell - 109 OPS+ (8329 PA) - Also Listed at SS
                    Larry Gardner - 109 OPS+ (7685 PA)
                    Bill Bradley - 108 OPS+ (6046 PA)
                    Billy Nash - 104 OPS+ (6719 PA)
                    Marty McManus - 102 OPS+ (7563 PA) - Also Listed at 2B
                    Harry Steinfeldt - 102 OPS+ (6694 PA)
                    Lave Cross - 100 OPS+ (9710 PA)
                    Milt Stock - 98 OPS+ (6951 PA)
                    Buck Herzog - 96 OPS+ (6047 PA) - Also Listed at 2B and SS
                    Arlie Latham - 92 OPS+ (7502 PA)
                    Jimmy Austin - 90 OPS+ (6302 PA)
                    Terry Turner - 89 OPS+ (6658 PA)
                    Eddie Foster - 89 OPS+ (6317 PA)
                    Billy Shindle - 88 OPS+ (6326 PA)
                    Sparky Adams - 83 OPS+ (6174 OPS+) - Also Listed at 2B
                    Howie Shanks - 82 OPS+ (6414 OPS+) - Also Listed at LF

                    I think this shows that a combination of longevity and above-average offensive production has been pretty rare at 3B and that perhaps we do need to reassess our expectations here. I think this also helps the cases for Groh, Leach, and Gardner. Not counting White, who played a lot at catcher, Groh looks to be the second best hitting 3Bmen we've seen (given decent longevity), and as others have commented earlier, he was no slouch defensively. Leach and Gardner, at just 109 OPS+, are tied for the fourth highest OPS+ (not counting White and tied with Sewell who really is a SS). Leach also has 1500-3000 more PA than anyone on the list except Lave Cross, though Leach could also be termed a CF (and I believe his defensive mastery of two important defensive positions is to his credit). I think when a 109 OPS+ is tied for the 4th (or 5th if counting White) highest over a 60+ year period among players with decent longevity, it demonstrates that perhaps 3B should be considered more of a defensive position during the time we're looking at. Even 2B has more players with a higher OPS+ and the requisite longevity, with 7 players above 109.

                    Shortstop (23)
                    Honus Wagner - 150 OPS+ (11739 PA)
                    George Davis - 121 OPS+ (10151 PA)

                    Ed McKean - 114 OPS+ (7610 PA)
                    Jack Glasscock - 112 OPS+ (7535 PA)
                    Bill Dahlen - 109 OPS+ (10390 PA)

                    Joe Sewell - 109 OPS+ (8329 PA) - Also Listed at 3B
                    Bobby Wallace - 105 OPS+ (9612 PA)
                    Art Fletcher - 105 OPS+ (6039 PA)
                    Dave Bancroft - 98 OPS+ (8244 PA)
                    Buck Herzog - 96 OPS+ (6047 PA)
                    Joe Tinker - 95 OPS+ (7145 PA)
                    Herman Long - 94 OPS+ (8493 PA)
                    John Ward - 92 OPS+ (8084 PA) - Also Listed at 2B

                    Donie Bush - 91 OPS+ (8374 PA)
                    Terry Turner - 89 OPS+ (6658 PA)
                    Roger Peckinpaugh - 87 OPS+ (8383 PA)
                    Monte Cross - 80 OPS+ (6711 PA)
                    Germany Smith - 75 OPS+ (6995 PA)
                    Tommy Corcoran - 74 OPS+ (9368 PA)
                    Ivy Olson - 74 OPS+ (6630 PA)
                    Mickey Doolan - 72 OPS+ (6598 PA)
                    Everett Scott - 65 OPS+ (6373 PA)
                    George McBride - 65 OPS+ (6235 PA)

                    I don't think there are many surprises here, though frequency of longevity is almost on par with 1B (and 2B). I also think this supports the argument I made earlier that Dave Bancroft, while perhaps not so impressive in a greater historical context, may have stood out more in his time than some better shortstops from earlier generations. I also think we were too quick to dismiss Ed McKean, though his defense is certainly a concern.

                    Corner OF (33)
                    Ed Delahanty - 152 OPS+ (8389 PA)
                    Elmer Flick - 149 OPS+ (6414 PA)
                    Sam Thompson - 146 OPS+ (6502 PA)
                    Sam Crawford - 144 OPS+ (6502 PA)
                    Harry Stovey - 143 OPS+ (6832 PA) - Also Listed at 1B
                    Billy Hamilton - 141 OPS+ (6268 PA) - Also Listed at CF
                    Jesse Burkett - 140 OPS+ (9605 PA)
                    King Kelly - 138 OPS+ (6455 PA) - Also Listed at C

                    Mike Tiernan - 137 OPS+ (6716 PA)
                    Sherry Magee - 136 OPS+ (8546 PA)
                    Jim O'Rourke - 133 OPS+ (9051 PA)
                    Joe Kelley - 133 OPS+ (8120 PA)
                    Fred Clarke - 132 OPS+ (9819 PA)
                    Hardy Richardson - 130 OPS+ (6029 PA) - Also Listed at 2B
                    Zack Wheat - 129 OPS+ (9996 PA)

                    Bobby Veach - 127 OPS+ (7557 PA)
                    Willie Keller - 126 OPS+ (9594 PA)
                    Jimmy Ryan - 123 OPS+ (9106 PA) - Also Listed at CF
                    Hugh Duffy - 122 OPS+ (7827 PA) - Also Listed at CF

                    Kip Selbach - 121 OPS+ (7089 PA)
                    Jimmy Sheckard - 120 OPS+ (9118 PA)
                    Bob Meusel - 118 OPS+ (6028 PA)
                    Harry Hooper - 114 OPS+ (10244 PA)
                    George J. Burns - 114 OPS+ (8251 PA)
                    Frank Schulte - 114 OPS+ (7413 PA)
                    John Anderson - 114 OPS+ (6768 PA)
                    Sam Rice - 112 OPS+ (10246 PA)
                    Jack Tobin - 109 OPS+ (6782 PA)
                    Duffy Lewis - 108 OPS+ (6007 PA)
                    Charlie Jamieson - 101 OPS+ (7488 PA)
                    Patsy Donovan - 97 OPS+ (8133 PA)
                    Shano Collins - 90 OPS+ (7036 PA)
                    Howie Shanks - 82 OPS+ (6414 PA) - Also Listed at 3B

                    Since a lot of these guys spent time bouncing around the OF, I thought I'd just group them together as corner OFers. Looking at this, it's not that surprising to me that we've elected a number of players here. There are a lot of players grouped very closely together that makes it difficult to distinguish and create a clear cutoff. Bobby Veach looks to be the line here, but I don't think he's that far removed, if at all from our standards, though he would definitely be near the bottom. Mike Tiernan stands out though. He's the only player among the first 15 players that we haven't elected, and with Bobby Veach, one of only two among the first 19. So Tiernan would appear to be well within our standards, especially when you factor in his baserunning. He might be in line for some extra consideration from the VC.

                    Center Field (23)
                    Ty Cobb - 167 OPS+ (13072 PA)
                    Tris Speaker - 158 OPS+ (11988 PA)
                    Billy Hamilton - 141 OPS+ (6268 PA) - Also Listed at LF
                    George Gore - 135 OPS+ (6104 PA)
                    Paul Hines - 131 OPS+ (7470 PA)

                    Edd Roush - 126 OPS+ (8156 PA)
                    Cy Williams - 125 OPS+ (7720 PA)
                    Jimmy Ryan - 123 OPS+ (9106 PA) - Also Listed at RF
                    Mike Griffin - 123 OPS+ (6832 PA)
                    Roy Thomas - 123 OPS+ (6575 PA)
                    Ginger Beaumont - 123 OPS+ (6281 PA)
                    Hugh Duffy - 122 OPS+ (7827 PA) - Also Listed at corner OF
                    George Van Haltren - 121 OPS+ (8979 PA)

                    Cy Seymour - 119 OPS+ (6204 PA)
                    Fielder Jones - 111 OPS+ (7894 PA)
                    Baby Doll Jacobson - 111 OPS+ (6072 PA)
                    Dummy Hoy - 110 OPS+ (8369 PA)
                    Tommy Leach - 109 OPS+ (9051 PA)
                    Clyde Milan - 109 OPS+ (8312 PA)
                    Dode Paskert - 108 OPS+ (6997 PA)
                    Max Carey - 107 OPS+ (10770 PA)
                    Steve Brodie - 102 OPS+ (6314 PA)
                    Tom Brown - 100 OPS+ (8182 PA)

                    Looking at this, I can see why it could be argued that Ryan, Duffy, and Van Haltren have noticeably lowered our standards. It isn't like the corner OF positions where there are lots of players grouped together at a higher level. Here, Ryan, Duffy, and Van Haltren all appear to be a noticeable tick below the other inductees. However, I still strongly believe that once Duffy and Van Haltren were elected, we could not leave Ryan out. In respect to Tommy Leach, his offense doesn't stand out as much here as it does at 3B. But he played roughly 1000 games at each position and I do think it's very much to his credit that he played excellent defense at both (giving him extra value in terms of the team's flexibility), that he had good longevity, and that he was a very good hitter by 3B standards, and a pretty decent hitter by CF standards.
                    Last edited by DoubleX; 01-09-2009, 01:06 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by DoubleX View Post
                      I just did a similar exercise but using 6000 PA as my cutoff in the hopes of capturing a few more 19th Century players, and I also stopped at players who retired in 1934 (given that's the current election year). There are 137 such players. For general consumption, here are all the players ordered by position in descending OPS+ order (I apologize if I missed any one). I have listed some players at multiple positions. Players in italics have been elected our Hall of Fame:


                      Third Base (21)
                      Frank Baker - 135 OPS+ (6660 PA)
                      Deacon White - 127 OPS+ (6972 PA) - Also Listed at 3B

                      Heinie Groh - 118 OPS+ (7035 PA)
                      Jimmy Collins - 113 OPS+ (7452 PA)
                      Tommy Leach - 109 OPS+ (9051 PA)
                      Joe Sewell - 109 OPS+ (8329 PA) - Also Listed at SS
                      Larry Gardner - 109 OPS+ (7685 PA)
                      Bill Bradley - 108 OPS+ (6046 PA)
                      Billy Nash - 104 OPS+ (6719 PA)
                      Marty McManus - 102 OPS+ (7563 PA) - Also Listed at 2B
                      Harry Steinfeldt - 102 OPS+ (6694 PA)
                      Lave Cross - 100 OPS+ (9710 PA)
                      Milt Stock - 98 OPS+ (6951 PA)
                      Buck Herzog - 96 OPS+ (6047 PA) - Also Listed at 2B and SS
                      Arlie Latham - 92 OPS+ (7502 PA)
                      Jimmy Austin - 90 OPS+ (6302 PA)
                      Terry Turner - 89 OPS+ (6658 PA)
                      Eddie Foster - 89 OPS+ (6317 PA)
                      Billy Shindle - 88 OPS+ (6326 PA)
                      Sparky Adams - 83 OPS+ (6174 OPS+) - Also Listed at 2B
                      Howie Shanks - 82 OPS+ (6414 OPS+) - Also Listed at LF

                      I think this shows that a combination of longevity and above-average offensive production has been pretty rare at 3B and that perhaps we do need to reassess our expectations here.

                      It could very well just mean that just coincidentally, there only happened to be 4 or 5 thirdbasemen who were of hall of fame quality playing between the 1870s and the 1920s. I don't see why that's such a problem. It's not like we have 17 hall of famers at each of the other positions. Right now we only have 5 catchers and 5 RFers. Groh will likely get in eventually. That will make four 3Bmen. If Deacon White were moved to 3B you could end up with five 3Bmen and only four catchers. Sewell will likely go in, but mainly as a SS. One of the positions has to coincidentally end up with the fewest hall of famers, and it just happens to be 3B right now, but the position does not have so many fewer inductess that we should be wondering about it.

                      I think we are building a good case for Groh and will get him in soon. There's also the arbitrary figure of 6,000 plate appearances. Given how short the seasons were in the 19th century, you don't see as many players from then who have the kind of totals of plate appearances as recent electees like Speaker and Cobb. If you drop the total to 4000 plate appearances you get the following great offensive 3Bmen:

                      Joyce - 144 OPS+
                      Lyons - 138 OPS+
                      McGraw - 135 OPS+

                      I don't think there's any cause for alarm here, and if groh gets in soon maybe we can drop the worry over 3Bmen.
                      Last edited by SavoyBG; 01-09-2009, 02:31 PM.
                      .


                      19th Century League Champion
                      1900s League Champion
                      1910s League Champion

                      1930s League Division Winner
                      1950s League Champion
                      1960 Strat-O-Matic League Regular Season Winner
                      1960s League Division Winner
                      1970s League Champion
                      1971 Strat-O-Matic League Runner Up
                      1980s League Champion
                      All Time Greats League Champion

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Chief Bender
                        Max Carey
                        Stan Coveleski
                        Heinie Groh
                        Tommy Leach
                        Joe Tinker
                        Bobby Veach
                        Hey, this is my public apology for suddenly disappearing and missing out on any projects I may have neglected.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Carey
                          Coveleski
                          Groh
                          Leach
                          "Any pitcher who throws at a batter and deliberately tries to hit him is a communist."

                          - Alvin Dark

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            I can see reassessing our expectations of offensive production at 3B for the early guys, as the position did seem to emphasize defense more before the lively ball. I don't see why 3B would be so dramatically affected in terms of longevity, though. Catcher, I certainly understand--even in 2009, they don't last as long as other position players, and back then, they had less sophisticated medicine and gear that provided a good deal less protection. If someone can provide some real explanation as to why that should happen, I'll certainly listen, but until I'm convinced there's a reason inherent in the demands of the position, I'm not apt to compromise much on that score. Now, I don't look at 7000 PA as a cutoff in the strictest sense, as a guy with offense like Frank Baker's can certainly overcome his fairly small shortfall in PA--but it is something that requires making up some ground. The bigger question to me is what level of offense should set the same kind of standard for early 3B?
                            Seen on a bumper sticker: If only closed minds came with closed mouths.
                            Some minds are like concrete--thoroughly mixed up and permanently set.
                            A Lincoln: I don't think much of a man who is not wiser today than he was yesterday.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by DoubleX View Post
                              Catcher (5)
                              King Kelly - 138 OPS+ (6455 PA) - Also Listed at RF
                              Deacon White - 127 OPS+ (6972 PA)
                              - Also Listed at 3B
                              Deacon McGuire - 101 OPS+ (6932 PA)
                              Duke Farrell - 99 OPS+ (6254 PA)
                              Ray Schalk - 83 OPS+ (6217 PA)

                              Of this list, only McGuire, Farrell, and Schalk can definitively be called catchers. I knew catchers had poor longevity, but I didn't realize just how rare 6000 PA has been for a catcher. Notice that the other two primary catchers we've elected, Bresnahan and Bennett aren't even on the list.
                              (my emphases)

                              Mike,

                              I hope you aren't going to revive this old canard.
                              We can "definitively" call Deacon White a catcher.
                              We should call him a "primary catcher". He was 34.4 years old when he became a regular 3B spring 1882, with ten games at thirdbase on his resume. White isn't a difficult case like Jim O'Rourke, lacking any regular position when he was in his prime (before he settled finally in leftfield at age 37.7). White was his team's regular catcher in ten of his first eleven professional seasons, 1869-76 and 78-79, spanning ages 21 to 31 except 29.

                              It's the Same Old Song, over and over, counts of major league "games" or "at bats" or "plate appearances" naively presented as descriptive measures of careers. (not only by Mike)

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by Paul Wendt View Post
                                (my emphases)

                                Mike,

                                I hope you aren't going to revive this old canard.
                                We can "definitively" call Deacon White a catcher.
                                We should call him a "primary catcher". He was 34.4 years old when he became a regular 3B spring 1882, with ten games at thirdbase on his resume. White isn't a difficult case like Jim O'Rourke, lacking any regular position when he was in his prime (before he settled finally in leftfield at age 37.7). White was his team's regular catcher in ten of his first eleven professional seasons, 1869-76 and 78-79, spanning ages 21 to 31 except 29.

                                It's the Same Old Song, over and over, counts of major league "games" or "at bats" or "plate appearances" naively presented as descriptive measures of careers. (not only by Mike)
                                Paul, I'm not going to change White's listing. I still believe his primary position is C, but there is enough to say that he isn't a catcher in the same sense that someone like Charlie Bennett was.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X