Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Stats on 200 major leaguers

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Stats on 200 major leaguers

    From February of 1916.

    Composite Records of Two Hundred Stars—Measurements
    for the Various Positions—Three Hundred Hitters—
    Banner Baseball States—The Veterans
    BY JOHN J. WARD
    The Baseball Magazine has published a little book comprising the records of all the leading regulars in the Majors. A comparison of two hundred players selected from this book reveals facts of unusual interest about the prevailing length of service in the
    Major leagues, the frequency of three hundred hitting, the distribution of players' birthplaces geographically, and other hitherto unpublished information.
    The Major Leaguer in Statistics




    Last edited by Ubiquitous; 01-25-2007, 10:31 PM.

  • #2
    The totals given here are flawed in that you took a sample of 200 players out of a roster size of 810 players. This does not even count how many players come and go on a 27 man roster each year. The Red Sox alone have 4 guys that have been in the majors for 13 years.
    Step into a better swing StancePro

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by SportsTalker
      The totals given here are flawed in that you took a sample of 200 players out of a roster size of 810 players. This does not even count how many players come and go on a 27 man roster each year. The Red Sox alone have 4 guys that have been in the majors for 13 years.
      I don't think you realize that this is data from the 1915 season.

      Secondly the 200 players are the regulars getting the bulk playing time. In 1915 there was a little over 500 players in the AL and NL. In 1915 the top 200 PA players got 88% of the plate appearances. which means the 320 other players only got 12% of the PA. Granted in this study of the top 200 pitchers are thrown into the mix so the % are going to be a bit lower.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Ubiquitous
        I don't think you realize that this is data from the 1915 season.

        Secondly the 200 players are the regulars getting the bulk playing time. In 1915 there was a little over 500 players in the AL and NL. In 1915 the top 200 PA players got 88% of the plate appearances. which means the 320 other players only got 12% of the PA. Granted in this study of the top 200 pitchers are thrown into the mix so the % are going to be a bit lower.
        Do you, or does anyone, have the height and weight stats for current MLB players? I was just thinking the other day about what the common heights and weights were for today's players. I'd love to see it, or compile it. Where can I find the data?

        Comment


        • #5
          I'm at work now so I can't compile the data for you but yes it is widely available. I believe Tangotiger might have the data readily available on this site.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by jbooth
            Do you, or does anyone, have the height and weight stats for current MLB players? I was just thinking the other day about what the common heights and weights were for today's players. I'd love to see it, or compile it. Where can I find the data?
            Heights and weights are listed in the master database from Lahman (I think...). Weights are going to vary over time, but heights will remain pretty constant.
            Statistically Speaking

            The plural of anecdote is not data.

            Comment


            • #7
              The weight listed in the BDB is the player's typical weight in his prime whenever that data exists. It's a good representative average in most cases.

              Comment


              • #8
                I was reading Crazy 08 the other day and in it the author Cait Murphy mentioned that during the deadball era pitchers were bigger and taller then position players. This got me to thinking about the era and I wanted to see if it was true. So I ran a query in which I looked at all players from 1904 to 1916 who pitched more then 125 innings or had more then 250 at bats. What I found was that the average pitcher was 6 feet tall while the average hitter was 5ft 10 inches. The average pitcher weighed 181.6 pounds while the average hitter weighed 171.9 pounds.

                Is it possible that this is one of the overlooked reasons for the deadball era? Now I'm not saying that this is the main reason but could it be that because pitchers were in all probability better athletes due to being bigger and taller that they had a natural advantage over their counterparts? Thus making the scores even lower then what the environment alone would dictate. If that is true then does that make the hitters of that era who did excel even greater then previously thought and does that also lower some of the pitchers of that era?

                I took a look at later eras and for instance I found in the 50's era the differences shrunk. Pitchers were 6ft 1 inches while hitters were 6 feet tall. Pitchers weighed 181.7 pounds and hitters weighed 185.3 pounds.
                Last edited by Ubiquitous; 07-17-2007, 10:36 AM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Makes some pretty good sense. As time passes, the hitters work out more and more, defenses get steadily less rangy, and the tall lean guys that can take advantage of the extra leverage go to the mound. I would think that current figures would be something like average pitcher at 6'2 and 200 pounds, while the average hitter is 6'0 and 210. Just a guess.....

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    From the book The Diamond Appraised by Craig Wright and Tom House, page 337:

                    Average Height and Weight by Period
                    Period...........BatterHeight....PitcherHeight.... BatterWeight....PitcherWeight
                    1901-1919..........5'10''...............6'0''.......... .....171..................180
                    1920-1945..........5'11''...............6'0''.......... .....175..................181
                    1946-1960..........6'0''.................6'1''......... ......182..................189
                    1961-1973..........6'1''.................6'2''......... ......185..................192

                    It didn't show data any later than 1961-1973.

                    There was slightly more of a diference between batter/pitcher weights in the deadball than in other eras. I don't know that I agree if this is why there was the deadball era though. #1 if you see in another pitcher's era, 1961-1973, there was no increase in the difference which would suggest that, at least then, that increasing size didn't have anything to do with increased pitcher dominance. #2 I don't think that in the case of pitchers vs. hitters size has anything to do with their actual athletic ability. Pitching isn't a classic "athletic" activity where those people doing it necessarily have to be able to be freaks in terms of capabilities of speed and strength. The abilities of position players have much more to do with that. Pitching has more to do with singular, unique skills that only relate to pitching itself. I think that being taller is of definite advantage to those unique skills of pitching and not nearly as much to position players. Pitchers who are taller get to throw the ball a little closer to home plate and are often thought of as harder to hit off. A lot of times the ideal pitcher is tall and relatively skinny. I don't see how brute strength or speed is necessarily going to help you as a pitcher. For instance when pitchers lift weights they're definitely not interested in lifting for power and going in and bench pressing a high weight only 5 or so times. They want to do lifting at lighter weight for a higher number of reps. Position players are more interested in pure athletic ability and thus being bigger doesn't really mean as much to them. It is easier to be a very good position player when being a relatively short person than being a great pitcher. I just think the difference in size is because of the unique differences in the dynamic of being a position player and hitter. I don't really think it means that pitchers are better athletes, just that pitching is more suited to bigger people.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Ubiquitous View Post
                      Is it possible that this is one of the overlooked reasons for the deadball era? Now I'm not saying that this is the main reason but could it be that because pitchers were in all probability better athletes due to being bigger and taller that they had a natural advantage over their counterparts? Thus making the scores even lower then what the environment alone would dictate. If that is true then does that make the hitters of that era who did excel even greater then previously thought and does that also lower some of the pitchers of that era?
                      I find that very interesting. It does make sense, though. How many 6-10 or 6-11 position players are there? If I said a player was 6-7, what position would you expect him to play? If I said a player was 5-7, what position would you expect him to play? I believe there have been two 6-10 and 1 6-11 players in history and they've all been pitchers. I don't know how many 6-7 players there have been in history, but I'd bet that the majority of them have been pitchers. I doubt there have been many 5-7 pitchers in history, but we know there have been plenty of small middle-infielders.

                      I'm just curious, though. Why would bigger pitchers be docked and smaller position players be given credit? Is this because the position players have gained a lot quality since then, while the pitchers have not? Maybe a better way of saying that would be asking if the pitchers gained little in ability compared to the hitters they were facing when making league quality adjustments? Or are you saying that larger players should receive a "penalty" since it's size, not skill, producing some of the results?
                      Johnson and now Goligoski gone.
                      I hope that's all.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        What I am saying is that perhaps in the deadball era a larger % of quality players were pitchers. Therefore their opposition was of inferior quality compared to other eras. Like a bunch of 5th graders playing against 3rd graders. Part of the reason the numbers are so low for these guys is because they got play against inferior foes.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          The game has phases - the 1890s and the current era are the two most distinctive offensive eras in history. Pitching/defense dominated at other times. Still other eras show a negligible difference.

                          Are there reasons for the perceive-domination? Sure, a myriad I assume. Does it mean a whole group of ballplayers (pitchers or batter) weren't on the same plane with their conterpart (pitcher v batter or vice-versa)? Unsure.

                          I do see the argument that there might be truth in this in the Negro leagues, minor leagues and in the majors during certain phases of the 19th century. On the other hand, I'm hard-pressed to see this in the majors after it had a full 25 years to incubate and especially after the pressure put on both leagues to sharpen their product as the AL entered the picture.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Ubiquitous View Post
                            What I am saying is that perhaps in the deadball era a larger % of quality players were pitchers. Therefore their opposition was of inferior quality compared to other eras. Like a bunch of 5th graders playing against 3rd graders. Part of the reason the numbers are so low for these guys is because they got play against inferior foes.
                            Gotcha. Now the question becomes how does that affect changes in rankings/ratings. The raw stats would obviously be better for the pitchers and worse for the hitters, but would the relative stats? Should we punish the pitchers for the lack of competition (facing) or reward them for their dominance through tough competition at their position? Likewise, should we punish hitters for lack of competitive hitters, or reward them for facing top pitchers? Rewarding the hitters and punishing the pitchers seems like we're rewarding the good hitters for dominating with no competition and punishing the pitchers for a plethora of talent at their position. All of this relative to their leagues, of course.
                            Johnson and now Goligoski gone.
                            I hope that's all.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I was thinking about this the other day and this seems to be the best place for it.

                              One thing I never hear people talking about when discussing the old players vs the new players is the reach of new players vs old players. People like to say new players have all the advantages or how they would like to see how newer players would handle the conditions of the olden days, But one that doesn't get brought up is the difference in height and gloves between then and now.

                              According to Ward the average SS in 1916 was 5 ft 8 inches (and some change). In 2008 the average height of a SS was 6 ft and some change,. So right there we have a height difference of 4 inches for the most important defensive position. Then comes gloves. An infielders glove is about 11 to 11 1/2 inches long and extends about 5 inches past a players fingertips. How far out did one of the old pre-web gloves extend? One inch?

                              So put the two together and you have a modern fielder with about 9 inches of more reach. It would seem to me that 9 inches of more reach would allow a SS to get to a lot more baseballs. Secondly the glove would allow the fielder to actually field many more hits that his longer reach enables him to get to. I can't imagine that too many fingertip grabs were successful in 1916.

                              Comment

                              Ad Widget

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X